►
From YouTube: OpenFeature - Project meeting,January 19th, 2023
Description
TODO: ADD descrioption here
OpenFeature website: https://open-feature.github.io/
A
C
I
heard
I
heard
something
very
interesting
about
Wallace's.
Oh.
D
Yeah
there's
a
python
operator-
that's
colloquially
named
at
walrus
because
it's
a
colon
and
an
equals
and
they're
very
divisive
in
the
python
world.
So
I
hear.
A
C
Okay,
so
looks
like
we
have
seven
I'm,
not
sure
how
many
people
will
get
today.
Mike
Mike
kind
of
usually
runs
these
meetings.
Mike
Beamer
he's
he's
not
here
he's
not
with
us
today,
but
he'll
be
here
next
time,
so
I'm
kind
of
filling
in
for
him.
C
B
Ben
I'm
just
gonna
copy
your
item
below
because
I
created
like
an
entry
for
the
19th.
B
Let
me
just
get
rid
of
that
piece
on
top.
Just
everything
is,
is
one
one
piece
down
my
bad.
D
B
C
Okay,
so
yeah
we
we're
three
minutes
after
so
I
guess
we'll
get
started
like
I
was
just
saying:
Mike
isn't
joining
us
today,
so
I'm
kind
of
running
the
meeting
and
oh
looks
like
we
have
been
volunteering
to
be
scribe.
So
thanks
a
lot
Ben
feel
free
to
add
yourself
as
a
participant
and
if,
if
you'd
like
to
you,
can
just
use
the
reactions
in
Zoom
to
raise
your
hand
if
you'd
like
to
introduce
yourself,
that's
totally
optional.
A
Hey
yeah
I
figured
I'd,
introduce
myself
I'm
Adam
I'm
from
Dev
cycle,
we're
also
building
a
feature
flying
platform
so
yeah.
He
came
in
to
kind
of,
listen
and
see
what
see.
What's
going
on.
C
C
We
did
ask
their
permission
to
record
it
and
they
were
okay
with
that,
so
I
don't
want
to
just
broadcast
it,
but
if
you're
interested
in
getting
a
copy
of
that
recording,
I'm
sure
that
would
be
okay
with
them,
considering
they
let
us
record
it.
So,
if
you're
interested,
please
hit
me
up
on
the
cncf
slack
and
I'll,
happily
send
you
a
copy
of
the
of
the
video.
If
you'd,
like
of
the
recording
there's.
Also
a
select
is
a
cool
thing
where
it
automatically
transcribes
them.
E
Also
got
one
of
us
has
got
a
recording
from
the
launch
Darkly
interview
that
we
did
as
well.
So
if
you
are
interested
in
two
recordings
then
hit
both
of
us
now.
C
Yeah
thanks
Pete,
that's
yeah,
that's
right!
So
I
think
it
was
a
really
productive
meeting.
I
don't
want
to
dive
too
deep
into
that
topic,
because
we,
the
other
thing
I
guess
I
have
to
to
mention,
is
we
do
have
a
dedicated
meeting
on
client-side
tomorrow.
C
C
So
we're
shifted
a
little
bit
more
to
to
the
West
Coast
tomorrow.
It's
at
1
1
p.m,
Eastern
Time,
and
it's
also
on
our
Google
Calendar.
So
if
you're
interested
in
and
hearing
more
about
client
development,
the
client
spec
changes,
we
can
talk
more
about
some
of
the
feedback
from
Spotify
as
well
as
the
launch
Darkly
meeting
Pete
just
mentioned.
Please
attend
there.
C
It's
going
to
be
more
of
a
free-form
meeting
and
we'll
just
we'll
just
kind
of
review
where
we're
at
so
far
and
and
that
kind
of
thing,
the
other
somewhat
minor
thing
I
wanted
to
to
mention,
is
I-
did
open
up
a
security
board
in
in
the
open
feature
open
feature
project
I'll
provide
a
link
to
that.
C
So
these
are
the
repository
requirements
for
for
basically
any
open
feature.
Any
repositories
under
the
open
feature
project,
especially
ones
that
that
want
to
hypothetically,
do
1.0
releases
of
artifacts.
C
These
aren't
arbitrary
they're,
designed
mostly
they're
kind
of
designed,
mostly
considering
the
cncf
tooling,
recommendations
which
are
also
linked
in
in
the
in
the
requirements
page
that
I
just
I
just
put
in
the
docs,
so
I'm
a
lot
of
the.
What
the
security
board
contains
is
collections
of
tasks
to
implement
these
in
various
repositories.
So
it's
things
like
s-bomb
generation,
which
is
particularly
important,
particularly
important.
These
days
for
open
source
projects,
especially
with
supply
chain
attacks
becoming
more
and
more
widespread.
C
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
we're
not
falling
victims
to
any
of
those
and
that
we
have.
We
have
those
things
kind
of
officially
documented,
as
well
as
things
like
dependabot,
slash,
renovate
and
also
some
basic
testing
automated
releasing
releasing
is
something
that,
especially
that
a
lot
of
maintainers.
It
takes
a
lot
of
maintainer
time,
so
we
want
to
do
our
best
to
kind
of
automate
those
things
in
a
consistent
way.
I
know
when
I,
when
there's
release
it
release
issues.
C
It
definitely
slows
me
down
a
lot
trying
to
troubleshoot
them
and
I.
Think
probably
everybody
who's,
a
maintainer
of
one
of
the
SDK
repos,
has
dealt
with
something
like
that
at
some
point,
so
we're
just
trying
to
bring
some
consistency
in
there
and
and
using
cncf
recommended
tools
to
improve
security
as
well,
so
I'm
going
to
continue
to
keep
this
board
up
to
date.
C
If
there's
a
security
related,
CI,
CD,
stuff,
I
suggest
you
use
the
security
label
to
kind
of
collect
them
under
that
under
that
topic,
because
then
we
can
easily
run
queries
against
our
repository
to
see
what
kind
of
security
related
things
we
need
to
do.
Obviously,
not
all
of
the
repo
requirements
are
strictly
about
security,
but
a
lot
of
them
do
kind
of
urge
into
that
that
territory
so
yeah,
that's
those
are
basically
the
two
things
I
wanted
to
to
talk
about
at
a
high
level.
C
We
don't
need
to
go
into
too
much
more
detail.
I
think
there
was
a
point
by
Ben
I,
don't
know
if
you
still
wanted
to
say
something.
Sorry.
D
Yeah
I'll
just
open
it
up.
I
didn't
realize
that
there
was
a
specific
client
meeting
tomorrow.
So
I'm
happy
to
wax
about
that
tomorrow
because
thought
about
it.
A
lot
about
an
opinion
about
now.
I
think
I
agree
with
Justin
so
but
I'll
stop
talking.
C
Foreign
yeah
so
I
mean
that's.
Those
are
the
only
things
I
want
to
mention
I
I
guess
if,
if
there's
nothing
else,
one
one
question
I
I
wanted
to
kind
of
follow
up
on,
and
maybe
I
hope
not
to
put
you
on
the
spot
too
much
David.
But
I
was
wondering.
If
maybe
you
could
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
incubation
process.
I've
been
you've
been
you've,
been
kind
of
creating
issues
and
stuff
like
that.
That
I've
been
trying
to
follow
my
best
and
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
update
us.
B
Yeah,
of
course,
that
was
I
was
actually
gonna,
put
an
item
but
I
wasn't
sure
yeah.
So
the
incubation
proposal,
we've
reported,
we've
forced
the
general
proposal
and
we're
kind
of
following
the
lines
of
obviously
other
projects.
For
now.
A
C
I
guess
we'll
come
back
to
David
because
he
seems
to
have
lost
connection
well
in
in
lieu
of
that.
Does
anybody
have
any
other
topics
before
Oh
my
God
David
he's
back
with
us.
A
B
Are
you
yeah
sorry
about
that
so
yeah,
the
the
incubation
proposal
is,
is
moving
forward.
I
was
saying
we
have
some
parts
which
are
completed.
My
plan
is
now
to
reach
out
to
everyone
who's
listed
as
a
maintainer
for
the
different
sdks
to
kind
of
get
an
advancement
of
what
has
happened
in
each
SDK,
which
one
is
stable.
Oh
sorry,
which
ones
are
stable
and
yeah
that
way
we
have
kind
of
a
full
proposal.
I
think
the
largest
item.
B
That's
still
missing
is
the
future
plans
section
which
I
think
Mike
had
already
brought
this
up,
probably
with
the
governance
board
I'm
at
least
that's
my
last
update.
B
B
Okay,
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
anyone
has
any
questions
or
I
think
yeah
something
else,
we're
still
looking
for
a
sponsor
to
then
get
this
done.
We
haven't
approached
anyone
yet
as
we're
still
completing
the
The
Proposal,
but
we
do
have
some
names
in
mind.
I
think.
C
One
one
of
them
so
back
to
the
governance
board
thing
and
the
future
plans
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
happened
at
the
governance
board
meeting
is
it
got
side
sidetracked
with
a
whole
bunch
of
client
discussion,
which
is
why
why
we
added
a
dedicated
client
meeting
tomorrow
and
why
I
didn't
want
to
have
the
same
thing
happen
here.
I
mean
if
we,
if
we
totally
run
out
of
topics,
maybe
we
can
discuss
a
little
bit
also,
maybe
it's
worth
saving
it
for
tomorrow,
but
I
guess.
C
The
other
thing
I'd
like
to
ask
about
that
is
I
know.
There's
adoption
requirements
and
I
I
also
know
David
that
you've
been
in
contact
with
some
production
users
and
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
give
us
an
update
on
that.
B
Yeah,
so
it
hasn't
been
so
much
myself
as
as
also
Adam,
so
Adam
Gardner
I
think
he
reached
out
to
you.
Justin
he's
reached
out
to
you
other
people.
B
Let
me
just
check
really
quickly
yeah
so
reached
out
also
to
Viet
wired
I,
know
for
sure.
If
I'm
pronouncing
it
correctly,
so
I
asked
forgiveness
has
reached
out
to
Rob,
Crowe
and
I
think
also
John
Rowley.
So
we
we
need
at
least
three
adoption
stories
in
production.
B
In
theory,
we
have
a
little
over
four
or
five
I'm,
not
sure
right
now,
if
the
fifth
one
is
confirmed
but
yeah.
So
ideally
we
adopted
stories.
We
don't
need
a
let's
say,
a
large
description,
it's
mostly
a
link
to
the
company
web
page
and
then
a
small
sentence
just
of
how
this
this
has
been
adopted,
or
let's
say
some
comments
coming
from
the
company
that
adopted
the
technology.
F
Sorry
to
jump
in
there
So.
Eventually,
we
will
need
more
I
think
we
can
sort
the
stories
in
there
for
the
for
the
document,
but
then
people
will
be
invited
to
join
a
dedicated
meeting
on
their
adoption.
C
F
So
somebody
from
the
TSC
there's,
usually
one
or
two
TUC
members
who
more
or
less
have
a
private
meeting
private
in
the
sense
of
the
none
of
the
project.
Members
are
joining
the
meeting,
so
we
should
also
have
names
and
people
who
would
be
willing
to
to
speak
about
the
project.
So
it's
a
bit
more
effort
for
them.
So
usually
it's
like
a
half
an
hour
interview
covering
questions.
Well,
how
are
they
using
the
project,
what
they
like?
What
I
think
the
project
should
improve?
F
C
F
From
from
my
experience,
I
think
we
really
should
wait
how
we
move
along
with
the
due
diligence
Pro
process,
because
this
can
actually
take
quite
some
time
and
in
some
cases
it
then
gets
frustrating,
because
you're
lining
up
meetings
with
people
and
then
they
keep
getting
delayed
or
in
some
cases
and
other
people
kind
of
move
on.
So
I
would
wait
until
we
have
at
least
a
TUC
sponsor
assigned
and
then
I
would
start
those
discussions
and
try
to
get
the
end.
User
interviews
usually
scheduled.
Rather
sooner
than
later,
honestly,
foreign.
F
C
C
You
know,
formalizing
those
those
things
and
making
meetings
about
them
and
that
that
kind
of
thing,
even
if
that's
the
case,
I,
think
that
we
still
need
to
keep
track
of
who
our
production
users
are
somewhere
and
make
somebody
responsible
for
that,
so
that
when
we
need
to
have
those
meetings-
and
we
need
to
create
that
documentation,
we
have
a
list
of
people.
C
So
yeah
I
mean,
if
you,
if
anybody
here
knows
of
production,
use
cases
that
you
know
that
we're
not
aware
of
please
like
Ping,
somebody
on
the
governance
board,
ping,
myself
or
somebody
else
in
the
technical
steering
committee,
because
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
keep
track
of
these
users
at
least
so
that
when
they,
when
the
time
comes,
that
we
need
to
document
the
stuff,
we
need
to
have
these
meetings.
We
know
who
they
are.
C
C
F
I
think
it
might
also
get
easier
honestly
once
we
reach
really
incubation
stage,
because
then
we
can
have
a
dedicated
project
meeting
at
like
kubecon
and
other
kind
of
things,
I
mean
nothing
is
holding
us
back
from
doing
one,
but
we
won't
just
get
any
sponsored
space
from
from
the
cncs.
Obviously,
I
have
seen
this
in
another
project
we
had.
F
C
Okay,
I
guess
kind
of
kind
of
so
far,
a
short
one
today,
so
I'll
open
it
up
to
any
other
topics
anybody
wants
to
mention.
Like
I
said
we
have
a
dedicated
client
meeting
tomorrow,
so
I'd
recommend.
E
C
Don't
spend
too
much
time
talking
about
that,
but
I'll
open
the
floor
up
to
anybody
who
wants
to
drop
more
topics
in.
G
G
I
I
clicked
the
button
to
analyze
the
Java
repository
like
during
this
meeting,
because
I
saw
it
on
the
security
list,
so
I
am
concurrently.
Listening
in
and
fixing
up
some
of
the
generic
issues
that
it
is
highlighted.
C
Okay,
well,
it
might
be
a
short
and
sweet
one
today,
unless
somebody
wants
to
unless
somebody
wants
to
bring
any
other
topics
up.
Maybe.
B
One
question
could
be
if
we
want
to
try
and
put
in
a
a
proposal
for
the
LFX
mentorship
I
thought
I
thought
they
sent
out
the
the
emails
for
project
proposals,
so
there's
I
think
about
a
week
and
a
half
still
time
to
do
this.
To
also
share
this.
B
B
Oh,
the
question
is:
if
we
want
to,
if
we
want
to
participate,
for
example,
in
Google
summer
code,
we
need
at
least
two
people
that
let's
say,
do
the
admin
work
and
then
the
ideas
you
have
usually
mentors
that
help
the
mentees
go
through
their
projects,
but
I'm,
not
sure.
If
anyone
else
has
already
participated
in
the
past.
B
B
I
think
one
final
update
on
my
side
is
yeah.
There
will
also
be
soon
the
the
form
for
the
kiosk
kubecon
EU.
So
once
once
that's
out.
I'll
also
put
that
in
the
next
agenda.
A
D
Yeah
I
I
might
jump
on
the
train
yeah.
D
So
yeah,
if
I'm
there
I'll
definitely
be
happy
to
yeah
yeah
sore
throat
standing
in
an
overly
air.
C
Conditioning
conference
room
it'd
be
good
to
see,
you
see
you
in
person,
maybe
we
should
do
we
do
we
have
a
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
I
think
we
used
to
have
a
coupon
Channel
like
a
kubecon,
open
featured
Channel.
Maybe
we
can
revive
that
or
create
a
new
one
yeah.
There
is
an
open
feature.
Kubecon.
C
Yeah,
so
it's
it's
open
feature
Dash
kubecon
in
the
cncf
slack,
which
we
used,
we've
used
a
number
of
time
or
times
around
other
kubecon.
So
you
can
go
ahead
and
yeah
there.
You
go
I,
see
Dan
O'brien!
Is
there
now?
So
if
you,
if
you're,
especially
if
you're
going
to
be
a
coupon
you
you
might
want
to
join
that
channel
just
so,
we
can
sync
up
and
then
yeah
and
a
little
bit
after
that
we'll
be
another
coupon
na.
F
G
Is
there
something
that,
in
relation
that
you
would
like
us
to
report
against
like
I'm,
happy
to
talk
about
what's
going
on
in
the
Java
SDK,
but
there's
not
a
ton
going
on
in
the
Java
SDK
and
if
there's
a
sdks
I
guess
we
can
like
report
against
the
security
board?
That's
one
like
how.
F
F
I
think
I
believe
one
of
obviously
of
the
this
approach
that
should
have
I
have
wood
in
it,
so
I
think
it's
just
what's
currently
going
on
and
what
you
would
like
to
work
on
and
maybe
would
need
support
kind
of
need.
Support
on
maybe
I've
been
working.
Quite
it
almost
felt
like
after
1.0,
everybody
was
like
super
happy
with
the
1.0
release,
but
yeah
I
think.
Maybe
that's
also
done
something
tough
for
the
rest
of
the
technical
committee
to
decide
on
like.
When
are
we
going
to
cut
the
next
release?
C
Well,
we've
had
releases
of
sdks
subsequently,
like
we
just
did
1.1
of.net
yesterday,
there's
probably
going
to
be
a
1.1
of
almost
every
1.0
SDK,
just
for
just
for
some
minor
stuff.
It's
nothing
crazy,
but
the
next
big
thing
is
client
support
and,
though
that
won't
implicate
I,
don't
think
that
will
really
implicate
any
of
the
existing
sdks.
C
We
have
to
talk
about
how
we're
going
to
actually
implement
the
JavaScript
SDK
for
client
support,
but
I
think
like
it
could
mean
a
kotlin
SDK
Spotify
May
donate
a
swift
SDK.
So
that's
that's.
What's
really
implicated
in
the
client
discussion,
I
think
as
far
as
I
know
and
that
that's
a
bit
predictive
a
bit
of
a
guess,
because
the
spec
is
not
complete
but
I.
Think
that's
that's
really
where,
from
a
specification,
SDK
standpoint
I
think
we're
going
to
spend
some
energy
in
the
near
future.