►
From YouTube: 2023-01-31 meeting
Description
Instrumentation: Messaging
A
B
A
So,
as
if
I
see
see
your
update
on
the
sandbox
is,
do
you
mean
the
the
pr
that
you
have
open
still
needs
more
work,
or
is
that
something
else.
C
Yeah
so,
although
all
the
extra
commented
out
packages
so
effective,
I'm,
actually
locally
uncommenting,
those
and
running
them
and
I
haven't
quite
got
all
the
tests
working
so
I'd
like
to
do
that
before
I
pushed
it
in
because
once
I
get
the
once
I
add
the
CI
task.
It's
just
going
to
start
spilling
over
well.
I
could
split
it
like
if
you're
happy
with.
What's
there
I
haven't
tried
it
with
just
the
API
to
make
sure
I
haven't
broken
the
API
tests.
C
C
C
And
some
of
the
packages
as
I
as
I'm
doing
them,
those
tests
don't
pass
like
there's
a
couple
where
I
have
to
explicitly
disable
node
tests
now,
as
which
is
a
new
plague,
that
I
added
so
really
I'm,
trying
to
have
the
full
set
of
web
packages
that
we
want
to
import
and
get
the
script
to
a
point
where
we
can
just
uncomment
them
all,
and
it
would
just
say,
but
that
would
just
all
work.
C
That's
ideally
where
I'd
like
to
be,
because
until
I
get
until
we
get
to
that
point,
creating
a
branch
to
go,
start
minification
or
start
doing
anything
else,
because
I
want
other
people
to
create.
Other
branches
is
less
useful
because
really
I
want
that
SDK
web,
at
least
to
say
how?
How
big
is
that
bundle
which
I
can
calculate
the
bundle?
But
so
not
all
the
tests
are
working.
C
I
haven't
even
addressed
the
examples.
Yet
I
was
going
to
do
that
with
a
pull-up
one,
because
I
want
bundle
sizes
for
those
examples
and
actually
usage,
because
that's
going
to
be
more
meaningful
than
just
the
SDK
okay
there's
more
work
to
do.
We
can't
do
it
in
bits
so
that
way,
it's
minor
updates
to
the
to
the
script.
That's
there.
A
Okay,
so
so
regarding
the
current
PR,
it's
so
large
that
I've
honestly
had
trouble
like
reviewing
it.
Yeah
I
tried
running
it
locally
and
I'm
still
yeah.
C
A
After
your
change,
I'm
still
having
issues
so
I'm
I
guess
I
could
you
could
continue
like
if
you
could
help
me
and
like
get
it
running
locally
and
I
can
continue?
You
know,
testing
it
locally,
but
I
can
also,
you
know
just
say:
okay,
I
trust
that
it's
that
it's
working
on
your
you
know
from
your
side,
and
maybe
we
can
just
I,
don't
know
like
if
you
merge
it
now
like
and
and
run
it
like,
is,
are
those
what
it
does.
Is
that
reversible
like?
A
Could
we
or
does
the
script
need
to?
You
know
work
perfectly
because
it's
like.
C
Oh,
it's
is
it
reversible,
reversible
in,
in
the
sense
that
removing
what
it
does?
No,
because
it
ends
up
in
in
GitHub
history,
updating
the
script
so
that
it
can
fix
any
issues
yeah
we
can
do
that,
which
is
what
I
had
to
do.
The
previous
script
I
had
to
like
it
wasn't
until
after
I
started,
merging
merging
in
the
country
group,
where
I
had
a
bunch
of
additional
issues
that
I
didn't
expect.
So
I
then
had
to
modify
the
previous
script
to
say
once
it
moved
everything.
C
C
C
There's
no
easy
way
around
that
one
so
yeah
we
could
push
it
in.
We
could
get
the
API
going.
We
can
get
the
CI
going
for
for
API
and
then
do
just
do
minor
updates
as
needed
as
we
bring
in
more
packages
which
hopefully
would
be
follow-up
once
we
activate
the
CI
job
the
script.
The
way
it's
working
is
Rush
will
just
automatically
add
the
new
package
directly
to
the
CI
pipeline,
so,
which
is
why
I've
been
trying
to
automate
it
so
that
it
just
comes
online
and
just
starts
working.
C
Yep,
so
what
I'll
do
then
is
I'll,
run
a
local
test
with
the
API
and
make
sure
that
the
build
and
the
test
works,
I
think
the
build
Works
make
sure
the
test
pipeline
works,
and
that
does
and
you're
happy
with
that.
We
can
push
that
in
and
start
that
process,
because
I
haven't
quite
yet
done
the
full
okay.
Now,
let's
update
the
the
the
merge
repo,
the
merge
branch
and
then
merge
that
merge
Branch
into
into
API,
that's
the
next
step,
and
we
can
only
really
do
that
once
it's
there.
A
C
A
C
A
Okay,
if,
if
we
had
don't
have
any
other
topics,
would
you
would
you
be
okay,
just
looking
at
the
command
that
I
have
and
see
like
if
I'm
running
it
correctly,
yep
yeah?
Let
me
share
my
screen.
A
B
C
C
C
Report
sure
not
found,
oh,
it
hasn't
put
your
username
in
there.
It
says
github.com
yeah.
C
Okay,
so
that
means
the
origin
user
didn't
get
passed
down;
okay,
let's
hack
up
both
of
these.
For
you.
If
you
load
up
the
script.
C
One
give
him
a
fork
record
Fork.
No,
oh
then
I'll
put
it
in.
C
Us
you
know
there
was
a
get
user
function,
I'm
going
to
get
user
function.
We
want
to
find
under
git.
It
should
be
user.ts,
not
the
git
folder.
C
Just
hard
code,
your
user
ID
there,
and
likewise
in
user
head
code
in
both
of
them
there,
because
yeah
name
will
come
out
as
a
Martin
space,
and
that
was
the
problem
so
effectively
the
way
this
sort
of
gets
around.
That
is
that,
if
you
already
have
a
fork
lines,
59
to
68.
C
effectively
look
up
the
remotes
for
the
current
four
yeah
put
it
also
in
line
74
as
well,
just
to
hard
code
that.
C
B
C
A
B
C
Okay,
let
me
luckily.
C
No,
it's
got
up
there,
but
it
failed
Authentication.
A
C
Okay,
so
this
is
where
git
doesn't
think
the
current
user
that
you're
playing
with
has
access
to
your
repo.
C
I,
don't
know
it's
just
yeah
get
saying
no
go
away.
You
could
probably
also
fix
this.
You
currently
haven't
got
a
haven't,
got
a
talk
of
the
sandbox
over
you.
A
C
C
Oud,
okay!
So
if
you
cloned
your
fork
and
then
so
as
part
of
cloning,
you
should
have
access
to
my
branch
in
there,
my
PR,
and
if
you
then
check
out
that
that
should
work
actually
go
back
to
your
folder
and
go
get
remote
list.
C
Yeah,
so
you
just
don't
origin
yeah.
So
if
you
know
yeah
so
you've
closed
the
open,
Telemetry
one
directly
yeah.
So
if
you
calling
your
fork,
that
should
make
the
thing
happy,
because
when
the
script
does
here,
it
will
actually
say
you're,
one,
not.
C
Yeah,
so
you
saw
it
already
started
to
in
your
Dev
slash
dot,
Auto,
merge,
temp,
so
I
think
it
creates
a
clone.
So
it
should
be
back
one
level
because
test
is
on
by
default.
Currently.
A
C
I
did
that
to
make
vs
code
happy
because
vs
code
kept
locking
it
if
it
wasn't
up
one
level
so
yeah
it,
so
it
creates
a
DOT
Auto
Dash
merge
folder
one
level
up
in
there.
It
creates
temp,
which
you
should
already
have,
because
it
it
already
cloned
that
one
once
it
clones
that
one
it'll
then
go
and
create
a
temp
Dash
merge
at
the
same
level.
C
I'll
probably
just
start
to
the
dot
and
you're
running
in
the
mixer
Factory.
That's
yeah,
okay,
yep
there.
It
is
so
yeah,
so
sorry
to
grab
the
champ
it
will.
The
second
step
is
to
create
a
temp
merge,
which
is
actually
a
clone
of
the
merge
branch
that
then
munges
the
merge
branch
and
then
does
it
get
merge
from
that
temp
merge
into
temp,
and
then
it
creates
its
PR
from
that
effectively.
C
Yeah,
it
seems
to
be
getting
lost
in
the
in
that
second
stage
of
saying:
okay
now
I'm
gonna
go
is
it
actually
creates
I,
think
a
clone
of
the
book
or
it
figures
out
if
you've
got
the
hawk
and
if
you
don't
have
anything
I,
don't
remember
the
exact
details
but
yeah.
If
you
do
it
from
the
book,
then
that
should
work.
A
B
C
Yeah,
because
if
you
look
in
the
the
action
so
in
the
dot
GitHub,
so
apart
from
it
effectively,
it's
just
running
GitHub,
so
it
has
access
to
the
GitHub
CLI.
It
forcefully
sets
the
user
to
the
open,
Telemetry
bot
using
the
credentials
that
are
in
there,
so
that
I
guess
potentially
would
be
the
other
way
to
do
it.
Except
it's
no
wonder
authentication
here
so
yeah
do
it
from
before.
That'll
just
make
that
change,
because
you'll
then
have
full
authentication
of
that
Branch
already.
A
C
C
B
A
Okay,
great
well
I'll
talk
to
you
tomorrow,
then
yep.