►
From YouTube: 2022-01-05 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Yes,
always
when
we
have
this
meeting,
I
always
like,
am
I
on
the
right
meeting.
I
I
kind
of
we
had
those
things
in
the
past
and
I
think
I
always
afraid
that
I'm
in
the
wrong
meeting.
C
I'm
not
sure
you
got
a
chance
to
look
at
the
hotel
repository
at
the
pull
request,
etc
issues.
I
saw
that
rasmus
did
his
job
already.
B
No,
I
I
didn't
right
now.
We
just
have
two
on
the
on
the
open,
telemetry.
C
B
Yeah,
let's
see
if
other
folks
join
before
we,
so
let's
give
those
folks
more
to
three
minutes
and
and
then
we
start
and
then
we
can
look
at
the
issue.
You
know.
B
Yeah
one:
let's
wait.
I
I
I
already
have
something
in
my
mind,
but.
D
E
Happy
new
year,
everyone
to
another
year
of
getting
the
calendar,
invite.
B
So
so
I
think
the
calendar
is
right,
so
you
guys
had
old
links
or
where's
that
where
did
you
get
the
hyperlink.
F
G
Yeah,
that's
what
I've
always
done,
and
I
thought
I
remember
us
saying
right
before
the
end
of
the
year
that
the
the
cat,
the
public
calendar,
might
have
had
the
wrong
meeting
id.
F
B
Yeah,
so
I
think
we
updated
the
calendar,
the
hotel
calendar,
but
I
think,
depending
on
how
you
put
that
in
your
calendar,
when
you
up
the
date
on
the
calendar,
doesn't
update
yours
depending
on
how
that
is
your
calendar.
You
know
so
yeah.
B
All
right,
robert,
can
you
or
or
anyone
that
can
share
the
screen
with.
I
think
I
at
the
project,
so
we
can
take
a
look
I
actually
before
we,
we
even
start
looking
at
that.
I
think
one
thing
that-
and
I
will
take
that
to
start
doing
is
kind
of
because
we
have
been
with
these
directions
about
the
hook
and
the
things
I
think
we
need
to
document
that
kind
of
nothing
ambitious
like.
I
think
I
did
last
year
kind
of
october
november
kind
of
overview
kind.
B
Of
short,
I
think
it's
the
equivalent
of
one
or
two
pages
and
kind
of
I
think,
adding
that
with
all
these
things
that
we
are
doing
regarding
startup
hook
and
this
kind
of
thing
just
to
give
a
a
calm
overview
for
anyone.
You
know,
so
I
think
I
will
take
that
to
to
get
started.
B
So
I
will
add
some
documentation
in
that
regard
or,
as
I
said,
not
ambitious,
just
kind
of
one
two
pages,
just
kind
of
trying
to
cover
these
paths
that
we
are
exploring
regarding
startup
hook
and
the
dependence.
B
Yeah
yeah
you,
you
can
share
the
the
project
board.
Are
you
right
there
new
one.
C
Here's
the
project
board
so
in
in
progress.
This
is
the
support,
essential,
open,
telemetry
event
variables
here.
I
do
not
remember
what
the
status
of
it
if
it
should
be
closed.
C
B
So
for
the
environment
variables,
we
had
that
prefix
that
we
wanted
to
add
to
some
places
right:
dot
net
underscore
alto,
not
is
not
a
prefix.
There
is
hotel
before
that.
B
So
the
the
the
thing
left
over
here
is
that
we
need
to
do
that
to
all
environment
variables,
or
do
we
still
need
something
on
the
sdk
to
change.
C
There
at
some
point,
we
decided-
I
think,
together
with
chris,
that
probably
this
is
like
the
essential
path
that
probably
it
is
good
enough
for
the
battery
release.
Well,
because
we
can
use.
I
here
acceptable,
short-term
work
round
here,
and
I
think
that,
during
submitting,
we
agree
with
everyone
that
it
will
be
good
enough
for
the
beta
just
to
support
the
non-changeable
face
context
baggage
propagator.
This
one.
B
C
B
Okay,
but
committed
just
for
the
one
that
we
are
targeting
for
beta
right,
yeah,
just
confirming
to
be
sure.
C
So
just
also
put
it
ready
to
create
this
one
and
this
one.
Next
one
is
from
chris
this
one.
G
Yeah,
so
I
believe
for
that
one.
The
next
step
is
for
me
to
actually
go
and
make
the
change
to
disable
the
bootstrapping
within
the
profiler
code
for
net
core
apps
and
then
also
update
the
documentation
to
show
that
you
have
to
also
set
the
environment
variables
for
the
startup
hook.
In
those
cases.
B
G
Locally
and
in
fact
yeah,
I
think
I
demoed
to
you,
paulo
yeah,
in
a
separate
meeting,
that
I
was
able
to
use
the
profiler
to
automatically
set
the
startup
hook
environment
variable,
but
I
think
that
it's
clearer
to
not
go
that
route
and
just
have
documentation
describe
that.
The
startup
environment
variable
is
mandatory,
but
that
still
leaves
work
to
disable.
The
bootstrapping
from
the
profiler
code
itself.
B
F
B
C
Now
we
can
check
if
we
have
any
new
issues
here,
so
this
one
is
about
removing
the
auto
service,
hotel
version,
auto
and
tax,
and
I
remember
that
they
were.
It
was
discussed
probably
outside
of
this
meeting,
and
I
see
that
yeah.
It
should
be.
C
G
Yeah,
so
that's
related
to
what
I
had
just
described.
C
G
G
If
the
profiler
is
doing
the
bootstrapping
process,
that's
happening
early
enough
that
not
all
the
dependencies
are
available
and
we're
seeing
errors
occur,
and
if
we
rely
on
the
startup
hook,
it
happens
later
in
the
process
where
those
dependencies
are
now
available
and
so
we're
able
to
successfully
bootstrap
the
the
sdk.
G
C
B
Yeah,
I
I
I
think
this
came
from
a
comment,
and
this
was
what
I
I
had
in
mind
in
this
regard.
I
think
we
should
try
to
use
this
for
the
things
that
I
specific
really
to
the
out.
Instrumentation,
I
think,
makes
very
very
bold,
but
on
the
other
hand,
there
is
no
risk
of
clashes
with
anything
that
the
sdk
may
may
do,
or
they
are
the
the
spec
itself.
C
By
the
way,
where
do
you
want
to
just
in
order
not
to
talk
about
it
next
time?
Where
do
you
want
to
put
it
in
our
like
backup.
G
B
Before
just
so,
I
don't
forget
about
it,
the
spec
for
1.2
is
still
not
stable.
I
think
the
next
sdk
wants
to
target
that.
So,
if
you
want
to
depend
on
a
newer,
sdk,
stable,
I'm
not
sure
when
we
will
have
one,
you
know
just
for
us
to
think
so.
I
think
since
you're
a
bad
beta
anyway,
I
think
it's
fine.
B
It
should
depend
on
whatever
beta
rc
the
sdk
has,
but
eventually
we
need
to
sync
with
when
the
spec
for
1.2
is
finalized
and
have
a
1.2
sdk.
G
But
I
believe,
all
of
that's
waiting
for
more
metric
stability
across
other
languages,
so
I
I
think
we're
we're
okay
for
now
I
know
that
there
there
were
talks
about
refactoring,
the
otlp
exporters.
C
C
H
C
C
There
were
some
people
who
started
creating
some
issues
I
think
like
they
were
being.
They
were
active
for
like
two
or
three
days.
I
think
that
we
also
saw
it,
and
basically
here
he
was
some
feedback
regarding
our
documentation.
C
What
was
missing
for
them
to
build
and
to
check
how
it's
working-
and
these
are
like,
like
four
points
and
basically
ryan,
told
that
he
could
be
able
to.
He
said
between
aprs.
There
is
no.
There
is
no
two
things
since
eight
days,
but
it's
just
eight
days,
so
I
think
we.
B
Items
one
and
two
are
resolved:
that's
correct!
Okay,
for.
C
B
C
I
think
you
need
to
read.
I
think
that,
for
example,
point
number
four
does
not:
they
are
not
even
solved,
they
are
just
he
understands
how
to
solve
it.
He
can
make
it
here
and
I
just
add
a
description-
how
to
describe
point
number
three
and
4.99
before
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
a
good
moment
to
describe
it,
maybe
someone
else
but
for
sure
not
not
ryan.
B
Yeah,
but
I
I
think
that
for
right
now
I
I'd
love
to
do
that,
but
I
I
think
this
gets
out
of
what
we
have
people
to
do
it
right
now.
You
know
I
I
I
love
to
to
have
that,
but
unless
somebody
say
hey,
I
can
do
it
and
I'm
gonna
jump
on
it.
I
don't
think
you
are
gonna.
Do
anytime
soon.
C
B
Now
it
sounds
good
to
me
robert,
I
don't
don't
know
if
anybody
anyone
thinks
different,
but
I
think
it's
reasonable
from
our
perspective.
E
Let's
I
didn't
realize
that
wasn't
I
done.
I
can
pick
that
work
back
up
to
switch
over
from
the
call
side
stuff
to
the
call
target
cool.
I
don't
know.
B
E
Still
have
anything
to
track
that,
but
if
not,
then
we
can
read
that.
E
F
B
And
just
just
because
robert
is
doing
this
on
the
on
the
dashboard
robert,
can
you
also
create
later
issue
and
assign
to
zac
for
that
removal?
If
we
don't
have
it,
I.
E
C
E
C
G
C
C
C
I
tried
to
I
tried
to
reply
to
the
call
in
like
discussion
comments,
I'm
not
sure
how
good
I
was,
probably
not
not
literally,
because
there
were
further
questions,
and
then
there
was
also
this
issue
about
documenting
additional
depths
and
runtime
package
store,
which
was
done
by
raj,
and
personally
I
would
like
to
put
it
on
the
top
or
quite
high,
because,
as
for
me,
even
the
discussions
during
the
pr
were
quite
long
how
this
work,
this
package
store
additional
dependencies,
how
they
are
related.
C
B
Yeah,
so
I
assigned
this
one
to
me
because
I'm
gonna
try
to
do,
but
I'm
not
gonna
try
to
be
very
deep.
I'm
gonna
try
to
cover
all
the
points
at
a
high
level
and
have
links
to
the
proper
stuff.
You
know
that's
what
I
I'm
I'm
trying
to
do.
You
can
assign
that
one
to
me
and
I
got
the
impression
that
the
other
one
perhaps
could
be
kind
of
clarified
by
the
same
kind
of
overview,
with
the
links
to
the
proper
technical
reference,
the
one
that
was
in
the
bottom
yeah.
B
Okay,
I
I'm
gonna
give
a
stab
at
trying
to
answer
ideas
on
these
dogs.
I
will
try
to
kind
of
do
both
thing
when
I
update
the
docs,
I'm
not
100
sure
if
you'll
satisfy
this,
but
then
we
open
we
can
enjoy.
B
It's
worth
to
look
it's
better
to
look
due
to
time
and
constraints
and
resource
after
chris.
Does
that?
Because
the
change,
because
let.
B
B
C
A
Yeah
wrong:
let's
start
one.
A
A
Their
application
is
overwriting.
It's
we
probably
need
to
do
the
same
solution
as
it's
done
with
the
diagnostic
source.
B
Yes,
then
it
it
also
gets
back
about
documenting
the
process
that
somebody
doing
this
needs
to
to
get
correctly.
B
Which
I
think
it's
going
to
be
kind
of
a
challenge
in
the
sense
that
people
will
reference
the
open,
telemetry
to
add
manual
instrumentation.
B
So
we
need
to
be
sure
that
we
have
a
kind
of
easy
story
for
that.
A
Yeah,
if
the
store
is
referencing
to
the
latest
version,
then
it's
gonna
overwrite,
the
user
version,
and
they
should
be
fine.
C
You
want
maybe
resonance,
I
think
it
would
be
better
if
you
describe
it,
don't
you
mind,
you
mean
reply
here
they
want
to
use
it.
Just
you
know
unlock
them
at
least.
A
A
I
added
a
question
there,
but
no,
you
can't
pump
it
so
up
to
date
now.
A
Yeah,
you
need
to
look
at
the
right
pr
that
yeah
no
no!
This
was
this
one.
A
B
Erasmus,
if
you
have
cycles,
if
you
have
sex,
can
you
kind
of
look
on
the
issue
and
kind
of
update
there?
So
with
the
things
that
you
find-
and
I
think
answer
the
the
issue
basically
so.
C
Just
to
be
sure
that
I
understand
correctly
because
right
now,
I
think
that
we
are
discussing
about
several
topics
and
we
got
like
a
little
bit
distracted.
So
how
long
you
were.
You
were
asking
paulo
to
write
on
the
issue
on
this
issue
or
create
another
one,
because
I
thought
that.
A
C
The
same
version-
and
I
think
just
answering
here
right
and
the
second
one-
is
about
documenting
the
the
additional
tips
and
runtime
packages
right,
etc.
B
We
we
should
what
the
long
the
long
solution
should
be
kind
of
a
nougat
package
that
have
the
dependencies
that
we
need,
because
then
the
process
of
kind
of
making
the
dependence
is
consistent
is
going
to
move
everything
to
the
version
that
we
need,
and
this.
A
B
B
C
A
And
it's
for
the
package
store
yeah,
so
you
can
see
the
link
in
chat.
B
Yeah,
I
I
I
think
we
will
be
kind
of
let
let's
kind
of
give
the
short
answer
and
kind
of
then
we
have
a
separate
look
at
these
alternatives.
I
I
think,
as
I
I
said,
I
think
kind
of
the
better
solution
is
if
we
can
wrap
this
in
a
nuget
package
that
people
reference
and
then
we
let
the
version
resolution
at
build
time
handle
that
you
know,
but
we
do
have
the
the
issue
that
not
every
time
you're
gonna
build.
I
keep
forgetting
that
yeah.
A
A
A
B
A
C
B
But
but
but
this
is
good-
let's
see
how
how
you
go
about
performing
the
committed
work,
but
this
is
good.
It's
a
long
time
that
we
don't
see
that
much
committed
so.
I
I
I'm
not
sure
tomorrow
is
the
empty
funny
day.
Oh
yeah.
C
Because
they
are
pretty
much
matching
all
this,
you
know
catholic
catholic
catholic
day
of
holidays.
B
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
we
have
some
work
on
this
arab.
Besides,
writing
the
overview
and
kind
of
the
stuff
that
chris
is
changing.
I
think
that
has
gives
us
kind
of
a
little
bit
more
input
for
what
we
should
try
to
do
in
that
regard.
You
know.
C
Hope
that,
at
some
point
I
will
be
able
to
contribute
more
to
the
hotel
as
the
bay
and
then
also
it's
also
a
place
that
I
wanted
to
create
such
like,
like
packages
for
supporting
environment
available,
because
they
want
that
without
the
auto
instrumentation.
They
just
want
to
something
for
facilitate
the
environment
available
and
probably
to
also
need
to
contain
some
good
packages,
so
that,
for
example,
handles,
for
example,
different
exporters,
etc.
G
Yeah,
so
I
think
that's
where
what
they
did
in
java
seems
like
a
useful
pattern
where
they
have
a
this
separate
library.
That's
like
a
auto
bootstrapper
that
is
responsible
for
reading
the
environment,
variables
and
configuring,
the
sdk
using
them,
and
that
can
be
used
in
the
context
of
just
using
the
sdk
or
within
the
context
of
the
java
auto
instrument.
Or
I
don't
know
what.
G
G
G
The
what
is
it
the
branch
restrictions
and
all
of
that.
C
But
I
think
that
we
were
discussed.
We
had
a
related
thing
to
this
one.
Well,
I
don't
know
if
you
remember
some
time
ago,
I
created
a
branch
instead
of
a
form,
and
I
was
not
able
to
permit-
and
I
have
found
out
that
it's
possible
to
change
some
settings
which
I'm
not
able
to
do
here.
B
So,
do
you
know
exactly
what
are
the
rights
that
should
be
giving
or.
G
So
if
I
remember
correctly,
like
this
branch,
we're
not
able
to
merge
the
changes
from
main
because
the
pandabot
has
not
signed
the
cla.
B
C
G
Well,
no,
the
error
it
gave
me
is
the
cla
okay
like
no,
for
example,
just
try
clicking
clicking
update
branch.
It
won't
do
anything.
G
C
C
C
So
it's
not
like
that
dependable,
just
not
working.
I
think
that
simply
zcla
and
maybe
other
branch
protection
rules
are
simply
not
working
fine
because
they
are.
This
is
not
a
pull
request.
We
are
just
pushing
to
a
branch
and
a
lot
of
our
rules
are
designed
to
be
to
be
working
for
pull
requests.
I
think
that
basically,
this
is
like
check
is
working
fine
for
full
request,
but
not
for
commits
when
you're
committing
just
right
to
the
repository
to
the
branch.
C
That's
my
that's.
How
I
understand
it
why
it's
working
there
and
I
see
because
they
pull
the
the
merge
done
by
done
via
github,
is
not
the
same
as
you
just
push
directly
to
a
branch.
E
So
are
you
suggesting
so
I'm
looking
at
the
studying's
branches
sort
of
thing
right
now
and
so
that.
E
Yeah,
that's
that's
what
I'm
I'm
thinking
because
the
to
protect
the
branch!
It
says
that
these
rules
for
requiring
stash
checks
apply
to
when
you're
merging
into
a
protected
branch.
E
So
and
for
like
all
of
our
prs,
we
want
to
have
this
role
in
maine,
because
all
the
pr's
like
depend
upon
everything
is
going
to
go
into
maine.
So
as
long
as
maine
has
that
stash
check
protection,
exactly
we're
satisfied
with
that,
although
I'm
still.
E
F
B
C
E
B
Yeah
now
worth
going
over
that,
so
we
can
automate
this
for
once
for
all
right.
B
Okay,
I
I
don't
know
how
long
the
the
ci
takes
to
pass,
but
I
don't
think
we
want
to
wait
that.
B
All
right
seems
a
good
start
for
our
22,
so
a
lot
of
commute
at
the
work.
Let's
see
how
much
we
can
do
until
next
week
and
let's
keep
pushing
happy
new
year
to
everyone.