►
From YouTube: ONNX Edge WG meeting 20190821
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
So
here's
the
agenda
that
I
shared
with
the
weekend
so
I
would
like
to
review
the
slides
or
took
that
we
are
gonna
go
over
in
a
meeting
on
Friday
and
then
maybe
continue
with
some
reviews
that
we
started
and
we're
supposed
to
the
last
time
around,
but
we
didn't
start
on
them
and
so
that
there
you
go,
but
before
doing
that,
I
just
want
to
briefly
update
everybody.
That
I
mean
for
transparency
reasons.
Obviously,
I
did
reach
out
to
steering
committee
about
two
weeks
ago
in
preparation
for
a
workshop,
I
felt
like
okay.
B
Let
me
raise
something,
and-
and
this
is
like
about
this
working
group
and
sort
of
asking
ask-
ask
them
for
advice
about
the
kind
of
how
do
we
increase
participation
to
this
group
right
because
you
know
it's
it,
it's
it's.
This
ton
of
set
of
people,
but
I
felt,
like
you
know,
I
should
raise
it
up
because
you
enough,
and
you
know
what
is
in
the
end.
You
know
how
this
translates
to
credibility
of
output
of
this
group.
B
It
cannot
be
that
only
you
know
three
of
these
you
know
coming
tell
and
why
we
care
about
edge
right,
and
so
there
you
go
so
just
want
to
share
that
that
I
need
to
reach
out
to
them.
They
they
reply.
This
is
a
lot
of
this
is
wouldn't
work,
let's
obviously
try
to
reach
out
individually
to
other
other
companies.
B
Let's
try
to
identify
who
these
other
companies
may
be
interested
in,
but
definitely
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
I'm,
gonna
I,
think
highlight
in
a
workshop,
because
I
would
like
to
us
to
get
somehow
higher
participation
in
this
working
group.
So
let
me
share
my
mice
with
that.
You
know
just
to
make
sure
that
you
are
on
the
same
page,
and
you
know
about
that.
I
am
gonna
share
the
slides
I
prepared
for
the
or
at
these
draft
of
the
slides
I
prepared
for
the
workshop.
So
basically
we
have.
B
I'm
I'm
gonna
start
right
away,
flushing
out
contributors
to
to
the
working
group,
actually
not
me,
but
offer
will
present
on
Friday
agenda.
So
this
slide
is
going
to
cover
the
I.
Don't
know
if
you
saw
it,
but
the
the
agenda
for
workshop
calls
for
ten-minute
status
brief
about
the
progress
so
I
guess
of
the
working
group,
and
then
there
is
a
45
minutes
breakout
session.
B
So
we
completed
and
published
two
documents,
statement
of
work
and
and
I'd
scope
and
profile
definition
document
they
are
published
in
the
use,
artifacts
folder
and
then
and
then
we
have
currently
what's
going
on.
We
have
proposals
currently
under
review
and
this
is
about
prototype
profile
and
product
template.
B
B
B
But,
however,
we
didn't
have
audience
so
we
decided
not
to,
and
then
there
is
a
profile
compliance
workflow,
which
is
something
that
last
meeting
me
and
sort
of
discussed
and
Sarah
offered
like
okay
can
I
can
I
you
know
he
suggested
like
putting
together
some
proposal
for
overall
profile
compliance,
workflow,
right
and
so
I
think
he
may
share.
Share
today,
some
of
it
this
is
an
agenda.
Effie
I
hope
we
get
to
it,
and
so
next
next
slide
is
now
I.
B
Don't
know
how
many
of
these
slides
actually
I,
put
it
still
in
these
ten
minutes.
I
think
some
of
them
we
may
move
later
on-
and
this
is
part
of
discussion
here,
so
I
assisted
no
work,
basically
what
it
does
and
we
define
some
goals
and
milestones
right
and
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
highlight
that
from
the
statement
of
work
and
that's
again
pointer
where
it
is
and
that's
a
higher
highlight
and
then
the
other
document
yeah.
B
So
we
are
here
currently
and
then
in
scope
and
profile
definition
document
I
think
that
this
is
the
one
from
Yeti
a
donkey,
drove
and
updated.
But
then
I
move
this
to
the
artifacts
folder,
just
so
kind
of
to
publish
it
sort
of
officially
not
move
it
copied
it
over.
Rather
from
the
this
fashion.
Material
and
I
just
put
this
together.
B
B
Well,
I
think
it's
gonna
be
challenge
it's
a
scope
of
eh
right.
It
is.
It
is
everything
by
cloud
right.
It
is,
you
know
really,
this
blue
rectangle,
it's
a
big
big
big
space
I
mean
you
have
infrastructure
edge
devices,
even
the
edge
devices.
They
have
a
lot
of
different
kinds
and
so
on
right.
So
challenges
in
my
my
view
is
really
you
know
this
could
live
potentially
to
a
large
number
of
profiles,
and
is
that
maintainable
made
really
in
my
mind,
I'm,
not
sure
this
is
the
question
for
everybody
here
to
kind
of
I.
B
Think
voice
for
is
there
kind
of
opinion
and
you
know
identifying
profiles.
Really
it's
like
you
know
it
takes.
It's
not
take
a
lot
of
time
potentially
to
identify
all
the
profiles
with
such
a
large
scope
and
then
second
challenge
that
I
mentioned
before
we
started
about
this.
It's
about
community
participation,
I
think
that
I
think
that
raises
a
question
about
the
relevance.
B
So
here's
working
group,
if
we
don't
have
a
bigger
participation
honestly-
and
you
know-
we
now
have
a
lot
of
work
ahead
of
us,
especially
with
on
such
a
large
scope,
and
you
know
we
would
like
to
have
bigger
participation.
You
know
we
would.
We
would
like
to
plead
in
this
workshop
2d
to
the
community
and
audience
to
make
sure
they
participate
if
they
care
about
the
edge
they
should
participate.
That's
that's
my
message
so
anyway.
This
is
our
first
ten
minutes
and
that's
what
I
had
put
together
so
for
a
breakout
session.
B
It
is
I
should
remove
this
image
anyway,
so
I
think
I,
don't
know
why.
First
45
minutes
I
thought.
Okay,
we
could
flesh
out
again
this
this
thing,
because
this
is
really
what
we
are
where
we
live
and
what
we
want
to
you
know
define
profiles
based
on
so
I
think
repeating
is
slide
or
actually
just
using
this
slide
in
a
10
minutes
overview,
just
because
10
is
maybe
too
little
time.
B
So
we
can
just
move
those
two
slides
into
the
breakout
session
and
that
maybe
would
be
the
best
to
do
anyway,
so
bottom
line
in
this
brief
overview
for
the
audience
in
the
breakout
session.
What
is
how
we
define
the
scope,
and
you
know
what
are
the
attributes
and
then
we
have
several
proposals
under
the
review,
I
mean
I
would
like
to
flash
these
proposals
out.
I
think
that
is
opportunity
for
us
to
do
that
in
a
wider
audience.
B
You
know
and
get
input.
You
know,
because
we
have
this
one
approach:
it's
this
product,
I
profile,
which
is
one
way
to
start
defining
profiles.
I
have
this
profile
topology
map,
which
I
will
try
to
get
your
feel
on
after
this
after
we
go
through
these
slides,
and
then
there
is
a
profile
compliance
workflow,
so
I
think
we
could
try
to
flash
all
these
three
proposals
together
and
and
get
input
from
folks
and
and,
and
you
know,
get
some
sort
of
a
feedback,
and
so
that
that
is
what
I
have.
B
Basically,
this
is
like
la
currently.
What
I
have
I
think
honestly
this?
This
piece
here
needs
more
content
afterwards,
I
didn't
get
to
adding,
but
at
least
I
had.
This
is
my
proposal
for
the
agenda
and
there
you
go
so
thoughts.
I
mean
I,
thought
that
potentially
I
could
move
these
two
slides
this
one
and
this
one
into
they
may
be-
or
at
least
this
one
move
it
into
the
the
breakout
session.
D
So
I
think
I
mentioned
it
a
few
minutes
ago.
I
think
one
of
the
issues
that
we
have
with
which
may
affect
participation
is
that
people
don't
really
understand.
What
do
we
mean
by
come
out?
Okay,
so
by
the
edge
which
is
like
not
cloud
so
getting
the
drawing
that
you
moved,
which
is
a
slight
10
to
kind
of
separate
it
to
two
things.
Just
have
one
slide
right
at
the
beginning
saying
to
people
this
is
the
edge
walking
group
scope.
D
Everything
that
you
see
here
is
the
edge
walking
group
scope,
not
talking
about
attributes
or
anything
like
that,
just
to
use
this
drawing
without
the
text
just
to
describe
what
is
the
walk
in
your
scope
and
have
it
in
the
ten
minutes,
because
when
you
get
to
the
breakout
sessions,
people
go
either
to
this
one
or
another.
One
yeah.
B
B
Is
that
at
least
appear
fully
okay,
so
you
know
again
my
fee
if
you
bring
bring
this
again,
that's
why
I
had
this
slide
here,
because
before
introducing
the
scope
of
the
edge
and
challenges
I
want
them
to
see
what
it
was
worth.
Currently,
our
scope
is
right
and
I
mean
rightfully
so
I
mean
all
this
is
potentially
edge.
I
mean
you
know.
Just
there
was
reading
article.
How
much
so
if
you
look
at
this
night
and
infrastructure
edge
is
getting
gaining
in
importance.
Let's.
D
B
B
B
I,
don't
know
I'm
open
to
suggestions,
I
mean
it
is
definitely
currently
about
execution
about
inference
correct,
but
we
I
mean
this
is
where
what
we,
what
we
did
state
in
a
you
know,
stable
work
and
really
profile
definition
is
like
yeah.
We
are
defining
profiles
about.
You
know
running
the
models
right:
it's
not
necessary
training
or
anything
right.
It's
just
running
them
and
yeah.
C
B
E
C
Even
like
talking
to
others
in
the
onyx
community,
I
don't
think
they
understand
very
well
of
what
we're
talking
about,
and
if
they
get
some
of
the
specifics
and
the
impact,
then
they
it
would
really
resonate
with
them
and
they
would
be
like
oh.
This
is.
This
is
important.
We
need
to
go
talk
to
these
guys
so.
D
I
agree:
we
do
that
they're,
you
know.
Maybe
it's
a
good
thing
to
reiterate
what
we
mean
when
we,
when
we
went
on
describing
for
files.
Why
does
profiling
means,
and
at
least
to
me,
and
maybe
it's
something
that
we
want
to,
but
I
eat
the
right
again
in
the
side
profile
end
up
to
a
list
of
use
cases
mapped
into
onyx
models
that,
if
off
I
need
to
go
for
compliance
in
order
to
describe
any
system
is
compliant
to
this
profile.
So
maybe
there
is
a.
B
C
Me
say
it
differently:
maybe
okay,
so
this
concept
that
we're
pushing
for
it's
related
to
education
profiles,
but
folks
on
the
data
center
to
could
benefit
from
it
right.
They
could
have
container
profiles
or
do
you
know
they
can
also
extend
the
same
concept
in
the
ER
world
and
benefit
from
it
the
same
attributes
they
could
also
use.
We
look
from
as
a
cloud
as
an
offload
element.
They
can
look
at
edge
as
a
local
computer
element
and
the
concepts
could
resonate
with
them.
Also,
the
same
way
right.
D
B
B
This
one
right,
so
it's
it's
about
compliance
I,
also
see
it
as
about
the
compliance
meaning
like
people
can
use
the
finish
another
profile
and
under
compliance
workflow
to
make
sure
and
say:
okay,
I
am
compliant
with
this
profile,
meaning
like
covering
this
models,
these
scenarios
and
these
operators
that
are
covered
by
that
profile
right.
So,
yes,
they
need
to
execute
for
sure
its
execution.
You
know
in
play
here
as
well,
but
I
don't
know
I'm
looking
for
the
right
right
way
to
kind
of
maybe
good.
C
I
would
that
would
help
us
be
more
specific
and
people
to
understand
what
we
mean
by
that?
It's
not
you,
know
the
edge
profile
or
something
this
is
edge
execution
profile,
so
it
worth
more
being
more
specific
into
what
we
mean
by
the
concept
of
profile,
it's
something
that
is
specified
in
the
model
files.
It's
something
that
you
need
to
be
aware
during
training.
It's
something
that
you
need
to
be
aware
when
you
are
going
to
run
it.
The
runtime
should
be
aware
about
these
attributes.
C
D
B
Maybe
I
think
there
is
interest
in
training,
you
know,
and
that
is
like
the
two
T
to
two
key
concepts
that
they
are
in
this
space
right
and
maybe
because
maybe
the
way
I
see
what
sorry
I'll
be
saying.
Is
you
know
there?
Is
this
breakout
sessions?
There's
a
training
breakout
session,
and
there
is
you
know,
and
so
if
people
understand
that
this
is
not
about
training.
This
is
this
is
just
about
compliance
in
and
then
it's
not
about
training
compliance.
It's
about
right,
one
time,
more,
influence
compliance
right.
C
B
C
B
Yeah
I
mean
again
training
profile;
it
is
inference
and
inference
and
compliance
I
mean
you
know.
So
maybe
that's
like
only
difference
compliance
let's,
let's
maybe
that's
something-
to
kind
of
flesh
out
correct
in
the
in
DNA
this
overview
or
make
sure
that
people
understand
upfront
that
for
this
breakout
session,
gonna
be
about
that's
like
I
guess,
another
point
so
yeah.
C
B
B
B
This
second
bullet
is
me:
I
actually
do
think
it
isn't
guys.
You
guys
didn't
even
see
this
yet
so
maybe
I
should
I
would
like
you
to
get
to
get
some
feedback
on
this
as
well,
because
I
think
depends
on
your
feedback
and
then
we
can
decide
to
mention
it
in
a
in
a
breakout
session
as
another
view
on
the
whole
profile
definition
or
not
so,
but
for
now,
if
two
offers
point
I
think
it
seems
like
then
four-wheel
drive.
B
B
B
D
B
So
you
have,
you
know
we
can
put
stuff
in
the
discussion,
material
folder
or
in
the
pool
request
as
a
discussion
material
and
then
share
that
way.
Oh
no
I
mean
I'm
all
for
for
kind
of
efficiency,
so
email
is
also
K.
Just
it's
just
it's
not
necessarily
public
right
and
that's
the
only
thing
that
I
would
like
to
avoid
three
emails.
I
might.
B
Then,
let's
I
mean
if
everybody
is
in
agreement
with
this,
this
working
group
audience
here,
then
then,
please,
you
know,
send
it
to
the
for
the
whole
four
that
are
currently
in
play
here,
and
this
is
just
in
the
context
of
preparation
for
the
workshop
right
and
then
we
so
we
can
be
helpful
kind
of
act
quickly
for
the
workshop.
So
that's
fine.
Let's
do
that
shared
over
the
email
in
unless
an
anybody
object,
I
just
don't
want
to
kind
of
make
it
sure
that
their
ways
on
the
same
page,
everybody's
recorded.
B
Think
so
every
they
don't
nobody
mention
anything
about.
It
was
pretty
pretty
much
free
form
in
the
past,
so
yeah
I
mean
we
can
ask
okay,
we
can
ask
for
sure
it
wouldn't
be
hard
to
kind
of
pull
two
different
templates:
okay,
okay!
So
so
then,
let's
then
follow
up
like
that.
I,
like
share,
maybe
proposal
for
this
breakout
session
for
this
item
and
for
this
item,
I
would
like
to
maybe
yeah-
and
this
is
gonna
stay
here-
assumed
I
think
offer
you
can
kind
of
decide
or
not.
B
But
this
this
slide
here
is
about
this
first
bullet
right
and
I.
Don't
know
if
you
need
more
than
this,
but
I
think
in
a
nutshell,
this
this
summarizes
right
and
okay.
So
I
would
like
to
switch
little
bit
different.
That's
okay,
with
everybody
to
second
bullet,
which
is
to
to
kind
of
put
up
this.
This
proposal
for
the
top
level
profile
breakdown
and
just
get
your
opinion
about
it.
I
did
put
it
in
the
discussion
material.
So
it's
there
and
I
github.
You
can
see
it.
Let
me
raise
it
here
so
I.
B
What
my
intention
with
this
was
like
to
try
to
start
put
up
sort
of
obviously
topology
map
but
hierarchy
right
of
these
edge
profiles.
How
do
we
go
about?
I
mean
we
had
the
one
prototype
which
was
about
smart
speaker,
basically
right,
but
then
I
thought?
Okay,
how
about
we
start
from
based
on
really
you
know
the
picture.
We
I
mean
the
drawing
or
the
finished
scope
of
etch.
B
Really
you
have
edge
infrastructure,
and
then
you
have
edge
devices
right
and
then
you
define
profiles
based
on
really
use
cases,
people
care
about,
and
so
what
do
people
care
about?
Well,
there
is
the
image.
Pro.
Father
is
out
your
profile,
you
know
and
and
I
thought
like.
How
can
we,
how
can
we,
you
know,
define
these
profiles
and
what
would
make
sense?
So
this
is
what
I
kind
of
came
up
with
and
I
started
saying:
okay,
maybe
there
is
a
basic
profile?
There
is
advanced
profile
or
something
like
that.
B
B
Interesting
I,
don't
know
it
doesn't
render
properly.
So
why
am
I
here?
If
you
see
this
news
cases
and
then
models,
maybe
bottles
of
every
identify,
so
this
is
probably
defined
a
profile
and
Diana
capability.
What
does
it
mean?
Maybe
this
is
more
description,
but
I
want
to
discuss
like
basic
means,
maybe
meet.
Some
accuracy
has
some
expectation
on
latency
input
resolution
and
so
on,
right
and
and
then
you
have
advanced
profile,
maybe
which
is
you
know,
really,
you
know
very
accurate,
very
fast,
very
but
in
the
edge
infrastructure.
B
B
You
know
this.
It's
stationary
and
bull
powered
predominantly
right
and
and
usually
what
are
the
profile
attributes
of
most
relevance
and
to
me
its
accuracy,
amazing
right
in
the
energy
infrastructure,
if
I
would
move
down
to
edge
devices,
see
kind
of
there
are
two
subcategories.
There
is
like
mobile
to
me,
which
is
battery-powered,
and
then
you
have
stationary
devices
that
are
also
edge.
B
B
B
What
do
you
mean
up?
No
I
mean
we
and
then
spy
the
attributes,
and
we
said
it.
You're
gonna
put
some
ranges
or
not
tributes,
but
if
we
define
profile
using
attributes,
you
would
say:
okay,
there
are
five
attributes
and
each
of
them
could
be
in.
We
decided
not
to
be
strict,
but
rather
this
or
two
ranges
right.
I.
C
B
Profile
is
an
optional
thing,
I
guess!
Well,
let
me
see
we
define
profiles
with
the
purpose
of
compliance
right,
and
so
so
people
will
say
I'm
compliant
with
this
profile,
meaning
I
can
run
I'm
compliant
with
the
with
attributes
specified
to
this
profile
and
with
the
models
of
scenarios
that
were
identified
as
a
part
of
our
compliance
right
and
they
could
say,
I
support
these
models,
and
this
operator
said
because
this
operator
set
comes
out
of
the
the
profile
definition
through
the
scenarios
right
and
the
models.
B
So
with
this,
the
models
we
identify
for
each
of
the
profiles
will
definitely
the
indirectly
implicitly
define
the
operator
set
right
now,
so
is
it
optional
profile?
I
mean
I
mean
no.
Nobody
is
in
the
onyx
specification,
and
operation
definition
will
evolve
on
its
own.
Here
we
are
defining
a
subsets
of
these
operators,
right
people
could
say
and
validate
and
say:
okay
I
am
compliant
with
this
subset.
This
is
the
way
I
see.
D
B
B
Is
like
I,
don't
know
if
you,
if
you
think
about
this
I
mean
there
are
some
open
questions.
Here's
like
this
data,
locality
and
aspect
that
is
like
you
know.
You
could
have
I
thought
a
potential
subtype
based
on
the
locality,
because
you
could
help
you
profile
this
all
local
processing
and
could
be
audio
profile.
That
is
counting
on
you
know
floating
so.
C
B
B
D
But
basically,
data
locality
getting
back
to
some
discussion.
We
had
back
on
differences
like
a
case
will
take
all
the
opposed
I.
Think
I
can
do
the
entire
processing
of
the
voice
or
the
language
on
device
or
I
can
do
it
in
some
kind
of
a
hybrid
fashion,
part
of
it
of
the
device
part
of
it
in
the
cloud
or
I
can
do
everything
remote.
So
when
you
look
at
data
locality,
what
it
maps
down
to
in
the
use
case
that
I
just
described,
you
already
got
fully
separated
Nevins
either
it's
completely
local.
D
F
C
How
I
was
going
with
it
was,
you
know,
like
nvidia,
has
a
group
going
on
around
data
pipeline
and
they
want
to
expand
the
operator
set
from
pure
ml
to
also
add
other
aspects
after
your
pipeline
right
and
some
of
those
could
even
be
expressed
in
the
model
file
and
onyx
runtime
has
a
concept
of
execution
providers
right
and
you
could
essentially
create
a
graph
and
describe
it
in
such
a
way
that
you
can
say
you
know
this
much
is
happening
local.
These
many,
this
sub
graph
is
happening.
F
C
Could
have
like
execution
providers
say
you
know,
there's
a
CPU
execution
provider
on
this
much
on
the
CPU.
Then
we
can
have
this
here.
I
have
a
fixed
function
or
a
DSP.
Let
me
run
this
much
of
sub
graph
into
this
DSP,
and
this
much
is
going
on
to
the
cloud
and
a
quality
of
service
would
be
relevant
for
those
kind
of
uses.
So.
B
I
think,
okay,
I,
think
I
mean
I'm.
Also
looking
for
your
kind
of
view
on
what
I
was
trying
to
do
here,
does
this
make
sense
versus
like
we
have
other
approach
which
offered
me
disgusted
offer
last
time,
which
was
another
view,
so
we
defined
more,
very
specific
profile
which
was
technically
composite
in
terms
of
combining
your
video
and
idea.
It
was
a
smart,
smart
kind
of
speaker
device
right,
and
so
this
is
another
view
to
try
to,
and
I
was
wondering
of.
B
You
know
we
could
go
and
start
the
defining
profiles
based
on
real
the
use
cases
in
wild
today,
like
smart
speaker
is
well,
you
know,
smart
camera
is,
and
you
know,
robotics
is
not.
Third
one
and
I
mean
it's
like.
How
do
you
I
mean
put
two
bow
I
mean?
Which
way
do
we
go?
Maybe
that's
also
a
point
for
discussion
that
I
would
like
maybe
to
get
some
input
from
audience,
maybe
in
a
workshop-
and
you
know
how
do
put,
how
to
bound
the
the
scope
or
profiles
number
of
profiles.
We
want
to
do.
C
B
No
I
decide
which
direction
we
want
to
go
I
mean
is
it?
Is
it
like
very,
very
use
case,
a
real
life
specific
to
what
is
happening
today?
No,
you
know
in
the
real
life-
and
you
know,
variety
of
companies
that
do
stuff
in
this
space.
You
know,
there's
a
people
that
are
doing
robotics
right
now.
People
are
doing
this,
so
maybe
they'll
decide.
Oh
I
would
like
to
have
this
profile.
It
is
very
specific
to
what
they
do
right.
B
Well,
we
could
come
up
with
something
that
is
very
specific
to,
for
example,
what
what
has
been
done
on
it
on
the
edge
right.
What
I'm
proposing
here
is
very
more
very
more
much
much
more
generic
I
feel
in
a
sense
like
okay,
if
I
am
compliant
say,
with
the
basic
out
your
profile
and
basic
to
the
image
profile.
I'm
also
compliant
with
my
basic
home
speaker
in
a
way
indirectly
right
I
mean
so.
D
B
Yeah
I
mean
I
mean
that's.
That
was
my
thinking,
because
these
are
the
real
world.
Real
generic
use
cases,
image,
processing,
Emelia
process
right
I
mean,
if
me,
maybe
define
some
couple
of
these
and
I,
don't
know
what
else
could
be
there,
but
then
technically,
whoever
built
the
device
being
at
automotive
or
robotics,
or
this
they
should
be
able
to
combine
they.
You
know
to
say
my
device
combines
these
three
profiles.
I.
D
D
Virtual
reality
or
augmented
reality,
you
can
also
have
a
six
dimensions
of
freedom
sensor.
So
there
is
a
sense
of
type.
Oh
I
know
sensor
is
one
way
to
describe
it,
but
maybe
there's
another
way,
and
once
you
define
a
type
of
sensor
or
the
type
of
input,
then
you
can
have
multiple
nevians
inside
lasik
advanced.
So.
B
They
are
not
necessarily
just
a
vision
or
camera
sensor
right
in
the
SI
used
computer
vision
here
as
a
use
case,
but
you
know
this
could
maybe
be
generalized
to
other
sensors
as
well
right,
that's
my
thinking
it
one
I
mean
I'm,
not
sure,
but
your
point
is
valid.
I
mean
there
are
other
types
of
profiles
tied
to
the
sensor
type,
and
maybe
it
could
be
3d
image
profile
right.
B
B
C
You
know
bandwidth,
we
just
you
know
it's
a
field
that
if
you
say
yes,
which
means
it's
fully
local,
then
or
you
are
saying
no,
then
you
specify
a
number
there
that
this
is
the
bandwidth
available
or
the
model
producer
has
specified
that
this
model
requires
at
least
this
much
of
connectivity.
With
this
much
quality
of
service.
C
Essentially,
because
you
know
these
profiles,
I
perceive
them
as
the
way
it's
like
a
contract.
You
know
something
that
produce
more
water.
Producer
is
specifying
in
the
model
and
saying
this
is
how
you
need
to
run
it,
and
the
runtime
platform
needs
to
comply
to
it
it
now.
It
has
a
guidance
that
okay,
in
order
for
me
to
run
this
model,
actually
I
need
to
do
these
things.
Upfront
I
need
to
make
sure
I'm
connected
and
I.
Have
this
much
of
quality
of
service
or
I?
Have
this
much
battery
power
or
I?