►
From YouTube: Open Source Antibiotics Science Update July 16th 2021
Description
Weekly open project meeting for Open Source Antibiotics Series 2.
Full Project: https://github.com/opensourceantibiotics/Series-2-Diarylimidazoles
Relevant GitHub Issue: https://github.com/opensourceantibiotics/Series-2-Diarylimidazoles/issues/82
On the call: Professor Matthew Todd, Dr Dana Klug, Dr Edwin Tse, Giada Sabatino, Alex Vaideanu (UCL), Prof Lee Graves (UNC Chapel Hill), Dr Flavio Emery (University of Sao Paulo), Dr Quillon Simpson (NEU), Anthony Sama (Citizen Scientist), Dr Chris Swain (Cambridge Medchem Consulting)
A
Okay,
all
right,
hi,
everybody,
it's
open,
source,
antibiotics
series,
2
meeting
on
friday,
the
16th
of
july,
and
I
will
share
screen
to
put
up
the
agenda
and
stuff
which
is
hopefully
this
guy.
A
Okay
and
we've
got
a
few
things
to
do
today.
One
is
to
run
through
some
of
the
admin
data
that
we
had
last
time
and
where
we've
now
got
some
log
d
data,
I
think
so
we
can.
We
can
write
through
that
in
just
a
second
and
also
going
to
hopefully
get
chemistry
updates
from
various
people
and
asked
alex
to
come
along
and
just
say
a
few
final
words,
hopefully
about
the
talks
and
lee
is
joining
us
to
talk
about
plans
for
the
mechanism
of
action.
A
Experiments
so
lots
to
do
anyone
want
to
go
first
lee,
I
guess,
did
you
want
to
say
something
about
mechanism
of
action,
because
we
we
came
back
to
you
with
some
requests
about
experiments.
We
could
do
based
on
latest
data
just
to
go
just
to
just
to
reiterate
what
I
said
on
the
email
we
have
been
measuring,
potency
versus
mrsa
and
toxicity
and
alex's
on.
A
We
were
very
interested
in
trying
to
find
out
mechanism
of
action
stuff
and,
and
the
idea
rose
the
you
know
what,
if
the
target
is
also
mammalian
human,
is
there
a
way
that
the
experiments,
if
we
did
them
on
on
a
mrsa
experiment,
and
I'm
a
malian
cell
line,
that
we
could
maybe
extract
some
information
about
that
to
see?
If
indeed
there
is
a
human
target?
A
I
guess
that's
where
we
were
at.
We
also
haven't
yet
identified
a
compound
as
better
than
the
ones
we
sent
you
the
positive
and
the
negative
control,
and
so
I
guess
we
wanted
to
talk
about
whether
you
needed
more
compound
and
and
what
the
plan
was.
Are
you
happy
to
just
just
update
us
and
tell
us
what
what
what
gives.
B
Yeah,
so
you
know,
I
don't
remember
what
we
left
off
with
as
the
most
promising
targets.
You
know,
we've
been
reevaluating,
a
lot
of
our
mass
spec
runs
over
the
last
year.
We
realized
we've
been
dealing
a
little
bit
with
the
detergent
contamination
that
has
sort
of
suppressed
some
of
our
signals.
B
Yet
I
think
that's
that's
where
I
feel
like
you
know
we
we
we
need
to
go
though,
and-
and
I
I
feel
like
there
were
some-
what
looked
like
some
pretty
promising
hits
from
the
first
set.
I
don't
know
what
other
people
have
if
anyone
else
has
followed
up
on
some
of
those
things
it's
been
a
while,
since
I
connected
with
you
guys.
A
Yeah
I
mean
we
were,
I
think
you
know
we
giardia
was
on
the
call,
was
doing
a
little
bit
of
modeling
on
looking
at
some
of
these
and
we
were.
We
were
looking
into
them
a
little
bit.
I
guess,
but
we
we
left
it.
I
think
where
you
were
gonna,
I
mean
last.
C
We
got
reports
back
about
lithuania
right
that
the
talk
scaled
with
devoted
z2,
so
I
don't
know
if
I
wrote
this
concern
a
while
ago.
We
don't
even
know
maybe
if
the
target's
even
protein
it
could.
Theoretically
we
could
have
theoretically
had
it
could
have
a
dna
binding
agent.
B
Well,
it
would
be
a
lot
easier
for
us
to
do
these
studies
in
a
human
cell
line,
because
we
don't
have
good
access
to
mrsa
samples.
I
had
to
go
to
a
lab
next
door
and
get
those
if,
if
there
are,
if
there's
a
great
interest
in
a
human
target
potential
off
target,
we
could
certainly
do
that
in
293
cells
and
we
have
a
very
well-established
kind
of
profile
in
293
cells.
A
D
F
I've
only
been
doing
stuff
in
heck.
I
think
we've
discussed
before
that.
Other
people
are
doing
other
cell
lines.
E
D
A
C
Would
it
be
possible
to
look
for
like
dna
damage
up
regulation
like
atm
and
stuff
like
that
to
see
if
what
we're
dealing
with
is
a
strand
susan
agent
versus
an
actual
protein?
You
know
kinase
inhibitor,.
B
We
have
assays
where
we
blot
for
dna
damage
markers
pretty
frequently
yeah
that
wouldn't
be
hard
to
do.
I
don't
know
someone
else
may
have
the
same
assays
running
in
their
lab
yeah.
B
B
A
A
A
Right
they
may
not
have
the
ones
we
sent
to
you.
I
don't
know
we
can
we
can
catch
up
by
email,
but
based
on
the
just
on
the
last
samples
we
sent.
I
guess
we
just
wondered
if
there
was
enough
leftover
yeah,
my
tech
this
morning,
on
that
all
right,
all
right,
great,
thank
you,
and
I
mean,
if
you
know,
I'm
just
thinking
about
publication
as
well.
So,
given
that
we,
you
know,
we've
originated
this
series
in
a
as
a
an
anti-mrsa
compound.
A
It
may
not
end
up
that
way,
but
if
we,
you
know,
originated
there,
we're
gonna
need
to
have
some
data
of
the
kind.
That's
on
the
screen
there
in
a
way
that
you
are
happy
with.
So
I
mean
if
there
was
a
possibility
repeating
this
at
the
higher
concentration
that
that
would
help
publication.
I
think
I
know
it's
more.
I
know
it's
more
difficult
because
you
don't
have
the
cells
locally.
E
Not
in
our
lab,
we
I
mean,
I
guess
we
could
get
them
from
paul.
Who
is
the
biologist
in
the
building?
Who's
been
doing
the
potency
test
thing
sure,
but
we're
yeah
we're
just
chemistry.
B
B
A
E
D
G
Matt,
I
I
have
some
experience
with
these
compounds
on
on
this
kind
of
compounds,
or
this
scaffolds
on
lash
and
trichrosis,
and
things
like
that,
and
there
are
some
information
available
that
targets
for
these
compounds
can
be
proteosomes
live
and
I
can
send
you
the
the
papers
and
references
in
github,
and
I
I'm
not
sure
I'm
not
completely
into
this
issue,
but
there
are
proteosomes
there
could
be
a
target
for,
as
for
antimicrobials
too,
and
then
at
some
point.
G
Maybe
this
could
be
something
also
to
to
start
because
for
sure
they
they
interfere
in
proteosomes,
but
and
and
chemo
trypsin
like
activity
of
the
these
protein
sounds
okay.
G
Yes,
I
was,
I
was
looking
for
it
and
then
I
found
something
some
reviews
on
it:
bacterial
proteosomes.
There
are
some
discussion
about
it
so
could
be.
I
have
to
to
to
read
more
and
to
be
sure.
B
Yeah
they
have
a
primitive
form:
the
lawn
protease
and
the
clpp
clip
protease.
Those
are
both
proteasome-like
in
terms
of
the
barrel
structure
and
the
atpas
function,
so
they
are
like
a
primitive
proteasome,
you're,
absolutely
right
and
there's
lots
of
interest
in
compound.
In
fact,
that's
one
thing:
our
lab
works
on
compounds
that
regulate
these
bacterial
or
mammalian
homologs
of
that.
A
B
We
did
matt
by
accident,
we
we
immobilized
the
compound.
We
were
interested
in,
we
captured
the
mitochondrial
protease
clip
and
that
has
the
bacterial
homologue
that
and
our
colleagues
have
been
studying
the
bacterial
ones,
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
both
inhibitors
and
activators
of
it,
because
they
have
growth,
inhibitory
effects
and
we're
looking
at
cancer
cells,
trying
to
figure
out
how
that
works.
But
yeah
we
used
an
affinity,
chromatography
approach
to
fish
it
out
and
that's
how
we
got
interested
in
it.
But
there's
a
lot
of
literature
on
that
area.
Actually,.
A
Okay,
that
sounds
right,
interesting,
okay,
great!
Well!
Thank
you
lee!
That's
that's
fantastic!
Just
let
us
know
if
you
have
the
compound
enough
for
the
compound
to
go
and
we
can
supply
more
if
needed
or
yeah,
I
mean
that
you
know
tim
or
karen
might
have
some
locally
I'll
check
with
those
guys.
Okay,
all
right
awesome!
Thank
you,
okay.
A
A
The
other
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
was
the
the
admi
data,
because
dana
has
just
added
in
what
was
it
the
log
d
data
right
you
added
in
yeah,
so
these
were
the
latest
data
that
we
got
back
and
I
guess
you
know
we're
thinking
about
well,
which
compound?
What
can
we
learn
here?
Because
last
time
we
looked
at
these
data,
we
were
struck
by
the
unfortunately
inverse
correlation
between
potency
and
clearance,
with
solubility
appearing
to
dominate
a
number
of
these
features.
A
So
we
had
some
compounds
like
this
guy,
bizarrely
highly
soluble
with
zero
potency
and
some
of
our
favorite
compounds
such
as
this
guy
h2
down
here
with
nice
potency,
but
dreadful
clearance
and
bad
solubility,
and
so
I
guess
you
know
we
daniel
included
the
log
d
value
so
that
we
could
have
a
sort
of
see
whether
there's
a
compound
with
a
nice
balance
of
things,
and
I
guess
there
are
a
couple
of
compounds
which
are
kind
of
somewhere
in
the
middle
there,
which
you
picked
out.
A
But
there
are
some
interesting
match
pairs
in
here
I
mean
you
know,
I'm
really
not
sure
what
we
we
do
with
the
data
except
try
and
figure
out.
You
know
what
what
to
make
next,
I
so
with
the
five
five
ring
system
here.
You
know
that
we
know
is
metabolized
at
this
position.
A
If
we,
if
we
remove
that
system-
and
we
go
for
the
five
six
system,
with
essentially
identical
substituents,
so
like
865
versus
978
over
here,
we
don't
solve
the
clearance
issue
and
it's
still
fairly
simple.
Our
numbers
here,
which
of
course
you
know,
raises
the
idea
that
maybe
there
is
another
liability
in
this
compound
so,
for
example,
the
methyl
group.
A
But
then,
if
you
look
at
the
compound
next
door,
which
has
the
o
trifluoromethyl
on
it,
then
the
the
numbers
are
approximately
the
same.
But
of
course
that
could
be
because
it's
being
metabolized
again
here-
and
so
I
guess
you
know-
one
possibility-
is
a
molecule
that
combines
the
five
six
system
with
with
something
parasubstituted,
which
again
is
a
bit
like
the
ocf
iii,
which
would
resist
metabolism.
C
A
Yeah,
I
mean
it's
possible
so
so
in
this
so
yeah
the
five
six
system
with
a
cf3
or
an
o
chf2
or
something
yeah.
D
Haven't
you
effectively
done
that
with
your
cell
phone.
D
E
So
I
was
actually
very
interested
in
864
because
we've
made
that
compound
with
the
para
cyano
instead
of
the
meta
and
it
is
active,
so
I
would
really
like
to
get
abby
data
on
that
and
I've
spoken
to
laurie
and
she
said
she
does
have
the
capacity
for
testing
some
more
of
our
compounds.
So
I
think
that
one.
C
C
Improvement
where
we
moved
where
we
moved
the
cyano
around
paris,
and
it
was
actually
pretty
good
yeah.
A
But
chris,
I
guess
you're
talking
about
these
in
terms
of
well.
You
know
this
still
has
the
apparent
liability
here,
but
we
that's
that's
right,
yeah,
so,
which
is
a
little
interesting.
Isn't
it
because
you
think?
Well,
if
these
I
mean
these
solubility
numbers,
I
don't
know
your
take
on
this
chris,
but
the
the
range
of
solubility
here
is
just
enormous
yeah,
with
apparently
small
changes,
giving
rise
to
very
large
differences
in
solubility.
I
mean,
if
you
look
at
these
two
compounds.
Sorry,
no!
It
wasn't
those
two
commas.
It
was
these
two.
A
So
this
is
a
difference
of
meta
versus
a
parameter
and
one
is
32
and
one
is
five.
Five
six,
I
mean
serious
differences.
Just
with
that
substitution,
I
I
mean.
Do
you
believe
that
I
don't
know
it's
difficult
to
rationalize
and
obviously
these
are
fantastic
numbers
here,
but
again
it's
I
mean
here.
I
guess
it's
a
little
bit
more
sensible,
the
the
solubility
differences
and
clearly
there
is
then
not
really
a
big
problem
with
this
group
if
your
molecule
is
soluble
enough
right.
E
D
A
Yep
so.
D
A
Cyano
is
quite
polar
as
well
yeah,
but
for
potency
we
don't
need
something
polar
in
that
position.
We
need
something
polar
elsewhere,
don't
we
because
it
appears
to
be
true.
I
mean
the
potency
seems
to
be
tracking
quite
well
with
something
which
is
power
substituted.
I
mean
these
groups
are
really
quite
nice.
C
What
do
we
do
next?
Do
we
maybe
try
going
from
paris
cyano
to
maybe
kara.
E
H
E
Mean
that's
jada's
actually
trying
to
make
the
diethyl
amino,
which
I
also
do
think
would
be
interesting
from
an
acne
standpoint
to
look
at
but
yeah.
Those
are
kind
of
on
the
docket.
A
I
mean
something
polar
or
ionizable
elsewhere
I
haven't
really
thought
of,
but
clearly
that
would
that
would
help
if
it
was
in
a
region,
the
molecule
that
could
tolerate
it
would.
C
The
idea
be
like
like
how
we
had
on
some
of
the
nau
compounds
on
the
pyridine.
We
had
a
methoxy,
maybe
some
cyanopyridine
instead
of
our
unsubstituted
pyridine.
E
E
We'll
have
to
see,
because
I
think
my
issue
was
that
I
just
had
never
scaled
up
that
core
to
get
enough
to
kind
of
play
around
with
stuff
before.
But
I
I
had
sort
of
thought
about
doing
that.
C
E
D
E
A
I
mean
yeah,
but
one
thing
to
say
is
a
high
degree
of
sensitivity
to
things
in
the
power
position
really
is
quite
noticeable
again
here
and
how
important
solubility
appears
to
be
for
other
numbers,
no
great
surprise,
but
good
to
see
it.
A
I
A
So
this
is
just
the
sorry,
the
latest
batch
of
things
sure.
So
sorry,
let
me
just
bring
up
the
master
page.
E
A
I
actually
forget
where
I'm
looking
for
this,
do
we
I
think
we
had
a
page
on
this,
but
I'm
suddenly
not
seeing
it?
Why
am
I
not
seeing
it.
E
No,
no
you're
good,
I
mean
some
of
these
are
from
neu.
I
think,
and
this
would
definitely
be
data.
Obviously
any
of
that
laurie
had
sent
to
me-
and
I
can't
remember
exactly
there-
there
possibly
is
more
but
yeah.
I
Yeah,
because
yeah,
okay,
I
can
see
a
few
here
in
general.
I
could
have
a
look
through
this
and
if
you
could,
let
me
know
what
has
been
sent
dana
and
I
could
send
compounds
that.
Perhaps
you
haven't
seen
or
tested,
but
I
can
still
provide
add
me
data
for
like
more
generally
speaking,
so
you
can
see
the
spr
for
the
series
as
a
whole,
if
you're
interested
in
that,
I
can
send
through
some
of
that
data
if
it
hasn't
been
done
so
already.
A
That
would
be
great-
I
guess
I'm
just
looking
at
this
now,
actually
and
looking
at
some
of
the
solubility
figures
and
some
of
the
clearance
data.
It's
not
completely
tracking
right,
because
the
for
eight
five
six.
A
E
We
I
think
these
the
the
carbon-carbon
linked
ones
are
also
quite
could
be
quite
flat.
I
would
expect
that
they
maybe
would
be
so
that
could
be
part
of
the
problem
as
well.
A
If
we
dumped
all
this
data
in
data
warrior,
we
could
get
a
3d
plot
right
of
of
mic
log
d
and
microsoft
clearance,
yeah.
D
Is
all
the
data
in
the
master
sheet.
A
A
That
would
be
useful.
Okay,.
I
Yeah,
so
something
that
we
found
is
that
if
you
do
the
n
alcohol
deliveries,
they
tend
to
be
more
soluble
than
the
three
nh.
So
it
could
be
a
geometry
confinement
issue,
as
opposed
to
a
purely
log
d,
driven
solubility
correlation
well,.
C
A
Okay,
all
right
all
right
thanks,
so
we
are
a
couple
of
targets
there
and
a
couple
of
ways
forward:
I'll
I'll,
put
actions
up
on
the
minutes,
but
trying
to
access.
Perhaps
other
compounds
here
from
our
precursor
to
try
to
improve
the
solubility
again
so
often
the
case
you're
trying
to
improve
the
solubility
of
things.
A
F
A
I
mean
just
just
remind
us:
okay,.
F
So
for
those
people
who
have
not
been
there
when
I
presented
before
also
because
I
don't
make
it
every
time
so,
we've
been
looking
at
toxicity
of
these
compounds
that
I
was
given
in
hector,
9
3
and
initially
I
started
with
the
quad
protocol,
while
trying
to
reproduce
that
and
and
their
readout
is
res
azurin,
so
fluorescence
read
out,
however,
the
our
preferred
method
is
mtt,
which
is
a
tetrazolium
dye,
so
absorbance
based
measurement.
F
So
I
compared
those
two
following
the
same
protocol,
which
essentially
is
incubating
well
seeding,
the
cells
incubating
48
hours
to
reach
some
sort
of
confluency
and
then
treating
for
24
hours
and
reading
afterwards,
and
from
that
I
sort
of
got
ic50s
or
cc50s,
ranging
from
1
to
10,
which
in
in
micromolar,
is
about
3
to
30,
I
guess
for
10
for
an
average
molecular
weight
of
300..
F
I
think
the
issue
that
I
had
with
these
was
that
the
standard
error
is
quite
high,
sometimes
20
to
25
percent.
So
I
wasn't
sure
why
that
is
also
there's
a
big
discrepancy
for
983
between
the
res
hazard
and
dmtt
readout.
F
Where
I
hear
I
couldn't
calculate
an
ic50
and
for
mtg
we
can,
and
actually
the
inhibition
is
quite
a
lot
higher
than
what
we
find
by
resizuring.
So
then
the
other
thing
we
wanted
to
do
because
this
is
actually
typically
the
way
we
do.
A
toxicity
assay
in
our
lab
is
seed.
A
sort
of
smaller
number
of
cells
allow
them
to
reach
exponential
phase.
So
typically
here
I
incubate
it
for
three
days
before
treating
then
we
treat
it
for
24
hours
and
then
we
allow
the
cells
to
recover
so
as
to
see.
F
If
then
they
actually,
if
they,
if
the
compound
is
actually
just
cytostatic,
it
just
holds
proliferation
or
it
actually
cytotoxic.
And
if
the
cells
then
don't
recover,
then
that's
the
case.
So
I
haven't
done
a
great
deal
of
these
because
they're
longer
than
this
one-
and
I
haven't
had
much
time-
sorry,
but
what
I
can
say-
and
I
wanted
to
clarify
this
issue
for
it
98983.
F
So
I
did
both
readouts
and,
as
you
can
see,
I
get
fairly
similar
values
versus
6050
and
the
standard
error
is
much
lower.
So,
for
me,
I'm
a
lot
more
confident
in
this
data,
also
because
it
from
our
point
of
view,
it
makes
more
sense
to
do
it
this
way.
So
in
terms
of
the
order,
neither
by
recess
or
mtc
that
doesn't
change
and
sort
of
yeah,
they
still
seem
to
be
quite
toxic,
at
least
the
ones
that
I've
tested.
F
Again,
it's
just
a
difference
between
the
actual
protocol,
also,
rather
than
seeding.
The
cells
here
I
see,
did
5000
cells
in
48
hours
because
I'm
doing
the
assay
in
a
96
well
plate
the
quad
protocol
used
it
384
well
played
so
they
seated
5000
only
for
24
hours,
but
because
I'm
using
a
larger
surface
area,
I
allowed
them
to
grow
a
bit
longer
and
then
just
incubate
it
with
the
compound-
and
I
said
after
24
hours
for
one
week.
F
So
what
what
means
one
week
is
because
I
incubate
for
three
days
allowed
to
go
to
exponential
phase
treat
for
24
hours
and
then
allow
for
recovery
or
wash
out
as
dana
called
it
for
another
three
days,
and
then
I
say:
that's
why
it's
seven
days
in
total
and
the
readout
is
just
mtt
or
a
cesarean.
F
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
I,
by
using
this
method
or
protocol,
whether
I
would
see
again
the
discrepancy
for
993
in
the
readout,
and
it's
not
the
case,
although
the
the
lowest
sort
of
the
maximum
inhibition
is
a
little
bit
different.
But
the
overall
cc50
is
not.
E
F
F
D
F
So
yeah
I
haven't
done
every
one
of
them,
but
for
by
mtc.
That's
not
really
that
different.
But,
as
I
said
before
here,
the
standard
error
is
quite
high,
so
20
to
25,
whereas
this
is
like
one
or
maybe
less
than
something
like
that
yeah
so
by
the
this
readout,
and
that
could
be
due
to
various
practical
things
to
do
with
the
two
assays.
As
I
said,
recession
is
a
fluorescence
readout.
F
It's
a
you
know
you
have
a
higher
dynamic
range.
You
have
well
the
opportunity
to
not
have
to
wash
in
between.
So
you
you,
you
add
the
the
die
and
just
read
in
the
well,
whereas
with
the
mtt,
it's
often
you
have
to
remove
the
solution
wash.
You
have
to
add
the
mtt
solution
and
then
remove
again
and
then
add
the
mso
to
stabilize
the
crystals.
So
there's
a
lot
more
error
that
could
come
from
these
many
steps
so
or
you
could
lose
cells
because
you're
aspirating
many
times
yeah.
A
Right,
so
this
is
great
for
for
publication.
Are
you
happy
to
complete
some
more
of
this
in
the
sense
that
I'm
thinking
on
the
right
there
with
the
rest
of
yours,
yeah.
F
F
A
I
mean
it
depends
on
some
of
the
the
last
potencies
here
and
some
of
the
mechanisms
of
action.
But
yes,
I
mean
getting
results
back
from
the
mechanism
of
action.
Stuff
is
going
to
take.
You
know
a
few
weeks
based
on
what
we
just
said.
A
I
would
guess
I
don't
know
we'll
wait
to
see
what
he
says
so
yeah,
I'm
just
yeah,
I'm
just
trying
to
make
sure
that
we
do
have
a
you
know,
a
set
where
you
know
a
referee
from
yeah
for
a
paper
that
you
typically
publish,
alex,
isn't
going
to
say,
hang
on
a
minute,
whereas
all
the
rest
of
it.
F
A
No,
I
don't
think
we
need
talks
on
everything
I
mean
this
is
a
representative
set.
If
we
come
up
with
a
a
much
more
potent
and
effective
compound,
then
we
may
need
to
measure
that,
but
at
the
moment
I
think
this
is
a
representative
set.
Okay,.
A
A
Okay
and
then
so
yeah,
I
wanted
to
also
mention
the
compounds
that
were
sent
through
from
nau,
which
is
great,
so
we
are
the
lucky
recipients
of
these
compounds
which
have
just
arrived
and
which
can
be
included
in
the
next
round
of
potency
evaluation.
So
thank
you
very
much,
lori
and
colin
for
sending
those
over
you're
not
sharing
just.
I
Yeah,
that's
right,
so
so
those
are.
Those
are
the
compounds
that
we've
just
sent
through.
I'm
sorry
that
we
didn't
have
enough
of
two
that
I
mentioned
in
the
previous
week
that
was
sort
of
a
bit
shy
for
our
own
projects,
so
these
ones
I
had
access
off.
So
I
was
able
to
send
through.
A
Fantastic,
that's
great!
Thank
you!
So
much!
That's
really
good.
Did
you
wanna,
so
I
just
wanna
invite
anyone
who
wants
to
give
a
chemistry
update
to
briefly
update
everybody.
If
anyone
would
like
to
say
anything
about,
you
know,
current
efforts,
yeah.
G
Just
just
a
brief
update
from
my
my
side,
I
believe
now
we
have
some
examples
from
the
wallet
series,
but
we
are
not
very
successful.
You
know
having
good,
very
good
yields
problems
on
purification,
so
we
have
them,
but
in
just
a
small
amount,
maybe
I
will
contact
laurie
and
and
the
guys
and
their
team
to
to
help
me
and
how
to
purify.
I
think,
last
to
last
meeting
I
participated.
G
Someone
mentioned
that
there
was
also
a
issue
known
this
alkylation
of
the
the
a
mines
or
something
like
that,
and
this
was
something.
G
G
A
Okay,
with
this
ch2
between
the
rings,
that's
the
homologous
side
arm
and
I
guess
february
you're
talking
about
putting
groups
on
the
nitrogen.
G
Yeah
yeah
there
is
someone,
it's
a
phenyl
groups
like
a
benzene
like
the
ones
we
are
working
on
and
we
have
to
alkylate
that
to
to
keep
working
with
the
same
kind
of
substitution
and
alkylation
is
is
not
working
that
well
for
us.
I
will.
I
will
try
to.
I
try
another
method
now,
just
copper
alkylation.
I
read
calculation
now
which
mean
which
maybe
could
work
better,
but
it
would
be
a
different
kind
of
chemistry
from
the
simpler
substitution.
I
Sure
so
for
those
for
the
homology
units,
I
actually
made
a
couple
of
those
here
at
neu.
I
installed
that
by
a
reductive
emanation.
Do
you
want
r
and
r
prime
to
be
separate
as
you
sort
of
have
it
up
here,
so
you
want
those
to
be
different.
Could
you
could
you
try
reductive
emanations
to
access.
I
Because
that's
how
I
installed
them
when
you
have
the
nitrogen
without
the
the
methylene
linker
there,
the
reductive
amination
fails.
But
when
you
have
that
in
have
the
the
further
linker,
the
reductive
ammunitions
have
been
fine.
So.
G
I
Doing
that
with
the
aldehyde
on
the
actual
core
itself,.
A
That's
right
and
quillin
you're,
you
guys
are
still
looking
at
alkylating
these
guys
or
some
of
these
guys
right.
This
transformation.
I
Yeah,
that's
right,
so
I
can
actually
say
that
I
prepared
some
slides.
I
can't
actually
share
them,
though
sorry.
I
So
I
sort
of
we
had
an
undergraduate
working
on
these
and
I
took
over
this
week
to
sort
of
finalize
because
he's
no
longer
with
us,
so
these
alkylations
have
all
gone
forward
conditions
up
the
top
here.
For
that
I
tend
to
find
that
the
best
way
to
purify
these
compounds
is
using
a
biotaj
c18
column,
so
on
about
100
milligram
scale,
I'm
using
the
30
gram
c18
column
to
do
the
reverse
phase
purification.
I
I
If
you
have
smaller
alkyl
chains
like
we
are
not
able
to
do
that,
we
send
it
away
to
to
get
professionally
purified,
so
I've
I've
been
able
to
isolate
these
these
four
that
we
have
down
the
bottom
here.
The
exception
is
this
final
compound
here,
there's
only
a
few
milligrams,
it
looks
like
I'm
waiting
to
remove
the
last
of
the
water
from
the
column.
I
A
I
mean
add,
me
is
always
really
useful,
particularly
in
this
case,
if
we
can,
if
we,
if
we
can,
if,
if
we
can
include
in
the
measurement
log
b
that-
and
if
that
is
part
of
your
add
me
screen
normally
yeah,
we
get
a
full
tier
one,
okay.
So
then
this
would
be
particularly
useful
because
it
has
the
author
substituent,
which
should
help
with
solubility
right,
because
it's
deep
plane
arises.
I
Definitely
does
so
I
can
just
as
a
little
bit
of
extra
information
as
part
of
our
efforts.
I've
been
growing
crystal
quality
structures
for
these,
so
these
are
some
some
x-ray
crystal
structures
that
we've
got
for
these
compound
series
and
a
bit
of
the
add
me
to
go
alongside
that.
Beautiful
and
yeah
definitely
improves
the
the
solubility
with
that
orthomethoxy
compound.
As
you
can
sort
of
see
here,
it's
it's
non-linear.
I
I
think
it
precipitated
out
of
the
the
top
end
of
the
curve,
but
yeah,
unfortunately,
for
us
it
completely
kills
potency
when
you,
when
you
twist
that
ring
so
if
you
are
able
to
get
potency
with
with
that,
then
there's
definitely
avenues
to
improve
solubility
through
functionalization
of
that
period.
Aisle.
I
G
Of
activity
for
us
yeah-
maybe
if
it's
so
if
it
keeps
that
that
idea
of
of
that
conforming
cypher
complexes,
it's
important
having
these
pyridine-like
compounds.
I
Yeah,
so
it's
I
think
for
us.
The
the
issue
is
that
the
the
nh
compounds
stack
a
lot.
The
the
crystal
volume
between
these
two
compounds
is
very
dramatic,
so
that
small
twist
actually
stops
its
stacking
in
the
actual
crystal
ladders
and
then.
I
Yes,
I
did,
I
did
a
very
rudimentary
sort
of
modeling
of
that,
and
it
does
appear
that
if
you
have
the
ortho
substituent
that
methyl
group
can
get
underneath
and
sit
when
you
have
the
direct
ch
linkage.
So
obviously
that
would
affect
the
stacking
ability
of
those
compounds.
K
A
You
know,
normally,
you
associate
you
know
big
groups
which
clash
with
giving
these
large
angles
here.
You
have
heteroatoms
which,
which
don't
necessarily
have
h's
sticking
out,
so
the
oxygen
doesn't
have
an
h
sticking
out
and
the
nitrogen
can
be
either
way
around
and
not
have
something
pointing
at
the
other
ring.
So
it's
nice
to
see
that
it
is
still
a
dramatic
impact,
in
fact
yeah.
So.
I
We've
also
done
some
energy
minimizations
of
these
two
compounds
as
well
and
at
a
b3
lip
level.
You
actually
see
the
pure
dial
rotates
completely
around
and
forms
an
nh
bond
with
with
the
amine,
so
is
obviously
like
x-ray.
The
the
caveat
here
is
that
it's
in
the
solid
state
and
the
solution
state
may
behave
very
differently,
but
the
then
you
got
to
then
sort
of
weigh
that
with
the
the
the
qm
models
that
we
have
as
well
and
how
believable
they
are.
I
So
we've
done
gas
and
water
phase.
Okay,
yeah
there
was
minimal
change
that
the
relative
change
was
was
negligible.
I.
A
Would
have
the
water
would
change
that
totally
that's
interesting
yeah,
just
because
that
would
make
it
less
soluble
right.
If
your,
if
you're
occupying
internal
hydrogen
bond,
is
less
available
for
interaction
with
the
solvent.
I
Sure
no
problem,
so
three
three
of
the
four
I
can
send
to
you
for
activity
I'll
see
if
I'm
able
to
purify
that
that
remaining
fluoro
compound
sorry,
the
yeah,
the
sixth
fluro
in
the
call.
Okay.
A
All
right,
very
that's
fantastic
one.
Thank
you,
a
very
quick
picture.
I
just
got
from
giada
who's
still
with
us,
who,
I
think,
has
this
red
card
nearly
pure
giardia.
Do
you
want
to.
K
Yes,
so,
basically,
last
week
we
synthetized
the
red
compound,
but
we
didn't
obtain
like
100
pure,
but
we
have
only
90
pure
and
the
eel
was
not
really
good.
So
we
tried
also
to
obtain
the
same
compound
by
different
intermediates
by
different
steps,
but
as
well,
we
didn't
obtain
the
desired
product,
so
the
plan
is
try
to
purify
again
the
compound
the
the
red
compound
and
test
it
and
next
week
try
to
optimize
the
the
synthetic
root
in
order
to
obtain
more
compound
or
more
pure
compound.
A
All
right,
fantastic,
thank
you
yeah!
I
mean
I
mean,
of
course,
that's
enough
compound
for
us
right
for
this,
so
if
you
can
get
something
similar
of
that,
that
is
pure
and
then
another
compound
on
the
same
kind
of
scale.
It's
enough
for
doing
the
biology,
see
how.
C
E
So
yeah,
I'm
still
on
the
one
pots.
It
looks
like
five
minutes
in
the
microwave
as
opposed
to
30
is
actually
helping
so
and
then
it's
just
the
purification
I
they're
just
they're
horrible
to
work
with
really,
but
the
crude
is
like
black
and
it's
gross,
but
I
have
done
the
pyrrole
a
normal
phase,
column,
the
nmr
and
the
lcms.
Look
okay,
but
the
material
is
still
black.
So
I
think
it
does
need
another
purification,
but
I'm
I'm
hopeful
about
that.
C
E
As
a
first
pass,
yes,
but
normally
it
requires
reverse
phase.
After
that.
I
I
I
really,
I
can
send
you
throughout.
Do
you
use
a
biotage
system.
E
I
I'll
send
you
the
graph
for
the
conditions
that
we
use.
It's
a
generic
method.
I
just
single
it's
sort
of
almost
a
catch
and
release
method,
so
it
will
precipitate
out
at
the
top
of
the
column
you
wash
out
all
the
impurities
and
when
it
gets
to
a
certain
percentage
it
redissolves
and
puts
it
out
of
your
compound.
It
makes
the
the
purification
of
the
one
pot
trivial.
E
Yeah
well
so
the
thiazole
one.
I
actually
went
to
purify
that
reverse
phase
and
ended
up
recovering
it,
just
from
washing
it
basically
with
methanol,
but
that's
not
working
for
the
peril
derivatives.
So
the
solubility
of
those
does
seem
to
be
a
little
bit
different,
but
yeah.
If
you
want
to
send
me
that
I
can
give
it
a
try
for
sure.
A
Okay,
great,
I
think
that
we're
running
out
of
time,
unfortunately,
but
I
think
we've
covered
pretty
much
everything
quality.
Are
you
on
github
already?
Did
I
miss
that.
A
Right
great,
so
I
can
tag
you
here
and
we
can.
We
can
stay
in
touch
there.
That's
fantastic,
okay,
any
other
urgent
things
that
people
want
to.
A
Mention
all
right,
if
not
then
great.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
and
and
I'll
put
up
some
notes
and
actions
after
the
meeting
but
great
to
see.