►
From YouTube: OCI Weekly Discussion - 2023-06-01
B
B
B
One
of
these
things
we
caught
when
people
started
looking
at
using
it
and
they
all
started
implementing
something
like
scratch,
but
wasn't
what
we
were
trying
to
make
a
scratch,
but
with
something
close
to
like
the
artifact
version
of
a
scratch,
which
was
if
they
didn't
need
layers
after
that
it
would
have
made
sense.
But
once
they
started
saying
okay,
we're
gonna
have
scratches
the
starting
point.
Then
we
start
adding
layers
on
top
of
it.
It's
like
well
now,
you're,
not
scratching
anymore,.
B
I
went
for
filler,
which
seems
to
be
equally
disliked.
I
think
everybody
wants
to
bike.
Show
this
one
a
little
bit
and
dislike
everything
is
out
there.
E
E
I
think
I
think
empty
object
like
let's
just
have
the
I.
The
media
type
literally
describe
exactly
what
it
is
empty
object,
Json.
D
D
B
I
was
doing
this
I
was
just
doing
a
quick,
find
replacement
or
anything
else.
That's
the
scratch
just
said:
rename
it
all
empty,
and
so
I
was
going
through
there
doing
that
and
I
started
reading
all
the
sentences
as
they
came
out
with
after
I
did
that
I
was
like
no.
This
stuff
makes
any
sense
anymore.
E
But
just
empty
dot:
Json,
no,
no
art
application,
slash.
B
F
B
E
I,
don't
know
if
you
saw
tianan's
comment
in
chat,
I
think
using
empty
Json
and
Pros
to
disintegrate
it
from
the.
G
I'm
hearing
more
people
kind
of
like
lean
towards
empty,
not
not
too
many
stands
for
fillers.
So
should
we
go
ahead
and
just
just
for
the
media
type
call
it
empty,
plus
Json.
B
B
B
Well
I
mean,
for
example,
the
wording
says
to
set
an
effectively
null
or
empty
config
and
maintain
the
portability,
see
the
guidance
for
yada
yada,
and
so
it's
going
to
be
a
empty
descriptor
or
something,
and
so
someone's
going
to
say.
Well,
it's
already
an
empty
config
and
you're
saying
how
to
do
an
empty
descriptor
and
as
empty.
The
scripture
is
supposed
to
have
data
in
there
or
is
it?
G
Yeah
I
guess:
yes,
it's
it's
been
less
confusing,
because
the
Shah
is
all
that
I've
I've
actually
cared
about.
So
the
media
type
is
kind
of
immaterialist,
but
I
thought,
but
it
seems
like
people
are
eating
into
what
the
content
media
type
is
also.
But
as
long
as
we
agree
that
the
digest
doesn't
change
in
the
context
of
this
in
the
media
type
is
just
a
string
right.
E
I
think
Brandon.
What
I
said
earlier
is
Tiana
has
some
comments
in
the
chat
to
suggest
Pros,
so,
instead
of
replacing
it
scratch
with
empty,
replacing
it
with
empty
Jason
and
the
empty
Json
descriptor
does
sort
of
make
sense
to
me
the
descriptor
of
a
blob,
that's
empty
Json.
G
E
Yeah
all
it
is
remove
the
miscopied
line,
I
think
on
this
PR
from
the
previous
one,
but
just
adds
the
artifact
type
field
to
the
image
index
so
that
apis
that
lists
it
for
any
reason
select
refers
API
or
any
others.
E
Also
share
my
screen
added
a
description
of
the
sort
of
use
case
here.
E
Is
that
a
a
top
level
package
stored
as
an
image
index
could
refer
to
a
set
of
image,
manifests
where
each
of
those
would
be
an
individual
artifact
and
a
client
implementation
would
sort
of
in
the
same
way
as
image
index
today
with
containers
would
not
intend
to
download
all
of
the
artifacts
it
would
choose.
It
would
use
the
index
to
determine
which
set
of
artifacts
from
the
Manifest
list
that
it
would
that
it
needs
to
continue
this
operation.
B
E
I,
don't
recall
where
we
left
off
yeah.
Thank
you,
I,
don't
recall
where
we
left
off
I.
Think
Brandon.
You
had
sort
of
thought.
Maybe
it
does
belong
in
image
deck
and
not
industrations
back
so
I'm,
not
sure
where
we
wanted
to
go
with
10
30.
B
Yeah
the
the
main
idea
of
looking
through
this
one
I
still
think
it
belongs
over.
Here,
though
the
stuff
we're
changing
is
over
here,
even
though
it's
enforced
on
the
registry
side,
all
the
phrasing
and
verbiage
around
this
stuff
is
over
in
every
specs,
so
I,
don't
I,
don't
see
how
you
would
easily
put
a
earn
distribution
spec
and
not
get
things
very
intertwined
between
the
two
it
already
kind
of
is.
B
A
I
really
appreciate
it.
Thank
you
Brent.
So
I
just
wanted
to
ask
a
quick
question:
what
is
what
does
it
take?
An
artifact
type
is
so
someone
Let's,
so
I
work
in
the
wazen
space
and
we
have
been
working
on.
You
know
different
ways
to
structure
webassembly
modules
and
and
store
them
in
in
Registries,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
do
it
the
right
way.
A
A
Why
would
we
or
why?
Would
we
not
want
to
use
the
artifact
type.
B
You
don't
have
a
configure,
you
type
for
the
XML
format,
s-bomb.
If
you
put
the
double
curly
brackets
in
the
config
and
you
you
set
the
media
type
to
be
XML
on
the
config
Mia
type
and
put
a
double
curly
bracket
in
there,
you're
technically
against
the
spec,
because
the
content
of
The
Blob
doesn't
match
the
media
type
on
the
blob
and
so
for
people
that
had
a
scenario
where
they're
pushing
an
artifact.
B
Yeah,
it
was
strictly
because
the
content
The
Blob
had
to
match
them.
You
type
on
the
blob
and
when
you're
setting
that
and
your
only
content
was
the
layer
down
below
your
config
media
type
didn't
have
anything
in
it,
and
so
there
are
Registries
out
there
that
are
very
picky
on
that
they
they
want
a
parsec
and
fake
field.
B
They
want
to
parse
that
blob
and
try
to
pull
data
out
there
to
bring
it
up
to
the
user's
Vision
visibility
there
and
when
they
start
parsing
stuff,
that's
not
Json,
they
get
picky,
and
so
that's
why
I
did
the
double
curly
bracket,
but
yeah.
If,
if
you've
got
wasm
today,
I
think
what
I've
seen
coming
from
that
side
already,
which
is
that
you've
got
to
config
media
type
already
now
that
you're
pushing
something
that
looks
like
our
config
descriptor
already
that
we've
got
today
the
the
content
from
the
config.json.
B
Maybe
you
want
to
change
it.
A
little
bit
to
use,
wasn't
specific
stuff
we're
cool
with
that
you've
got
a
different
media
type
on
there
already.
So
it's
indicating
this
awesome
so
once
you
change
that
media
type,
it's
yours
to
set
whatever
you
want,
the
content
in
there
to
be,
and
then
it's
just
up
to
you
and
container
D
and
everybody
else
is
trying
to
do
the
runtime
on
this
to
agree
on
what
that
content
should
look
like
at
that
point.
F
B
B
Yes,
otherwise,
on
my
agenda:
let's
just
try
to
get
some
of
these
conformance
stuff
knocked
out,
and
so
it's
it's
getting
there.
We've
got
a
few
of
them.
I
think
I've
got
a
pure
PR's
review
again.