►
From YouTube: 2021-11-03 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
B
A
Okay,
having
seen
today's
entry,
I'm
going
to
add
a
meeting
entry.
B
B
So
I
think
they
just
suggested
that,
if
part
of
any
new
release,
if
we
also
should
start
providing
what
are
the
versions
of
various
dependencies
which
we
have
like
grpc
json
library,
open,
telemetry
protocol
protocol
versions
which
we
are
using.
That
would
be
good.
That
would
be
easy
for.
A
B
And
also
I
wanted
to
talk
about,
I
mean,
while
we
are
discussing
this,
I
just
wanted
to
talk
about.
How
should
we
handle
so
right?
Now?
We
don't
we
don't
ins
as
part
of
our
build
definition,
at
least
for
cmake.
We
don't
download
any
of
the
dependencies.
We
assume
that
they
are
already
installed
either
they
are
coming
as
a
sub
module
or
they
are.
They
are
basically
defined
as
an
external
external
dependency.
B
They
they
are,
they
are
installed
externally
and
we
are
just
going
to
use
that
the
problem
right
now.
What
we
test,
which
I
see
here,
is
that
at
least
the
at
least
the
dependencies
which
are
coming
as
a
sub
module.
So
right
now,
if
we
see,
let
me
just
open
this.
B
If
we
go
to
the
third
party
at
least
some
of
the
dependencies
like
json
and
open
telemetry
proto,
which
we
definitely
need
for
quite
for
for
our
grpc
exporter
and
json-
is
required
for
other
exporters.
The
problem
here
is
that
our
releases
are
the
tar
files
and
which
are
not
the
github
repos
I
mean
so
so.
The
sub
modules
does
not
really
come
into
the
picture.
B
I
mean
you
cannot
really
initialize
those
sub
modules
because
there
is
no
dot
get
directory,
and
so
that's
that
kind
of
is
causing
the
conclusion
of
different
teams.
Then
how
should
we
do
the
installation
so
when
they
so
running
our
cma?
We
may
try
to
use
the
third
party
library,
but
it
may
not
be
there,
at
least
at
least
for
the
get
update
it
won't
get
initialized.
Also,
some
models
will
not
be
updated.
B
B
That's
that's
one
of
the
issues
which
we
do
have
it.
I
think
tom,
if
you
have,
but
you
can
just
go
through
this.
A
Is
it
recommended
to
uc
make
to
download
our
dependencies?
I
mean
like
for
pc
package
like
this
package.
It
itself
manages
their
dependencies
right.
I
think
this
patch
package
should
should
install
all
our
dependencies
before
building
and
install
us.
Should
that
be
the
case
in
this
case.
B
A
B
It's
it's
the
fallback
for
json,
but
it's
not
fall
back
for
at
least
open
telemetry
proto.
All
right.
B
Is
there
and
we
are
going
to
use
it
from
here?
I
mean
so
basically
for
this
one.
It's
because
the
problem
is
that
this,
this
open,
telemetry
proto,
does
not
have
any
cmake
configuration
script
inside
that.
So
basically,
we
just
need
to
download
it
and
try
to
create
the
photo
of
files,
the
headers
and
the
source
files.
Using
this.
A
So
I
say
and
yeah
open
telemetry
dash
protocol
is
also
not
available
in
this
package.
It
is
not
there,
so
I
think
we
need
to.
A
C
A
Know
that's
true,
I
think,
probably
based
on
our
current
implementation.
We
can
check
whether
the
some
module
is
empty.
If
it
is,
we
can
start
download
yeah
if,
if
it
is
empty
means
the
user
may
just
extract
it,
download
it
as
a
zip
package
and
no
sap
module,
so
we
have
to
download.
I
think
we
have
some
logic
in
our
build
script
for
this.
I
think
max
added
something
like
this
check,
whether
the
mojo
is
embedded
or
not,.
B
A
B
Yeah,
so
probably
in
that
case,
I
think
downloading
it
does
makes
sense
for
specifically
for
open
elementary
products,
because
we
that
assumes
that
we
don't
need
to
do
this.
I
mean
at
least
the
users
does
not
need
to
download
the
text
outside
and
then
put
it
somewhere
and
then
somehow
change
our
cmake
scripts
to
make
it
work.
It's
kind
of
it's
kind
of
weird.
In
that
case
I
mean
they
have
to
change.
B
A
C
A
B
Only
only
problem
would
be
that,
as
of
till
now
we
have
been
our
cma.
Build,
script
was
something
which
can
run
even
if,
even
if
they
are
even
if
you're
offline
on
your
local
laptop,
you
don't
need
any
external
connection
to
really
do
anything
as
long
as
you
have
all
the
different
things,
but
that
is
going
to
break
now.
B
A
A
A
I
think
we
can
file
a
park
and
lay
sand
there.
B
A
A
Yeah
for
others
I
just
want
to.
I
think
we
just
need
to
make
sure
we
prefer
the
dependence
from
like.
If
we
are
build
from
a
vc
package,
we
prefer
the
dependence
installed
by
vc
package,
not
our
sub
module.
Maybe
that's
a
good
thing.
A
I
mean
for
the
basic
package
installation
like
for
all
the
sub
modules
and
except
proto
they
should
prove
they
should
prefer
the
one
from
vc
package,
not
our
sub
modules,
because
that
one,
then
we
can
reuse
the
share.
We
don't
need
to
build
actual
synthetics.
A
B
C
A
C
A
A
C
A
B
A
B
This
is
from
some
module,
but
if
it
is
not
present,
then
if
it
is
not
windows,
then
it
is
going
to.
A
B
A
A
Your
the
arrow
you
got-
and
I
I'm
just
wondering
about
the
order-
and
here
we
prefer
our
third
module-
I
mean.
Perhaps
we
we
need
to.
We
could
prefer
the
one
installed
by
the
os
not
are
so
much
our
story.
Module
can
can
be
used
as
a
for
back
this
way
we
can
reuse
the
one
installed
by
the
user
or
other
package
manager
at
first
without
building
our
own
copy
of
google
test,
okay
yeah
like
if
we
are
like
in
in
currently,
I
think,
based
on
this
code.
A
If
it
is
installed
in
five
basic
package,
it
will
try
to
build
a
google
test
in
in
from
our
third
party
instead
of
reuse
when
installed
by
vc
package,
which
means
we
build
an
extra
copy
and
only
for
us
not
sure
with
everyone
else.
B
Okay,
we're
saying
that
we
should
change.
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
Yeah
it's
already
there,
so
I
got
some
comment
from
rayleigh
and
josh.
I
have
incorporated
those
comments
but
just
feel
free
to
look
into
this.
I
still
need
to
do
any
the
changes
here.
The
the
changes
which
we
discussed
in
terms
of
the
name
space
so
we'll
have
the
matrix
name
space
for,
for
both.
B
A
B
Yeah,
I
mean
sr
is
still
there
probably.
I
know
their
company
has
been
using
that
so
just
wanted
to
check
with
him.
B
No,
I
mean
we
are
planning
to
do
the
change.
I
mean
we
are
planning
to
change
the
current
code
base
such
that.
So
if
you
see
here
right
now,
there
is
a
matrix
directory
under
api,
so
we
are
going
to
change
it
to
matrix
dot
code.
C
C
B
I
know
there
were
a
few
companies
who
were
using
matrix.
That
is
the
promises
exporter,
so
I
just
wanted
we'll
definitely
mention
it.
I
mean
upfront
that
we
are
going
to
do
these
changes,
but
yeah
this
is
going.
This
would
be
a
breaking
change
if
you're
going
to
rename
this
directory.
So
I
just
wanted
to
do.
B
A
B
A
B
A
I
received
a
question
from
this
package
that,
right
now,
at
least
otop
exporter
is
missing
in
our
busy
package
installation.
Maybe
we
should
fix
that
or
in
our
at
least
I
think
our
next
release,
currently
the
1.0.1
there's
no
ootlp
exporter
there
in
the
list.
A
B
B
Which
means
we
want
to
just
express
explicitly
document
that
vc
package
and
conan
packages
are
there,
but
not
officially
released
by
open
telemetry
somebody
want
to
use
it,
they
can
definitely
use,
but
it's
not
something
coming
from
our
open,
telemetry
community.
B
B
B
B
Open
trading
matrix,
if
this
is
missing
my
dependency
on
grpc
yeah-
this,
I
think,
probably
I'll
look
into
this
I
mean,
I
think,
is:
I
did
use
custom
install
for
grpc
and
protobuf,
but
I
think
the
issue
comes
only
if
the
protobuf
and
the
grpc
are
installed
in
separate
directories,
then
the
issue
comes
and
probably
I'll,
look
into
this
and
design
it
to
voice
them.
B
Now
this
pr
is
raised.
This
is
a
valid
pr,
but
I
don't.
I
don't
know
why
it
is
failing
this.
Basically,
we
should,
if
we
are
not
using
grp,
we
are
using
this.
B
I
mean
grpc
http
protocol,
then
probably
we
should
not
be
some
of
some
of
the
dependencies
should
not
be
built.
So
let's
just
does
those
changes
and
somehow
david
has
not
really
done
fix
the
ci
build
issues.
So
probably,
I
think
we'll
ping
him
once
again,
otherwise
I
think
probably
I'll,
take
it
over
and
fix
these
changes.
B
This
is
also
we
don't
want
to
really
touch
it,
because
we
are
anyway
going
to
change
the
matrix
api.
We
do
use
dynamic
cast
in
somewhere
in
the
matrix
implementation,
which
should
not
have
been
there.
Okay,
that's
good,
I
think.
If
it's
a
design
chain,
I
don't
I
don't
want
to
touch
it
right
now
is
assuming
we
are
going
to
rewrite
most
of
the
stuff
in
the
sdk.
B
B
B
This
is
ongoing,
I
mean
from
you,
you
are
working
on
this
http
log
right,
so
I
think
you
can
close
it
once
it's
done.
A
B
Make
string
this
is
something
which
is
not
reproducible
by
us.
I
think
one
of
the
user
was
getting
it,
but
I
think
I
told
him
to
give
a
minimal
reprove.
He
is
not
able
to
provide,
as
of
now
so
we'll
wait
for
him
to
really
I'll.
Thank
him
once
again,
and
probably
I
don't
want
to
keep
it
open
if
it's
something
which
is
not
reproduced
by
anybody
else
and
he's
just
seeing
it
in
his
own
setup.
A
B
B
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
solutions
which
we
can
do
it,
so
it
it
is
going
to
affect
the
performance
for
sure
because
they
we
are
going
to
mention
is
no
inline
and
not
known
as
attributes.
So
it's
going
to
affect
the
performance.
So
if
at
all,
you
have
to
do
the
change,
it
should
be
only
specific
to
this
compiler,
just
because
there
is
a
bug
with
this
which
may
go
which
may
be
fixed
sometime
later.
B
Okay,
so
I'll
keep
it
with
me,
and
let
me
see
if,
if
I
told
you
to
do
any
change,
I
don't
see
anybody
else
complaining
complaining
as
of
now,
if
they
are
not
keeping
it
as
a
priority
for
now.
B
B
A
No
problem
yeah
you're
offended
this
one.
B
B
This
is
on
draft,
so
do
not
see
image
of
known
this.
I
will
take
it
over
if
it
is
not
if
david
is
not
going
to
work
on
this
I'll.
Take
it
over
this
is
we
already
discussed
this
this
on?
I
think
we'll
review
it
this
week
and
I
want
for
this
one
some
changes
I
have
suggested,
but
he
has
not
get
back
to
us.
So
let
me
let
me
just
thinking
once
again.
B
A
A
A
Both
so
that's,
why
we're
great,
I'm
not
sure
whether
that's
possible,
if
yeah
yeah,
if
not
possible,
maybe
I
think
for
say
make
we
use
one
for
values
or
use.
Well,
I
think
that
okay,
that's
physical
yeah,.
B
Okay,
I
think
that's
it.
We
don't
have
anything
else
to
discuss.
I
think
we
get
20
minutes
back
thanks
thanks
assan
and
tom
for
joining
have
a
good
rest
of
the
day.
You
too,
thank
you.