►
From YouTube: 2020-05-27 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
D
C
E
C
A
B
C
C
C
B
I
mean
this
is
just
you
know,
it's
I
mean
we
will
need
some
metrics
I
mean
with
the
naming
convention
can
change
the
city
later
once
we
have
it
because
currently
be
done,
but
other
than
that
it's
I
think
it's
it's
quite
similar
I
mean
the
number
of
the
metrics.
It's
it's
also.
What,
for
example,
today
data
dog,
hat
and
stuff
like
this
laughter,
okay,.
B
C
C
F
C
G
Yeah
a
little
bit
because
I've
walked
a
lot
of
it's
not
only
this
weekend,
I
comments,
the
last
the
last
comment
of
DPR,
because
so
yeah
this
one.
So
the
odd
thing
is
that
at
the
root
why
I
wanted
to
refactor
it?
It
was
for
the
case
with
with
I
think
that
we
currently
leak
the
context
after
the
witnessing
so
I
just
considered
at
the
bottom.
G
While
we
are
in
a
width
method,
so
it's
I
mean
if
we
fix
this
is
pretty
much
break
with
functionality,
as
I
said
in
the
PR
description,
the
if
we
fix
this
problem,
the
or
a
sink
operation
inside
the
with
lose
the
esteem
context.
So
it's
kinda
problem
that
we
are
to
sort,
because
if
we
fix
one,
we
break
the
other
one
and
I
couldn't
right
now
find
a
way
to
fix
them.
G
Both
I
will
continue
to
work
on
that,
but
it
is
starting
to
get
a
little
bit
problematic
because
babies
are
different
issues
open
this
week
or
last
week.
I,
don't
know
about
the
fact
that
the
initial
implementation
that
done
for
which
I
think
was
breaking
the
context
with
with
the
wave
method.
So
there
is
some
issue
I
don't
know
if
I
should
continue
to
work
on
that,
may
make
a
quick
PR
to
fix
the
with
method
and
then
walk
again
on
with
our
sink
method.
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
any
insight
on
that
opinion.
G
G
G
It's
if
you
use
there's
a
quick
report,
it's
easy
to
reproduce,
but
it's
if
you
use
I,
think
inside
the
inside
the
span
I'm
not
sure
exactly
why
but
I
already
fixed
it
with
my
factor,
so
I
I
think
I
should
I
should
quick.
Could
we
fix
this
and
then
try
to
make
talk
with
with
I
think
method,
but
it's
kinda
odd
to
make
currently
work
both
in
my
P
artist,
so
yeah,
that's
what
it's
pretty
much
yeah.
C
G
Saying
that
currently
I
didn't
find
a
way
to
do
it,
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
possible
or
not
I
will
consider
to
find
try
to
find
something.
I
didn't
I
looked
at
the
implementation
of
the
dog,
so
the
one
that
Hodge
made
for
the
commercial
rpm
of
the
today
and
I'm,
not
sure,
but
maybe
from
the
solution
and
I,
was
trying
to
truly
implement
that's
inside
open
telemetry,
but
I
did
not
make
it
work
for
now
so
yeah.
G
G
D
G
G
G
C
The
types
node
package
updated
recently
and
broke
compatibility
with
webpack
EMV
and
zone
J
s
it
turns
out.
The
issue
is
that
the
newest
version
of
types
node
declares
global
as
like
type
of
nodejs
or
wall
and
global
this,
where
the
one
end
zone
j
s,
only
declares
it
as
type
of
node.js
global,
so
they
don't
they're
not
compatible
when
that
can
be
actually
updated.
So
updating
what
they
can
be
fixes
that,
but
its
own
j
s
does
not
have
an
update
yet
for
their
type
things.
C
Today
the
impacted
modules-
if
there
were
only
three
of
them,
it
was
the
both
of
the
context
generally
packages
and
the
opens
lemon
tree
web
package,
we're
all
affected
and
until
zone
J
s
updates.
If
we
want
to
use
the
latest
node
type
package,
we
need
to
do
this.
The
other
option
is
to
roll
back
to
an
older
version
of
text
which
I
believe
Bart
already
dated
and
different
PR,
but
this
is
just
I
wanted
to
open.
C
This
PR
is
another
option
so
that
we
can
use
the
latest
type
things
without
having
to
pin
to
an
older
version,
so
I
just
opened.
This
I
know
that
nobody
probably
has
had
any
time
to
look
at
it,
yet
very
smart
to
make
sure
you
make
sure
everyone
is
aware
of
what
the
and
get
your
as
opinion
on.
Would
you
rather
into
an
old
version
of
node
types,
or
would
you
rather
disable
those
the
live
check
for
now,
in
that
a
couple
of
packages
I.
F
C
C
Neurons
ojs
did
create
an
issue
we're
not
actually
because
we're
not
has
a
dependency
which
has
Titus
node
as
a
regular
dependency,
not
a
death
dependency,
so
it's
being
installed
in
our
root
node
modules,
the
route
of
the
projects.
So
even
if
you
remove
node
modules
from
the
length
plugins,
it
still
complains
I,
don't
know.
If
there's
an
issue
in
zone,
guess
right
now.
I
will
check
that
after
the
call.
B
C
C
There
are
a
couple
of
instruments
that
we
don't
have
that
need
to
be
implemented
and
our
existing
instruments
don't
match
the
current
spec
names
because
they
change
the
names
and
a
couple
of
them.
So
the
gauge
is
now
a
value
recorded,
so
I
just
opened
a
sample
of
issues
this
morning
and
I'm
gonna
work
on
these
this
week.
So
if
anybody
wants
to
work
on
these
comments
on
the
issue
and
I'll
assign
it
to
you,
but
if
not
I'm
just
gonna
tackle
them
one
by
one.
This.
B
One
I
think
with
the
matrix,
because
I
mean
when
I
almost
in
commenting
matrix
it
it's
it's
the
issue
which
perhaps
basically
currently
we
can
observe
it
as
one
one
value
which
basically
looks
like,
for
example,
the
process.
If
you
asked
what
is
the
CPU
usage,
you
have
to
cash
it
because
otherwise
you,
if
you
ask
this
again,
then
the
way
it
works.
It's
keeping
heat
the
process
from
the
last
call,
which
means
you
should
update
all
the
values
that
you
want
at
once.
B
B
It's
not
that
bad
I
would
say
it's
the
way
that
it's
implemented.
So,
for
example,
if
you
you
know,
let's
say
you
want
to
have
the
matrix
for
CPU
usage
for
a
long
fulfill
different
stuff.
The
way
it's
done
now,
you
have
to
call
the
observer
and
you
have
to
update
each
of
the
value
individually,
which
means
you
have
to
keep
the
CPU
matrix
somewhat
like
in
the
cache,
because
see.
Every
time
you
ask
it's,
the
Delta
is
being
calculated.
This
is
how
with
example,
some
some
of
the
things
are
working.
B
So
with
this
you
can
I
mean.
Ideally
it
would
be
like
you
could
observe
a
couple
of
the
values
like
maybe
the
RI
and
then
one
it's
cold.
You
can
update
and
I
mean
this
is
about
the
sub
comment,
because
with
top
server,
it
will
be
sorry
with
table
separately
busy,
but
with
with
the
counters
or
other
stuff.
It's
it's
the
issue
that
you
have
to
update
this
individual
on
e,
not
at
once
I
think.
There
was
also
discussion
about
this
I'm,
not
sure
how
the
implementation,
how
the
specification
has
been
changed.
I.
C
B
C
I've
been
spending
some
time
getting
myself
up
to
date
on
the
metrics
spec
over
the
last
week
and
I.
Don't
think
I
read
anything
about
updating
multiple
times
back
and
I'm.
Gonna
join
the
metrics.
The
metrics
meeting
tomorrow
and
I'm
gonna
continue
joining
them
for
the
next
few
weeks.
So
I
can
ask
them
about
that.
At
the
meeting.
B
C
Guess
that's
all
we
have
on
the
agenda
today.
Is
anyone
have
anything
else
that
they
want
to
bring
up
or
any
issue
I
guess.
One
thing
that
I
do
want
to
quickly
mention
is
the
the
PR
to
update
the
contribute
vote.
Appoint
to
the
latest
version
of
the
SDK
is
a
little
bit
out
of
date,
so
I'm
going
to
update
that
and
push
it
right
here
today,
and
hopefully
we
can
release
a
new
version
of
all
the
controls
before
the
end
of
the
week
third
rounds
available.
B
More
thing
with
the
matrix
because
currently
the
matrix
allows
only
for
like
under
the
same
name.
You
cannot
register
right,
you
can
register
Omni,
let's
say
counters
or
observers.
You
cannot
mix
them.
So
let's
say
you
will
have
the
nice
face
of
the
matrix
like,
for
example,
CBO,
and
you
would
like
to
have
several
metrics
for
them,
but.
B
B
B
Yeah
yeah,
but,
for
example,
if
you
are
registering
a
new
metric
with
the
name
CTO,
then
you
are
you
creating
panting
stomach
to
that
right
and
the
bound
instrument
can
be
on
me
either
observer
or
the
accountant,
so
we
cannot
mix
and
that
you
cannot
create
a
new
metric
under
the
same
name.
So
you
cannot
have
like
say,
for
example,
a
new
city,
new
metric
that
this
observer
and
then
use
EPO
metric.
That
will
be
the
counter
then,
when
you're
exporting,
you
could
then
merge
them
right
which
are
different.
C
B
C
C
If
you
want
to,
if
you
want
to
bring
that
up
with
someone,
j9d
has
done
a
lot
of
has
been
doing
most
of
the
spec
work
for
metrics.
So
there
might
be
something
you
want
to
bring
up
with
him.
What
does
think
so?
You
can
do
yeah
like
that
Jake
and
a
CD
on
Gator
or
on
up
and
I'm
sure
you'd
be
willing
to
talk
about
metrics
and
Johnny,
and
the
changes
everything.