►
From YouTube: 2022-03-22 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
About
only
jack-
and
I
showed
up
this
morning
to
the
metrics
meeting,
the
jvm
metrics
meeting
ben
had
mentioned
ahead
of
pen
that
you
couldn't
make
it.
A
So
I
think
over
there
we're
just
if
you
want
to
look
at
I'm
gonna
start
pinging
the
tc
for
to
try
to
get
a
merge
on
jonathan's
cpu,
metrics,
jvm,
cpu,
metrics.
Pr.
A
A
Cpu
time
and
so
would
end
up
and
the
process
cpu
count,
and
so
we
decided
to
try
to
to
reuse
the
process
ones
the
system
ones
right.
They
said
we
couldn't
use.
We
talked
about
this,
but
I
didn't
push
it
any
further,
because
we
don't
actually
our
cpu
system.
Cpu
metrics
don't
match
up
anyway.
A
And
oh
yeah
so
process
cpu
time
we
can
get
from
jmx.
A
B
A
The
jmx
so
jack
put
in
the
jmx
links,
so
this,
and
this
are
so
process.
B
B
A
Like
from
the
jmx
perspective,
I've
never
relied
on
this
jmx
metric,
but
it
is
don't.
B
A
Jumps
I
like
the
process
cpu
time.
That's
always
my
go-to,
because
it's
it
gives
me
like
over.
I
mean
it's
cumulative.
A
But
I
think
these
are
still
good
to
have,
and
especially
from
a
micrometer
compatibility
perspective.
Also.
A
A
Yeah,
did
you
see
the
problem
around
the
link
checker,
all
the
spec
prs
started
failing
today
for
the
they're,
using
the
same
link
checker
that
I
started.
I
added
to
our
repos
and
I
had
noticed
that
in
our
repo
just
yesterday
our
ci
started
failing
because
they
started
adding
anchors,
validating
anchors.
A
B
A
And
nobody
could
merge
anything.
A
A
I'm
going
to
add
that
I
I
ran
it
against
the
java
repo.
I
have
that
queued
up
next,
I
just
didn't
want
to
conflict
with
this
one
yeah.
They
were
like.
A
Oh,
the
spell
checker,
oh
no,
it's
really
cool
it's
just
a.
I
mean
it's
just
a
has
a
dictionary
of
common
misspellings.
A
So
it's
not
a
it.
Doesn't
do
a
full
dictionary
aware
like
it
doesn't,
do
a
full
spell
check
right.
B
B
B
Because
that
could
be
a
misspelling
that
would
get
triggered
by
method
names
or
something
that
sort
of
was
it.
What
I
was
imagining
like,
why
wouldn't
the
names
trigger
the
spell
check,
in
any
case,
zero
percentage
rate
on
that
the
names
seemed
like
it
might
be
aware
of
what
they
are,
or
maybe
it's
still
this
coincidence
that.
A
I
that
so
I
didn't
follow
the
method.
A
A
B
B
A
B
B
A
To
avoid
that
impression
of
concurrency.
B
A
A
A
Cool
I
had
it
yeah
I
had
it
the
only
reason
I
knew
that
was
because
this
morning
google
watch
had
suggested
this
and
I
searched
to
see
if
this
pattern
was
used
elsewhere
and
I
did
see
it
in
the
simple
span:
processor
and
another
processor
yeah.
This
doesn't
work
out,
but
that's
okay,
yeah.
B
A
A
B
A
Yeah,
so
if
I'm
happy
to
comment
on
this
point
out,
the
the
new
update.
B
A
B
A
A
B
B
A
B
B
A
A
B
B
A
B
B
B
B
B
A
Our
yeah
ours
is
all
embedded
too
much
and
so
yeah.
So.
B
A
Okay,
I'll
probably
I
mean,
let's
I'm
comfortable,
giving
it
a
month.
B
B
A
B
B
B
B
A
Yeah,
so
the
web,
the
thing
that's
still
right
because
we
were,
we
didn't,
have
the
cherry
picking
over
here
already
the
one
thing
that
we
don't
over
here,
we're
still
using
nebula
and
I
know
the
core
repo's
using
nebula.
A
So
I
don't
know
I
I'm
not
the
I'm,
not
a
big
fan
of
nebula.
I,
like
I
kind
of
like
the
version
numbers
in
source
control.
A
Yeah
so
there's
workflows,
you
have
to
kick
off
a
workflow
and
it'll
submit
prs
two
pr's
one
to
the
release
branch
to
bump
it
and
one
to
the
main
branch
to
bump.
It.
B
B
A
Prepare
and
then
release
and.
B
A
Cool
yeah
I've
been
taking
notes,
I'm
on
all
the
sort
of
different
github
action
and
other
maintenance
things
trying
to
write
up
something
that
we
could
share
like
with
across
open
telemetry.
B
A
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
these
things,
even
the
thing
of
like
trying
to
use
get
the
github
cli
over
third-party
actions.
Where,
like
a
lot
of
times,
I
mean
you
were
totally
right,
like
it's
like
it's
just
as
easy
for
a
lot
of
the
thing:
the
cases
to
use
that
versus
using
some
random
third-party
github
action.
B
A
A
Even
mathias
asked
also.
B
A
A
Too-
and
it's
annoying
also
over
like
on
the
when
you
go
but
then.
B
B
B
A
B
B
A
No,
you
can
use
no,
no,
you
can
do
steps
too.
I
haven't
done
any
okay.
B
A
Well,
it
could
make
the
reusable
workflow
that
populates
output
for
the
java
version
and
then
you
can
still
update
it
in
just
one
place.
A
B
There's
I
mean,
I
think,
there's
one
like:
I
believe
there
are
well-maintained
projects
for
code,
jennings
github
actions,
and
so
that
is
something
if
we
ever
need
it,
but
it
looks
like
the
really
reasonable
workflows
are
good
enough
for
enough
of
our
use
cases.
We
wouldn't
do
that,
but
that's
definitely
something.
I've
always
been
interested
in
trying
someday
continuing
the.
B
A
Yeah,
but
did
that
yeah
but
the,
but
it
ended
up
kind
of
working.
I.
A
A
Oops,
oh
yeah,
that
was
one
of
my
tips.
I
I
wrote
down
was
using
that
concurrent
job
pr
cancelling
the
concurrent
prs.