►
From YouTube: 2021-08-03 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
D
Yeah,
our
our
pr
well,
our
prs
are
still,
but
now
at
least
they're
failing
like
a
bunch
of
things,
failing
for
not
easy
cla.
So
are
you
sure.
E
E
B
Was
this
I
don't
know
if
you
had
a
chance
to
read
it
yet.
B
Basically,
multiple.
D
Subscribers,
so
I
guess
the
way
that
right
now,
the
our
monos
and
things
flexes
and
things
like
that
work
is
the
first
subscriber
gets.
We
pass
the
content
or
no,
when
you
do
the
subscribe.
D
That's
when
we
initiate
the
context
right,
that's
when
we
grab
the
context,
because
that's
and
then
we
pass
it
to
the
subscriber-
am.
B
A
D
C
D
D
D
Okay,
yeah
just
wanted
to
try
to
figure
out
what,
like.
F
F
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
F
F
F
D
F
F
F
D
I
suspect
that
I
don't
know
why,
but
I
would
guess
that's
because
people
are
probably
just
replacing
it
with
open
telemetry
directly,
especially
consensus.
D
Yeah
or
at
this
heavily
google
internal
google
stuff
and
don't
they
like
auto.
F
D
I
know
that
azure,
our
python
was
like
an
early
adapt
early
adopter
of
open
census.
So
our
python,
we
do
have
python
users
on
open
census.
F
I
just
practiced
because
I
thought
someone
doesn't
want
to
migrate.
Pokemon
geometry,
just
adding
the
job
agent
actually
seems
like
the
best
thing
they
could
do
in
general,
and
in
which
case
we
don't
like
open
tracing
vibration,
doesn't
matter
that
much.
We
can
probably
do
a
better
job
with
performance
using
some
instrumentation
context.
Everything.
F
D
Talking
about
actually
writing
auto
instrumentation
for.
F
D
Let's
see
the
other,
I
mean
it
certainly
could
go
out
of
this
repo.
F
C
D
F
F
F
Yeah
otherwise
they're
sort
of
stuck,
I
mean,
I
still
think
as
much
as
I
don't
like
job
agents.
Most
people
do
so
most
users
are
going
to
use
the
job
agent
and
if
that's
the
way
to
get
into
our
instrumentation,
then
if
they
also
have
open
tracing
instrumentation
enabled
and
using
this
gym
seems
like
just
all.
Craziness
could
happen.
D
D
D
B
D
I
can
provide
some
feedback
tomorrow
on
that
to
help
get
what
carlos
know
that
we're
serious
about
thinking
about
it
see
what
he
thinks.
F
B
F
C
Does
the
promo
also
publish
subjects?
F
Like
I've
been
wanting
to
wrap
that
for
a
long
time,
just
because
I
feel
as
if
yeah
it's
going
to
ask
why
why
it's
a
good
exercise,
because
right,
like
it's
server
framework
and
as
execution
like
it's
an
async
framework
as
well.
So
I've
always
wanted
to
try
instrumenting
that
as
a
library
instrumentation,
and
it
worked
pretty
well.
F
F
F
A
C
F
F
Which
is
both
good
and
bad
because
I
did
find
rat
pipe,
doesn't
expose
much
information.
I
need
to
dig
some
more
because
they
have
a
very
abstract,
like
all
their
objects
are
just
maps.
Basically,
so
it
might
be
in
there
somewhere.
But
some
information
like
the
remote
socket
address
might
be
hard
to
get.
D
Do
we,
as
far
as
neti.
C
F
F
F
F
D
One
we'll
ask
nikita
for
his:
let's
see
if
he
can
access
his
memory
bank
on
thursday.
F
F
F
D
B
D
F
D
C
C
However,
you
name
it,
but
I
think
that
we
might
need
a
separate
thing
for
a
server
consumer
response
or
maybe
two
of
them
at
once.
Maybe
we
need
a
separate
local
root
span
or
something
like
this,
that
that
would
be
set
by
the
server
estimator
and
just
use
the
labels,
the
categories
of
types
just
for
the
client
things.
C
D
C
Application
server,
then
any
application
server
like
tomcat
and
server
the
api
level.
Oh,
I
guess
the
ready
netty
and
what
was
it
right?
This
is
still
like
the
same.
C
D
Sorry
span
being
different
than
server
spam,
for,
like
producer,
I
mean
for
like
a
customer
consumer
to
bridge
the
consumer
and
servers.
D
A
C
D
C
C
A
D
D
C
B
Oh
one
thought
also,
I
don't
think.
D
I
don't
remember
if,
having
notes
honor,
I
had
a
thought
that
made
probably
orthogonal
to
these
of
calculating
the
the
category
based
on
the
extractors
that
were
added.
D
C
C
There
is
a
lot
of
code
here.
I
made
it
slightly
different
from
cpr,
but
oh,
if
you
just
expand
the
code
in
the
middle
now
in
the
instrument,
there's
this
case
server
and
there
was
a
hidden
bit
of
code.
Oh
oh.
D
D
C
C
C
C
C
What
I
tried
to
do
first
was
to
create
a
separate
labels
for
separate
categories
for
server
and
consumer,
and
then
only
I
found
out
that
they
are
pretty
much
the
same.
So
I
added
the
local
root
one,
but
still
got
the
server
one
with
the
to
do
and
with
the
question
like
do
we
want
to
replace
the
server
and
consumer
with
yeah
and
there.
D
C
F
C
D
C
A
D
D
If
it's
just
client
and
server
yeah,
you
can
have
separate
keys,
but
yeah.
You
probably
want
to
share.
D
Do
you
want
to
share?
I
mean
like
for
consumer
yeah,
for
this
like
is
this
really?
Is
this
correct?
Even
like
I
mean.
D
D
A
D
Which?
Maybe
that's.
F
F
D
D
B
F
C
Whether
we,
maybe
we
should
have,
should
have
it
separated.
That's
I
I
don't
know.
A
D
D
D
F
F
F
F
F
B
F
A
A
F
F
D
F
So
wrapped
up
doesn't
have
the
full
url,
and
so
I
have
logic
to
build
it
up.
My
pr,
I
think
this
is
also
like
this
is
the
case
where
we
wouldn't
want
to
do
it
either.
If
we
have
the
full
url,
we
use
it.
If
we
don't,
then
we
use
the
parts.
That's
one
approach
or
we
always
try
to
fill
everything.
That's
another
approach
and
that's
sort
of
what
this
issue
is
just
fascinating.
D
Yeah,
I
think
that
my.
D
Capturing
what
I
guess
not
constructing
the
url
like
if
we
aren't
given
it
like
I'm,
okay
with
the
exporter,
you
know
having
to
do
that
kind
of
logic
or.
D
F
F
F
B
F
F
D
The
oh,
it
gives
you
that
it.
B
D
B
A
A
A
A
F
F
D
So
is
there
a
difference
between
server
and
client.
A
F
F
Yeah,
it's
common
for
a
client
to
have
the
full
url.
It's
also
common
for
it
not
to
the
server.
I
guess
it's
rare
done
with
the
url.
Maybe
that's
a
client
he
might
just.
He
might
always
pick
the
url
like
tv
or
something
like
that
and
or
you
might
set
that
in
the
client
and
then
use
just
a
relative
path
and
both
patterns
prevail.