►
From YouTube: ORI FPGA Meetup 29 November 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
What
we
are
planning
to
do
over
the
next
week,
what
kind
of
things
we
need
in
order
to
do
this
work
and
if
we
have
any
roadblocks
anything,
that's
that's
kind
of
blocking
our
way
and
I
will
turn
it
over
to
James
to
give
a
brief
report
I've,
not
coordinated
the
move,
moving
of
the
lab
equipment
yet,
but
I
will
really
soon.
So
just
just
wanted
to.
Let
you
know
about
that.
But
but
anyway
you
have
the
floor
because
I
know
that
you
have
some
classes
to
get
to.
C
Thank
you.
Excuse
me
just
one
moment:
apologies
for
that
my
dog
saw
a
truck
go
down
across
the
street
and
that
he
decided
that
the
entire
household
needed
to
be
alerted
we're
doing
fairly.
Well
we're
continuing
our
work
in
moving
things
up
and
pairing
things
around.
Only
Roblox
lately
has
been
the
weather
has
been
less
Cooperative
to
some
of
our
work,
nothing
that
would
damage
any
equipment.
It's
just
been
more
rainy
recently,
but
we're
still
getting
more
work
done
and
we're
not
in
a
terrible
need
of
assistance.
Currently.
B
Awesome,
thank
you.
I
should
have
some
some
more
information
for
you
over
the
next
week
now
that
we're
back
from
from
all
the
Thanksgiving
Festival
festivities
here
in
the
the
U.S
kind
of
a
big
holiday.
So
thank
you
so
much.
Okay
and
ever
East.
You
have
the
you
have
the
floor.
D
Okay,
just
a
quick
update
of
what
I
did
I
mainly
played
with
dvb
GSC
and
I
use
right
now,
the
disencapsulator
from
done
he,
he
A4
GPZ,
who
has
developed,
BB
BB
frame
to
IP
the
fragment
the
dvbjc
in
the
rest
language.
So
it's
a
good
start.
D
El17170,
which
is
dvb
GS,
encapsulator,
professional
and
I,
try
to
study
if
there
is
some
Corner
cases
and
I
want
to
well
understand
all
the
all
the
protocol
before
implementing
it
on
the
modulator.
Well,
that's
it.
A
Okay,
we
have
been
working
on
the
Cobbs
decoder,
making
good
progress.
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
the
behaviors
are
nailed
down
now
we're
at
the
point
where
we
need
more
automated
testing
and
we're
almost
ready
to
start
running
a
bunch
of
that
I've
created
a
an
automated
test,
Vector
generator
program,
it's
a
yet
another
Jupiter
notebook
in
Python
and
a
second
python
notebook
that
takes
the
output
from
the
simulation
and
checks
to
see
whether
the
decoded
frames
are
the
same
ones.
A
We
use
to
generate
the
test
vectors
that
was
completed
last
night
and
is
ready
to
have
its
first
test
anytime
now
so
maybe
today
and
then
we'll
be
ready
to
turn
up
the
number
of
frames
per
test,
and
this
is
kind
of
a
a
big
milestone
for
the
Cobbs
decoder.
A
If
it
passes
a
bunch
of
randomly
generated
tests
with
handshake
signals
being
stressed,
then
it'll
be
ready
to
move
on
to
the
next
step,
which
would
be
integrating
it
into
with
the
actual
decoder
and
or
maybe
with
some
axi
blocks
for
further
exercise
before
you
integrate
it.
We
haven't
decided
which
path
to
take
on
that,
but
there
we
are
we're
just
about
ready.
A
This
cops
has
been
kind
of
a
diversion
from
from
the
mainstream
of
of
getting
things
tested
for
the
decoder,
but
I
think
it'll
make
actual
testing
the
decoder,
much
less
frustrating
and
more
automatable
and
more
reliable,
and
so
it's
been
worth
it
and
it's
been
very
fun
that
we
learned
a
lot
about
the
HDL
and
testing
and
axi
and
all
that
stuff.
That's
in
there.
So
that's
where
it's
at
while
I've
got
the
floor.
I'll
mention
there's
nothing
much
to
say
about
the
remote
lab
here.
It's
cranking
along.
A
Oh
one
thing
we
discovered
Michelle
discovered
that
if
you
leave
your
SSH
Keys
lying
around
on
GitHub
for
a
year
without
using
the
log
onto
GitHub,
then
and
GitHub
expires
them,
and
this
is
a
potential
problem
for
the
remote
lab,
because
we
use
the
SSH
Keys
stored
on
GitHub
too
authenticate
access
to
the
Nevada
floating
license.
A
E
A
That
you
need
to
update
the
keys,
then
all
the
keys
that
were
there
before
will
be
wiped
out
as
part
of
the
update
if
they've
been
expired
by
GitHub.
So
I
added
a
few
words
about
this
to
the
document
on
working
with
fpgas
for
his
future.
But
if
anybody
ends
up
needing
to
solve
this
problem,
then
we
know
what's
going
on
and
we
can
help,
hopefully
we'll
get
in
the
get
in
the
loop
and
and
stop
anybody
from
making
a
damaging
update.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
so
much.
It
was
a.
It
was
an
interesting
experience
to
not
be
able
to
check
out
the
license.
What
what
it,
what
it
looked
like
was
that
synthesis
failed
over
on
karapi
for
some
HDL
coder
work.
So
what
we'd
like
to
do
is
take
Fred,
Harris's,
really
wonderful,
polyphase,
channelizer
work,
that's
in
Matlab
and
convert
that
into
vhdl
human
readable
vhdl,
using
the
tools
that
we
currently
have
access
to,
and
so
learning
how
to
do.
B
Hdl
coder
revealed
that
the
the
floating
license
couldn't
be
assigned
because
my
keys
had
expired,
so
anybody
that
got
got
involved
with
remote
lab
around
the
same
time
that
I
did.
This
is
probably
something
that
that
will
happen
to
you.
But
if
you're,
if
you're
just
using
the
same
VM
that
you've
always
used,
then
then
you
won't
notice
right
away.
So
the
reason
why
it
was
obvious
to
me
was
because
I
was
using
a
different
VM.
B
So
hey
there's,
never
a
shortage
of
things
to
learn
about
remote
work
and
access
and
the
internet.
So
it
was.
We
got
it
under
control,
but
but
just
a
heads
up
to
anybody
that
wants
to
use
remote
Labs.
The
way
that
we
do
it
is
with
SSH
keys
on
GitHub,
and
if
those
aren't
used
to
log
into
GitHub,
then
they
don't
consider
it
to
be
active
and
they'll
expire
them
in
a
year
with
the
HDL
coder
stuff.
B
There's
a
lot
going
on
there,
so
we're
trying
to
take
full
advantage
of
what
the
of
that
Tool
to
produce
as
much
work
as
possible,
and
it's
it's
a
very
powerful
tool.
What
I'm
I'm
doing
on
for
on
my
end
is
trying
to
get
a
class
with
with
Adam
Taylor,
who
does
a
lot
of
fpga
classes
and
trying
to
put
together
a
class
for
the
open
source
community
that
addresses
space.
B
You
know
working
a
vhdl
and
and
other
fpga
work
for
space
applications,
because
we
need
higher
reliability
and
there
are
some
concerns
and
some
things
that
you
can
do
in
your
approach
to
fpga
work,
to
make
it
more
reliable.
So
I
think
this
would
be
a
great
class
for
us
to
to
support
and
try
to
develop.
And
so
that's
we're
in
the
initial
stages
of
trying
to
work
that
out
and
and
trying
to
bring
that
to
the
open
Community.
This
is
a
class
that
that
he
does
for
companies
currently.
B
B
I'll
I'll
work
as
hard
as
I
can
to
make
that
happen
and
and
get
it
up
and
running
as
as
quickly
as
possible,
we'll
be
doing
some
travel
in
mid-December
early,
mid
December,
so
I'll
be
gone
from
the
6th
through
the
9th
of
December
to
Washington
DC,
for
this
is
for
the
FCC
Tac
meeting
that
is
the
end
of
the
year
and
we'll
be
presenting
our
final
reports
and
talking
to
all
sorts
of
different
people
about
open
source
and
amateur
radio.
B
Yes,
now
I'm
muted,
it's
the
song
of
our
people;
okay,
no,
we
are.
We
have
another
resource
for
layout,
so
if
you're
interested
in
RF
layout,
we
have
at
least
one
other
person
who's
available.
That's
spinning,
they're
spinning
up
to
do
it.
So
that's
the
good
news
for
you
and
just
looking
for
any
any
way
to
help
I.
E
Think
my
mic
works
now:
oh,
go
ahead!
Okay,
cool
sorry
about
that!
I
was
on
another
device
with
more
flaky
Hardware,
so
yeah
I,
actually
I
bought
some
some
receiving
Hardware
last
week.
So
I
bought
the
two.
The
two
cards
that
were
in
the
GitHub
repo
and
I
also
bought
I.
Think
I,
don't
remember
the
exact
name,
but
one
of
the
the
mini
tuner,
the
one
that
like
was
available
on
that
store
that
it
could
just
buy
like
pre-made,
because
I'm
not
up
for
an
adventure
with
getting
that
soldered.
E
So
that
is
all
of
that
is
on
the
way
and
I'm
going
to
be
looking
I'm
going
to
finish
up
looking
at
parts
for
like
all
the
all
the
up
converter
parts
so
like
local
oscillator
frequency
frequency
frequency
synthesizer.
If
I
can
pronounce
correctly
and
also
like
the
mixer
and
all
of
that
I'm
not
going
to
look
at
the
power
amplifier
this
time
around
and
yeah
I
think
yeah.
Also
another
thing
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
try
and
try
and
find
a
a
way
to
down
convert
it.
E
E
B
E
B
B
E
Because,
like
we're,
we're
because
like
if
I
have
some
Dev
boards
that
are
doing
like
expand
up
that
have
X-Men,
then
it
would
be
a
bit
like
difficult
for
me
to
get
the
expand
signal
to
somewhere,
where
I
can
analyze
it.
So
that,
like
that,
that
would
be
the
issue
if
I
yeah
I
I
mean,
is
that
would
there
be
a
way
like
sort
of
just
like
sending
stuff
over.
C
A
Play
back
here
at
the
lab,
we
can
attempt
to
do
that.
All
the
details
are
gonna.
You
have
to
be
figured
out.
A
E
Yeah
the
thing
I'm,
the
thing
I
was
wondering
is
I:
I
want
to
test
up,
I
want
to
test
up
conversion
to
expand
so
either,
but,
let's
say
10
gigahertz
notional.
A
and
I
want
to
look
at
what
what
the
output
of
the?
What
are?
The
output
of
the
up
converter
looks
like
this
in
the
Spectrum
analyzer
to
make
sure
that
there
aren't
that,
like
the
spectral,
Purity
is
good
enough
and
is
not
going
to
like
get
The
Regulators
angry
at
us,
because
the
emission's
not
okay,.
B
C
E
Yeah
I
mean
I
mean
for
harmonics,
like
we
can
just
put
a
low
pass.
Filter,
I
was
more
thinking
of
like
or
like
side.
Bands
like
like
the
signal
is
gonna
normally
take
up
like
whatever
10
10,
megahertz
or
whatever,
but
I
was
I
was
just
wanting
to
make
sure
that,
like
past
the
past,
like
that,
it
means
like
the
emission
masks.
E
E
B
B
Okay
and
there's
tons
of
other
stuff
going
on
so
we'll
we'll
meet
back
up
on
slack
and
I'll.
I'll
turn
it
over
to
anybody
that
has
any
final
comments
or
questions.
Concerns
needs
resources
any
anything
at
all.
D
Just
to
quick
question
I
have
to
review
the
country.
Remember
if
it
is
the
downstream
or
the
Upstream,
which
means
on
the
modulator.
What
is
planned
to
do?
D
Is
it
a
multi
input
stream,
which
means
there
is
several
stream
in
the
dvbs2
dvb
GST,
or
is
it
only
some
mod
code
which
is
changing
depending
on
the
on
the
efficiency
link
where,
where
can
I
find
this
document
which
describe
what
exactly
we
need
on
the
DBS
2
in
color
and
what
is
the
dynamic?
Well,
what's
the
par
the
parameters?
D
Well,
what
could
be
dynamic?
Which
means
is
it
just
the
mod
code
which
is
adapt
from
from
the
link?
If
the
link
is
not
enough,
then
we
can
increase
the
FEC.
Do
we
need
multiple
stream
in
the
same
in
the
same
moderation?
B
D
B
Is
an
article
about
adaptive,
coding
and
modulation
the
way
that
we
want
to
do
it-
and
this
was
in
amsat
DL
Journal
a
while
back
and
I
can
share
that
with
you.
It's
it's
in
the
repo,
but
it's
kind
of
sprawling
everything's
a
little.
B
C
B
E
B
It
and
yes,
it's
exactly
like
what
you've
said
so
the
what
we're
doing
is
we're
looking
at
the
link
quality
and
if
you
need
a
better
mod
Cod,
then
we
give
it
to
you
and
then
what
we
do
on
the
transponder
is
that
everybody
that
that
is
the
same
type
of
mod
Cod
goes
into
that
particular
frame.
So
there's
some
multiplexing
that
we're
doing
and
quality
of
service
decisions
that
we're
making.
But
it's
it's
to
give.
B
You
know
the
best
performance
possible
based
on
the
challenges
that
people
have
with
the
the
link
quality
based
on
SNR,
so
so
pretty
straightforward.
Acm
is
what
we're
thinking
about
and
what
we'll
do
to
implement
that
for
an
end-to-end
test.
So
getting
the
encoder
working,
you
know
getting
the
transmitter
working
is
one
part
of
it
and
getting
the
Uplink
working
and
then
deciding
how
to
put
that
information
into
the
downlink.
All
of
that
is
is
very
important,
so
so
it's
pretty
straightforward,
ACM
to
start
out
where
okay.
D
B
D
What
and
have
you
already
choose
the
the
where
the
feedback,
what
what
is
the
the
method
of
the
written?
D
Well,
if
a
client
has
has
not
enough,
is
enough,
because
he
has
a
little
dish,
for
example,
yeah
how
how
he
sends
it
to
to
the
transmitter?
Yes,
yes
or
another
protocol,
the.
B
Uplink
is
a
a
dedicated
protocol,
so
the
Uplink
is
opulent
voice
protocol
and
then
the
downlink
of
course,
is
dvb
S2.
So
the.
D
Yeah,
but
but
for
the
for
the
quality,
which
means
how
do
you
yeah
the
SNL?
Okay,
there
is
a
client
which
has
a
little
SNR
I
want
to
have
more
robust
mod
code.
How
is
how
it
he
sent
it
to
to
the
transponder?
Is
it
by
by
the
protocol
the
protocol?
Sorry,
the
protocol
you
mentioned
well.
E
D
Maybe
it
is
described
on
the
document,
so
I
can
read
it
and
and
be
more
comfortable
with
that.
Yeah.
B
Yeah,
it's
it's
based
on
SNR,
so
we
want
to
support
all
different
types
of
stations,
so
a
station
that
has
like
a
small
dish
or
a
station
that
has
a
large
dish,
but
it
happens
to
have
a
pointing
error,
is
in
the
same
trouble
right
yeah,
you
know
low
SNR
and
what
we
want
is
the
link
to
adapt
to
that,
to
give
you
the
best
possible
way
to
complete
the
link,
so
yeah
I'll
send
send
you
the
document
and-
and
it's
also
in
the
the
main
architecture
document.
B
But
not
you
know
it's
mentioned
in
the
the
in
our
architecture,
but
yeah
I'll.
Send
that
send
that
to
you
it's
a
the
first
first
step
for
us
for
end
to
end
is
to
is
to
get
anything
working.
You
know
so
a
fixed
mod
Cod.
C
B
Be
the
first
thing:
that's
what
kind
of
what
we're
working
with
now
so
and
later
on,
with
with
all
of
with
everybody
helping,
then
we
add
in
the
functionality
that
that
looks
at
signal
to
noise
ratio
and
then
says
you
need
this
mod
cod.
In
order
to
close
the
link
in
the
in
the
article
for
amsat
DL
a
journal,
we
picked
a
subset,
so
we
we
picked
high
points
across
the
the
whole
Spectrum,
the
five
different,
mod
cods
and
said.
Okay.
This
is
good
enough
to
start
out
with.
B
So
instead
of
supporting
every
single,
solitary,
mod,
Cod
I
think
we
picked
out
like
five
and
and
said
okay,
so
so
this
would
be
a
good
place
to
start.
B
So
it
gives
you
very
low
SNR
all
the
way
up
to
pretty
good
SNR
for
an
amateur
station,
and-
and
if
you
do
those,
then
you
can
see
that
the
difference
between
them
is
a
reasonable
DB
jump
in
SNR,
and
it
will
keep
you
from
from
vacillating
from
oscillating
back
and
forth,
which
is
can
be
a
problem
with
ACM,
where,
if
the
steps
are
too
small,
then
it
it
right.
You
know
it.
B
Wanders
around
and
and
you
have
a
lot
of
extra
frames,
so
so
we
want
the
resolution
to
be
appropriate
for
our
particular
application,
and
we
may
not
know
until
we
actually
get
some
some
real
world
experience,
how
how
mentee,
how
many
different
levels
are
going
to
work
well
for
us,
you
know
because
we
don't
want
to
have
empty
sets
of
frames
going
out
and
we
also
don't
want
to
make
people
wait
and
lose
lose
lock
or
signal.
B
A
Well,
a
couple
one
is
I:
don't
think
that
the
details
that
you
may
be
looking
for
every
have
actually
been
written
down
packet
formats
and
protocols
and
exactly
what
the
procedures
are
for
getting
this
ACM
to
work.
We
have
ideas
and
intentions,
but
not
a
detailed
design
at
this
point
that
I.
As
far
as
I'm
aware
yeah.
B
We
only
we
only
have
like
the
SNR
levels
to
switch
between
the
different
mod
cods.
You
know
so
a
table
essentially
like
for
this
for
this
level
of
SNR
use
this
mod
Cod
and
for
this
use
that
and
that's
as
far
as
we've
gotten
so
far,
because
without
a
actual
end-to-end
system
working,
that's
really.
As
far
as
you
can
go,
you
can
design
something,
that's
very
complicated
or
very
simple,
but
when
you,
when
you
actually
start.
D
Okay,
so
as
far
as
I
understand
they,
the
the
the
stream
is
the
same
mod
code
for
everyone,
which
means
that
there
is
no
multiple
input
stream,
because
it's
possible
in
dvbs2
like,
for
example,
this
stream
is
a
Qs.
Well,
depending
on
the
Qs
you
can.
You
can
have
a
mod
code
for
high
priority.
Well,
just
thinking
that
this
particular
content
is
very
important.
D
So
you
you
will
try
some
mod
code
with
a
lot
of
check
error
and
on
the
other
way,
you
need
more
bandwidths,
but
there
is
less
error.
So
there
is
multiple
stream
on
that
and
there
is
a
different
mod
code.
Yeah.
B
B
What
we've
talked
about
a
couple
of
times,
is
that
if
there's,
if
the
capacity
of
the
system
is
not
full,
if
you
have-
and
you
know
it's
a
fairly
large
capacity
system
that
we're
talking
about-
let's
say
the
capacity
of
the
system
is
a
hundred
simultaneous
users,
and
you
only
have
30.,
then
you
can
give
them
all
Maximum
coding
and
modulation.
You
can
make
sure
that
that
even
the
smallest
station
can
receive
everything
and
then,
as
you,
if
you
filled
it,
started
filling
it
up.
B
Then
you'd
have
to
start
making
some
decisions
about
who
gets
what
and
when.
So
some
people
may
only
get
certain
amounts
of
traffic
if
it
was
really
really
full.
So
we
would
like
to
make
sure
that
everybody
can
hear
everything
as
much
as
possible
and
beyond
that
you
would
have
to
start
making
these
sorts
of
decisions
to
where
okay.
B
A
For
instance,
you
might
say
that
okay,
all
voice
is
going
to
be
transmitted
at
a
certain
mod
code
and
if
you
want
to
be
able
to
receive
that
you'd
better
have
a
reliable
ground
station
at
that
dish
size
to
be
able
to
receive
that
in
that
way,
you'd
be
able
to
dial
in
whatever
voice
conversation
was
going
on
and
I
I
think
that's
reasonable
for
a
certain
type
of
service,
which
is
the
primary
one
for
ham
radio
uses
where
everybody
might
want
to
dial
into
any
conversation.
A
I
think
we're
probably
aiming
in
my
opinion
anyway,
we're
aiming
at
something
a
little
bit
less
than
ACM,
because
we
can't
close
the
loop,
because
we
want
not
only
everybody
in
the
conversation,
but
everybody
monitoring
the
conversation
to
be
able
to
hear,
and
they
can't
all
be
giving
continuous
feedback
to
the
satellite,
as
that
would
be
probably
impractical
and
certainly
inefficient.
A
So
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
details
here
that
need
to
be
figured
out
and
we
want
to
keep
in
mind
what
the
use
case
is
for
the
for
the
actual
users
and
make
it
a
pleasant
experience
for
for
the
majority
of
people
who
have
lesser
equipment
to
be
able
to
have
conversations,
preferably
multi-way
conversations,
preferably
anybody
without
prayer,
Arrangement,
yeah.
B
And
people
with
weather,
you
know,
weather
conditions,
environmental
conditions,
equipment
conditions,
pointing
all
of
these
things
can
affect
the
reception
and
transmission
yeah.
A
And
if,
if
you're
in
a
disadvantaged
location
or
you're
just
managed,
you
know
you
get
weather
above
you
that
causes
a
disadvantage,
maybe
that's
just
too
bad.
We
can't
possibly
close
every
link
yep.
B
But
we
can
try,
because
ACM
is
so
neat,
so
we
can
make
it
as
automated
as
possible
and
then
be
smart
about
the
overall
system,
design
that
it's
it's
going
to
try
to
prioritize
Communications
as
much
as
possible
and
then
start
spreading
people
out.
You
know
like
okay,
your
station
is
now
capable
of
maybe
text
or
or
file.
You
know
slow
file
transmission,
but
Voice
May
drop
out
for
you.
B
If
enough
people
are
on
board-
and
this
is
in
in
some
sense
this
is
Superior
because
you
you're
gonna
have
more
people
being
able
to
use
it
than
would
use
it
without
the
the
digital
error
correction.
So
these.
B
Talked
about
for
a
while,
you
know
so,
but
we
we're
only
now
getting
to
the
point
where
we're
able
to
start
writing
the
code
or
or
making
the
decisions
based
on
the
actual
Hardware
achievement.
So
the
hardware
being
capable
of
doing
this
stuff
then
allows
these
ideas
to
be
tested,
so
so
far,
they're
just
ideas
and
pseudocode
and
and
some
papers,
and
now
it's
very
exciting
because
we
as
soon
as
we
have
Hardware
that's
capable
of
transmitting
and
and
and
doing
ACM.
B
D
Okay,
thanks
for
all
the
details,
I
think
that
more
and
more
we
go
forward
than
we.
We
need
to
well
some
some
details
before
is
well.
We
need
more
and
more
details
on
that,
because
I
I
understand
the
the
global
strategy,
but
as
soon
as
well,
I
begin
to
I'll
try
to
send
different
mod
codes
and
try
now
IP
dvgb
dbb
GAC.
D
There
is
a
lot
of
strategy
to
to
achieve
on
that.
That's.
B
B
So
we'll
we'll
do
all
that
we
can
to
answer
all
the
questions
and
put
out
actual
designs
instead
of
just
desires
and-
and
you
know,
architectures
and
high
level
talk,
that's
great
and
you
have
to
do
that
part,
but
the
the
real.
The
real
thing
is
the
working
code
that
implements
it
over
the
air
to
me
anyway.
That's
my
my
opinion.
That's
what's
most
important,
so
we're.
D
As
soon
as
I
understand,
all
the
all
the
the
the
all
the
strategies
done
in
the
transponder
so
on
the
satellite
itself
right
yeah,
the
the
maybe
your
first
step-
is
to
have
this
strategy
on
the
ground
station
on
a
nap
links
ground
station.
D
Well,
if,
if
I'd
like
to
test
it,
for
example,
on
the
Q100,
then
I
I
try
to
well
maybe
get
some
uplink
from
the
satellite
then
receive
all
that
and
then
Uplink
the
dvbs2
and
which
could
be
received,
which
means
that
it's
a
simulation
of
the
of
an
automatic
transponder,
but
it's
on
the
on
the
ground.
So
it's
easier
to
test
yeah.
B
D
B
B
Yeah,
we
might
not
have
the
meeting
next
week
because
we'll
be
traveling
to
Washington
DC
for
the
FCC
meeting,
so
just
keep
an
eye
out
on
slack,
I
might
have
Steve
Conklin
or
one
of
the
other
or
Keith
wheeler
might
might
be
able
to
host,
since
he's
going
to
be
instrumental
in
board
layout
for
a
well
we're
hoping
for
a
low-cost
version
of
an
SDR
that
might
work
for
for
ground
station,
so
so
keep
an
eye
out
for
that
I'll.
B
Try
to
make
sure
that
that's
set
up
and
if
not
then
we'll
see
you
in
two
weeks
and
we'll
have
plenty
to
report
from
from
the
FCC
lots
of
feedback
on
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
over
the
past
year
on
open
source
advocacy
in
the
regulatory
process.
All
right
thanks,
everybody
see
you
on
slot
bye-bye.