►
From YouTube: 2023-03-01 meeting
Description
cncf-opentelemetry@cncf.io's Personal Meeting Room
B
Well,
mute
how's
it
going
Trask,
hey,
so
I
got
some
I,
don't
know:
okay,
I'm,
not
counting
my
chickens
before
they
hatch,
but
I
got
some
potentially
exciting
news
in
that
some
people
on
my
kind
of
team
are
supposedly
Expo,
so
they
come
from
flow
Mill,
a
company
that
we
Acquired
and
uses
ebpf.
Another
cncf
projects
filters
with
open
telemetry
bit
of
a.
A
B
The
tldr
is,
they
already
have
a
metadata.yaml
I'm
trying
to
find
it
for
you,
it's
given
to
me
earlier.
Just
don't
have
it
right
now.
Oh.
A
For
for
the
following,
the
semantic
convention.
B
C
A
B
Also
something
an
internal
metrics
there
for
them,
but
yeah
I
thought
it'd
be
relevant
for
us,
because
this
is
some
prior
art
of
someone,
but
they
seem
to
be
really
good
with
networking,
but
I'm,
not
very
good
with
networking.
So
I
don't
know
if
I'm
qualified
to
make
that
assertation
didn't
hear
back,
we'll
see.
A
C
A
We
could
definitely
use
networking
experts
I'm,
trying
to
push
off
us
having
to
declare
the
networking
semantic
conventions
stable
for
HTTP
to
give
us
some
flexibility,
because
I
don't
want
to
get
into
that
layer
yeah,
but
we
do
depend
on
it.
So
I
think
we
found
a
compromise
of
marking,
something
in
that
document
that
says,
while
it's
not
stable,
it
depends
on
some
of
the
some
of
the
attributes
are
dependent
on
by
HTTP
semantic
conventions,
so
Redwood
tread
lightly.
B
A
Cool
I,
let's
see
Riley,
were
you,
did
you
all
discuss
this
at
all
in
the
PC.
C
C
C
Yeah
to
just
just
wait
for
a
vote,
I
figure
like
we
have
to
do
a
vote
and
the
good
thing
is
in
the
TC.
We
have
nine
faults,
so
you
won't
see
like
four
PS4.
No,
that's.
A
The
worst
case,
nobody
better
I
I,
got
the
impression
from
Josh's
comments
in
the
spec
meeting
that
he
was
abstaining
from
this.
He
was
tired
of
the
debate.
I
mean
not
yeah.
A
C
A
This
one
I
wanted
to
check
if
you
were
good
for
merging
this
one,
because
after
this
I'm
going
to
I'm
thinking
to
send
PRS
to
mark
these
two
sections
as
stable.
A
It
cool
so
for
attribute
requirement
levels
I,
so
once
that's
merged,
and
this
has
changed
to
opt-in,
I'm,
just
going
to
send
a
PR
I
think
to
Market
stable
and
see
what
people
have
to
say.
A
A
What
do
you
all
think
so
I
know
we
have
the
ECS
question
hanging
still
we
have
one
potential
kind
of
PR
of
renaming
these
to.
A
Let's
see
rename
these
from
NetApp
protocol
to
just
net
protocol
and
if
we
do
align
with
ECS
OB
Network
protocol,
but
I'm
kind
of
I'm
getting
a
I'm
kind
of
thinking.
C
Yeah
yeah,
so
so
the
good
message
would
be.
Everything
is
done,
sort
of
initials
conversions
and
we
already
have
a
clear
list
of
items
like
maybe
four
four
or
five
PR's
that
are
waiting
for
the
final
decision.
It's
a
yes
or
no,
and
once
we
know
yes
or
no
well,
we'll
just
like
spend
five
seconds
to
either
abandon
those
CRS
or
merge.
Sbrs.
A
Yeah
I'm
thinking
of
starting
to
prepare
some
draft
PRS
for
those
ECS
changes,
so
I'm
gonna
be
out
so
I'll
be
in
next
week,
but
after
that
I'm
gonna
be
out
for
two
weeks.
A
So
the
goal
was
to
have
all
of
the
HTTP
semcom
stuff
done
by
March
10th
before
I
go.
So
that's
still
my
my
goal
to
get
all
of
that
stuff
in,
but
then,
since
I
won't
be
around
I'm
thinking.
If
I
can
get
in
the
ECS
drafts
at
least
then.
A
Else
could
help
drive
that,
even
if,
if
the
ECA,
if
we're
lucky
in
the
ECS
decision,
gets
made
quickly.
C
Yeah
and
for
your
information
I'm,
putting
out
the
brief
list
of
what's
the
benefit
and
what's
the
potential
side
effect
that
we're
going
to
merge
with
ccs
and
and
focus
like
there's
a
TC
meeting
this
morning,
folks
asked
if
I
could
help
to
summarize
that,
from
both
ECI
side
and
open
climate
side
so
basically
like
what
benefit
would
elastic
guys
and
what
they
have
to
give
up
or
what
they
have
to
ask
for
and
what
does
open,
Telemetry
guys
so
I'm
putting
a
list
and
first
it
might
might
need
your
information.
C
Some
you
have
some
summary
about
like
what's
the
advantage
when
you
look
at
ECS
semantic
convention
versus
the
open,
Telemetry
one.
So
probably
we
need
to
combine
that
and
that
would
help
to
facilitate
the
discussion
with
easy
as
folks.
It's
just
like
I'll
I'll
do
a
majority
of
how
to
work
but
I
needed
to
review
and
maybe
contribute
some
ideas.
Absolutely.
A
A
Is
there
anything
that
you
think
we
should
I
mean
we've
got
this
I
think
we'll
probably
chat
more
on
Friday
about
this?
Oh
no
mitesh
won't
be
here
Friday,
but
I
would
want
Lynn
Miller
for
this
discussion
and
I'm
not
ready
for
this
discussion
anyway.
I
need
to
do
I
need
to
prep.
It's.
B
D
D
E
A
A
Yeah,
if
anybody
has
time
this
is
probably
the
one
of
the
trickier
ones.
I'm
gonna
also
spend
some
time
here
on
this
one:
try
to
I
Wanna
go
through
it
and
hopefully
approve
it.
It's
got
a
lot
of
comments,
but
no
approvals,
but
I
think
it's
getting.
The
discussion
seems
to
be
winding
down.
A
Sir
yeah,
if
anybody
has
time
you
know
thinking
and
commenting
on
these
two
is
great,
but
other
than
that
I
didn't
have.
Anything
else.
Would
love
to
give
people
time
back
unless
somebody's
got
anything
you
want
to
chat
about,
which
is
awesome
too.