►
From YouTube: 2022-03-02 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello
bob
good
afternoon.
D
F
F
C
Hi
captain,
I
guess
you
don't
know
that.
I
don't
you
don't
know
spongebob
squarepants.
Do
you
team,
though.
C
F
Does
he
or
it
or
does
it
only
affect
I
mean,
does
it
have
the
right
to
close
your
arms.
F
Yeah
we
talked
last
week
about
this
pr,
so
we
just
agreed
to
just
leave
it
open.
So
maybe
he
wants
to
we're
asking
a
question
and
if
it's
closed,
that's
something
I
will
change
with
the
rework
of
the
exporters
anyway.
So
it's
not
realism,
not
anything.
Just.
A
C
Understood:
okay,
cool
well,
we'll
make
sure
that
we
review
that.
F
Yeah,
we
will
have
a
look
I
just
I
I
keep
the
ci
off
so
the
ones
and
yeah
I
will
have
a
look
later,
but
since
we're
there
actually
I
can
maybe
we
can
answer
the
question.
Oh
that
already
answered
something.
F
We
can
give
a
can.
I
could
give
a
different
answer,
and
so
the
reasoning
is
basically
once
once
this
plan
is
finished.
It
cannot
be
written,
so
it's
unmutable.
So
that's
why
we
have
two
different
classes
for
the
span,
so
the
first
one
when
you're
actually
interacting
with
it.
So
we
can
add
stuff
to
it.
It's
attributes
it
ends
whatever
there
is,
and
once
it's
finished
so
it's
ended,
it's
only
readable,
so
you
cannot
change
any
of
the
attributes
or
anything.
That's
why
there
are
different
interfaces.
F
That's
basically
it!
So
that's
just
our
implementation,
if
that's
really
how
it
will
be
at
the
end,
it's
another
question,
but
that's
why
it's
that.
C
A
Yeah,
so
I
wanted
to
like
extend
the
follow-up
to
that
question
so,
like
I
was
working
on
creating
events.
B
A
Handlers
in
like
present
library,
so
I'm
presently
creating
the
event
handlers
in
the
on
start
and
the
on
end
function
in
the
like
the
span,
processors.
So,
like
the
event
handler.
If
I
provide
something
like
a
span
or
the
span,
processor
or
the
read,
write
span,
processor
or
something.
So
I
wanted
the
event
how
all
the
event,
like
the
onstart
event
handler
and
the
on
and
event
handler
to
have
a
single
base
class
so
that
it
could
all
be
any
integrated
from
the
same
base
class.
But.
A
A
F
Well,
not
really,
it
really
depends
on
what
you
actually
need
from
the
from
these
bands.
What
you
want
to
I
mean:
why
isn't
the
read
write
interface
is
extend.
Well,
if
you
use,
if
you
use
the
readable
span
interface,
then
that's
implemented
in
both
so
so
read
right,
so
that
should
be
without
looking
at
the
code.
Both
span
classes
should
implement
that.
F
Yeah
yeah:
well,
you
could
change
it
but
as
this
probably
gets
passed,
but
the
interface
doesn't
allow
it.
I
understand,
let
me
think
about
that.
So
I
can
I
just
say
I
have
to
look
at
the
code
and
maybe
somebody
else
as
well,
so
because
I'm
just
looking
at
what's
like
at
the
moment-
and
I
I
don't
have
all
the
code
in
my
head
since.
A
F
Yes,
yeah
not
necessarily
base
class,
because
yeah
inheritance
is
not
always
really
well
most
of
the
time.
It's
not
the
best
solution
and
if
you
want
to
you,
know,
reuse,
something
and
php,
it's
oftentimes
better
to
use
a
trade
or
something.
A
F
If
you
don't
have
to,
then
I
know
we
have
some
abstract
classes
in
the
code,
but
I
personally
that's
just
my
opinion.
F
And
actually
I
don't
know
how
you
how
you
could.
Is
there
an
english
word
for
for
the
pause
I
made
in
germany?
Well,
I
said
something
and
then
I
was
waiting
for
something
you
know
in
german.
We
call
it.
We
call
it
the
art,
art
paused,
you
know
a
good
spouse,
so
I'm
like
I'm
waiting
for
you,
know,
applause
or
whatever,
something
like
this.
F
Yeah,
well,
it's
it's
more
yeah,
it's
more
used
in
a
sarcastic
or
you
know
joke
way.
So
it's
yeah.
F
Okay
got
it,
I
have
some,
do
you
have
some
more
stuff.
C
So
the
the
the
only
things
that
are
that
nobody
added
anything
else
to
the
open
agenda,
so
we
talked
about
the
open
pr's,
and
so
I
think,
those
that's
the
onl.
Those
are
the
that
was
the
only
thing
that
was
on
the
current
agenda.
I
think
we
probably
all
also
ought
to
talk
about
our
next
release
and
our
project
boards
to
make
sure
that
we're.
F
Yeah,
so
for
the
next
release
we
should
have
about,
I
think
in
two
weeks
right,
a
few.
If
we
take
those
four
weeks
cadence
unless
there's
something
well,
I
we
talked
a
little
bit
in
checks
about
some
changes.
F
We
need
to
make
to
the
logging,
so
maybe
I
can
go
into
that
and
why
it's
actually
needed.
F
So
a
few
weeks
ago
we
have
talked
about
how
we
want
to
implement,
generate
the
logging,
and
then
we
ended
up
with
having
the
global
logger
holder
and
because
I
gave
in
and
no
no
because
I
said
at
the
moment,
yeah
I
couldn't
come
up
with
anything
better,
but
since
I
went
back
and
so
we
have
the
symphony
bundle,
which
is
basically
because
people
don't
know,
bundle
is
like
extension
or
plug-in
floors,
and
this
is
more
or
less,
and
then
we
have
a
demo
for
it,
which
was
in
this.
F
In
this
github
organization
we
have,
which
is
called
telemetry
php.
What
a
surprise-
and
I
wanted
to
actually
set
this
up
for
objectives
cluster,
so
we
can
run
some
tests
against
it
and
it's
actually
the
only
thing
at
the
moment
which
more
or
less
resembles
some
real
world
scenario.
We
have
otherwise
we're
doing
a
lot
of
stuff
and
don't
know
really
if
it
makes
sense.
If
it's
used
right.
F
Well,
maybe
some
people
know,
but
we
don't
have
an
example
which
is
somewhere
in
code
which
we
could
test
against
so
and
why
this
whole
symphony
bundle
was
something
was
more
or
less
the
one
of
the
first
shot.
I
gave
at
open,
telemetry
and
I
do
had
to
do
some
stuff
which
well
needed
some
fixing,
because
there
were
changes
in
the
sdk
code
base
and
because
some
things
I
just
did
not
really
wanted
to
do
them.
F
Getting
the
logger
into
the
sdk
is
very
complicated
or
actually
nearly
impossible,
because
most
frameworks
come
with
some
logging
out
of
the
box
or
they
can
just
provide
another.
You
know
some
psr
whatever
just
depends
on
the
framework,
but
usually
it's
somehow
implemented
in
dependency
injection
and
then,
if
you
need
this
logging
somewhere,
you
would
just
use
dependency
injection
to
get
the
and
to
set
up
the
logger
in
wherever
you
need
it.
The
problem
with
the
implementation
we
have
at
the
moment
is
that
it's
static
access,
so
there's
no
real.
F
F
So
this
would
be
something
you
would
need
to
artificially
create
and
since
the
global
logger
holder
itself
doesn't
have
a
real
dependency,
at
least
not
in
a
constructor
or
in
a
setter
or
something
like
this
is
just
a
static
variable.
It
won't
be
automatically
injected
so
and
the
symphony
bundle,
just
the
sdk
button
does
nothing
more.
At
the
moment,
it's
not
instrumentation
or
something
like
that.
F
It's
basically
just
setting
up
the
sdk,
make
it
configurable
and
right
into
something,
and
so
there's
no
real
way
without
any
user
land
code
to
to
get
the
the
logger
from
the
framework
and
to
get
it
injected
in
the.
F
Yeah
and
the
sdk
basically
so
that's
a
little
bit
of
the
problem,
and-
and
we
could
solve
this
by
basically
just
creating
making
the
logo
holder
some
kind
of
signal-
I'm
not
a
big
fan
of
singleton,
but
at
the
moment
it
would
be
a
short
time
short-term
solution.
So
yes,
that's
about
it.
There
was
more
speech
to
bob
and
brett
because
we
talked
a
little
bit,
but
maybe
you
know
why
it
doesn't
really
work
or
do
you
have
any
more
questions.
F
Thank
you,
sir
otherwise
bretton
we
talked
about.
Well,
we
want
to
pick
up
the
configuration
again.
Did
I
write
something
with
this
global
sdk
thing?
I
think
I
did
at
least
I
wanted
it
right.
D
B
F
No
okay-
and
I
will
just
just
go
on
talking,
so
we
have
the
problem
which,
in
a
lot
of
parts
at
the
moment
we
have
the
sdk
is
that
we
don't
have
like
a
global
axis,
and
by
that
mean,
if
you
take
a
look
at
some
of
the
other
sdks,
they
have
like
an
sdk
object
now
or
some
might
be
an
object
or
some
static
axis
which
actually
called
sdk
and
which
then
you
know,
holds
maybe
factories
or
configuration
or
what
have
you
it's
different
different
implementations
and
because
we
don't
have
something
like
this.
F
A
lot
of
things
in
our
code
ends
up.
You
know
a
single
static
access,
because
if
we
would
just
have
this
one
static,
top
level
object,
we
couldn't,
could
you
know,
stick
all
the
other
stuff
in
there
and
it
doesn't
have
to
need
to
be
singletons
or
static
axis,
because
we
just
need
this.
No
one
global
object.
F
Good,
so
I
think
that's
the
problem
that
would
something
we
should
tackle
and
then
a
lot
of
other
things
or
problems
will
be
any
problems
anymore
or
we
don't
have
to
fight
or
argue.
Overall,
things
are
good
or
not,
because
we
just
need
ones
yes
and
actually
brett
and
me
wanted
a
meeting
where
we
talked
about
this.
We
did
not
manage
to
do
it
yet,
but
I
just
we
will
find
some
time
next
week
right.
B
Yep,
I'm
certainly
available
for
that.
That
sounds
good.
D
F
Context,
that's
that
topic
and
yeah.
The
other
thing
is
for
the
next
release.
We
hopefully
have
all
the
magic
I
promised
in
place,
I'm
working
on
it,
but
I
was
yeah
quite
distracting,
distracted
with
other
stuff
since
I'm
in
the
process
of
getting
a
new
job.
So
I
have
to
do
a
lot
of
stuff.
There
tell
the
story
of
my
life
a
few
times
a
day.
Sometimes,
and
today
I
told
it
three
times
yeah.
So
I
was
I
hadn't
did
not
have
as
much
time
as
I
wanted
to.
F
Knocking
on
wood
well
yeah,
I
mean
it's
kind
of
obvious.
F
E
F
E
D
F
C
It's
it's
a
good
one
to
know.
F
F
F
Now
we
can,
but
to
say
a
few
seconds
before
you
were
just
sounded
like
a
robot.
F
F
Yeah
and
then
maybe
I
go
on
two
more
topics,
at
least
so
at
the
moment,
if
we
look
at
merge,
pull
requests,
we
still
have
the.
C
F
Yeah
so,
but
generally
we
could
set
up
something
that
or
maybe
the
we
could
set
up.
I
know
some
reports
from
the
ci
processors.
You
know
what
I
mean
or,
for
example,
some
weeks
ago.
I
think
I
added
this
second.
C
F
F
F
Make
target
in
the
make
file,
obviously,
which
creates
this
metrics?
Well,
it's
not
a
user
interface,
but
it's
like
a
report.
It's
quite
useful!
There's
a
lot
of
metrics.
You
can
find
there
and
dependencies
and
all
this
stuff
around.
So
maybe
that's
something
we
could
publish
on
the
github
pages
instead
of
the
actual
documentation,
because
it's
something
that
actually
changes
when
we
do
when
we
do
a
merge
so
and
yeah,
and
maybe
something
like
the.
C
F
F
C
I
was
mentioning
that
our
maintain
in
the
hotel
maintainers
slack
channel.
They
were
having
a
discussion
about
giving
admin
privileges
to
the
maintainers,
and
I
was
advocating
for
it
very
hard
because
I
agree
with
you:
it's
very
frustrating
to
be
american
or
repository
that
you
don't
have
access
for
admin
access
to
so
yeah.
F
F
I
don't
maybe-
can
work
with
them,
but
it's
a
little
bit
frustrating
to
not
be
able
to
set
up
a
web
or
something
which
shouldn't
be
a
problem
since
weapon
cannot
really.
You
know,
crash
things
or
destroy
things,
or
I
mean
you
can
do
stupid
things
for
them
nearly
everything.
But
I
don't
really
see
the
point
where
you
can't
manage
this
yeah.
C
It's
yeah,
I
agree
with
you,
it's
frustrating
and
if
somebody,
if
somebody
in
our
group
wanted
to
do
something
vindictive,
they
probably
wouldn't
need
admin
privileges
to
do
it.
So
it
seems.
F
Yes,
yes,
I
have
one
more
topic:
okay,
now
that
we
merge
this
changes
in
this,
the
contributing
document
in
this
other
branch.
Do
you
want
to
merge
this
actually
in
the
main
branch,
or
should
it
stay
there.
F
Okay
was
just
a
little
reminder
and
maybe
do
we
have
to
do
the
same
in
the
other
report.
C
In
the
contribution
I
thought
about
that
yesterday
and
I'm
thinking
I'm
trying
to
decide
whether
it
should
have
its
own,
whether
it
should
have
its
own
contributing
md
or
if
it
should
just
point
to
the
one.
That's
in,
I
think
I'm
just
gonna
put
like
a
link
to
the
open
telemetry
php,
one
in
the
open,
telemetry,
php
contrib
repo.
F
Good:
okay,
good,
that's
good
with
everybody!.
E
Yeah
definitely
thank
you
timo
and
brett
for
all
the
review
on
the
jaeger
stuff
and,
I
think,
yeah.
I
think
we're
about
probably
one
pr
away
from
full
thrift
support.
So
that's
kind
of
exciting
awesome.
F
Cool,
that's
really
cool
yeah.
Thank
you
for
all
your
work
there
and
then,
maybe
after
that,
if
you're
done,
then
we
can
actually
or
I
can
go
ahead
and
you
know
bring
some
german
order
into
the
exporters.
F
Well,
you
know,
whatever
ukraine,
you
know
created
a
little
bit
a
better
abstraction
though
now
then,
once
we
know
what
bits
and
pieces
we
have
there,
then
it's
easier
to
have
a
look.
What
actually
can
be
an
interface?
What
can
be
abstracted
or
needs
to
be
exit
and
just
specific
to
one
exporter?
That's
basically
the
idea
that
we
don't
have
easier,
have
easier,
maintainability
and
not
so
much
code,
duplication.
E
Yeah
for
sure
yeah-
and
I
think
after
that
I
was
probably
just
going
to
take
a
look
to
see
again
how
many
of
the
other
languages
have
added
support
for
grpc
and
or
product
off
over
grpcc.
E
B
F
I
think
we
talked
about
this
some
weeks
ago.
I
think
it's
the
same
that
zipkin
or
yeah.
They
use
the
same
grpc.
F
E
F
Yeah,
thank
you
and
we
are
looking
forward
to
have
all
this
stuff
in
the
spokane
all
right.
It's
the
country,
okay,
anything
else
to
complain
about.
C
F
Okay,
then,
let's
all
hope
that
google
moves
there
am,
I
allowed
to
say
yes
in
a
recording,
I
just
said,
and
they
finally
merge
brett's
changes
so
that
we
can
get
rid
of
those
failing
tests.
Otherwise
do
you
think,
did
they
really
mean
another
another?
Eight
weeks,
oh
no,
you
said
yeah.
C
Okay
for
for
context
for
everyone,
brett
made
a
change
upstream
to
one
of
the
proto
breath.
Libraries
and
google
gave
an
as
an
estimate
of
four
to
eight
weeks
to
get
that
change
pushed
out.
I
have
a
contact
at
google
from
my
day
job
and
I
very
out
I
very
nicely
asked
them
to
expedite
that,
so
we're
hoping
that
they
will
be
able
to
push
that
next
week.
F
Wow,
I
suppose
I
do
yeah
imagine
if
we
wouldn't
have
that
contact
one.
Maybe
you
could
next
year
or
something.
Let's
see
that
change.