►
From YouTube: 2022-06-24 meeting
Description
cncf-opentelemetry@cncf.io's Personal Meeting Room
A
B
A
I
thought
I
I
don't
have
access
to
the
or
privileges
on
the
on
the
calendar
and
so
forth
meeting.
So
I
had
carlos
meeting,
but
here's
a
notes
file
that
I
created
that
maybe
we
could
use
for
just
recording
whatever
we
do
from
the
most.
C
Sorry,
the
other
thing
that
I
was
mentioning
in
the
tc
chat
in
slack
is
that
I
forgot
to
actually
include
some
of
the
members
in
the
final
invitation.
C
So
I
think
the
three
of
us
is
honestly
enough
for
now
for
start
but
yeah.
I
hope
that
tc
members
now
that
they
were
told
that
we
will
have
this
call
on
fridays.
They
can
start
coming.
C
A
All
right
sounds
fine.
I
guess
time
is.
Is
that
somewhat
short
as
well
in
terms
of
this
first
session?
I
I,
I
certainly
wasn't
involved
you
know
a
year
ago,
whenever
you
guys
were
doing
this
before.
A
Hopefully,
as
we
go
forward,
we
could
have
the
participation
release
that
you
have
before
or
more
and
part
of
the
question
I
think
for
us
is:
how
do
we
make
sure
that
we
can
sustain
this
so
that,
whether
you
or
I
are
here,
this
continues
in
terms
of
grooming
and
triaging
the
various
issues
that
might
come
up
to
make
sure
that
plutine
is
always
focused
appropriately
and
things
are
getting
general,
so
it
becomes
more
of
a
self-sustaining
type
of
activity.
A
All
right,
so
did
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
some
of
the
issues
here?
I
guess.
C
A
B
A
A
B
Here's
my
suggestion,
initially
angel
added
this
priority
tag
just
to
help
us
to
focus
on
the
release
of
tracing
spec,
because
at
that
time
there
are
so
many
issues
and
we
want
to
tell
people.
These
are
the
issues
we
want
to
focus
on
nowadays.
I
I
think
we're
not
chasing
a
particular
milestone,
unlike
metrics
like
last
year.
I
did
the
same
thing
using
priority
for
now.
I
I
think
the
church
can
focus
on
whether
we
accept
it
or
not
and
better
like
so
so
one
outcome
could
be.
This
doesn't
make
sense.
B
We
refuse
to
do
it
just
close
the
issue
and
the
market
has
triaged.
The
second
thing
is,
we
think
this
is
something
very
useful,
but
it's
a
bigger
topic,
so
we
can
give
suggestions
like
hey,
go
back
and
work
on
some
like
old
type
or
maybe
even
start
a
sick
and
see.
If
there
is
funding,
if
there's
no
funding,
then
you
should
wait,
don't
expect
anyone
to
jump
in
and
help
you
because
we're
we're
liking
of
the
resource
or
the
third
thing
is.
This
looks
like
a
very
good
thing
and
it's
small
enough.
A
Yes,
okay;
okay,
that
that
makes
sense
that
makes
sense
and
that
so
that
keeps
it
pretty
much
more
straightforward.
As
we
look
into
one
of
these
and.
B
Yeah
and
regarding
the
the
scope
of
the
issues,
I
would
suggest
we
focus
on
getting
the
issues
in
the
past
week,
like
always
handled
in
this
meeting,
and
if
you
have
extra
energy
we
can
either
expand
the
scope.
For
example,
we
can
look
at
the
the
historical
issues
and
see
if
we
can
like
we
can
close
more
of
them
or
make
progress
on
them
just
to
clean
up
the
backlog,
or
maybe
we
can
go
deeper
and
see
like
what
additional
thing
we
can
add
to
this.
A
So
definitely
addressing
the
ones
that
are
the
most
recent
first
and
then,
if
they
have
time
consider
some
of
the
others
do
we
want
to
deal
with
the
well?
Are
we
using
you
know
there
was
there
was
the
I
understand
this.
This
marker
label
called
scale
right.
The
system
automatically
tries
to
mark
things.
Still.
A
Okay,
all
right
all
right,
so
then
that
goes
back
to
what
your
comment
then,
just
as
we
had
time.
If
something
goes
back
in
two
years,
we
might
at
some
point
when
I
go
through
those
things.
That's
just
been
sitting
around
for
years
right
and
deciding
whether
you
want
to
still
have
those
on
the
log
or
not
all
right,
and
if
we.
A
Extended
download
time
yeah
all
right.
So
if
I
go
through
and
shorten
the
query
here,.
B
So
I
I
think
we're
hitting
an
issue
here.
We
need
someone
who's
more
familiar
with
the
semantic
convention.
I
I
don't
have
that
context.
So
from
the
description,
it
seems
okay
to
me,
but
I
I
don't
like
the
general
direction
that
we're
giving
the
super
long
name
in
the
trace
like
for
people
who
use
http
dot
flavor.
It's
very
easy
for
everyone
to
understand
the
knight
dot,
f.
Protocol
name
is
just
a
super
long
thing
and
I'm
not
even
sure,
like
people
find
it
easy
to
understand.
B
A
You
know
it
is
a
good
question
in
terms
of
the
names
of
these
things,
and
I
I
guess
my
question
would
be
have
we,
as
in
the
past,
established
new
type
of
best
practices
or
conventions
in
that
regard.
B
So,
for
example,
if
this
is
about
matrix
like
the
dimension
name
of
matrix,
because
I've
been
working
on
the
matrix
like
spike
forever,
like-
I
probably
I
probably
wrote,
90
percent
of
this
bag,
so
I
have
a
very
strong
position
and
in
in
general
I
I
think
I
have
a
different
knowledge.
So
what
I
mentioned
there
would
give
people
confidence
here.
I
don't
I'm
I'm
like
a
new
buyer
here.
A
Gotcha,
so
that
goes
back
to
your
earlier
comment
that
we
perhaps
need
again
some
party
with
sufficient
knowledge
to
help
us
adjudicate
the
situation
here.
Yeah.
B
A
So
so,
from
a
from
a
triage
standpoint
is,
would
we
provide
a
a
a
a
response
or
some
direction?
If
you
will
to
the
author
here,
what
do
we
we
want
to
tell
them?
If
anything,
I
don't
know,
I
don't.
C
I
suggest
we
put
what,
in
your
case
your
opinion
about
that.
So
at
least
you'd
really
know
that
somebody
is
taking
a
look
at
that.
I
agree
with
your
opinion,
so
we
can
start
with
that
one.
C
B
And
do
you
think
we
have
energy
to
cover
this
like?
Do?
We
ever
want
to
change
this,
because
this
has
been
existing
since
the
very
beginning
and-
and
we
can-
we
can
always
say.
Oh,
the
semantic
convention
is
experimental.
Let's
change
that
to
a
to
something
that
is
more
general,
but
is
that
a
good
thing
or
in
general
we
think
whatever
we
put
in
the
semantic
convention,
even
if
it's
experimental,
unless
we
have
a
strong
reason,
we
don't
want
to
break
it,
because
I
know
that
not
just
folks,
they
have
strong
opinion.
C
Yeah
there's
also
the
wrong.
The
client
say,
which
I
suspect
they
will
be
interested
in
keeping
things
the
way
they
are
for.
You
know,
because
http
flavor
is
so
common
in
the
browser,
so
probably
they
will
also
be
opposed
to
that
yeah.
So
so
maybe
let's
mention
that
our
concern
in
general
and
being
the
client
wrong
in
the
comment
and
yeah
I
said,
there's
we.
I
think
that
for
this
one
we
can
only
leave
or
comment
on
regarding
your
position,
initial
position
at
least,
and
then
just
wait
for
more
feedback.
B
C
A
All
right,
so
I
guess
part
of
my
question
here
is:
do
you
sorry
from
a
triage
standpoint,
with
the
common
code
here
or
right
or.
B
I
I
think,
for
you
we'll
focus
on
what's
the
outcome
of
the
triage
and,
for
example,
if
I
or
like
carlos,
we
have
personal
opinion,
we
should
go
and
add
our
personal
opinion
as
our
own
comment.
So
your
comment
would
represent
our
decision
here
in
the
meeting.
It's
not
your
personal
comment,
so
you
can
mention
something
as
like
discussed
in
the
triage
meeting
like
put
the
date
and,
let's
say
the
decision,
this
money
is
deferred.
B
B
Does
that
work,
I
I
feel
it's
more.
The
semantic
convention
sheet.
A
B
B
And
get
get
support
on
this
issue,
so
the
message
is
we'll
come
back
to
this
issue,
maybe
like
a
few
weeks
later
and
based
on
the
support
here.
If
we
see
a
lot
of
people
have
questions
like
here,
you
see
chris
and
he
has
a
lot
of
questions.
You
see
like
two
question
marks
right.
If
you
all
have
questions
they're,
saying
it's
not
clear,
then
we
shouldn't
do
it
if
a
lot
of
people
are
coming
here
and
say
clearly,
this
is
a
good
ideation.
A
C
A
A
B
A
A
B
We
need
to
tag
this
issue.
Market
has
already
tried,
I
think,
click
on
created
the
the
tags.
So,
if
you
scroll
to
the
very
top
on
the
right
side,
you
can
see
the
the
labels
yeah,
so
you
don't
have
permission
right
now,
either
colors
or
I
can
do
it
I'll,
add
it
as
a
follow-up.
You
need
to
apply
it
to
be
a
feature
for
this
back.
We
can.
We
can
support
an
idea
there.
B
A
Okay,
good
anything
else,
we
need
to
say
on
this
one
then.
B
A
B
Yeah,
so
my
suggestion
is,
for
example,
I
I
don't
have
energy
to
write
a
clarification
for
him,
but
if
he
he's
willing
to
send
a
pr,
I'm
willing
to
help
to
reveal
and
merge
it.
B
A
Okay
and
you're
willing
to
write
it
up,
and
then
I
can
say
we
can.
We
can
help
or
something
like
that.
It
is
unnecessary,
but
we
can
help.
You
view
it.
Yes,.
A
All
right
we
have
time
for
one
more,
I'm
not
sure
we
do
or
not.
Let's
take
a
look
at
it.
C
C
A
C
A
Any
other
comments,
thoughts
that
we
have
we'll
have
to
continue
to
define
this
process,
but
we
can
continue
to
do
that
as
we
go
forward.
Any
additional
thoughts,
though,.