►
From YouTube: 2020-12-09 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
D
E
Hey
again,
it's
jeff
from
walmart
is
stanza
testing
in
kubernetes.
I
remember
they
had
vm
test
results,
but
do
they
have
any
kubernetes
test
results.
C
You
know,
I
don't
know
that
we
have
anything
documented,
but
we
certainly
have
developed
features
that
work
in
kubernetes,
and
I
mean
I
would
I
guess
I
would
just
say
that
I
I
think
that
whatever
your
use
case
is,
we
should
be
able
to
support
it
and,
if
not
like,
to
understand
what
it
is,
and
we
would
make
sure
that
it
does.
But.
E
All
right
dan
I'll
follow
up
with
you,
we're
going
to
probably
do
a
poc
in
early
january
in
games
awesome
because
right
now
we're
using
fluent
bit
so
we
want
to.
We
want
to
compare.
D
F
D
Right
we're
we're
running
the
collector
on
the
nodes
and
we
don't
see
the
ipad
pressing
the
code
in
that
case
you're
right.
D
E
B
So
I
think
last
time,
unfortunately
I
missed
last
last
meeting
but
like
looking
at
the
notes,
I
think
there
was
there
was
one
question
raised
around
and
there
was
actually
an
issue
made
in
a
specification
around
the
max
size
for
logs
I'm
wondering
kind
of
how
people
feel
about
you
know
going
hard
after
resolving
that
one
or
maybe
not.
D
I
remember
last
time
we
discussed
this.
The
conclusion
was
that
I
think
jana
raised
this
right,
so
the
idea
was
that
she's
going
to
make
a
proposal.
If
I
remember
correctly
about
what
did
we
do
about
it,.
A
D
So
yeah,
all
I
remember,
is
that
we
discussed
that
and
the
recommendation
was
that
we
need
a
proposal.
We
need
it
to
be
more
or
less
uniform,
with
the
remain
the
rest
of
the
open,
telemetry
like.
If
it's
a
recommendation
about
the
attributes,
then
it
should
apply
also
to
traces.
Likewise
right,
but
I
don't
think
we
discussed
any
of
you
or
made
any
decisions
about
how
exactly
it's
going
to
work.
B
I
know
that
you're,
probably
beyond
busy.
You
want
somebody
else
to
maybe
jump
into
the
issue
and
you
know
quickly
say.
B
Like
you
know,
we
don't
want
to
let
this
issue
linger.
If
janna,
you
know,
if
you
have
a
proposal,
please
put
it
here.
If
not,
you
know
some
of
the
thoughts
that
you
just
share,
take
grant
just
put
in
a
bullet
point
like
saying:
hey
it'd,
ideally
be
you
know
consistent
with,
what's
being
done
in
other
places
in
the
in
open
telemetry.
But
okay,
you
want
me
to
run
that
down
or.
D
B
For
what
it's
worth,
it's
a
bane
of
my
existence,
a
freaking
limit,
it's
as
as
you
like,
I
think
you
packing
guys,
will
probably
understand
it's
very
hard
to
find
a
good
answer
for
this.
One.
C
Yeah,
I
guess
I'll
I'll,
just
a
quick
update
on
stan
that
I
know
some
of
you
guys
are
curious
and
others
are
a
little
bit
more
in
the
loop,
but
you
know
we're
still
we're
still
trying
to
move
forward
with
us
and
I
think
everything
seems
on
track.
We're
just
apologies
from
our
end.
We've
been
a
little
slow
on
the
discussion
side,
but
you
know
I
think
in
the
next
probably
by
next
week.
C
We
have
something
more
clear
to
announce
about
this,
but
yeah
I
mean
we're
still
looking
to
move
stanz
over
to
telemetry
and
integrate
them
together
and
all
that
so.