►
From YouTube: ONNX Edge WG meeting 20191218
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Yeah
I
can
see
yeah
so
yeah.
This
is
just
get
a
channel,
but
the
main
topic,
as
we
discussed
last
last
time,
was
about
discuss
messaging
to
or
with
steering
committee
on
future
Europe
engagements,
and
that's
still
the
main
topic
I
mean
I,
see
I,
see
the
comment
from
your
dog
saying
that
we
have
a
new
member
and
I
mean
how
about
you
really
well
sure.
That's
that's
what
we
are
doing
felt
last
couple
of
kind
of
months,
I,
guess
and
that's
why
we
wanted
to
to
reach
out
to
the
steering
committee.
A
A
A
You
can
start
reading
this
as
I
talk,
and
so
then
we
can.
We
can
continue.
I
guess
I
want
to
let
everybody
know
that
I
did
reach
out
to
Prashant
gulab
Artie
and
you
know
I
thought
like
okay.
Maybe
the
easiest
way
is,
if
I
ask
him
to
join
this
meeting,
and
so
he
can,
you
know,
get
first
hand
kind
of
input
from
from
one
of
the
steering
committee,
members
and
so
I
did.
I
did
reach
out
yesterday
to
him
asking
if
you
could
briefly
join
this
meeting.
He
said
he
won't
be
because
he's
channeling.
A
A
A
Can
they
make
a
recommendation
and,
and
so,
if
you
know
he
basically
thinks
a
steering
committee
will
be
supportive
of
whatever
recommendation
we
decide
to
make,
and
so
it's
up
to
us
I
guess
but
but
just
for
unity.
That's
that's
update
from
my
side
on
that
topic
that
I
didn't
reach
out
to
one
staying
committee.
Member
directly,
so
I
don't
know
if
you
had
a
chance
to
read
through
this.
What
I
put
together.
B
Can
be
donated
in
a
way
that
we
would
like
to
make
progress
and
how
the
steering
committee
suggest
we
make
progress.
Is
the
right
evolution
yeah?
So
this
is
like
a
maybe
form,
a
new
working
group
which
has
a
broader
scope
and
products.
A
sort
of
blue
yeah
I
would
be
apprehensive.
You
know
we
had
like
you
mentioned
right.
We
didn't
have
a
lot
of
representation
from
other
companies,
so
would
even
that's
there's
a
point
of
even
doing
that,
so,
basically
looking
for
guidance
from
them,
you
know.
A
Yeah,
so
this
is
like
you
know,
you're
totally
right,
I
didn't
this
is
not
completely
I.
Think
there's
a
last
I
was
listing,
I
ended
up
wasting
like
kind
of
sort
of
key
points
reasons,
and,
and
so
say
you
know
we
could.
We
could
add
topic
to
say
something
like
to
your
what
you
are
saying
right
to
say
that.
B
A
B
B
C
B
You
mean
like
hundred
windows
or
the
framework,
or
so
I
mean
like
your
system,
integrators
of
Qualcomm
and
system
integrators
of
Intel,
which
are
the
ones
who
are
burdened
by
the
fragmentation,
which
is
what
we
are
trying
to
reduce
by
compliance
and
the
work
that
we
were
doing
was
going
to
benefit
them
right
and
if
it
evolves
into
a
broader
scope,
do
you
see
from
your
site?
We
would
have
higher
participation.
A
I,
don't
know
sure
you
mean
it's
hard
to
say,
I
mean
if
we,
if
we
make
it
something
that
is
if
the
brookie
workgroup
would
evolve
into
something
wider
I'm
guessing.
Yes,
you
know
because
it
has
implications
beyond
just
you
know:
hardware
vendors,
if
you
wish
I
mean
in
a
sense
like
this.
This
is
a
it
feels
like
largely
so
far.
A
The
edge
has
been
perceived
as
a
hardware
vendor
topic
right
and-
and
you
know,
by
by
creating
in
your
working
group
or
renaming-
or
you
know,
into
the
general
compliance
working
group-
I'm,
not
sure
how
to
say
this.
There
is
no
such
thing
right
right.
Currently,
there
is
no
actually
there.
No,
there
is
no
I'm,
not
sure
what
we're
the
compliance
is
currently
covered.
B
A
A
A
C
B
A
A
C
A
A
A
If
the
working
group
should
continue
with
the
current
naming
name
and
under
current
scope
and
because
the
things
we
have
been
discussing,
sort
of
go
beyond
just
edge
and
it's
it's
more,
it's
turning
more
into
the
domain
of
compliance
in
general,
mm-hmm
and
and
so
that's
why?
What
you
see
on
the
screen
is
sort
of
and
the
letter
steering
committee
that
you
are
trying
to
kind
of.
A
D
D
So
we
didn't
do
an
issue
where,
when
we
were
working
on
1.5
and
the
differences
between
1.5
and
1.6
they're
minor,
but
we
have
to
keep
track
so
that
caused
us
to
find
out
as
to
how,
in
what
direction
is
onyx
moving
on
to
continue
watching
whether
how
do
we
actively
support
the
format
and
and
going
forward
yeah
for
so
even
that
is
kind
of
larger
scope
that
no
edge
right.
Yes,
yes,
but
we
are
focused
on
edge.
For
example,
we
are
not
doing
anything
regarding
training.
A
A
D
A
A
D
D
A
A
D
A
A
So
those
are
the
options
and
I
could
I.
Could
he
said
he
may
be
a
real
on
Friday
around
11:00?
Well
again,
I
I,
don't
know.
In
that
case
you
know
not.
Everybody
could
join
or
I
could
just
send
this
letter
to
him
and
say
here
here
what
we
have
and
he
is
the
one
that
would
forward
further
to
steering
committee
right.
A
C
A
A
That
is
what
I'm
gonna
probably
do.
One
logistics
updates
I
think
because
of
the
Linux
Foundation
switch
I
think
they
are
now
I
got
notification
from
them
that
they
are
gonna,
be
start
using
some
of
the
Linux
Foundation
sort
of
logistics
and
infrastructure
to
organize
and
track
meetings
and,
and
then
there'll,
be
some
mailing
lists
and
calendars
that
we
can
use
and
etc.
So
that
might
be
changing
going
forward,
I
mean
how
we
can
organize
meetings.
A
A
B
A
Yeah
I
will
I
will
see,
see
you
actually.
What
is
the
best
way
to
do?
This
I
mean
that
I
want
to
obviously
do
anything.
Other
I
will
I.
Will
you
know
CCD
the
active
currently
active
members
of
the
working
group
I
mean
the
ones
the
guys
that
we
have
been
discussing
this
with.
Mainly
me,
I
mean
you
don't
rush
in
and
I
guess
offer
right
and.
A
Okay,
that's
it!
You
don't
need
to
continue
necessarily
any
more.
We
can
conclude
and
then
you
know
we'll
see
about
you
know
next
steps.
Either
there
I
mean
it's
gonna,
be
probably
the
New
Year's.
So
happy
new
years,
everybody
yeah.