►
From YouTube: 2019-10-01 .NET SIG
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
E
B
A
H
G
D
Yeah
I
can
start
because
ookay
yeah
first
one
is
a
thanks.
Ludmilla
for
the
for
the
awesome
feedback
on
the
latest
PR.
We
did
so.
We
try
to
implement
this
name
tracers
proposal
we
just
brought
in
into
the
old
tap
and
specification,
and
it's
got
a
huge
change.
I
guess,
but
we
are
trying
to
get
that
info
for
alpha
v3
and
yeah.
D
I
will
encourage
all
of
you
folks
to
have
a
look
at
it
and
and
for
a
feedback
if
possible,
and
let
me
think
there
was
one
thing:
I
I
just
wanted
to
ask
yeah
right
Miller,
you
mentioned
that
interfaces
will
be
changed
now
to
extra
classes
in
the
in
the
abstractions
package.
Basically
in
the
API
level,
and
yes,
what
does
it
mean
for
for
namespaces
naming?
D
G
D
G
The
API
and
SDK
still
need
to
be
independent,
independent
of
each
other
right,
so
we
still
need
to
be
able
to
swap
out
SDK
implementation
from
the
abstract
API
class.
That
won't
parvenu
is
too
rational
using
interface.
Well,
a
part
of
the
rationale
for
the
interface
right
is
that
you
do
have
a
concrete
definition
of
the
methods
that
are
going
to
be
there
to
abstract
classes.
Survives
that
same
safety,
so
that
someone
can
just
use
the
API.
A
Like
the
biggest
drawback
of
absurd
causes
versus
interfaces
like
and
we
discussed,
computer
abstract
classes,
so
it
eliminates
what
the
concerns
are.
There
is
no
other
implementation,
so
if
you're
talking
about
pure
abstract
classes
versus
interfaces,
the
only
drawback
is,
you
cannot
have
multiple
interfaces
like
inherit,
one
object
or
multiple
interfaces.
You
can
only
hear
it
from
one
object
class,
so
we
need
to
see
how
much
it
will
affect
us
and
I.
Don't
feel
like
that.
Has
too
much.
E
C
A
D
Because,
right
now
we
have,
for
example,
we
have
I
tracer
in
abstractions
and
tracer
in
not
abstractions
I,
don't
remember
the
package
name,
but
the
name
space
is
the
same
for
these
two
projects.
So
if
you
drop
the
I,
we
suddenly
have
name,
we
have
the
same
fully
qualified
name
that
was
mine.
Where
are
you
concrete
problem?
Yeah?
D
D
F
Have
a
question:
if
no
one's
next,
it's
also
for
Ludmila
I.
Have
this
one
PR
that
I
haven't
touched
in
ten
days
since
I
opened
it
and
she
linked
a
change
into
a
tracing
class,
and
this
shows
her
strategy
or
Ludmila
your
strategy
into
modifying
both
the
processor
in
the
config.
At
the
same
time,
I
like
that,
it's
it's
fine!
It's
a
constructor!
You
automatically
pass
both
references,
so
I
I,
don't
see
I,
don't
understand
in
which
branch
this
change
is
like.
Are
you
gonna
merge
this
in
so
then
I?
Just
oh.
F
C
F
G
F
B
A
Yeah,
just
to
give
some
update
on
our
positions
that
netsim
we
are
trying
to
front-load
sound
work
on
fish
like
explain.
What's
the
Naresuan
to
support
in
open
sea
lemon
trees
DK,
so
they
can
like
looking
at
the
scenarios
and
how
they
implement
is
they
may
have
some
ideas?
What
what
can
be
improved
in
AP?
Is
you
have
a
lot
of
experience
on
how
to
do
allocation
free
or
like
performance
in
general
AP
ice
and
like
what
kind
of
names
to
use
cuz,
I
big
happiness
was
that,
but
they
need
tinnitus
from
us.
A
That's
why,
with
me,
I
did
a
couple
PRS
about
documentation,
updates
and
how
to
use
SDK
an
API,
so
that's
I
will
be
doing
some
ethics
kind
of
API
usage
examples.
So
yeah,
that's
what's
happening
quiz
that
and
yeah.
Last
week
we
released
a
version
of
open
sea
Dimitri-
oh
no,
like
in
other
alpha,
so
just
fresh
Air's
and
before
more
improved
yeah.
A
H
F
C
F
C
C
I
A
A
C
D
One
last
question
may
be
so:
I
just
came
off
the
spec
waiting
as
the
new
Sergey,
and
one
of
the
discussion
points
was
to
remove
vendor-specific
code
from
the
avila,
many
referrals.
So
what
was
the
tested
mean
for
the
asp
net
project
package,
for
example,
would
stay
there?
We
would
have
to
go
into
another.
A
Yeah
I
see
that
the
vendor
specific
code
is
mostly
vendors.
Like
my
girls,
yeah
more
like
strict
driver
and
application
size
well,
I
would
say
those
needs
to
go
alone.
I
have
those
like
moving
I
spin
it
out
because
I
spin,
it
is
such
an
integral
part
of
dotnet
that,
like
it,
doesn't
break
anybody
I
can
you
change?
Is
the
key.
You
probably
want
to
change
those
packages
as
well.
At
the
same
time,
so
I,
don't
think
that'll
be
a
problem.
I
suppose.
D
G
We
can
probably
push
that
discussion
out
a
little
bit
once
we
have
any
in
beta
and
we
expect
change
then
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
time
to
start
looking
at
how
to
reorganize
like
some
of
these
things
and
pull
packages
out.
I
know
there's
an
issue
about
this
and
respect
witho
right
now,
I
think
yeah.