►
From YouTube: 2021-04-02 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
A
C
A
Taking
three
minutes,
let
me
share
my
screen,
so
one
topic
ted
I
want
to
mention
is
alolita-
is
willing
to
help
and
join
the
triage
meeting,
but
she
couldn't
make
this
time
so
wonder
if
8
a.m,
pst
would
work
for
everyone
here.
B
A
C
Yeah
this
is,
this
is
kind
of
simple.
Basically,
we
are.
We
have
this
field
or
attribute
and
anurag
thinks
that
it's
expensive
and
we
should
qualify.
We
should
verify
that
instrumentation
should
be
selling
it
only
if
it
exists
already
in
an
easy
fashion.
Otherwise,
don't
go
and
try
to
gather
this
information.
C
B
Semantic
http
status
spencer
must
be
left
on.
B
B
A
For
this
one,
this
is
just
a
follow-up
from
one
pr
review.
Where
george
from
google
commented
hey,
it
seems
right
you're,
trying
to
clarify
whether
the
string
should
should
support
any
unicode
character
or
is
ascii
code,
and
when
it's
unicode,
which
unicode
plan
like,
are
we
going
to
support
all
the
unicode
or
only
a
subset
of
unicode?
So
I
clarify
that.
Then
he
followed
up
and
said
we
probably
should
clarify
that
across
entire
spec,
instead
of
just
the
matrix.
B
B
B
D
B
By
the
way
so
so
riley,
I
think
I
would
suggest
first
to
start
thinking
or
proposing
to
have
this
common
or
whatever.
We
call
it
section
where
we
put
all
of
these
things.
B
Already
you
said,
you
have
a
couple
of
questions
for
me
and
I'm
leaving
in
three
minutes.
Do
you
need.
D
Yeah
bargain
just
had
couple
of
questions-
if
I
can
just
interrupt
right
now,
is
one
was
that
you
know:
we've
been
following
up
on
the
collector
phase,
one
and
phase
two
backlogs
and
I've
been
assigning.
You
know
engineers
internally
also
to
start
working
on
it.
I've
added
we've
added
a
couple
of
engineers
you
know
to
beyond
anthony
and
and
men,
and
I
noticed
that
in
the
phase
two,
there
are
additional
items
that
have
been
added
in
because
I've
been
asking
google
to
add
a
couple
of
engineers.
D
Also
to
help
is
there
a
reason
why
that
backlog
phase
is
changing?
Can
we
do
them
after
the
stable,
stable
is
achieved,
or
are
they
must-haves
again.
B
B
So,
to
be
honest,
I'm
adding
items
there,
but
we
can
probably
probably
what
we
should
do
is
next
collector
seed.
E
B
Of
those
okay,
I'm
adding
them,
because
because
I
I
don't
want
to
forget
about
them,
so
I
want
to
have
a
discussion
with
more
people.
Do
we
want
this
or
not,
and
my
default
is,
if
I'm
not
hundred
percent,
convinced,
I'm
not
gonna,
add
them,
because
it's
it's
more
likely
to
forget
about
things
than
to
remove
them
from
the
backlog.
If.
D
Okay,
I
see,
I
see
so
you're
just
adding
them
as
as
items
to
discuss
rather
than
you
know,.
B
D
I
think
that's
a
great
great
point
bogdan
because,
let's,
let's
start
doing
a
regular
triage,
you
know
at
least
15
minutes
on
the
collector's
day
meeting,
because
it
just
helps
as
we
are
assigning.
You
know.
Engineers
and
punya
is
also
signing
folks,
a
couple
of
folks
and
I've
rallied.
I've
also
asked
wish
to
kind
of
join
in
to
help
there
so
again.
E
D
Just
to
make
sure
that
the
backlog
is
clearly
understood,
because
I
want
google
to
pick
up
some
of
the
issues
and
wish
to
also
have
a
clear
understanding
so
that,
if
the
backlog
changes,
we
are
like.
Okay,
how
come
this
is
heading
stuff
as
we
as
we
planned
for
it.
B
I
mean
again
we
there
is
that
backlog
is
not
free,
so
there
is
clearly
things
that
we'll
discover
during
some
of
these
things
that
we'll
add
yeah,
just
fyi,
so
adding
new
things.
It's
it's
expected
somehow.
E
B
D
B
And
also
also
besides
you,
amazon,
besides
splunk
and
now,
google,
which
may
put
some
effort,
there
are
other
people
like
datadog
and
others
that
are.
D
B
E
B
But
yes,
that
that
was
the
answer.
Another
thing
important
for
everyone.
Next
week,
I'm
gone,
I'm
not
gonna
you're,
taking
a
break.
C
B
And
I'm
gonna
just
send
you
a
picture,
does
the
I
can
do
it
make.
B
B
You
want
me
to
look
at,
but
I'm
just
saying,
okay,
I
have
to
go
right
now.
As
I
said,.
C
Dear
talking
about
that,
I
will
leave
you
five
minutes,
but
probably
you
don't
need
anything
from
me
or
otherwise.
You
can
beat
me.
Sadly,
I
have
to
prepare
another
call.
A
This
string
discussion-
I
I
think
one
outstanding
issue
so
we're
trying
to
clarify,
for
example,
we're
saying,
hey,
unicode
or
ask
history
something,
and
then
people
figure
out
oops
in
the
tracing
spec.
We
haven't
clearly
specced
it
out,
but
we're
trying
to
restrict
that
some,
like
implementations,
might
run
into
an
incompatible
issue.
A
A
D
But
then
I
would
think
riley.
This
is
a
must-have
right,
because
if
this
really
wants
to
be
it
needs
to
be
implemented.
As
a
standardized
you
know
support,
then
it
shouldn't
be
too
difficult
to
do.
But
it's
just
that
defining
the
rules
that
need
to
be
handled
and
and
then
building
that
adding
that
in
good
good
intern
project
right
if
we
can
define
the.
C
C
D
A
A
D
C
A
D
A
E
E
E
Yeah
the
histograms-
and
I
was
curious-
I
don't
see
like
I
see
both
issues
in
pr's
linked
here
in
the
columns
but
not
oteps,
and
I
was
curious
if
you
feel
like
it's
appropriate
to
have
an
otep
included
or,
if
that's
not
the
right
way
to
categorize
these,
not.
E
Here's
the
here's,
the
one
that
I
have
in
mind
if
it
helps
to
have
an
example.
So
we
closed
sort
of
a
long-running
pr
where
the
conversation
got
out
of
hand
and
opened
an
otep
around
exponential,
bucketing
and
histograms,
and
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
to
include
it
in
that
column.
For
for
planning.
A
Yeah,
I
I
think
that
makes
sense.
I
my
understanding,
is
old
type
is
just
one
mechanism
to
help
us
making.
A
On
the
spec,
so
the
actual
spec
is
like,
even
if
we
have
some
old
tab
and
the
pr
is
perfect,
it's
merged.
If
we
don't
have
that
converted
into
the
spec,
the
issue
is
not
resolved.
So
ultimately,
there
should
be
little
item
in
the
spec,
but
it
wouldn't
harm
to
put
the
old
type
item
in
the
project
tracking,
because
if
you
want
to
have
a
quick
overview,
what's
going
on,
you
can
see
it's
working
out
whether
you're
stuck
so
I'm
support.
D
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
a
good
suggestion,
josh,
it's
just
that
we
maybe
we
should
add
it
to
some
guidelines
for
the
these
issues
just
go
best
practice.
Maybe
you
can
just
add
it
to
the
documentation,
like
the
description
on
top
for
the
board
that
please
add
or
tap
also
link.
Also
in
the
in
the
task
item.
D
D
D
Okay,
okay,
well
great
today,
I'd
like
to
help,
but
they
I
end
up
having
a
conflict
at
8
30.,
but
I
mean,
even
if
it
is
we
start
a
date,
then
I
can
help
for
sure
every
regularly.