►
From YouTube: 2022-02-16 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
What's
up,
maybe
so
I
guess
one
interesting
development
is
that
the
renaming
of
the
tracer
meter
name
to
scope
name
finally
happened.
This
got
merged
to
the
spec,
which
is
what
was
important
for
us
now.
The
the
remaining
bit
is
for
the
logging
spec
to
describe
what
exactly
it
means
for
the
logs
right.
How
do
we,
where
exactly
the
wiring
happens?
Where
do
we
put
the?
How
do
we
put
the
logger
name
into
the
scope?
Name?
It's
we
should
be
describing
this
in
the
logging
spec
a
login
library,
sdk
specification.
C
So
I
think
once
we
do
that
and
the
implementation
looks
doable,
I
mean
the
prototypes,
then
I
think
that
is
the
last
remaining
bit.
We
can
then
declare
the
data
model
stable
unless
I'm
missing
something.
I
think
this
was
the
last
one.
B
Do
we
need
to
have
any
kind
of
period
of
like
feature
freeze
before
we
hit?
We
declare
this
officially
stable
or
is
the
next
step
to
go
straight
to
stable.
C
A
C
C
Yeah,
I
think
that
that's
a
good
idea.
Well,
whatever
this
cooling
period
is,
we
should
actively
seek
opinion
on
others
of
others
during
this
period
to
see
if
there
are
any
use
cases
we
didn't
take
into
account
which
contradicted
what
we
have
right.
So,
let's
make
sure
we
try
to
kind
of
popularize
the
idea
of
log
data
model
existing
and
nearing
the
stability,
and
if
we
can
add
examples,
as
you
say,
I
think
that's
that
that
would
be
also
a
good
exercise
to
do
for
us
or
for
anyone
else.
So
yeah.
D
D
C
D
C
A
C
A
C
D
C
D
The
sig's
been
pretty
quiet
on
ebpf
I
was
going
to
like
half
of
those,
but
it's
been
not
much
has
gone
on
the
last
six
weeks
on
ebpf,
so
yeah.
C
B
Just
to
try
to
represent
what
I
heard
from
ted
last
week,
I
think
he
was
also
interested
in
trying
to
reconcile
the
events
on
spans
with
with
the
log
events
so
that
they
could
share
the
same
data
model
instead
of
having
two
completely
separate
representations
of
nearly
the
same
thing.
C
Yeah
yeah.
Actually,
at
some
point
I
tried
to
do
that.
There
is
an
even
open
and
open
issue
in
the
specification
repo.
I
think
the
only
difference
we
have.
No,
not
the
only
difference
the
the
beat
that
exists
in
spawn
events
and
does
not
exist
in
the
log
records
is
the
may
at
the
moment.
C
C
A
Okay,
so
I
wanted
to
actually
catch
up.
I
have
sort
of
an
action
item
for
myself
to
catch
up
with
ted
anyways.
I
can
sort
of
bring
it
up
just
see.
You
know
if
we
want
him
to
come
back
to
the
sick
and
explain
it
more
or
like
what
the
level
of
interest
in
reality
is.
I
can
I
can
take
that
one
and
then
on
ebpf
tikrun.
Do
you
want
to
go
and
poke
them?
I
will
do
that.
Yes,
I
will.
C
C
C
So
that
will
be
in
addition
to
that
right
and
the
week
changes
which
describe
how
the
logger
name,
although
their
name
works
there,
so
that
that
probably
depends
on
that
right.
So
the
bringing
the
object
first
and
then
we'll
modify
the
the
language
there
to
tell
what
happens
with
the
logo
name
so
yeah.
If
there
are
no
one
else
who
wants
to
take
that,
and
I
will
work
on
that.