►
From YouTube: 2020-09-21 C/C++ SIG
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Hi
one
sec,
I'm
just
going
to
figure
out
how
my
camera,
what
that
needs
to
do,
I'm
actually
one
of
the
aws
interns
and
I'm
just
like
it's
my
second
week,
I'm
just
joining
on
the
sig
meeting
to
see
what
I
can
learn
about
the
c
plus
repo.
B
Yeah
yeah
yeah
one
second,
I'm
just
gonna
quit
zoom
so
that
I
can
get
my
camera
settings
there.
B
B
Gitter,
I
did
the
doc
fx
yeah.
B
You
for
explaining
what
it
was
to
me
like.
I
was
so
confused
before
that,
but
I
noticed
something
that
like
it
would
pass
all
the
tests
when
I
submitted
like
on
my
branch,
but
then
after
you
merged
it,
it
was
failing
one
of
them,
so
I
don't
know
which
one
that
could
be.
A
Okay,
I'll
I'll,
take
a
look.
What's
the
thing:
okay,
perfect
thanks.
C
I'll
put
it
yeah,
you
already
wrote
it.
It's
cool.
B
A
C
A
A
Okay-
and
I
heard
from
lolita
that,
like
you,
might
be
interested
in
the
premises
story
or
is
there
any
specific,
like
tasks
that
you
have
already
like
started
looking
at
or
you're
just
like
open
any
things
here.
C
We
just
got
our
project
yesterday
or
on
friday,
so
we
don't
really
know
what
we're
gonna
be
working
on.
So
I
think
just
any
pointers
on
like
a
good
place
to
start
getting
into
the
cpp
pipeline
would
be
great.
B
A
B
We've
got
richard
who's,
one
of
our
principal
engineers,
who's
also
going
to
be
working
with
us.
I
think.
A
Yeah
we
can
probably
try
to
list
the
like
a
small
number
of
items
and
see
if
alolita
is
aligned,
I
think
from
aws.
They
have
their
own
agenda,
so
we
need
to
have
the
mutual
agreement
with
alolita.
B
Yeah
she
suggested
setting
up
a
meeting
with
all
three
of
us
plus
her
and
richard
to
sort
of
discuss
that.
A
Yeah
sounds
good
and
for
tracing
part,
I
know
you
got
unless
you're
working
on
some
improvements,
so
wonder
like
if
you
have
energy
to
work
with
one
intern
and
if
they're
interested
in
working
on
the
tracing
part.
A
Okay,
I
saw
someone
called
et
sung
so
who's
that.
F
A
A
A
Okay,
so
one
update
from
my
side,
the
the
open,
telemetry
tracing
part,
has
all
the
p1
issues
resolved
and
there's
a
there's,
a
plan
to
start
work
on
the
metrics
back,
like
I
wonder
like
if
someone
here
from
from
the
class
project
would
have
the
bandwidth
to
work
with
the
matrix
spec
folks
to
see
what
are
the
gaps
we
want
to
close
or
if
not,
then
I
think
we
can.
A
A
Like
I'll
get
the
thing
part
down,
and
I
want
to
get
the
internal
logging,
so
they
can
be
shipped
as
a
relatively
stable
component
from
matrix
part.
I
I
think
it's
just
a
reality.
We
don't
have
enough
people,
although,
like
microsoft,
town
max
and
on
this
dual
ram
house,
so
measures
will
will
not
get
into
this
year.
That's
my
thinking,
please
don't
know
if
any
other
thinking
or
priority.
A
E
I
have
the
same
thinking
there
I
mean,
I
wonder
what
kind
of
feedback
or
what
involvement
would
be
expected
or
desired,
or
is
this
like
just
a
metric
like
c
plus
plus
related,
or
is
this
kind
of
a
general
discussion
about
gaps
in
the
metrics.
A
So
it's
very
amazing
those
like,
for
example,
we
use
open,
telemetry
python
to
drive
the
metrics
dk
design.
Then
probably
the
outcome
wouldn't
work
for
c,
plus,
plus
dotnet
and
java
at
all.
So
this
has
been
the
situation
before
and
this
time
I
I
think
we
have
that
commitment.
We
got
to
cover
that
otherwise,
we'll
just
set
the
expectation
we're
not
going
to
do
that.
A
A
A
So
for
tracing
the
last
priority,
one
issue
got
resolved
and
I
think,
over
the
next
couple
days,
people
are
going
to
look
at
the
p2
and
p3
issues
and
see,
if
there's
anything
that
they
want
to
escalate
to
priority
one,
but
there
should
be
like
that
should
be
rare.
So
from
from
my
take,
I
I
think
the
tracing
spike
is
almost
there.
I
don't
expect
any
changes
like
for
open
time
to
donate.
I
just
told
my
customers,
all
the
tracing
api
should
be
done
already.
I
don't
expect
any
braking
changes.
E
Yes,
that's
the
same
way.
I
see
it.
I
think
the
tracing
stuff
is
the
is
what
you
should
focus
on
to
get
it
ready
and
released
elementary
stuff.
E
E
D
D
What
I
think
we
may
do
is
what
I'm
suggesting
to
do.
Is
we
allocate
an
azure
vm
that
already
has
a
pre-configured
visual
studio,
2015
installation
like
a
docker
image
recompile,
because
if
we
go
with
plain
image,
it's
going
to
result
in
like
25
minutes
about
time.
It
takes
a
lot
to
establish
because
a
lot
of
that
style,
visual
studio
and
pretty
much
add
one
of
these
machines
to
our
ci
loop.
D
So
when
the
pre-check
runs,
we
will
also
kick
off
a
2015,
build
just
to
verify
that
the
code
is
actually
compiling
for
15
as
well.
That's
just
expanding
and
well
not
really
expanding,
but
ensuring
that
we
fully
support
any
shipments
plus
11
compiled
so
I'll.
Take
care
of
this.
I
assume
that
you
guys
don't
have
major
objections
about
it.
D
Or
yes,
so
it's
gonna
be
a
github
actions,
but
it's
gonna
be
hosted
runner,
so
we
would
have
to
locate
the
app
for
that,
like
it's
pretty
much
azure
cloud
hosted
runner.
The
problem
is
that
there
is
no
default
actions,
runner
that
has
the
right
image
for
that.
D
D
D
It
means
one
of
the
team
members
like
from
all
over
and
tom
will
turn
me,
can
take
a
take
a
look,
so
we
will
have
to
guarantee
hundred
percent
of
time
and
that
we
know
other
ways
we're
going
to
be
blocking
like
the
armors.
We
can
also
set
it
as
optional
to
make
sure
that
if
it
fails
but
can
still
merge
or
if
the
machine
is
down
against
the
merge
generally,
I
don't
that's,
anticipate
major
reality,
just
like
still,
which
is
gonna,
be
up
and
running.
D
I
hope
that
the
cost
is
not
gonna
be
too
high.
There
is
an
open
issue
against
github
that
they
will.
They
are
committed
to
actually
provide
one
of
the
standard
images
for
that,
but
there's
no
eta,
so
I
think
once
once
they
provide
that
we
can
shut
off
our
own
vm,
our
own
hosted,
run
and
just
use
theirs.
D
I
can
refer.
They
shouldn't
have
found
september.
A
You
can
put
that
in
the
in
the
meeting
notes
the
good
question.
The
reason
you
cannot
use
like
the
github
action
and
the
like
rebuild
darker
image
is
because
yeah.
D
It's
because
it's
starting
25
minutes
at
least
25
to
30
minutes
to
receive
look
it's
just
too
much.
D
A
Yeah,
I
I
I
what
what
like
the
open
times,
we
don't
add
project.
We
use
the
pre-built
images.
For
example,
we
need
to
do
integration
testing
with
redis.
We
just
have
our
like
docker
file
with
the
redis
and
the
first
time
it's
going
to
take
some
time,
but
after
that
it'll
be
very
fast.
Just
fetch
the
image
directly,
and
I
think
here
I
would
prefer
to
go
through
the
same
approach
and
having
something
specific
to
microsoft.
Only
like
you
and
tom
has
would
have
is
a
little
bit
concerning
to
me.
D
Let
me
check
my
understanding
is
that
it
has
to
be
a
self-hosted
runner.
We
can
just
share
the
message
in
the
chat
window.
It
does
explicitly
say
about
a
self-hosted
friend.
It's
why
it's
a
self-hosted
level
and
well.
We
can
develop
self-hosted
even
instead,
anyways.
Let's
take
this
of
my
own
launcher.
A
So
so
before
we
jump
to
the
the
prototypes
evan,
would
you
do
a
quick
introduction
of
yourself.
F
F
I
have
been
the
various
properties
there,
in
particular
on
the
finance
property,
where
there
was
a
lot
of
c-plus
plus
used
in
the
at
least
in
the
first
decade.
I
was
there.
I've
moved
out
of
that
area,
but
I
still
have
a
strong
interest
in
c
plus
plus.
So
I,
the
other
thing
I
think,
maybe
I
have
interest
here,
which
I
don't
know
if
anyone's
approached
you
about,
is
to
get
open,
telemetry
integrated
into
envoy,
so
that
envoy
and
istio
start
using
open,
telemetry
and
w3
tracing.
A
That's
it:
okay,
thanks
for
for
the
heads-up,
I
remember
like
when,
when
ryan
bourne
was
on
this
product,
like
he
seems
to
be
interested
in
envoy
still
integration
and
there's
some
thinking
about
like
like
linux,
forking
support
and
some
of
the
efforts,
I
think,
is
specific
to
envoy.
E
The
with
the
envoy
integration
or
yeah,
I'm
not
an
envoy
expert
either
I
mean,
but
if
ever
needs
any
help,
I
definitely
can
help
out
with
like
the
open,
the
diameter
c
plus
plus
specifics.
So
we
can
unite
our
knowledge
and
work
from
there.
So
I'd
be
definitely
open
for
that,
but
I
cannot
really.
I
I'm
not
deep
into
envoy,
so
I
cannot
help
with
anybody
details,
but
I
can
definitely
help
with
the
open
the
diametric
plus.
F
A
Okay,
so
if
you
have
like
questions
related
to
how
the
overall
open
climate
project
works
or
like
things
specific
to
the
w3dc
like
trace
contact
specs,
I
have
been
involved
in
these
two
areas.
A
lot
I
can
help
out
and
for
also
I
can
help.
For
example,
if
you
have
questions
about,
why
would
this
particular
open
time?
F
Right,
I
mean
I've
already
envoy
already
has
built-in
traces,
for
I
think,
jaeger
and
zipkin
and
so
on.
So
I
just
see
this
as
being
another
one
that
fits
into
that
pattern,
I'm
hoping
and
then
you
select,
which
ones
you
want
to
use.
You
know,
on
a
case-by-case
basis,.
A
A
E
To
go
to
some
of
the
stale
prs
because
I
think
for
some
of
them,
for
example,
for
the
mock
exporter
or
the
memory
exporter,
it's
now
called
the
test
system
didn't
pass,
but
I
think
once
this
global
context,
variable
or
negative
car
is
merged.
I
think
that
was
the
reason
why
the
tests
in
some
of
the
previous
pr's
didn't
pass.
A
E
We
had
unresolved
symbols
in
some
instances
and
I
also
plan
to
go
through
some
of
the
pr's
once
this.
The
predoctor
before
is
merged
and
get
this
ready
for
review
and
merge.
Okay,.
A
So
how
about
this,
like,
I
think
you
have
permission
to
assign
prs
to
yourself.
Oh
yes,
I
think
so
yeah
so
pick
the
prs
that
you
want
to
take
a
look
and
assign
them
to
yourself
and
I'll.
Take
the
rest
of
the
pr's
assigned
to
myself
and
we
can
follow
up
individually.
E
D
D
So
I
was
wondering,
like
I
realize
it's
not
fully
in
our
camp,
but
a
sort
of
projection
related.
I
remember
when
we
started
this
ryan
mentioned
that
there
could
be
use
cases
where
other
languages
may
be
needing
to
use
based
implementation.
D
A
I
think
having
the
c
plus
class
open
country
ict
running
as
part
of
the
other
language
runtime
is
the
interesting
area
and
especially
their
scenario.
For
example,
python.
I've
heard
from
folks
from
icelab
that
they
have
like
python
customers
who
use
both
the
higher
level
python
script
together
with
lower
level
c
plus
class
components,
and
they
interact
with
each
other
through
the
foreign
function,
interface
and
and
for
both
the
classplus
plugins
and
the
python
libraries.
They
need
you
to
probably
get
the
contacts.
D
D
D
E
Right,
I
think
that's
definitely
an
interesting
part
to
look
into,
because
I
think
that
might
I
don't
see
any
big
like
stumbling
blocks.
There
I
mean
the
biggest
unknown
for
me
is
just
the
context
handling
like
obtaining
the
active
span.
I
think
that
is
the
biggest
question
mark
there.
E
I
think
we
are
also
kind
of
it
doesn't
look
that
bad
for
me,
because
I
mean
we
have
we
we
have
to
in
c
plus
plus
we
have
the
possibility
to
kind
of
provide
a
custom
kind
of
contact,
runtime
context
handler,
but
I'm
not
sure
how
that
works
in
other
languages.
Right,
for
example,
have
the
node
api.
E
D
I
also
see
like
tremendous
value
in
this
going
forward
like
for
the
next
year
or
for
2022.
So
it's
very
simple
scenario:
most
of
windows
telemetry
is
actually
native,
like
ttw
for
windows
8.
So
if
we
are
on
boarding
any
windows,
application
written
like
in
react
or
electron
for
others,
it's
a
microsoft
design,
application
written
in
javascript,
but
it
needs
to
go
through
the
sender
centralized
agent
through
the
os
configurable
privacy
settings
that
mean
that
it
has
to
use
some
sort
of
information
to
native
c
api
anyways.
D
E
Yeah
I
mean
for
traces.
I
came
up
with
this
guitar
project,
where
I
collected
like
missing
features
that
were
missing
for,
like
the
tracing
part.
E
A
Okay,
so
so
tom
to
answer
the
question,
I
think
there
are
two
things
overall,
the
spike
has
this
matrix,
it
tells
you
what's
the
compact
status
and
also
johannes,
has
created
this
project.
So
if
you
just
go
here,
you
can
also
see.