►
From YouTube: OCI Weekly Discussion - 2022-03-03
D
I'm
just
well,
I
have
an
announcement,
maybe.
B
B
C
C
I
G
I
I
I
don't
really,
I
don't
really.
I
guess
what
is
the
question.
I
The
data
the
I
guess,
the
summary
I
I
don't
know
if
I've
seen
all
the
latest
changes,
but
to
summarize
we
want
to
add
a
data
field.
We
can
still
expect
that
clients
will
update
we'll
upload
those
blobs
at
least
for
now,
and
so
all
that
we
need
to
do
is
add.
Support
for
this
field
or
or
maybe
just
add,
support
for
unspecified
fields,
as
the
spec
asks
us
to,
and
we
currently
don't,
but
either
of
those
would
support,
would
allow
the
data
field
to
happen
either.
That's
it
yeah
yeah.
C
A
It
might
be
now
now,
since
that's
kind
of
green
lighted,
just
to
see
if
there
is
any
last
notes
that
might
have
needed
to
be
touched
up,
because
at
some
point
with
conversations
like
this,
they
end
up
being
like
lingering
updates.
G
Yeah
we
I
think,
last
week
we
discussed
explicitly
that
registries
may
validate,
but
there's
no
requirement
and
it's
up
to
the
client
to
actually
ensure
that
the
content
matches
the
blob
that
just
so
there's
no
expectation
on
the
registry.
To
do
anything
you
could
for
good
for
good
purposes,
but
spec
doesn't
require
it.
I
A
Effectively
the
second
one
like
most
most
folks
who
are
involved
here
are
usually
already
have
tested,
something
like
it.
So
when
it
merges
here
they
have
it
staged
or
can
play
with
it.
But
technically
you
know
until
it's
like
tagged,
then.
D
C
I
I
will
start
working
on
getting
some
folks
on
board
with
doing
this.
C
Oh
anisha,
sorry,
so
various
situations
where
I'm
storing,
like
a
text
document
and
a
registry,
that's
say
under.
C
Bytes,
it
is
faster
than
to
just
embed
that
in
the
manifest
than
to
have
to
fetch
the
manifest
and
then
ask
for
a
blob,
we
get
redirected
to
a
blob
store
and
then
download
that,
from
the
blob
store.
B
A
C
A
B
C
B
A
C
Are
we
like
live
reviewing
your
comment,
or
is
this
asynchronous.
A
C
C
I
I
tried
to
use
it
and
someone
was
like
no
that's
only
for
microsoft.
I
was
like
no
you're
wrong,
because
this
is
the
spec.
A
I
think
I
think
I
think
that
if
I'm
remembering
correctly,
red
hat
ended
up
working
around
that
by
having
top
level
like
business
to
business,
negotiated
302s
on
the
docker
hub,
that's
cool
because
in
red
hat's,
like
eula
or
otherwise,
was
like
the
the
level
of
support
so
that
if
you're
fetching
binaries
that
red
hat
compiled
but
from
another
source,
then
it
like
implies
a
certain
level
of
support.
A
F
So
we
are
making
progress
in
windows
on
removing
foreign
layers,
it's
it's
a
business
level
decision
and
that's
been
progressing,
so
it's
slower,
but
it
is
happening
so
and
then,
once
the
decision
is
made,
it's
going
to
take
some
time.
Obviously
because
people
use
you
know
older
versions
for
a
while,
but
at
some
point
in
the
future
near
future,
we'll
no
longer
be
using
requiring,
we
will
no
longer
be
using
the
foreign
layer
feature.
F
Because
of
all
the
problems
it
just,
it
doesn't
work
for
cross
registries,
it
doesn't
work
for
air
gap,
it
doesn't
work
in
cross
clouds.
There's
a
long
host
of
issues
that
have
created
more
usability
issues
than
they
were
the
benefit
of
it
was
there.
F
F
B
B
A
Things
have
slowed
down.
I'm
sorry
that
I
haven't
been
more
present
in
you
know
all
the
the
community
and
calls
in
otherwise.
I
think,
I'm
honestly
still
getting
my
feet
under
me.
A
C
B
I
guess
other
than
that,
if
anybody
folks
don't
have
something
else
for
their
quick
update
on
the
working
group,
we're
starting
to
go
through
proposals
right
now
and
so
we're
looking
at
the
various
different
options
there
will
be
and
we're
going
to
try
to
standardize
how
we
look
at
those
so
josh.
I'm
sure
you'll
throw
more
cool
details
out
there
at
some
point
and
we
can
sort
out
how
all
this
stuff
makes
look
pretty
incomparable.
E
Yeah
I
yeah-
I
was
hoping
to
throw
out
that
this
morning,
but
hopefully
they
end
the
day,
and
people
can
look
at
that.
E
But
thanks
for
putting
that
up,
brandon
I
think
that's
really
good
to
have
is,
like
the
other
end
of
the
scale.
A
E
I
was
concerned
for
a
while
just
be
a
repeat
of
this
call,
but
it
does
feel
like
it's
becoming
its
own
thing.
The
two
calls
we're
doing
different
things.
B
Whatever
was
in
my
head
recap,
which
was
you
know
we
started
saying:
we
need
to
decide
how
we
can
compare
all
the
different
existing
proposals
together,
and
so
we
grouped
we
got
four
of
them
out
there,
one
of
them
being
no
change
at
all,
one
of
them
being
the
original
one.
I
think
dan
put
up
there
of
how
you
can
put
a
reference
type
on
existing
objects.
B
D
But
that
dovetails
into
the
fact
that
I
am
also
leaving
my
current
employer,
and
so
I
also
have
hardware
shifts
going
on
and
that's
why
it's
taking
me
a
bit
to
get
it
up
then,
and
I
apologize
for
that.
B
D
Oh
well,
I
guess
congrats
on
you,
so
this
is
and
and
since
I'm
in
the
tob,
I
guess
I
don't
think
there's
going
to
be
any
change
with
that,
but
I
don't
think
that's.
A
It's
it's
a
little,
it's
a
little
gray
and
especially
given
some
of
the
confusion
we
had
with
this
last
vote
of,
like
when
there's
nominations
by
current
company
seats
versus
the
community
dominated,
but
it's
still
ultimately,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
humans
that
are
representing
not
not
the
other
way
around
so.