►
From YouTube: 2023-02-08 meeting
Description
OpenTelemetry PHP SIG Meeting
A
A
B
B
B
B
C
Yes,
so
I
I'm
wondering
if
you
had
to
experience
something
similar
because
I
tried
to
you
know.
I
was
experimenting
with
this
Auto
instrumentation
today
and
I
installed
all
packages
and
I
tested
very
simple
slim
application,
so
I
installed
it
all
auto
instrumentation
packages
and
yeah
and
I
try
to
export
these
traces
to
Zipkin
and
I
discovered
something
like
that.
A
A
Yeah
I'll
I'll
have
a
think
about
that
and
apply
I
wonder
if
something's
just
being
too
eager
things
need
to
be
sort
of
lazier
and
only
really
try
to
instantiate
classes.
When
they're,
when
they're
called
when
they're
called
for
and
not
straight
away,.
C
A
C
Seems
to
be
General
problem,
not
the
not
related
to
the
WordPress,
because
we
can
have
similar.
You
know
behavior
in
other
Auto
instrumentation
packages.
A
Yes,
yes,
so,
yes,
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
solution
is
yet
but
I
I
think
that
I
understand
the
problem
and
since
we
can't
guarantee
the
order
that
these
will
be
executed
in
I,
don't
think
we
can
I,
don't
think
we
have
any
control
over
that.
Then
they
just
need
to
assume.
A
That
things
don't
exist
yet,
and
maybe
we
defer
that
SDK
auto
loading
somehow
forever
yeah
I'm,
not
sure
I'm,
not
sure
yet,
but
I'll
I'll
certainly
attach
a
debugger
and
go
through
it.
Let's
see
if
I
can
work
something
out,
yeah.
C
A
A
A
Thank
you
for
that.
Thank
you
for
being
so
thorough,
25
fastball
here.
B
B
Here
are
the
notes
you
all
can
see
my
meetings.
B
B
Totally
get
in
case
somebody
leaves
the
project
or
somebody
gets
disgruntled
or
whatever
so
I
just
wanted
to.
Let
you
all
know
that
I
did
that
this
week,
so
this
document,
this
document
that
we're
looking
at
right
now
is
officially
owned
by
the
cncf.
Okay,
just
figured
I'd
share
that
context,
because
maybe
I
don't
think
I.
B
It'll
ever
come
up,
but
it
may
all
right.
Enrico
is
not
here
correct.
Just
the
Three
Musketeers
today.
A
B
Start
here,
Brett
relax,
composer
version
version
requirements.
I
saw
that
Nevada
was
talking
about
this
with
you.
A
Yes,
yes,
so
look
I,
think
he's
probably
right
and
I.
Think
the
let's
see
what
he's
suggesting
there
is
that
those
ones
in
the
top
level
compose
a
drop
Json
stay
as
they
are,
but
it
does
raise
other
questions
for
me
about
what
what
is
the
you
know,
the
open,
Telemetry
meta
package,
yeah
yeah,
a
problem
to
think
about
I
yeah
I'm,
not
sure
what
to
do
without
yet.
Okay.
B
C
B
A
B
Right,
let's
go
back
here;
okay,
that's
all
those
no
contribute
open,
pull
requests,
no
instrumentation
or
pull
requests
project.
This
is
the
auto
experimentation,
composer
bug
that
y'all
was
talking
about.
Yes,
Brett,
you
had
stealth
version
of
composer
Json,
incompatible
with
subtrue
splits.
Yes,.
A
A
Think
that
one's
done
so
I
created
the
same
issue
in
oh,
no,
sorry,
it's
not
so
that's
half
fixed
extra
for
contrib.
This
is
the
bug
attached
that
pull
request.
We
were
just
talking
about.
B
B
C
B
It's
there,
it's
their
stab
at
jira,
I,
guess,
yeah.
B
But
but
we
have
to
be
careful
with
that
right
part,
because
atlassin
is
an
Australian
company
and
we
have
to
watch
out
for
your
country's
livelihood.
I
guess
yes,.
C
A
Well,
there's
an
issue:
there's
not
a
lot
of
conversation
in
this
spec
repo
I
think
this
can
just
hang
around
waiting
for
something
to
come
with
that.
B
Cool
all
right
so
I'll
sign
us
to
the
tradition
project,
and
then
we
will
so
it's
a
wedding
triage
because
I
think
that's
what
it
is.
A
I,
don't
think
it's
helped
wanted.
Okay,
unless
any
maintainers
have
a
have
a
strong
opinion
or
an
idea,
but
no
I
think
it's
it's
something
to
sort
of
pick
up
and
dig
out
with
the
specification
seek.
B
Okay,
you
know
what
I
will
take
this
and
I
will
go
and
ask
questions
about
it.
B
A
B
C
I
think
that
someone
on
the
slack
mentioned
about
that,
oh.
B
Yeah
I
see
that's
right
on
January
25th,
cool
I'm,
just
gonna
tag
him
in
this
just
so
that
we
don't
have
to
go
back
and
figure
that
out
again
yeah
yeah
but
says
what
is
this
GitHub
handle?
A
B
A
Is
one
tip
I
just
speak
it
something
that
I
thought
about
I've
forgotten
a
couple
of
times,
but
we've
got
that
whole
backwards
compatibility
layer,
but
we're
not
really
maintaining
it.
Certainly
some
of
the
things.
A
So
it
was
a
question
for
the
maintainers
of
you
know:
should
we
just
go
through
and
remove
most,
if
not
all,
of
the
backwards
compatibility
stuff,
particularly
because
we're
now
at
beta
and
they're
all
hacks?
For
you
know,
ancient
versions
of
the
library.
B
I
think
that
we
should
remove
any
backwards
compatibility
that
we
possibly
can
if
we
I
think
we
should
remove
any
backers
compatibility
if
we
can
that
we
can,
especially
before
we
continue
on
with
beta,
so
that
people
don't.
You
know
that
XKCD
about
heating
the
space
using
the
space
bar
as
a
heater
you're,
all
familiar
with
that
one
I
know.
Well,
let's
show
you
this.
B
So
this
is
the
this.
Is
the
comic
that
I'm
referring
to
talks
about
CPU?
You
know
what
longer
overheats
when
you
hold
down
the
space
bar
and
then
you
just
say
this
updated
broke,
my
workflow,
my
control
key
it's
hard
to
reach
this.
Is
this.
This
feels
very
much
like
a
backwards
compatibility
thing.
It's
like
we
know
we.
B
B
Was
gonna
say
well,
we
have
to
remember
that
it's
I
forget
this
all
the
time
like
ever
every
week
we
are
all
non-paid
individual
contributors
to
this
project.
It's
like
we
need
to
prioritize
the
things
that
that
makes
sense
for
our
group
and
I
think
supporting
a
backwards
compatibility
player
for
some
promise
that
nobody
made
to
nobody
else's
not
worthwhile
to
me,
but
you
know
we
can
remove
it
and
say
hey
if
you
want
this,
please
contribute
you
know.
You
know
what.
A
I'm
saying
yeah
I
mean
you
can
kind
of
leave
the
functionality
there
for
now
yeah
because
it
might
come
in
useful,
but
the
actual
the
implementations
that
we've
got
are
you
know
I
I
I,
don't
see
the
point
of
leaving
BC
in,
for
you
know
more
than
one
minor
efficiency.
B
B
We
did
that
we
do
that
all
the
time
at
work.
It's
like
some
old
API
functionality
that
somebody
May
rely
on,
but
most
likely
not
it's.
The
problem
for
us
is
it's
tough
to
gather
observability
around
our
observability
tool
and
that's
pretty
meta
but
I.
Think
you'll
understand
I
mean
we
don't
know
how
many
people
are
using
this
part
of
the
library,
so
it's
very
difficult
to
processors
say
like
yo
shut
it
off.
A
B
If
some,
if
somebody
really
needs
it,
they're
going
to
yell,
oh
yeah,
yes,
yes,
okay,
but
I
think
we're
all
on
the
same
thing.
Speaking
of
compatibility,
priority
of
Windows
support
traffic.
A
Do
any
kind
of
goes
back
to
what
you
said
before
no
one's
really
asking
worried,
I
think
best
effort
and
if,
if
someone
wants
to
come,
if
someone
cares
enough
and
knows
about
Windows,
then
they
can
sort
of
help
out
and
fix
it
up.
Yeah
I
think
it's
much.
B
B
Nobody
ever
uses
it.
I
can't
I,
can't
think
of
a
direct
use
case
where
this
library
is
going
to
be
super
super
helpful
in
Windows,
especially,
like
extension,
support
for
things.
But
again
you
never
know
what
people
would
want,
but
I
think
that's
not
what
we
have
to
prioritize
from
my
perspective
at
this
point,
I'm
also
a
Windows
hater,
so
yeah.
A
I
mean
we've
had
so
far,
I
think
one
Windows
user
come
along
asking
for
help.
So
it's
not
it's
not
impossible
and
if
you're
doing
instrumentation
in
Windows,
you
probably
want
to
also
do
auto
instrumentation.
But
but
if
we
don't
have
the
resources
to
to
do
this,
then
you
know
I.
Don't.
C
It
will
take
some
time
to
to
to
build
it
as
Windows,
because
for
now
I
am
experiencing
some
problems.
It
seems
to
be
Pro
SDK
problem
as
configure
scripts
that
generates
some
code.
It's
it.
It
generates
wrong
code,
so
I,
don't
know
why
yet
and
yeah.
It
probably
requires
some
time
to
to
figure
out
this
problem
yeah.
Why.
C
B
I,
don't
even
think
it's
about
I,
just
think
it's
because
there
are
not
supporting
windows
but
I
guess
we
haven't
explicitly
stated
known
as
foreign.
C
A
B
A
Yeah
I
mean
listen,
it
does
have
some
visibility,
yeah
and
you
know
no
one's
going
to
know
that
we
need
help
if
we
don't
advertise.
If
we
need
help.
C
Maybe
I
create
a
bug
and
if
we
will
have
a
time,
then
we
can
try
to
fix
that.
Otherwise
someone
else
can
try
to
fix
that.
That's.
A
Yeah
and
look
if,
if
no
one
else
wants
it
badly
enough
or
to
even
complain
about
it,
and
it
certainly
doesn't.
A
C
B
Right,
okay,
cool
the
GitHub
co-pilot
Quest,
so
I
found
out
yesterday
that
GitHub
called
pilot
is
offered
for
free
for
contributor
for
contributors,
open
source
projects
that
are
more
popular
I'm,
not
yet
sure
what
the
definition
of
popular
is
I
just
want
to.
B
Let
you
all
know
that
I
asked
about
that,
and
then
that
started
an
interesting
topic
in
the
maintainers
channel
about
whether
or
not
autocompleted
code
is
of
kts
and
cncf
projects,
so
just
want
to
make
sure
to
make
sure
you
all
are
aware
of
that
I'll,
let
you
know
how
that
goes
as
we
move
forward,
but
it's
a
I,
don't
know
it's
an
interesting
time
that
we're
living
in
where
you
can
write
a
comment
and
have
it
on
a
complete
a
code.
B
C
B
Posts
we
had,
we
I
wrote
that
blog
post
last
week
and
it's
on
those
explanatory
blog
and
I
also
posted
on
LinkedIn
and
Twitter.
If
there's
any
place
that
y'all
would
like
me
to
also
post
it
or,
if
you'd
like
to
post
it
other
places.
Please.
B
A
B
All
right,
nobody
else
have
anything
about
discuss
today,
foreign.