►
From YouTube: 2023-03-27 meeting
Description
cncf-opentelemetry meeting-2's Personal Meeting Room
B
A
Yeah,
thank
you
for
joining
I
think
we
can
start.
We
can
share
my
screen.
B
A
A
That
means
that
semantic
convention
can
be
made
stable
as
a
separate
entity
and
not
would
be
part
of
the
specification
in
any
change
in
space.
Semantic
convention
will
not
need
a
change
in
the
upgrade
a
new
version
of
the
specification,
which
looks
good
in
a
way
that
would
be
you
know,
so
this
conventions
can
be
tracked
separately
and
we
need
not
be
part
of
the
specification.
A
A
Something
probably
I
found
here.
This
canned
effect
I'm,
not
sure
whether
this
can
I
think
it
at
least
I
would
go
to
gen
to
generate
the
the
code
from
the
semantic
convention.
Probably
that
will
change
the
actual
tool
tools
which
we
use
for
code
generation.
We
may
have
to
take
it
from
there
that
could
be
one
of
the
change
in
even
reading
the
semantic
convention,
the
actual
files
which
we
now
we
have
to
read
it
from
this
Repository,
not
from
the
specification
Repository,
so
yeah.
A
That
probably
has
we'll
have
some
change
if
it
goes,
if
it
get
first,
but
yeah
looks
like
look
like
it
is
not
agree
with.
This
will.
C
C
C
B
B
C
Yes,
I'm
sorry
I
can
see
that
project
or
yeah
the
link
you
shared
or
Mark
Mark
are
you?
Are
you
seeing
anything
I
haven't
heard
of
it
clearly.
C
C
C
Oh
I
saw
this
belongs
to
Orcs
or
and
under
open
Telemetry,
and
was
that
is
it
owned
by
overtime
tree
or
some.
C
And
here
I
think:
okay
from
the
URL
I
saw
that's
open,
till
I'm,
sure
I'll
just
think
about
maybe
other
languages.
We
use
the
same
projects
or
V,
give
some
conflict
to
use.
Yeah.
C
D
D
Yeah
I
mean
right
now
the
it's
called
iteration
I
used
from
the
template,
so
it's
like
editorials
so
right
now
its
iteration
represents
one
week,
but
we
can
change
it
to
anything.
D
D
Yeah
I've
added
them,
the
the
old
ones
manually
and
the
new
ones
comes,
come
automatically.
Okay,
I
see
all
the
new
issues
and
PRS
they
will
come
here.
C
D
D
D
C
D
C
See
yes,
this
seems
like
like
our
kind
of
our
private
report
but
Providence
stuff,
and
then
we
add,
we
granted
permission
to
the
the
CVP
maintenance
and
their
problems.
E
B
C
C
And
I
think
yeah,
with
better
check
with
meeting
and
the
compartment
from
our
side,
I
think
in
the
same
snow
problem,
at
least
from
my
side,
and
how
do
you
think
about
it?
Mark.
F
D
You
should
have
access
to
it,
yes,
so
I
mean
the
whole
idea
is
we
talked
last
time
with
Tom
and
lalit
and
we
try
to
somehow
manage
the
the
resources
we
have
some.
So
my
idea
was
to
follow
what
Ingress
nginx
project
doing
basically
using
this
GitHub
project
and
triage
everything
in
in
bi-weekly
basis.
So
every
two
weeks
they
come
together
and
go
through
issues
and
say
if
they
want
to
make
it
happen
or
not,
and
so
on
so
I
basically
followed
what
they
did
and
created
this
project
from
a
template.
D
Github
template
and
all
the
issues
are
imported.
All
the
open
issues
that
we
have
right
now.
Okay,
from
now
on
anything
new
meaning,
any
new
issue
or
new
PR,
will
be
added
to
this
project
as
well.
And
what
will
happen
is
we
will
decide
how
we
are
going
to
triage.
A
D
B
D
I
mean
this
is
only
visible
to
maintainer
and
approach.
Okay
and
I
I
just
made
the
upper
approvers
read
only
but
I
can
change
it.
I
can
change
it.
Okay,.
C
F
C
C
C
A
D
Look
yeah.
We
will
have
everything
under
one
project,
but
we'll
have
iterations
so
an
iteration
represent
right
now.
It
depends
a
week
but
I
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
as
a
month
so
like,
which
is
aligns
with
our
release.
Cadence.
D
B
D
D
A
A
D
B
A
B
A
D
E
A
Once
a
month,
I
think
we
can
even
do
a
driving
once
a
month
and
then
follow
that
I
mean
that
well,
I
think
I've
talked
to
you,
like
you,
think
yeah.
D
A
Looks
looks
good,
at
least
to
start
with
yeah.
B
B
A
We,
if
there
is
something
some
some
issue
coming,
which
is
kind
of
breaking
the
thing
and
you'd
have
to
go
inside,
but
yeah
I
think
anyway,
that
that's
still
okay,
but
we
have
to
do
a
review.
A
B
A
We
were
trying
to
do
something
similar
to
Milestones
I
mean
I
was
trying
to
create
a
milestone
for
every
release,
and
probably
anything
which
should
be
part
of
that
relationship
can
be
added
to
that
milestone.
But
Milestone
was
only
having
three.
After
that
it
cannot
have
the
issues.
That
was
the
problem.
A
A
This
is
interesting
to
should
we
do
both
of
them
now,
because
I
think
it's
will
it
make
sense
to
have
both
milestones
and
projects.
In
that
case,
we
should
have
actually
I
think
this
Milestone
will
give
a
bison
will
give
us
an
idea
whether
a
given
given
like
for
logs
API
and
SDK,
at
least
through
Milestone.
We
can
come
to
know
it
all.
The
issues
related
to
that
has
got
closed
or
not.
C
B
A
C
A
B
A
A
C
Interesting
to
like
either
for
a
different
signal
or
APS,
because
you
use
different
projects.
A
C
C
E
D
A
A
E
A
A
I
mean
I
I
personally,
I
don't
want
I
mean
if
it
looks
okay,
you
can
do
it,
but
if
it
looks
something
over
engineering-
and
we
don't
really
need
that,
just
for
the
sake
of
adding
one
maintenance,
I
think
we
can
even
leave
it.
I
mean
I,
don't
really
it's
if
it
looks
more
of
a
work
than
the
number
of
issues
of
which
we
are
actually
getting
and
the
amount
of
work
to
price
there
would
be
more
than
an
amount
of
effort
or
within
the
actual
number
of
issues,
and
we
can
use
the
Milestones
I.
C
A
C
A
D
A
D
B
A
B
B
C
F
So
this
is
the
maintainability,
the
minus
case
on
purpose,
to
find
as
many
issues
as
you
can
in
one
run,
what
he's
asking
for
is
make
minus
J
yeah.
B
F
B
C
F
C
Maybe
we
can
just
ask
PR
if
or
file
the
decision
connect
to
provide
a
PR.
Like
just
add
this
tree.
D
A
A
C
C
A
D
D
A
A
I
think
the
problem
is
basically
for
curl.
As
of
now
for
for
Basel,
we
use
we
use
bazel
framework
to
install
to
build
and
install
curl,
but
I
think
what
for
other
platforms
for
posix,
we
directly
use
the
APT
kit
and
install
it
or
we
use
VC
package.
A
C
C
A
D
A
Definitely
ensure
that
both
will
pick
up
from
for
Benchmark
I
think
we
should
have.
We
should
use
the
consistent
versions,
but
for
curl
I
think
we
can
remove
it
from
days
and
then
use
the
package
manager
to
install
it.
A
E
D
D
E
A
C
A
E
F
C
D
Okay,
so
we
have
Clan
tidy.
C
Thanks
yeah
should
we,
like
also
like,
add
all
these
tools
like
to
the
CIA,
because
even
like
around
client
ID,
which
may
depend
on
the
clan
version
or
rural
set
rules
set
right,
maybe
different
I
mean
we
added
it
to
CI.
So
we
have
a
camera
standard
like
which
which
coming
up
we
need
needs
to
be
done.
B
C
D
D
C
D
C
Yeah,
probably
we
have
another
work
item
to
add
all
the
tools
to
CI.
Once
now,
these
three
or
four
items
is
fixed
with
all
the
tool
apps
and
then
add
they
need
to
see
it
because
trading
up,
maybe
like
Mark,
has
good
first
issue.
Maybe
you
may
yeah,
maybe
easy
for
for
the
community
to
help
and
the
CI
Maybe
Etc
time
and
other
I
think.
D
D
A
C
D
D
A
D
A
D
A
A
I
think
he
this
guy
was
saying
probably
the
changes
from
the
event
earlier.
Pr
will
should
be
fixing
it.
You
know
so
probably
I
think
he
should
yeah.
He
said
this
player
can
be
offended.
So
if
you
know
the
last
comment.
D
D
D
D
A
F
D
C
D
D
A
A
A
B
C
Is
the
last
step
we
need
to
like
push
a
new
tag
to
to
our
report
directly
I
think
as
parallel
it
in
new
granted
the
permission
right
to
our
repo.
So.
E
A
A
So
probably,
if
any
of
us
will
go
to
the
settings,
we
won't
be
able
to
find
anything
with
anything
substantial,
probably
for
too
many
changes
and
I.
Don't
think
anything
is
required
for
us
as
an
admin.
Just
correct
me
if
we
need
anything
for
the
admin
role.
D
A
This
has
been
discussed
earlier,
also
and
I
mean,
as
the
respects
meeting,
also
that
none
of
the
maintainers
should
be
admined
and
should
be
just
the
maintainer
that's
on
so
probably,
if
there
is
any
admin,
access
is
required
we
can
get.
We
can
ask
for
specifically
for
that.
Particular.
If
you
have
to
create
some
tasks
or
something
we
can
ask
relevant
people
in
GC
or
TC
to
do
the
changes.
A
A
E
C
F
This
spec
seems
to
release
once
a
month
and
the
last
one
was
a
while
ago.
So
I
think
we
can
wait
for
the
next
semantic
conventions:
okay,
to
make
a
race
form
and
whatever
is
ready.
Then.
A
A
We
can
do
that
and
probably
I
just
want
it.
Probably
that
will
give
us
some
opportunity
opportunity
to
release
a
beta
of
beta
for
locks.
Also
I
mean
I
would
probably
just
need
to
go
through
if
there
is
anything
pending
from
Lock
perspective,
we
can
have
a
better
release
for
that.
Only
if
it
is
couple
of
weeks
I
think
you
can
add
that
also.