►
From YouTube: Open Source Antibiotics Science Update Apr 6th 2022
Description
Weekly open project meeting for Open Source Antibiotics Series 2.
Full Project: https://github.com/opensourceantibiotics/Series-2-Diarylimidazoles
Relevant GitHub Issue: https://github.com/opensourceantibiotics/Series-2-Diarylimidazoles/issues/114
On the call: Professor Matthew Todd, Dr Edwin Tse, Dr Daniel Gedder (UCL), Prof Lee Graves, Thomas Gilbert (UNC), Dr Lori Ferrins, Maria Dichiara (NEU), Dr Chris Swain (Cambridge Medchem Consulting).
A
B
Okay,
so
today's
meeting
wednesday
6th
of
april
the
I
guess,
the
two
things
we
were
hoping
to
talk
about
were
data
from
lee's
lab
and
then
compounds
from
daniel
and
potentially
from
maria,
so
thinking
about
what
we
might
be
testing
next
and
potentially
last
before
we're
trying
to
write
up
the
paper.
So
those
are
the
two
things
today
really
and
so
lee
tom
did.
You
want
to
dig
right
into.
A
Yeah
I've
I've
prepared
some
slides
just
to
go
over
really
quickly.
You
know
I,
as
you'll
see
this
has
taken
a
lot
longer
than
we
wanted,
of
course,
with
coven
and
everything,
but
I
think
we're
turning
the
corner.
I
feel
like
there's
a
few
things
we'd
like
to
repeat
and
I'll
talk
about
that,
but
I
feel
like
maybe
we're
getting
some
insight
and
I'm
hopeful
anyway.
A
A
Everybody
see
that
okay,
I
hope
that's
good
right
and
the
idea
that
we're
adapting
our
approach
to
is
the
competition
assay,
where
basically,
we
incubate
with
the
compounds
and
then
ask
if
we
compete
binding
to
the
inhibitor
beads
and
look
at
subtractive
analysis.
Basically,
if
we've
competed
off
something
and
we
try
to
do
it
in
a
dose-dependent
manner-
and
we've
used
this
quite
extensively
to
you
know
to
determine
kinase
inhibitor
selectivity
in
the
past.
A
So
if
you
remember
the
first
attempt,
we
got
a
mrsa
lysate,
we
weren't
very
happy
with
the
results
it
seemed
like
we
were
struggling
with
enough
mercy
lysate.
So
we
were
also
concerned
if
the
assay
was
working
properly.
So
what
what
we
did?
I
should
just
reiterate:
the
goals
of
the
project
were
to
profile
compounds,
26
and
28
in
mrsa
and
then
also
to
profile,
26
and
28
against
the
human
kinome
and,
as
I
said,
because
we
were
struggling
with
our
initial
analysis
of
the
mrsa
data.
We
weren't
sure
that
everything
was
working.
A
We
sort
of
we
compared
293
cells
through
a
known,
kinase
inhibitor,
the
nasa
cleb,
and
we
asked
you
know-
were
there
any
particular
interesting
kinases
that
were
competed
as
a
result
of
this
incubation,
so
basically
293
cell
lysate
incubate
with
the
compound
briefly
and
then
pass
it
over
the
beads
and
look
for
competition
and
and
so
not
unexpectedly,
with
the
positive
control
the
nasa
clip,
we
saw
a
dose
dependent
innovation
of
cdks
like
cdk9,
cdk5,
cdk2
and
others
that
were
specific
and
and
these
weren't
affected
by
either
26
or
28
to
any
great
degree
which
again
argued
for
the
specificity
assay.
A
A
We
were
missing
the
lowest
concentration
in
this
experiment,
so
we
had
the
point,
one
micro,
more
and
one
micromolar,
but
both
of
those
showed
pretty
strong
displacement,
particularly
with
neck
two,
where
we
didn't
see
that
effect
with
the
26
compound
at
the
same
concentration.
B
A
The
point
is
that
you
know
we
have
an
assay
that
works.
We
have
some
insight
and
I
and,
as
I
said
before,
I'd
like
to
repeat
this
experiment,
so
we
have
at
least
two
independent
verifications
of
this,
because
I
think
it
could
be
important
in
terms
of
what
the
specificity
is
and
what
the
potential
effect
on
human
cells
is
now
most
recently,
you
know,
as
many
of
you
know,
the
bottleneck
has
been
getting
safe
and
fortunately
we
found
a
lab
next
door.
A
Brian
conlon's
group,
who
was
kind
enough
to
get
us
mercilessly
so
kareem,
set
up
the
experiment.
Kareem
also
is
known
as
thomas,
and
he
showed
pretty
good
results
in
this
last
experiment.
I
think,
and
what
I
did
is
I
didn't
put
all
the
data
in
there.
A
What
I
did
he
and
I
went
through,
and
we
just
said
what
were
28
specific
responses,
what
were
26
specific
responses
and
there
were
a
couple
that
really
stood
out
and
one
was
this
protein
acp,
which
was
specific
to
the
treatment
of
28,
showed
dose
dependent
displacement.
A
Which
is
an
atp
binder,
and
so
none
of
those
three
proteins
changed
significantly
with
26,
so
they
were
very
much
28
dependent.
There
were
other
ones
that
were
26
dependent,
which
I
think
we're
not
so
interested
in
those
as
26.
I
think
it's
the
control
compound,
but
we
were
interested,
and
I
did
a
little
bit
of
research
on
these
three
and
again,
there
were
others
that
we
could
potentially
tease
out
of
there
that
were
much
weaker.
A
These
were
among
the
strongest
hips
that
were
found
and
and
so
results
I
would
say,
of
the
kinases
we
can.
We
can
breathe
pretty
certain
that
we're
seeing
competition
against
probably
casein
kinase,
one,
the
two
neck
kinase
and
the
tgfr
beta
kinase
that
I
mentioned,
and
then
in
the
immersive
proteome.
A
A
If
it's
inhibited
could
potentially
be
important
in
terms
of
regulating
protein
translation
in
mrsa
and
then
this
mnma
is
a
trna,
specific
thiourdylic
delays
and,
like
I
said
it's
an
atp
binder,
and
there
was
a
paper
from
a
group
of
acs
recently
that
talked
about
this
potentially
being
down
regulated
as
a
result
of
lactobionic
acid
treatment
which
is
being
tested
for
mercy.
So
all
three
of
them
have
some
credibility
to
them
in
terms
of
potential
potential.
Targeting,
I
think
what,
like
I
said,
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
then
figure
out.
A
A
Are
future
directions
yeah?
So
I
think
the
first
thing
we
should
do
is
repeat
our
hdk
293
kind
of
analysis
just
to
get
better.
You
know
values
on
everything
again,
so
we
can
say
for
certain
that
we
think
these
kinases
are
likely
to
be
targeted
by
the
28
and
not
26.,
I'd
like
to
repeat
the
mercy
experiment,
one
more
time
we
can
get
more
mercilessate
from
brian
conland's
group
and
just
go
ahead
and
repeat
that
and
see.
A
So
many
thanks
to
kareem
he's
really
carried
this
project
all
the
way
through
thanks
to
brian
conlon's
lab
for
stepping
in
and
getting
us
mrsa
lysate,
which
is
not
easy
to
do.
And
then
laura
herring
and
the
proteomics
group
for
running
the
analysis
on
this
and
happy
to
take
any
questions
or
comments.
B
All
right,
thank
you,
that's
fantastic,
so
yeah
the
there
were
the
two
repeats
there
that
you're
talking
about
are
they
I
mean
I
mean
given
that
they
repeat.
So,
are
you
able
to
do
those
in
the
reasonably
short
term?
I
mean
how's
your
pipeline,
looking
of
experiments
that
you
ought
to
do
well,
we're
extremely
busy.
A
As
you
might
guess,
but
this
wouldn't
take
kareem
that
long
to
do
those
samples.
As
long
as
I
have
to
talk
to
brian
conlon's
group
and
see
how
quickly
they
can
get
us
more
merciful,
life
safe
and
they
were
fairly
quick
once
they
got
their
lab
back
together.
A
But
I'll
just
have
to
check
and
see
what
the
time
we
have
tons
of
293
cell
lysates
in
the
freezer,
which
we
can
break
open
and
do
quite
quickly
and
cream,
might
even
be
able
to
get
our
new
person
to
do
those
experiments.
But
I
actually
probably
have
him:
do
it
just
because
he's
more
experienced
but
yeah
that's
what
cream.
B
C
B
C
No,
it's
yeah.
The
the
bottlenecks
are
getting
the
getting
a
hold
of
enough
material
to
do
the
experiment
and
getting
stuff
into
the
queue
for
mass
spec
analysis.
B
What
about
the
so
the
kyname
analysis?
Is
it
possible
or
helpful
to
to
go
after
repeats
just
against
the
hits
that
were
found
rather
than
everything
else.
A
Well,
we
could,
and
but
in
some
ways,
I'd
like
to
just
go
ahead
and
do
the
whole
thing
again
just
so
that
we'd
have
two
completely
independent
experiments
to
say
you
know
this
is
what
we
found
and
we
could
certainly,
then
I
I'm
sure
david
brewery
has
neck
and
antibodies.
We
could
do
some
simple
experiments
to
see
you
know
just
competition
binding
or
something
with
an
antibody
to
validate
that
it
would
make
a
nice
figure,
the
tgf
beta
r1.
A
I
don't
know
what
you
think
about
that
and
I,
I
suspect
we
should
pay
attention
to
that
as
well,
since
that
was
a
pretty
strong
hit.
In
fact
that
was
the
strongest
hit
we
had.
It
was
clearly
different
from
28
26.
I
mean
26
didn't
touch
it
right.
So
in
terms
of
biology,
I
don't
know
what
to
make
of
that
either,
but
and
and
maybe
lori
laurie.
Can
you
tell
us
more
where
what's
the
origin
of
these
compounds
over
these
things
that
you
made
has
any
other
profiling
been.
E
Done
against
them,
matt
would
be
the
one
to
speak.
To
specifically
these
compounds-
I
I
don't
know
is
we
actually
know
what
the
original
target
is
right,
matt.
B
No
yeah,
we
we
we
don't.
I
I
don't
know
what
they
were
made
for.
I
forget
these
came
from
david
drury
and
bill
zurcher's
project
bill
was
was
looking
after
them
initially
and
developed.
The
first
hits.
A
Well,
I
know
they
have
a
great
interest
in
neck
kinase,
and
so
it
wouldn't
surprise
me
if
they
have
some
nick
effect.
There
are
other
kinases
in
here
that
did
show
some
response.
That
might
be
important.
Plk
pka
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
response,
and
I
think
if
we
just
repeat
the
experiment
again,
we
can
say
with
greater
confidence.
We
can
potentially
expand
this
list
a
little
bit
more
than
an
n
of
one.
B
So
I
mean
he
might
be
yeah.
He
might
be
able
to
throw
some
light
on
this,
whether
these
are
surprising
to
him
or
not.
I
suppose.
B
A
B
B
A
I
mean
they
all
make
logical
sense,
targeting
fatty
acid
biosynthesis,
targeting
translation.
These
are
all
processes
that
are
critical
for
bacterial
growth.
Whether
or
not
you
know
again,
we'd
like
to
be
certain
that
these
are
really
being
hit.
A
We
would
need
some
antibodies
to
validate
that,
and
I,
I
guess
that's
something
I
don't
know
if
we
have
other
who
who
the
bona
fide
mrsa
labs
are
on
this
in
this
group,
but
that
might
be
somewhere.
They
can
help
us
out.
A
We
we
can
send
you
the
accession
numbers
from
the
excel
sheet,
that's
sort
of
how
I
did
some
basic
research
on
it.
You
know-
and
I
think
did
a
little
bit
of
google
searching
to
see
if
there
was
some
potential
connection
to
mrsa.
B
A
B
A
Right
and
the
mnma
is
clearly
an
atp
binder,
so
it
would
make
sense
why
it
might
bind
to
these
beats
the
other
two.
It
wasn't
clear
to
me
that
there
was
a
atp
or
nucleotide
pocket
that
might
determine,
although
possibly
there
is
something
that
you
know
would
allow
them
to
bind.
You
know
in
a
bead
specific
manner
that
could
show
competition.
A
Yeah
in
some
ways,
I'd
be
very
pleased
if
we
find
some
new
targets
to
this,
because
if
it's
a
challenge
right
with
these
are
designed
for
kinases,
if
we
capture
things
that
are
not
kinases
and
we
can
show
competition,
ultimately
we're
setting
up
in
the
lab
here
this
thermal
denaturation
assay,
where
we
put
compounds
in
and
then
we
thermally
denatured
to
look
for.
Broadly,
you
know
drug
binders,
but
that's
not
set
up
yet.
We've
got.
B
B
Right,
thank
you,
guys,
really
good
feel
free
to
stick
around
or
leave
if
you've
got
yeah.
B
To
stick
around
yeah,
okay,
we
we
just,
I
guess
we
were
hoping
to
get
just
some
quick
updates
on
the
next
compounds
that
we're
coming
through
so
so
daniel.
Do
you
want
to
lead
off
just
because
you,
I
think,
you've
already
posted
something
about
this,
that
you
could
share.
C
I
think
I'll
take
off
at
this
point.
Thank
you
all
right.
D
Can
you
see
my
screen
so
based
on
the
results
from
the
compound
975.?
We
designed
some
new
analogs,
some
of
them.
We
hope
to
improve
their
longitude.
We
get
better
logi.
D
D
It's
really
complicated
when
I
have
the
pyridine,
the
in
the
fenugreek,
so
the
purification
is
getting
a
bit
harder,
but
after
seven
columns
sometimes
I
can
get
the
pure
compound.
So
I'm
gonna
work
in
this
compound
tomorrow
and
the
last
one
that
I
have
the
cf3
and
the
nitrile
group,
I'm
still
waiting
for
the
chemical
I
bought
from
apollo
is
on
demand.
D
D
Please
yeah
yeah.
First
of
all,
so
I
have
tried
many
different
ways.
So
first
I
was
doing
like
normal
phase.
D
So
after
the
reaction,
the
last
step
is
the
coupling
I
do
like
just
a
filtration
through
silica
light.
Then
I
go
for
normal
phase
using
chloroform
and
methanol.
Chloroforming
methanol
is
better
than
other
solvents,
so
I
try
the
other
ones.
Then,
for
this
specific
compound
I
use
the
column
the
amino
colon.
There
is
a
biotech,
a
minor
column.
We
have
here
it's
a
normal
phase.
So
after
that
I
went
for
the
reverse
phase,
the
reverse
phase.
I
used
methanol
and
ammonium
and
water.
D
So
I
got
the
salt
of
the
compound,
so
it
was
not
only
the
salt
was
a
mix
of
salt
of
the
compound
and
then
also
the
pure
compound.
So
the
nmr
was
a
bit
messy.
I
did
a
workup
yesterday
to
try
to
recover
it
from
the
water
phase,
but
so
far
it's
still
in
the
water
face.
Even
when
I
try
to
control
the
ph,
because
I
was
calculating
the
pka,
there
are
many
different
pks
because
I
can
get
protonation
in
three
different
nitrogens.
D
So
it's
chilled
my
compound
is
in
the
water
face
and
I'm
trying
to
work
on
that
forex,
for
example,
the
other
compound
two
four
six,
that
I
have
only
the
period
gin.
I
have
done
so
far,
seven
columns,
but
the
problem
of
this
one
is,
I
always
have
start
material
together
with
the
final
compound.
D
D
D
F
D
What
I
have
done,
it's
like
I
do
like
you,
methanol
and
water,
then
I
collect,
let's
say
10
troops,
so
these
10
tubes,
I
need
to
run
lcms
to
check
which
tool
I
have
the
pure
compound,
because
even
the
lcms,
sometimes
not
the
lsms
like
in
the
biostage.
It's
showing
me
just
one
one
signal,
but
then
in
the
lcms
some
tubes
are
mixed.
Sometimes
some
tubes
are
pure
and
some
tubes
are
only
the
final
compound.
So
it's
better
if
you
can
run
lcms
for
all
the
tubes
that
you
collect
from
the
body.
D
E
We
haven't,
we
haven't
used
that
for
this,
maybe
maybe
in
the
interest
of
time.
We
should
take
this
discussion
offline,
but
I
mean
we're
more
than
happy
to
help
you
troubleshoot
the
the
purification
of
of
these
compounds.
It
sounds
like
you're
struggling
quite
a
bit.
D
I
haven't,
I
haven't,
seen
any
side
products
so
far
for
this
one,
but
it
can
happen.
Actually.
This
reaction
takes
five
hours
in
microwave
to
complete
the
reaction,
and
I
got
only
the
sign
of
the
final
compound.
Okay,
didn't
I
didn't
see
any
side
product
so
far.
D
D
B
A
F
Okay,
so
these
are
the
analogs
on
which
I'm
working
on,
and
particularly
this
compound
should
be
ready.
I
have
to
to
check
the
purity
of
the
compound
and,
let's
see
if
the
nmr
is
okay,
but
this
looks
good
and
then
I'm
working
also
on
this
compound
and
I'm
in
the
middle
of
the
synthesis
of
the
reaction,
and
I
hope
to
to
have
also
this
compound.
E
Just
to
add
to
this
as
well,
we've
also
got
compounds
in
the
queue
for
the
the
nitrogen
scan
of
that
left-hand
piece
analogous
to
the
the
compound
in
the
dotted
box
with
the
purity
to
check
on
maria's
screen
maria.
Can
you
point
to
that?
Pyridine
ring
whoa
yeah
anyway,
so
those
are
coming
through
as
well.
B
Awesome,
I
think,
reading
availability
of
people
and
and
the
fact
that
we've
got
our
you
know
the
chocolate
holiday
coming
up.
I
think
it's
likely
we're
gonna
have
the
next
round
of
evaluation
as
towards
the
end
of
april.
I
would,
I
would
guess
so,
sometime
after
the
20th,
so
on
that
kind
of
timeline
yeah
I
mean
anything
that
you
can
ship
by
approximately
20th
or
something
is
likely
to
to
feed
in
nicely
to
the
next
round
of
evaluation
that
we
could
do
here.
B
E
I
did
actually
chase
up
wushi
for
the
missing
experimental
from
the
beginning
compounds,
so
I've
actually
met-
and
I
just
sent
you
the
document
so
that
you've
got
that.
So
we
have
that-
and
I
also
got
their
author
names
and
affiliations
for
the
publication.
It's
my
intention
to
read
that
this
week
I've
been
hoping
to
get
to
that
for
several
weeks,
but
anyway.
B
Okay,
okay
and
so
so
so
yeah.
Well,
we
can
take
this
offline,
but
but
we
would
she
would
like
authorship
for
that.
You
think:
okay,
every
company
is
different
right,
yeah.
E
I
mean
they
were
working
with
dndi
in
the
beginning
to
make
those
compounds,
so
they
said
they
would
like
to
be
included
as
authors
well,
good
great.
B
Great,
I
think
it's
important
we're
really
clear
about
that.
So
that's
that
sounds
fine.
All
right!
That's
wonderful!
Thank
you
for
chasing
that.
Okay!
If
there's
nothing
else,
then
that's
all
good.
We
will
likely
regroup
after
easter.
So
if
there's
nothing
else,
then
have
a
great
break
and
see
you
all
again
pretty
soon
bye,
then.