►
From YouTube: 2022-02-16 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
D
C
C
Yeah,
that's
how
I
was
gonna
ask
like
kind
of.
If
I
I
don't
even
know,
if
the
same
family,
you
know,
I.
C
A
A
I
have
this
stuff
in
progress
from
hotel.
I
could
start
by
the
way
I
have
a
suggestion.
C
C
C
I
I
I'm
I'm
late
on
my
my
tasks
for
hotel.
I
had
a
very
simple
one,
but
I
will
do
this
right
after
the
meeting
right
after
the
meeting
I
have
other
meeting
but
updates
the
americas
status.
You
know
so.
C
And
I
will
do
the
calendar
and
passcode
helping
people
to
get
that
fixed.
So
just
for
me
to
be
sure,
so
you
put
the
right
one
or
at
least
the
one
that
we
are
using
on
the
slack
channel.
You
pin
it
this.
A
C
B
A
C
And
just
so
people
know
next
week
I'll
be
I'll,
be
pto
so
I'll.
I
I'll
take
my
pto
series
and
don't
enjoy
the
meeting.
B
E
Yeah,
so
with
this
pr
there's
kind
of
a
question
out
there,
do
we
keep
the
net
five
support
in
there
or
do
we
remove
it
at
this
time?
I
kind
of
shared
my
thoughts
within
the
pr,
and
I
I
just
wanna
say
that
I
can
go
either
way.
C
I
have
I
I
have
a
very
practical
question
about
that.
Can
we
open
one
of
the
last
passes
that
we
have
in
ci,
because
windows
is
taking
like
26
minutes
25
minutes?
C
If
you
can
save
10
minutes,
I
would
say:
let's
remove
it
it
right
now.
You
know
because
I
I
think
I
agree
with
you
chris
argument
on
the
the
on
the
comments
there,
because
I
really
think
it
was
clear
to
everyone
that
five
was
a
intermediary
step.
You
know.
C
A
C
Okay,
so
you're
not
gonna,
save
big
here,
no
okay!
So
then,
then
we
we
can.
I
think
we
can
in
my
in
my
perspective,
we
we
don't
have
any
reason
to
do
immediately,
but
I
also
think
we
should
do
rather
sooner
than
later,.
C
E
So
perhaps
that
maybe
the
first
week
of
may.
A
E
A
E
B
E
Right
zach
didn't
have
any
known
or
wasn't
aware
of
any
known
compatibility
issues
with
net
six
correct
previously,
and
so
I
think
just
knowing
that
we
have
tests
running
against
it.
That
will
probably
be
fine.
I
don't
know
that
for
this
we
need
full
cross
vendor
sign
off.
C
Yeah
and
it's
good-
the
the
history
will
be
there,
so
we
can
revert,
merge
again.
A
A
F
A
Okay,
so
these
are
all
the
pr's
which
were
there.
We
made
a
very
good
progress.
Basically,
this
week
they're,
I
think
the
most
pr
smashed
in
the
whole
history,
probably
things
in
progress.
Raj
is
not
here,
but
I
I
saw
no
progress
here,
but
at
least
I
I'm
I
put
this
one
in
progress,
because
this
is
something
he
started
working
on.
A
I
have
I
want
to
address
this
one
tomorrow.
I
just
thought
that
it's
low
priority,
but
I
want
to
have
it
disappeared
from
here,
just
not
lose
our
time
to
discuss
it
each
week.
Regarding
this
one,
I
basically
created
a
pr
for
the
for
the
auto
specification.
A
So
far
there
are
free
up.
So
it's
here
so
far.
There
are
free
approvals
and
I
think
there's
a
high
probability
that
it
will
be
merged,
probably
need
to
make
some
reformatting
and
other
cleanups,
because
I
promise
to
do
so,
but
basically
what
it
means
that
we'll
probably
not
need
to
do
anything
more
related
with
with
the
jaeger
support
right
now.
Probably
there
are
some
things
that
will
need
to
be
fixed
first
by
the
sdk,
and
later
we
figure
out.
If
we
need
to
make
any
further
further
refinements.
A
A
A
C
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
I
think
doing
as
the
sdk,
even
if
it's
not
kind
of
the
current
default
of
jaeger
itself,
it
makes
more
sense
is,
is
less
surprise
for
people
that
are
coming
from
the
net
side
of
things.
C
Yeah,
the
the
the
only
thing
is
that
it
needs
to
be
clear
what
you
are
doing.
We
are
following
the
sdk,
you
know,
so
people
that
want
to
send
you
jaeger
know
have
some
information
about
what
they
need
to
do.
They
need
to
install
something
that
leads
to
udp
or
they
can
change
the
configuration
to
send
over
other
protocols.
A
So
maybe
here
I'll
just
tell
my
my
opinion
that
I
think
that
in
our
documentation
we
should
basically
copy
the
the
configuration
even
from
the
sdk
to
make
it
like
usable
for
the
users,
okay,
because
otherwise
it
will
be
very
hard
to
fight
for
them.
That's
my
opinion.
C
Yeah,
I
I
I
think
the
the
only
thing
is
is
really
that
jaeger
is
one
of
the
participants
of
the
the
project
and
one
of
the
big
things
for
disability
tracing.
We
have
to
have
an
easy
way
for
people
to
send
to
yeah.
True.
F
C
This
one,
let's
let
me
go
back
very
fast,
307
you
need.
You
are
waiting
on
raj,
just
to
be
sure,
because
I
I
was
gonna
ping
him
about
something
else.
So
I
mentioned
this
to
him.
So
he
can
we
don't
block
on
this
anymore.
A
C
No,
I
I
I
I
think,
for
now
we
are
still
low
achieve
it
enough
that
we
can
handle,
but
you're
right
in
the
future.
We
should
should
have
something
that
automatically
close
in
active
issues.
A
I
see
zekner
joined
hello,
hey
I
see
you,
it's
okay,
we
merged
the
support
4.6.
I
hope
that
you're,
okay
with
it.
A
A
Okay,
so
that's
all
regarding,
like
the
current,
like
current
work
status,
here
are
some
new
stories,
so
here
we
just
it
is
just
an
issue
created
from
a
command
for
piot's
pr
that,
instead
of
manually
updating
dependencies,
we
can
consider
using
the
pandabot
to
bump
it
good
idea,
not
a
good
idea.
Any
concerns.
C
I
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
but
I
have
a
related
question
and
we
because
you
have
been
participating
more
on
the
sdk.
Do
you
know
when
they
plan
to
release
any
new
version,
not
rc,
but
1.2
and.
B
E
E
B
Trigger
they
were
not
wait
for
the
stable
version.
The
mix
will
be
accepted.
As
I
understand
last
comments,
because
there
is
a
lot
of
stuff,
most
of
them
will
be
stable
status,
but
part
of
them
will
be
in
the
mixture.
There
is
a
ongoing
pr
for
the
specification
to
stabilize
it
or
marking
as
a
mixed
version.
E
Right
because
net
doesn't
support
up
down
counters
and
that
seems
to
be
some
of
the
most
unstable
parts
of
the
spec.
A
The
directory,
where
the
props
file,
where
the
props,
I
think
the
file
is
located.
A
All
right,
update
documentation
after
auto
sdk
bump,
basically
pure
trust
time
made
the
bump
of
the
sdk,
and
I
just
saw
that
new
environmental
variables
have
appeared,
etc.
They
are
not
documented,
so
I
just
putting
it
to
the
beta,
and
I
think
that
is
something
that
we
should
just
do.
Each
time
we
are
making
a
bump
of
the
sdk
to
make
sure
that
our
documentation
is
sick
because
later
it's
harder
to
figure
it
out.
A
B
A
B
G
That
was
definitely
vendoring
and
stereolog
into
the
the
build.
So
currently
I
do,
we
still
use
all
that
serolog
code.
B
G
A
G
As
far
as
I
know,
there's
ceralog
in
here
the
datadog
library
does
docstatsd,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
that's
not
in
here.
G
There's
also
new
and
soft
as
well.
Let's
see.
E
A
C
G
G
C
G
Yeah
then,
maybe
not
we
use
we
use
jason
for
the
way
the
data
dog
talks
with
the
agent.
So
that's
probably
the
only
use
case
really
do
do.
C
We
we
don't
do
that.
Perhaps
the
tracer
did
before,
but
parsing
configuration
right.
G
C
A
B
C
Not
to
my
knowledge,
but
we
can
always
bring
to
the
government
board
to
if,
when
we
we
get
read
for
that.
A
C
C
I
out
this
conversation
make
me
think
about:
should
we
have
some
approximate
date
for
trying
to
release
this
beta.
C
Because
we
we've
been
looking
at
the
tasks,
we
haven't
been
putting
the
tasks
but
not
true
kind
of
announce
and
pursue
the
data
above
those,
but
just
to
have
something
in
our
minds
as
a
kind
of
target
date.
For,
of
course,
we
can
change
the
delay,
and
but
I
didn't
achieve.
E
A
F
B
A
So
you
suggest,
for
example,
you
do
not
see
my
screen,
so
we
can
tie
targeting,
for
example,
8th
of
april
is
the.
A
So
15th
is
the
friday
or
for
the
sig
meeting
will
be
on
13th,
so
we
can
try
13th,
so
I'll
just
share
my
screen
just
to
have
any
date.
So
here
we
have
april
so
wednesday,
it's
13th.
We
can
try
just
to
target
this
thing
this
date
and
I
will
just
try
to
find
where
the
milestones
anyone
remembers
probably
can.
C
Yeah,
it
would
be
great
if
we
can
get
something
dimmable
on
the
conf.
It
would
be.
It
would
be
really
good.
C
We
always
have
somebody
participating
and
what
I've
been
advocating
is
that
doesn't
need
some
be
somebody.
Actually,
it
gives
a
kind
of
a
different
kind
of
credibility
if
somebody
that's
not
participating
on
the
projects.
The
one
demo.
C
C
C
Now
I
I
I
think
it's
fine,
you
know,
but
of
course,
also
people
that
I
think
I
think
the
deadline
for
that
cube
coin
is
already
gone
quite
some
time
ago,
but
we
have
people
participate
and
their
panels
and
things,
and
just
mentioning
having
something
that
people
can
link
to
is
is
a
red
kind
of
giving
visibility.