►
From YouTube: 2021-07-28 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
B
C
C
B
Have
we
changed
the
the
time
for
for
demand
meeting
yeah?
I
remember
we
talked
about
that.
A
We
talked
about
that
and
actually
it's
my
mistake
somehow.
I
did
update
you
so
after
that
I
I
discussed
with
really
that
we
plan
to
change
the
meeting.
I
mean
we
want
to
make
the
same
time
for
the
meeting
yeah,
but
really
really
told
that
now,
let's
not
change
it,
let's
keep
it
as
as
it
is.
If
nobody
is
going
to
join
on
monday
or
on
wednesday,
then
probably
we
can
close
the
we've
closed.
A
That
meeting,
saying
that
we
didn't
have
any
updatedness,
but
let's
not
change
it,
just
let's
not
change
it
temporarily.
I
mean:
let's
keep
it
as
it
is,
so.
A
A
Issues
which
we
have
I
mean
I
don't
see
any
I
mean
just
in
case.
You
have
any
blocker,
please
please
we
can
discuss
that,
but
I
mean
I
don't
see
any
blocker
as
of
now
which
really
stops
in
terms
of
specs
completion
we
do
have.
I
think
there
are.
There,
are
things
missing
in
our
build
pipeline,
which
probably
we
definitely
need
to
improve
on,
but
in
terms
of
specs
completeness
for
1.2.
I
didn't
really
find
anything
which
is
blocking
as
of
now.
B
A
C
A
Yes,
I
did
raise
a
pr
for
adding
in
the
environment
variables
for
otlp,
probably
that
the
reason
is
that
we
I
mean
that
one
of
the
I
mean
just
because
we
are
talking
about
that.
A
So
we
are
using
this
environment
variable
logic.
Is
there
in
multiple
two
three
places
right
now,
so
I
just
consolidated
in
hdk
common,
so
I
moved
to
the
logic
for
reading
the
environment
variable.
So
that's
a
different
logic.
We
have
for
unix
and
different
for
windows,
so
just
consolidated,
sdk,
common
okay.
So.
A
A
My
max
has
already
discussed
that
uwp
does
not
support
reading
environment
variables
and
there
will
be
lots
of
other
real
time,
probably
embedded
system,
so
we
don't
know
which
may
not
support.
So
I
just
added
one
flag,
no
tnv.
So
if
we
build
it
with
this,
then
our
code
from
the
environment
reading
code
will
not
be
built
with
this
okay.
A
So
that
was
one
thing,
and
apart
from
that
for
hotel
to
be
here
pc,
I
did
add
the
environment
variables,
because
even
though
it's
optional,
the
benefit
which
we
get
is
that
we
can
dynamically
load
the
exporters
at
runtime
using.
We
already
have
it
and
we
got
plugin,
but
we
can't
really
use
it
as
of
now,
because
this
environment
variables
cannot
be
set.
A
If
you
want
to
load
any
plugin
at
run,
if
you
want
to
load
any
sdk
or
exporter
at
runtime,
we
cannot
do
as
of
now,
because
the
the
configurations
cannot
be
set
at
runtime,
so
environment
variable
gives
us
a
way
to
set
the
configurations
and
load
these
libraries,
so
probably
just
go
through
that
when
you
have
time.
A
A
A
A
Yes,
but
I
think
that
that
specification
does
want
that
there
should
be
a
internal
edit
logging
and
it's
not
internal.
This
is
the
way
yeah,
so
this
is
internal,
but
it
does
does
allows
applications
to
plug
in
their
own
logic.
A
A
A
A
B
A
Yes,
so
yeah,
it
would
be
different
most
of
the
languages
they're
fine,
because
they
have
the
global
log
handler
with
them.
So
they
can
use
that.
I
mean
python
is
using
a
global
log
and
the
logger
object
is
they
have
they
are
using
that
they
do
provide
the
interface
to
change
it,
but
I
think
by
default
they
use
that
to
capture
the
logs
with
error
logs,
but
in
c
flip
plus
we
don't
have
that.
A
A
A
So
that
would
be
a
problem,
so
I
think
the
recommendation
would
be
use,
add
event
serialize
the
exception
in
a
string
format
and
then
use
id1
to
basically
send
that
exception
as
an
event.
A
Yeah,
it
can
be
disabled.
So
basically,
let
me
go
through
go
through
my
change,
but
I
think
it
by
default.
It
uses
so
basically
how
you
can
disable
it
is
that
you
can
set.
A
A
A
A
A
To
be,
I
mean
up
sync
with
the
actual
code
and
I'll
update
all
those
information,
whether
whether
the
default
by
default.
What
what's
the
log
level
can
we
change
remove
it
all?
Together
I
mean
whether
levels
can
be
changed
at
the
runtime.
I
don't
think
it
can
be
changed
in
the
runtime,
because
I
remember
I
didn't
create
an
extern
level
for
that.
B
A
A
A
Schema
convention,
this
two:
are
there
probably
this
once
we,
these
two
should
definitely
go
in
1.2.
B
A
A
Time
to
have
it
by
friday,
but
let's
see
if
I
really
wanted
these
things
to
go
in
that,
but
I
think
if
there
are
more
issues
in
this
pr,
probably
I'll,
we
can
make
it
on
for
monday
or
something
I
mean
in
that
case
I
mean
I
just
wanted.
Error
logging
and
trace
gamer
should
go
in
that
and
because,
if
any
issue
coming
because
of
these.
A
I
mean
I
don't
want
these.
These
changes
to
go
in
directly
in
1.2
any
new,
any
new
feature.
I
would
like
to
avoid
going
in
directly
1.2
better
to
have
a
release
candidate
for
all
the
features
so
that
any
issue
comes.
We
can
plan
for
another
rc
between
just
in
case.
We
see
any
issues
in
this
new
features
which
we
are
adding.
In
that
case,
we
can
have
another
rc.
A
B
B
B
A
Because
we
are
going
to
tag
it
with
the
commit,
so
we
don't
need
to
change
it.
I
mean
it's
totally
fine,
I
mean
adding
in
the
main
branch
I
mean
we
already
have
folk
broth
from
where
we
are
doing
all
the
features
changes
and
once
we
are
fine
with
those
we
are,
then
only
we
are
merging
it
totally.
Fine,
not
not
to.
A
C
A
A
They
are
are,
most
probably
I
mean
I
don't
think
they
are
going
to
do
all
the
testing
and
everything
they
are
probably
going
to
see
glance
the
codes
and
see
whether
all
the
features
I
mean
we
are
complying
with
all
the
specs
or
not.
So
probably,
I
think
they
are
not
going
to
that.
That's
what
they
did
with
the
dotnet
they
just
they
were
just
probably
mapping
it
with
the
compliance
metrics.
Try
to
see
if
we
support
all
the
features.
A
B
B
A
A
A
Yes
is
fine,
so
this
guy
there
was
one
by
max
tyrell
this
week,
so
he
was
already.
He
was
had
some
discussion
with
max
for
vc
package
and
he
had
some
ideas.
How
can
we
use
dc
package
for
creating
a
port
file,
and
also
he
had
some
other
thoughts
also
can
be
improved
using
vc
package.
A
A
He
said
that
he
want
to
contribute
on
this,
but
he
had
some
other
thoughts.
I
mean,
if
you
go
through
what
he
is
thinking
about,
so
he
wanted
to
have
our
own
private
vc
package
registry
instead
of
using
the
offshore
registry,
I'm
not
sure
if
that
would
be
a
good
way
of
doing
it.
So
probably
we
should
have
our
own
our
official
package
available
through
this
registry,
not
private,
but
that
would
be
different,
registering
through
which
you
can
install
open
telemetry.
A
Yes,
which
is
fine,
but
I
mean
I
was
not
sure
whether
we
should
provide
this,
this
flexibility
of
with
stl
and
which
excel
and
as
part
of
vc
package,
because
these
macros
are
not
abi
compliant,
I
mean
if
anybody
is
building
with
these
macros,
the
api
will
not
be
compliant.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
we
should.
C
A
A
A
He's
saying
that
with
the
official
vc
package
registry,
you
cannot
configure,
but
you
cannot
provide
this
alternative
options
of
building.
You
can
add
additive
features
like
with
with
otl
page
still,
okay,
because
that
adds
a
new
set
of
target
in
the
vc
package,
so
that
will
still
work.
But
if
these
kind
of
replacements,
like
with
stl
or
with
epsilon,
that
will
not
work
with
the
official
registry.
A
A
A
A
A
A
In
the
official
rep
in
the
official
registry,
you
can
just
provide
open,
telemetry
or
multiple
multiple
packages,
open
telemet,
I'm
not
sure,
multiple
packages,
the
open,
telemetry
api,
sdk
exporter,
different
exporters.
It
would
be
four
or
five
different,
open
telemetry
packages.
A
A
C
A
A
A
C
A
Okay,
you're
saying
that
we
will
have,
we
will
have
our
official
open,
telemetry.
C
B
Available
yeah,
I
think
that
will
be
very
helpful.
As
yeah
you
mentioned,
many
people
requested.
A
This
yeah,
I
mean
I
wanted
to
tell
him
that,
let's
probably
let's
prioritize,
delivering
a
open,
telemetry
official
package
in
the
optional
vc
package,
instead
of
doing
lots
of
other
improvements
yeah,
we
don't
need
to
do
other
improvements.
As
of
now
things
are
for.
When
I
don't.
I
don't
think
that
our
build
system
is
that
bad,
that
we
should
change
lots
of
things
here
and
there,
okay
yeah.
So
probably
we
can
ask
him
that,
probably
I
I
I
mean
you
want
to
reply
to
him.