►
From YouTube: 2020-11-13 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
A
A
A
So
welcome
to
spec
issue
scrub
session
friday
edition
we
I've.
We
don't
have
that
many
spec
issues
to
scrub
through.
I
was
hoping
to
also
tackle
collector
issues
as
well.
If
we
got
quorum
and
tigran,
I
know
you
may
have
missed
the
last
collector
meeting
but
like
there
was
a
p1
issue,
it
looked
like
it
had
a
with
a
deadlock.
It
looked
like
it's
been
fixed
now,
so
we
can
look
at
that
once
we
get
to
the
collector
issues,
but
we
can
start
on
the
spec
issues.
A
First,
we
will
come
here
and
six
days
ago,
six
days
ago,
one
p1,
p1,
p1p1
and
after
j
allowed
for
j
and
for
real.
This
is
the
only.
A
C
A
A
Okay,
friggin,
that
clears
it
guys,
good
job.
Let
me
just
do
a
quick
look
on
photos.
D
A
Sorry
I
didn't
hear
what
you
said
this
one
should
be.
D
D
D
E
Backwards
compatible
to
add
another
thing:
it's
not
even
to
add
one
more
option
to
the
any
the
one
of.
E
D
E
There's
no
language,
because
this
is
it
looks
like
this
looks
like
jason.
D
E
E
The
next
release
will
happen
before
jay,
I'm
confident
on
this.
So
all
right,
I
work
with
just
miscellaneous
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
know.
A
Okay:
okay,
okay,
thank
you,
and
that
brings
it
there
and
I
need
to
just
take
both
tips.
Just.
B
A
A
G
E
Closed
yeah,
we'll
close
it
I'll
close,
it
is
the
issue
in
1909.
A
Okay
is
that
one's
looking
good
yeah,
they
put
a
pretty
pretty
rigorous
proof
in
the
or
at
least
description
in
the
deadlock
thing,
which
was
very
interesting,
very
helpful.
A
A
D
Protocol
in
the
otrp,
we
don't
have
a
way
to
preserve
this.
Oh,
we
don't
have
the
equivalent.
No
we're
saying.
E
E
We
have
this
concept
of
temporality
being
delta,
our
gauges,
and
these
are
delta
or
cumulative,
but
these
are
gauges,
so
the
pr
does
not
set
them
priority
and
expect
that
if
temporarity
is
not
said
that
it
means
it's
a
gauge
which
adds
an
meaning
on
top
of
the
protocol.
E
Yeah
yeah,
so
I
was
commenting
that
and
I
was
commenting
that
it
requires
to
be
in
the
proto
so
tigran.
If
you
would
like
to
respond,
maybe
or
I
can
respond
to
this
issue,
so
indeed
it
is
a
bug
allow
for
ga
output
because
it's
the
old,
open
sensors.
We
are
not
that
focused
too
much
on
that
clarity,
p2
and
yep.
D
B
Yeah,
can
you
scroll
down.
B
F
A
B
A
I'll
change
the
filter
to
just
go
over
the
issues
that
we
have,
whether
they're
bugs
or
not.
A
Oh
sorry,
sorry
I'll
jump
to
the
contrib
to
check
the
bugs.
E
You
go
down,
I
think
there
is
an
open
theorem,
allow
for
ga
allow
for
game
and.
B
B
D
A
You,
okay,
so
going
back
to
its
open,
telemetry
collector
to
triage
the
issues
coming
in.
I
will
start
from
the
beginning
the
most
recent
one
going
backwards.
D
I
don't
know
how
to
do
this,
even
if
even
this
is
possible
at
all,
does
circle
ci
allow
but
who
are
not
who
are
not
team
members
of
the
all
the
particular
repository
to
see
the
logs.
I
mean
we
didn't
do
anything
to
prevent
that
from
happening.
If
people
can't
see
that
and
that's
a
should
stick
with
the
eye
behavior
does
anybody
know
if
it's
possible
at
all
to
configure
this?
G
G
Is
there
an
item
to
to
move
the
ci
to
github
actions?
There
is
a
need
for
doing
that,
because
we
need
to
do
it
for
all
the
records.
Correct
yeah
so
probably
just
like
resolve
this
issue
and
link
to
the
actions,
because
I've
seen
many
issues
like
code
coverage,
other
stuff
people
complain
and
after
move
to
actions
all
problem
solved.
G
D
D
F
B
B
D
A
B
B
A
Okay,
okay,
sent
okay.
D
I
think
there
is
a
way
to
achieve
what
the
person
wants.
E
They
say
that
they're
gonna
try
that,
but
they
also
try
to
think
to
say
that
maybe
maybe
the
exporter,
all
the
receivers
should
have
a
way
to
be
configured
or
via
a
header.
Maybe
you
know
tlp
by
a
header,
let's
say
respawn
fast
or
whatever
we
want
to
call
the
header.
D
E
E
D
A
This
guy's
going
up
to
bug,
build
failures,
look
as
well.
D
D
D
Okay,
it's
a
p3,
because
it's
two
individual
errors
that
happened
once
the
area.
E
D
D
E
D
And
when
we
do
the
subsequent
triaging
sessions,
we
go
over
this
because
they
are
not
considered
triaged
and
if
there
is
still
no
information,
we
just
skip
as
yeah.
We
close
them.
Okay,
if
yeah,
because
if
the
person
reports
something
and
does
not
report,
we
give
them
some
time,
obviously
right
to
respond.
If
they
don't
respond,
we
don't
know
what
to
do
about
this,
which
of
course,
I
don't
see
the
point
of
keeping
them.
B
B
E
D
E
D
Merged
this
is
probably
the
pr
where
the
issue
was
found.
I'm
guessing
a
comment
from
that
comment.
D
D
F
E
A
I
I
I
like
to
offer
that
we
concentrate
the
efforts
on
p1
sp2s.
There's!
No,
you
know
I
mean
like
that's
where
the
health
is
really,
we
don't
want
it
to
be
able
to
work
on
stuff
we
have,
and
but
we
could
discuss
later,
if
that's
more
simple,
why
are
some
of
these.
E
The
reason
why
is
p2
is
because
we
we're
gonna
have
a
bunch
of
components
that
will
use
this
helper
and
we
need
to
to
to
make
sure
we
have
it
in
a
good
shape.
C
B
D
So
the
first
two
are
duplicates
of
what
we
already
tried.
What's
the
third
occurrence,
can
you
scroll
down.
D
I
I
can't
tell,
but
it's
it's
an
implant
test
can
be
anything,
so
I
think
we
should
either
it's
miss
daniels
or
we
keep
it.
A
D
D
And
again,
maybe
anywhere,
I
suggest
we
keep
keep
it
without
this
particular
labels.
It's
it's
a
it
can
be
throughout
the
code
base.
So
we
better
don't
use
the
vehicles
here.
A
A
E
E
Respect
this
is
a
rename.
We
currently
have
a
is
valid,
and
this
this
is
asking
for
renaming.
So,
if
it
happens,
it
happens
before
so.
Allow
for
ga
2
sooner
is
better.
If
we
decide
to
do
it.
E
E
A
E
I
have
to
leave
now
sorry
yeah.
Let's
do
this
one
and
okay
enough.
D
For
today,
he
similarly
peter,
if
that
one
was
the
other
number.