►
From YouTube: 2020-07-22 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
Gotcha,
oh,
it's
just
I
think
we
talked
about
it
briefly
in
chat,
maybe.
B
D
F
C
E
E
C
E
And
they're
they're
marked
so
they're
going
to
be
different
kinds
right.
So
let's
say
that
I'm
just
recording
every
individual
duration,
but
I'm
also
doing
like
calculating
descriptive
statistics
on
those
raw
values.
So
the
exporter
you
know
coming
out
of
the
SDK
you're
gonna
have
the
raw
value,
the
raw
measurements
and
then
you're
gonna.
Have
you.
E
C
C
E
So
if
you're
getting
all
of
that
data
and
I
don't
know,
I
haven't
been
really
involved
with
it.
But
that's
what
I'm
expecting
to
happen
on
the
metrics
development,
but
that's
when
I
expect
dams.
So
all
you
really
want
to
do
to
go
to
Prometheus
is
to
filter
out
the
raw
metrics
and
just
send
the
aggregate
aggregate
snapshot.
G
I
think
it's
not
necessarily
that
we're
just
gonna
be
using
like
they're
that
we
might
be
getting
taking
receiving
from
SDK
packages,
but
there's
also
a
chance
that
I
think
what
we're
assuming
is
that
sometimes
some
sorts
of
metrics,
whether
it's
from
SDK
or
another,
sort
of
data
scraping
client
that
to
us
not
with
any
aggregated
or
q-tip
generated
values.
But
we
would
have
to
be
like
me,
would
have
to
accumulate
them
within
to
collect
their
first.
But
there's
no
books,
Jen.
C
We
could
see
that
so,
if
a
so,
if
the
metric
is
if
a
metric
value
come,
it
comes
in
and
tells
me
that
it
is
adding,
which
means
that
it
should
be
like
aggregated
and
it's
monotonic,
and
it
is
also
instantaneous.
Then
it
means
that
it's
something
that
a
user
would
like
to
aggregate,
but
it's
not
that
has
not
been
aggregated
it.
Yet
that's
my
understanding
and-
and
in
that
case
we
would
a
great
this
metric
before
using.
E
B
C
Right
if
the
user
indicates
that
the
semantic
like
this
is
like
adding,
then
it
doesn't
really
like
which
which
I
guess
just
adding
a
monotonic
and
it
will
be
encountered
in
Prometheus.
So
we
wouldn't
really
want
to
export.
Yes,
we'd.
E
B
C
E
G
B
Right
yeah,
like
I,
mean
I,
don't
know
if
you
would
like,
if
you're
using
one
of
the
resource
processors
like
you
might
get
some
like.
It
would
also
add
certain
labels
about
the
collector
but
yeah,
it's
like
I,
don't
know
if
you
just
always
add
a
label
like
inside
the
processor,
I
guess
problem
that
way.
It's
always
unique.
B
B
A
J
Yeah
yeah
so
basically
for
aw
CCS.
We
have
a
easiest
task,
met
at
a
ten
point
and
who
are
writing
a
receiver,
so
we
should
read
the
matrix
from
this
endpoint
and
transport
through
our
pipeline.
So
that's
the
basic,
a
skeleton
of
this
receiver,
so
nothing
fancy
here
is
the
fastest
skeleton
I
just
wanted
to
get
my
first
contribution
March
then
maybe
we
will
focus
on
our
four
stops.
B
Okay,
cool
also,
if
y'all
are
interested,
so
when
being
we
don't
have
the
will
event
you
want
to
have
four
ECS.
Is
this
observer
thing?
So
basically,
this
is
observer.
We
can
talk
about
it
offline,
but
so
this
kind
of
came.
This
idea
can
came
from
from
the
signal
effects
agent
and
it's
read
like
dynamically,
discovering
workloads,
they're
running
and
then
accentuate
receivers
for
them,
and
so,
when
the
ones
we
supported
the
agent
in
signal
effects
agent
as
ECS.
B
H
B
I
H
Started
a
couple
of
meetings
ago
also
three
device
well
two
meetings
ago,
because
then
I,
you
know
typically
join
every
other
meeting
because
after
time
zones
and
during
the
last
the
last
couple
meeting
way
I
presented
the
face
and
wanted
to
get
some
feedback
on
that
I.
Think
Kevin
perhaps
was
the
one
that
sent
some
ideas,
some
feedback,
but
I
think
it
is,
but
at
least
that
the
proposal
implies
quite
a
significant
change
in
the
configuration
for
much
I
know
that
we
had
a
lot
in
the
queue
right
now.
H
I
think
I
mentioned
working
for
these
items,
but
my
place
be
good
for
us
to
take
a
look
at
that
think
about
it
in
for
a
while
and
see
what
we
require
in
terms
of
configuration
so
that
we
don't
do
gradient
changes
on
a
you
know,
because
we
so
we
can
to
make
a
change
before
you
reviews
one,
let's
hero.
But
after
that
we
have
to
wait
for
two
years
to
the
blacks
to
do
some
breaking
changes.
H
So
not
sure
if
you
want
to
go
over
during
this
call
now
or
if
you
forget
what
you
read
on
their
own
but
yeah,
let's
Ben.
What
I
wanted
is
to
get
irritation
to
to
this
item
here
and
then
share
some
feedback
and
at
least
keep
in
mind
before
1x
other
I
mean
it
might
be.
Shame
for
us
to
lose
the
future
or
you
know
what
to
think
about
it
before
women's,
because
it
is
something
that
people
really
care
about.
H
Need
lieutenancy,
yes,
I
think
it
was
kind
of
a
because
at
that
same
meeting,
I
was
planning
on
reading
this
topic
as
well
yeah,
but
I
mean
it
is
something
that
comes
up
quite
often
also
on
the
eager
community.
So
Nagar
we
heard
about
that
a
few
times
ago
or
a
few
times.
H
First
for
single
tenant
and
the
code
block
will
be
very
similar
to
multitude.
She
said
if
there's
only
one
route,
so
there's
only
one
way
of
data
flowing
through
the
pipeline.
The
biggest
change
here
is
what
to
do
after
the
pros.
Christopher
might
decide
that
a
specific
pipeline
or
a
specific
set
of
exporters
is
responsible
for
these
pieces
of
data.
So
that's
the
main,
the
main
point
on
this
change.
Now
this
might
be
a
just
a
regular
processor
or
it
might
be
a
first
class
system.
B
B
B
Don't
like
still
instantiate
like
single,
you
know
for
each
to
knit
instantiate
like
a
single
service
expense.
You
know,
but
then
just
have
the
routing
done
somehow
separately,
I,
don't
know
it's
I
guess
the
problem
is
gonna,
be
I,
wouldn't
see.
Maybe
you
see
if
you
can
find
somebody
else
who's
interested
in
this
and
they
can
work
on
it
because
I
feel,
like
you
know,
like
it's
not
on
our
roadmap,
like
it's
hard
to
find
the
time
to
dedicate
to
it
to
work
through
issues
right.
B
So
at
the
same
time
like
we
don't
want
the
like,
you
know,
pull
things
up
that
you
know
they're
good
things
so
I
feel
like
I
feel
like.
If
maybe
there
is
like,
if
there
was
another
user
who's
in
this
feature,
then
there's
enough
more
validation
there.
You
know
at
the
feature
and
somebody
to
work
with
and
I,
don't
know.
Maybe
I
think
you
put
out
a
call
and
chat,
see.
There's
somebody!
That's
didn't
collaborate
with
to
kind
of.
H
So,
instead
of
having
table
based
import
or
having
that
kind
of
logic
inside
your
collector,
there
should
be
a
router
or
a
proxy
in
front
of
the
cluster
of
collectors
and
that
approximate
direct
spans
to
specifically
collectors
based
on
their
trade
cities
that
that
works
and
anything,
that's
a
very
sound
approach.
The
problem
with
that
is
it's
not
something
that
people
can
consume
right
now.
People
have
to
build
build
a
wrong,
or
you
know
they
have
to
really
proxy.
Basically,
because
there
is
no
such
a
proxy
out.
I
H
H
Would
benefit
in
having
inside
of
the
collector
I?
Don't
ever
think
this
would
be
a
solution
for
big
for
all
the
use
cases
and
for
more
complicated
these
cases.
People
might
really
want
to
develop
their
own
process,
but
for
the
vast
majority
of
the
cases
that
I've
seen
on
the
air
community,
this
kind
of.
E
H
B
B
B
That's
actually
one
thing
also
do
wanting
to
improve.
So,
let's
see
so
I
think
we
already
had
the
beta
1.
So,
yes,
we
always
have
one
milestone,
distracting
the
next
release.
You
know
every
two
weeks,
so
I
think
that
one
should
generally
be
pretty
accurate
but
I'm,
also
as
I'm
going
through
the
issues.
I'm
also
cleaning
some
of
those
up.
So
ideally
it's
fairly
accurate.
This
GA
one
I,
don't
think
is
that
accurate
necessarily
like
I
feel
it's
not
been
triage
very
heavily
so
but
yeah
I
think.
Ideally
we
need
it.
B
Would
it's
an
issue
I've
seen
as
well
like
having
milestones
and
trying
to
see
where
kind
of
what
our
roadmap
is.
It
does
seem
like
we
have
that
gap
right
now,
but
do
you
have
any
thoughts
on
I
mean
kind
of
how
how
far
out
the
the
roadmap
she
go
or
kind
of
I
mean?
Do
you
have
any
ideas
around
what
kind
of
what
you
want
to
see?
There
was
a
mouse.
H
B
Other
I
think
it's
I
think
that's
completely
fair
and
yeah.
Definitely
yeah
one
of
the
things
I'm
trying
trying
to
improve
so
yeah
a
few
bytes
definitely
appreciate
it.
So
let
me
know
things
to
get
better
worse
or
or
you
know,
Don.
B
B
Tell
community
has
also
defined
a
charger
role,
so
I
guess
we're
gonna
kind
of
on
top
of
that
and
have
I
guess
I'm
currently
wearing
the
Hat,
but
basically
somebody
that
you
know
we,
you
know
Mon
together,
Asante
ours
make
sure
they
get
reviewed
in
a
timely
manner,
not
sure
what
timely
means
yeah.
If
we
should
can
have
some
SLA
around
that
we're
still
working
through
that.
I
G
E
B
B
E
B
H
J
B
Yeah
but
I
mean
I,
would
probably
I
mean
if
it's
I
would
probably
default
to
putting
it
in
the
channel
there,
unless
it
really
is
like
absolutely,
unless
you
really
want
a
private
channel
yeah,
it's
probably
sometimes
it's
better
to
default,
to
sending
it
to
the
public
channel
and
just
adding
me
that
way.
You
know
in
case
I'm,
PTA
or
whatever
you
know
things
don't
get
stagnated.
So
just
maybe
bear
that
the
observer
stuff
yeah,
but
maybe
you
can
bring
me
directly.