►
From YouTube: 2023-03-23 meeting
Description
Open cncf-opentelemetry-meeting-3@cncf.io's Personal Meeting Room
A
B
D
B
C
C
Yeah
I
think
we
can
talk
about
it.
Okay,.
C
C
So
yeah,
let's
look
at
I,
don't
know,
I
think
we
not
should
be
joining
at
least
okay.
Bryce
is
not
coming
today.
Okay,
but
Bina
didn't
say
anything
so:
okay,.
C
C
B
C
B
C
C
C
C
A
C
Image
for
running
the
the
protobarf
stuff
and
that
so
it
doesn't
work
if
you
don't
have
an
Intel.
The
docker
image
is
not
compatible
or
something
like
that.
So
we
are
a
bit
that
we
are
a
bit
Frozen
here
with
that.
But.
C
From
my
other
computer
I
will
have
to
update
something
probably
but
I
can
try
to
update
the
spec,
because
we
are
a
bit
a
bit
behind.
We
also
as
part
of
the.
E
C
Knew
we
wanted
to
release
some
of
these
things,
one
of
the
things
that
we
was
added
that
now
we
have
the
version
of
this
pick
that
we
are
supporting
in
this
variable,
so
we
can
use
that
also
for
the
HTTP
request.
Do
you
remember
Kevin
that
previously?
B
C
Yeah:
okay,
that's
a
small
thing
that
you
might
take
if
you
want
as
it's
better
of
your
yes.
F
A
C
That
can
be
done.
Sure
I
also
want
to
try
to
update
our
version
so
I
will
we
can
do
that
if
you
want
Kevin
at
the
question
here
to
acidity.
B
C
With
a
very
new
collector
versions,
we
we
would
have
problems
because
the
collector
didn't
understand
they.
They
didn't
keep
versions
well
between
collectors
and
the
spec,
and
this
header
was
was
useful,
then
recognizing
that
the
person
is
not
the
correct
one.
B
C
Silently
disappearing
their
deaths,
so
it
was
difficult,
so
I
think
both
things
can
be
useful
if
you
cannot
touch
header
as
it's
in
the
issue.
I,
don't
remember
that
issue
exactly
what
it
is,
but
it's
in
the
latest
page
and
I
will
try
to
update
the
pr
at
the
spec
that
okay
automatically
now
the
the
the
the
the
script
that
we
have
will
update
the
environment
variable
automatically
also
created
it
will
be
automatically
updated.
So
we
can
keep
it
synchronized
without
having
to
change.
D
I'm
not
I'm
not
up
to
date
on
what's
being
done
in.
C
Okay,
yeah,
because
one
of
the
things
that
that
we
got
also
as
an
as
an
issue
recently
in
the
project
is
something
that
we
talked
before.
I
think
we
talked
it
two
meetings
ago
that
the
this
this
one
that
says
separate,
otlp
exporter,
HTTP
foreign.
C
They
are
using
it
from
a
long
time
ago,
and
he
he
said
this,
that
the
grpc
has
a
lot
of
dependencies.
That
is
a
bit
help
that
it
makes
applications
to
grow
a
lot
also
to
build,
takes
a
lot
of
time
and
that
having
separate
libraries
for
the
HTTP
and
grpc
will
be
a
great
idea.
That's
something
that
I
remember.
We
talked
here
also
so
yeah.
What
do
you
think
about
that?
Do
you
think
it
makes
sense,
also
for
your
Stephen
and
Carlos.
E
At
this
point,
I
I
actually
probably
shouldn't
make
an
opinion.
I
haven't
been
really
concerning
myself
with
build
time
or
size
of
the
app
at
this
point,
we're
so
early
in
the
development
I've
not
been
concerned.
I
haven't
noticed,
though,
build
times
being
more
than
you
know,
a
couple
of
seconds
and
and
stuff,
as
always,
I
guess
on
a
on
principle.
The
more
separate
things
are,
the
easier
it
is
for
somebody
to
integrate,
but
I
I
haven't
seen
the
I
haven't
seen
the
issue
myself
yeah.
C
Okay,
yeah:
it's
because,
apart
from
the
build
time,
all
those
dependencies
are
the
the
truth,
issues
of
Doubt
link
problems
that
we
saw
so
yeah,
probably
having
two
will
also
ease
that
transition,
because
lots
of
people
are
using
the
otrp
exporter
yeah.
So
if
we
can
move
the
HTTP
to
a
simpler
library
that
has
less
dependencies
and
people
move
to
that,
that
I
can
expect,
most
of
the
people
will
end
up
using
the
HTTP
one
instead
of
the
erpc
in
the
near
future.
It
will
probably
help
everyone
with
that.
C
I
have
seen
some
really
nasty
things
with
the
dependencies
in
the
in
the
Apple
libraries
with
erpc.
They
think
that
you
usually
don't
fix
a
version
on
your
dependencies
has
made
some
some
errors
that
are
not
easy
reproducible
or
that
you
can
fix
so
yeah
I
yeah
I've
seen
that
that
could
be
a
another
option.
Maybe
Kevin.
C
B
B
Yeah
I
could
I
actually
took
a
spent
a
little
time
on
this
the
other
day
and
I.
Guess
I,
don't
quite
understand
enough
about
just
builds,
so
I
might
need
a
little
help
with
it,
maybe
like
maybe
a
quick
layout
of
where
things
should
go,
because
there
are
some
things
that
are
shared
between
the
grpc
and
HTTP
exporters.
So
I
wasn't
quite
sure
where
to
put
them
and
I
didn't
want
to
copy
stuff.
So.
C
D
B
C
B
B
C
Just
saying
because
you
said
you
wanted
to
do
something:
I
don't
know
if
you
are
interested
more
just
in
code
or
do
you
want
also
to
learn
about
the
build
system
and
the
SPM
packages
yeah.
B
C
Yeah
yeah
the
thing
now.
The
only
thing
is
that,
with
the
latest
change,
we
have
now
two
different
files
that
did
that
that
should
be
taken
in
account.
We
have
to
that's
something
that
it
was
needed.
We
have
now
also
for
Stefan
and
Carlos,
so
you
know
maybe
no.
We
we
now
have
two
packages:
okay,
what
that
means,
if
you
have
a
swift
tools,
version
after
equals
or
after
5.6,
we'll
use
this
one
for.
C
Lessons
we'll
use
this
one.
It
was
needed
basically,
because
we
what's
OS
was
not
supported.
B
C
It
was
failing,
and
it's
13
in
this
version
when
you
can
limit
a
dependency
to
just
some
platforms.
A
C
Person
you
couldn't
say
that
you
didn't
want
to
watch
OS
version
for
this,
and
this
library
with
reachability
swift,
is
not
available
for
what's
OS,
so
it
had
to
be
defined
like
this,
because
we
say
that
we
support
what
choice
with
this
version
and
you
need
a
swift
either
six,
but
for
previous
versions
that
probably
no
one
is
using
anymore.
So
we
could
think
about
updating
it
also,
but
breaking
it
now
was
a
bit
rude
yeah
for
some
people,
so
I
prefer
to
have
another
one
that
is
with
the
5.2.
C
That's
the
initial
one.
We
had
that
doesn't
so
as
an
available
platform
whatever,
and
that
has
a
bit
older
way
of
defining
packages
and
dependencies.
So
when
building
that
you
will
need
to
to
add
to
both
packages.
Okay,.
C
By
default,
if
you
use
a
new
xcode
it
will,
it
will
solve
as
it
opens
with
this
one,
but
it's
really
really:
okay,.
C
C
A
And
that's
the.
C
So
if
you
change,
you
will
have
to
change
in
both
the
way
to
to
check
that
both
works
is
commenting
this
out
and
opening
the
project
again
something
before
package
like
another
another
letter
because
it
uses
the
fixed
package.com.
C
So
if
you
change
habit
the
name
of
the
file
locally,
it
will
open
with
the
order.
You
can
check
that
it
also
the
old
one.
Okay,.
B
C
C
So
yeah,
if
you
have
any
issue,
just
contact
me
or
send
me
a
slack
message
or
whatever
you
want.
Okay
sure
yeah.
You
can
try
to
help
or
take
a
look
yeah.
My
idea
will
be
using
an
intermediate
library
for
both
another
currency.
C
Yeah,
but
that
could
mean
that
you
have
to
make
public
some
things
in
the
library
some
import
and
making
some
things
public
to
be
able
to
be
read
from
all.
B
F
C
We
were,
we
were
reviewing
the
last
meeting
actions.
Okay,
I
think
you
took
a
look
at
the
same
question:
I,
don't
know:
what's
the
status
of
that
step
that
it
doesn't
work,
we
are
that
Kevin
was
going
to
add
the
new
version
header
that
was
released
with
the
last
person
HTTP
or
TLP
code.
Okay,
okay,
try
to
update
the
spec
with
my
old
computer.
F
Okay,
okay,
yeah
yeah,
I
I
was
actually
yeah.
That
I
think
involves
opening
a
PR
with
that
team,
so
yeah
at
least
an
issue
to
begin
with,
because
you
know
I'm
sure
there
are
other
people
who
have
also
run
into
the
same
situation
with
other
projects
and.
F
Yeah
I
think
it
is
because
I
saw
in
the
I
think
it
was
it.
Maybe
the
open
Telemetry
go
project
also
some
similar
issue.
That
was,
you
know
they
were
discussing.
Okay,
so
yeah.
So
but
I
think
you
know
if
you
yeah
for
now
yeah
we
can
definitely
proceed
with
this.
So
that
way
we
can
be.
You
know,
complied.
C
F
That
yeah
but
I
think
it
is
not
a
yeah.
There
is
no
quick
ETA
on
this,
so
I
think
you
know
this
is
a
faster
way
and
then
yeah
and
then
you
can.
F
I'll
I'll
create
an
issue
similar.
C
Yeah
great,
you
can
open
that
it
will
be
great.
At
least
we
will
it
solved
Sunday
or
track
it
somehow,
yeah.
F
C
The
in
the
meantime,
I
will
try
to
add
it
with
my
old
laptop
sure
that
we'll
have
to
set
up
some
things
there,
but
yeah
I
was
trying
not
to
do
that.
It
was
possible,
but
if
they
we
don't
have
much
much
more
info,
we
cannot
just
increase
our
version
anymore.
We
have
him
for
a
long
time.
Yeah.
F
C
Also,
we
were
saying
that
with
the
link
error
issue
and
also
some
feedback
that
we
get,
we
got
from
servlock
in
having
two
separate
otlp
exporters.
C
So
maybe
we
can
keep
the
existing
one
and
have
a
two
other
ones.
So
we
don't
break
it.
I,
don't
know,
Kevin
is
going
to
work
on
it
and
let
we
will
see
how
how
it
works
out
to
have
it
separately.
Okay,
yeah,
we
maybe
we
can
refactor
in
folders,
also
the
thing.
So
we
can
still
have
one
thing
that
links
everything
and
to
simplify
that
just
build
some
folders
that
could
give
it
tricks
yeah.
You
can
exclude
folders
from
I,
don't
know
if
you
know
about
that.
F
C
We
can,
we
can
think
about
that
more
when,
when,
when
Kevin
advances
that.
C
C
C
E
Been
completely
behind
on
getting
to
this,
we've
had
a
couple
of
high
priority
customer
escalations
on
the
existing
product
that
have
sort
of
Taken.
All
of
my
time
and
more-
that's
probably
gonna-
consume
me
this
week
as
well.
So
but
I
did
get
a
good
piece
of
news
when
talking
to
the
our
back
inside
guys
in
that
they
have
are,
are
supporting
protobuf
over
HTTP,
so
the
library
you've
built
should
should
work
straight
out
of
the
box.
E
E
C
Just
to
to
to
know
how
it's
working
yeah
but
yeah
I
mean
yeah,
see
it's
an
address,
but
probably
if
you
see
something
as
strange
or
that
doesn't
work
as
little,
we
can.
We
can
focus
there
and
improve
it
as
soon
as
possible.
Yeah.
E
C
C
The
day
that
we
don't
have
issues
for
our
customers,
then
we
must
really
be
concerned.
Good.
C
Great
okay,
so
and
the
other
topic
that
shows
from
last
meeting
action.
The
story
was:
oh.
C
Bryce
is
working
on
it.
Yeah
price
told
me
that
that
he
he
or
told
us
that
he
had
finished
the
code
portion
for
the
metrics
SDK,
so
he
needs
tests
and
he's
only
missing
exponential
histograms
for
the
rest
of
the
metrics.
His
brands
with
metrics
Brands
take
two
or
something
like
that.
I
think
is
the
name.
Should
we
be
ready,
yes
missing
test,
but
the
code
person
should
be
ready.
C
So
that
means
that
we
will
have
updated
versions
of
the
metrics
with
the
official
aspect
and
the
official
API
really
soon
in
the
project,
so
that
that
those
are
really
good
news.
C
No,
he
couldn't
make
it
okay,
he
had
another
meeting.
At
the
same
time,.
F
C
C
Okay,
so
that
was
that
sorry
and
the
other
thing
that
shows
here
talk
about
other
issue
in
the
project.
I,
don't
know
what
was
that
related
to.
D
C
B
C
Okay,
yeah,
okay,
okay,.
C
Nice,
okay,
any
other
topic
that
you
want
to
bring
here.
I
I
know:
Kevin
wanted
something
to
work
on
on
the
project.
I,
don't
know
if,
with
those
two
things
you
feel
fulfilled
for
this
week
or
you
will
be
interested
in
doing
something
more
related
to
other
areas.
B
Think,
that's
you
know.
That's
certainly
good
for
starting
so
that'll
keep
me
busy.
Sometimes
I
end
up
having
like
half
the
time.
I
think
I'll
have
to
spend
on
the
project,
but
yeah
I
think
that'll
be
good
and
if
I
need
more
I'll
just
you
know,
I'll
ask
for
more
or
if
anybody
sees
things
that
need
to
be.
C
Review
one
yeah,
maybe
is
helping
Verizon.
C
Sure
we
should
talk
with
Bryce
to
know
if
he
would
like
that.
But
it's
another
thing
that
I
can
think
of
I.
C
C
That's
better
option
for
you.
F
A
C
I
think
Sunrise
conditions
for
the
old
API.
That's
with
the
latest
release.
C
You
serious,
or
we
can
try
to
find
other
areas
of
development
that
could
be
interesting
here.
I.
C
Client
side
was
a
big
topic
that
they
were
bringing.
C
To
bring
to
to
mobile
development
for
Android
and
for
iOS.
A
C
An
area
that
it
has
an
aspect
I
think
that's
based
on
on
logs,
but
that
that
still
has
no
work
on
on
Swift
We.
C
Sdk:
okay,
if
that's
something
that
you
will
be
interested
in
doing
it,
that's
a
really
big
task,
probably.
A
C
Clear
API
or
not,
but
I,
don't
know
if
that
will
be
that's
a
big
task,
probably.
D
C
Will
fit
for
you
or
you
prefer
doing
smaller
things.
C
Santos
is
from
up
to
Dynamics
right.
Stephen
worked
with
you
at
Dynamics.
C
So
I
know
that
you
were
interested
in
doing
something
with
with
that
I.
Don't
know
when
then,
with
Hotel
playing
right
with
clear
client
side.
C
See
yeah,
if
you
are
interested
in
that
Kevin,
maybe
you
can
work
on
that
area,
okay
and
that
that
will
be
a
big
task.
That
probably
will
have
some
impact
in
the
near
or
medium
term.
Okay,
but
I,
don't
know
if
maybe
it
will
be
I,
don't
know
what?
What?
What
are
you
looking
for?
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
doing
a
small
task
from
time
to
time
and
learn
about
habitat
everything
or
prepare
to
focus
on
some
week
area.
I,
don't
know
so
that's
another
option.
C
C
We
can,
or
if
you
have
another
idea
that
you
think
should
be
supported
or
things
that
you
would
like
on
around
the
project.
Just
let
me
or
let
us
know
in
the
next
meeting,
okay.
C
Guess
I'll
do
these
two
ideas
that
I
think
that
tan
be
done
more
or
less
sure
yeah
easily.
That
are
a
small
touch,
but
maybe
you
prefer
something
more
more
impacting
the
HTTP
exporter
is
impacting
for
sure.
B
That's
true,
yeah
I
mean
I
I,
think
I'd
be
right.
Now
just
have
to
maybe
do
a
couple
of
small
ones
and
think
about
it
and
that's
you
know
things
a
little
better
and
then
you
know
next
meeting
or
the
following
one
out.
It
has
a
better
idea
what
I
want
to
do
longer
term,
if
I
think
I
have
time
to
work
on
something
big
all
right,
I
think
I
know
things
well
enough
to
work
on
something
big.
So.
C
Okay,
then
then
we
can.
We
can
finish
this
meeting
it's
early
for
us
in
Europe,
because
we
still
didn't
change
our
time.
C
Thank
you.
So,
okay
have
a
nice
weekend.