►
From YouTube: OCI Weekly Discussion - 2023-07-27
A
A
E
This
is
going
to
be
I.
Guess
it's
going
to
be
tough
and
I
created
the
poll
so
that
people
could
definitely
give
inputs.
Do
we
know,
at
least
so
that
the
key
stakeholders
who
want
to
join
in
this
group
can
commit
to
it
I
think
that's
what's
important
right.
D
A
D
A
E
E
E
Right
so
I
caught
this
when
run
and
decide
to
throw
it
over
the
fence
so
that
the
pole
would
go
out.
I'm,
not
good
at
doodle
and
I
wanted
to
get
a
sense
of
where
people
at
so
collectively
I
think
I'll
be
bungling
with
everybody
here.
So
let
me
know
what
Brandon,
if
you
have
a
better
idea
on
this
or
anybody
else
who
has
a
better
idea
on
this?
E
Please
kind
of
give
inputs,
because
I'm
doing
this
for
the
first
time
so
and
I
see
that,
even
though
these
days
are
grayed
out,
that's
because
it
probably
your
dates
are
done
right,
but
just
looking
at
the
check
marks,
where
did
you?
Where
did
folks
find
as
a
good
time.
A
A
F
A
A
and
if
you
scroll
back
on
Monday,
there
was
a
couple
others
with
nine
respondents
as
well,
so
no
clear
winner
and
that's
where
I
would
say,
look
at
the
people
that
are
like
proposed
owners,
folks
that
we
think
are
going
to
be
representing
a
registry
of
some
kind,
that
sort
of
thing
and
make
sure
it
may
prefer
the
time.
So
we
can
get
them
on.
E
Do
you
remember
what
was
the
reference
type
working
group
time
that
we
chose?
We
could
throw
that
into
the
mix
also
right.
E
C
Yeah,
that's
a
ongoing
every
week
it's
nominally
an
hour,
but
it's
usually
two
and
a
half
so
wow.
E
All
right,
so
we
see
one
that
Wednesday
11
A.M,
that
has
nine
the
other
one.
The
largest
one
was
also
Tuesday
at
11AM.
It
seems
like
11
A.M
seems
to
be,
and
you
stay.
10
am.
E
A
D
Tuesday
at
this
time
is
Coupe
or
signaled.
C
D
A
D
E
So
9am
is
not
working
out
or
oh
sorry,
9am
PST,
which
is
the
one
this
one.
A
A
E
John
was
missing
here:
I'm,
not
seeing
tardy's
poll
in
this
I
don't
know.
E
E
So
Mike,
it
kind
of
does
affect
you
right.
So
would
you
be
able
to
make
it
on
like
an
on
on
need
basis
or
or
others
the
kubernetes
one
like
the
higher
priority?
I
just
want
to
get
a
sense
because
definitely
you're
one
of
the
distribution,
spec
maintainers,
so
I'm
less
important
here,
honestly
speaking,
I'm
just
doing
the
paperwork.
D
When,
when
the
Sig
note
call
is
short,
I'd
be
able
to
be
late
on
the
call?
Okay,
we.
D
E
This
time
slot
on
Tuesday
is
what
we're
thinking
about.
How
do
we
put
this
on
the
calendar
like.
D
Alternatively,
I
suppose
once
you've
scheduled
it,
we
could
consider
slipping
at
30
minutes.
G
D
A
So
with
that
first
meeting
for
that
Sanjay,
you
want
to
say
next
week.
A
Right,
yeah
she's
good
about
that
stuff.
If
you
hit
her
on
slack
or
something
like
that,
she'll
knock
that
right
out
and
would
use
the
same.
Zoom
call
as
this
one
keep
everything
simple
sounds.
E
A
Cool
the
other
thing
I
threw
on
the
agenda,
was
just
to
kind
of
get
a
temperature
check
on
how
the
1.1.0
implementations
are
going
out.
There,
a
saw
ores
go,
looked
like
you
had
on
the
go
implementation
side,
but
not
on
the
aorus
client
itself.
Just
yet
so.
E
A
I've
gave
an
attempt
to
try
this
out
on
go
container
registry.
That
was
where
I
found
the
panics
and
the
conformance
tests
so
I'm
not
sure
if
anybody's
run
the
conformance
against
certain
Registries
yet,
but
that
one
that's
also
where
I
discovered
that
the
content
type
over
there
was
not
being
set
right
and
we
never
defined
it
in
the
spec
either
and
so
I
was
coming
back
as
text
plane
from
go
container
registry
on
the
reverse
response.
A
So
that's
where
I
put
that
change
request
in
for
distribution.
So
we
specify
what
the
content
type
is
on
the
reverse
response,
and
hopefully
that'll
get
some
standardization
there
by
hope.
We'll
start
to
find
more
implementations
to
this,
so
we
can
actually
start
testing
comparing
and
seeing
tools
interoperating
with
each
other
a
little
bit.
G
E
A
I
was
mostly
wanting
to
see
about
Jason
and
John
because
of
the
Google
group
container
registry
stuff
wanted
to
see
if
they
had
any
concerns,
one
way
or
another
on
that,
since
they
implemented
one
way
they
haven't
said
anything.
It's
been
a
couple
days,
they
can
always
scream
later
and
make
another
PR
of
the
spec
thing
too.
A
A
A
B
Yeah
I'm
trying
to
find
the
the
smallest
example
to
to
point
out
the
problem,
but
before
that
I
just
want
to
make
sure
the
issue
is
not
at
my
end
before
I
waste.
Your
time.
A
No
I
mean
if,
if
it's
at
your
side
and
you're
paying
me
on
that,
one
I
don't
mind
that
we
can
work
that
out
one
way
or
another
good
thanks.
A
D
A
A
A
This
is
the
new
refers
API,
so
there
are
any
any
registry
to
implement
the
new
API,
which
is
sought
and
a
branch.
Well,
it's
not
a
branch
grow
container
registry
actually
has
it
in
there,
but
you
have
to
flip
a
flag
to
even
turn
it
on.
So
anybody
has
turned
on
the
1.1
version
of
the
specs
so
far.
A
A
A
I
think
Rob
and
I
were
on
the
same
page
on
that.
One
thinking
that,
since
the
response
from
the
refers
API
was
a
an
oci
index
that
that
would
be
the
content
type
header
as
well.
A
D
E
G
A
D
A
D
E
You
always
drive
so
I'll
help
you
so
yeah
I
think
from
the
spec
side
refers
API.
We
want
to
set
the
content
type,
it's
a
must
to
the
image
index
and
in
the
conformant
test,
you're
validating
that.
The
response
to
this
is
in
context
after
our
first
API
right.
So.
A
D
A
E
G
A
E
A
Yeah
say
create
it
and
then
go
over
in
general
and
say
new
selection
on
who,
this,
with
a
link
over
to
it.
A
Not
yet
I
think,
once
once
we
get
to
the
point
that
we
need
that
we
might
just
start
off
with
like
a
hack
MD
and
do
some
brainstorming
and
see
how
far
we
get.
Okay,
all
right
sounds
good.
E
A
I
suspect,
once
we
get
to
the
point
that
we
need
one
we
we
can
ask
and
get
that
created.
E
I
I
think
I
wanted
to
also
introduce
Nathan
Nathan
you're
kind
of
doing
new
to
the
call
do
you
want
to
give
a
brief
of
where
you're
coming
from.
H
Sure
so
I
I
work
on
Sanjay's
team
on
Azure
container
registry
I
do
a
lot
of
kind
of
work
on
our
backend
services
and
stuff
that
do
interactions
with
other
registries
and
stuff.
So
I've
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
just
kind
of
General
kind
of
interoperation
there.
So
just.
G
D
G
A
Yeah,
the
the
stuff
I
really
want
to
see
is
how
how
soon
can
we
just
looking
for
more
implementations
to
interoperate
with
each
other?
So
whenever
we
get
some
news
of
that,
I'll
be
happy
to
hear
from
anybody.
It's
got
something
going
on
there.