►
From YouTube: 2021-05-12 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
C
D
C
B
Yes,
yeah
we're
past
the
snow
chances
at
this
point,
there's
still
a
chance
for
hail,
yeah,
but
no
more
snow.
But
it's
about
time
to
start
watering.
Your
plants
that
are
outside.
B
Well,
I
don't
know
if
rasmus
or
david.
C
D
B
C
B
C
B
Yeah,
so
I
don't
have
any
specific
agenda
items,
and
I
mentioned
earlier
before
you
joined
zach-
that
it
looks
like
all
the
inflight
stuff
got
wrapped
up.
Okay,.
C
So
from
our
side
we
were
discussing
these
plugins
if
we
can
have
them
in
the
repository,
so
we
have
a
precedence
because
in
java
they
have
it.
So
we
decided
that
at
this
point
it's
safer
to
just
follow
this
way.
Even
though
you
know
java
is
the
biggest
like
the
most.
The
biggest
traffic
is
there
regarding
contribution,
so
we
just
do
the
same
way
and
if
at
any
point
there
will
be
a
problem
there
just
will
ask
for
excuse
or
whatever,
but
at
this
point
it
will
be
the
most
effective
approach.
C
Yeah,
for
example,
and
we
can
put
plugins
there-
we
can
decide
later
if
we
want
these
plugins,
for
example,
to
be
like
installed
out
of
the
box,
like
you
know,
copied,
but
not
used
for
that.
That's
something
that
I
would
prefer
that
the
dlls
will
be
there,
but
they
will
be
not
used
that
user
need
to
explicitly
just
enable
the
plugins.
So
I
don't
know
if
it's
okay
for
you,
we
can
always
change.
B
Of
course
yeah,
if
we
do
that,
we
might
want
to
do
something
that
the
collector
does
and
that
there's
two
pre-packaged.
D
B
And
so
one
is
a
slimmed
down
version
and
the
other
is
a
full
version.
So
so
one.
C
B
A
B
A
C
Okay
and
the
other
topic
is
that
we
like
the
automated
pipeline
is
like
merged.
So
if
it's
not
a
problem
for
you,
it
will
be
great
to
add
even
v001
tags.
So
we
have
some
release
and
then
we
can
prepare
more
automation
and
and
stuff
like
that
yeah.
I
think
I'm
okay
with
that
any
volunteer
zack
or
you
chris.
B
I
don't
know
that
I'll
have
time
this
week.
It's.
D
B
Yeah
yeah:
no,
that
would
be
fine,
okay,
yeah
and
it's
just.
Is
it
an
annotated
tag
or
just
any
sort
of?
Oh?
No,
it
has
to
be
annotated,
so
it
can
be
pushed
right.
I
think.
A
You
can
even
create
we
did.
We've
only
done
I
I
know
there's
like
right,
like
small
lightweight
tags
and
like
more
descriptive
tags,
we've
only
done
the
really
small
ones
in
datadog,
but
president
we
want
to
have.
I
don't
know
if
there's
sort
of
an
expectation
for
hotel
repos,
but
whichever
is
supported
whatever
you
guys
want
to
do.
C
I
guess,
even
if
you
go
to
the
github
repository
and
just
create
a
release,
I
think
it
should
work
just.
B
D
C
The
benefit
of
using
furoi-
I
don't
know
if
you
have
a
signature
on
your
that
if
you
do
it
on
your
machine
and
you
forget
to
put
this
hypen
s,
you
will
not
have
a
verified
tag
in
github.
B
Yeah,
no,
I
I
have
that
as
my
default
cool
git
config,
but
okay,
so
you
just
want
to
create
a
new
release
and
that
will
automatically
do
it
so
show
your
screen.
Let's
see,
yeah.
C
B
B
C
B
C
A
B
A
Two
not
aware
I
just
got
back
signing
on
this
morning,
catching
up
on
emails
and
then
it's
like,
oh
an
hour
into
work.
This
meeting
happens
so
I've
got
nothing.
C
B
Cool
yeah,
so
the
the
only
other
thing
that
I
have
it
looks
like
so.
The
next
set
of
work
will
likely
be
moving
some
of
the
plugins
into
the
repo.
C
This
is
one
thing,
but
I
think
that
before
we
do
it,
we
try
to
prepare
something
that
I
think
that
even
without
the
plugins
will
be
usable,
so
maybe
cleaning
up
this
default.
At
least
this
is
something
I
would
suggest
cleaning
up
these
default
values
of
this
auto
conventions,
etc
just
to
have
something
working
out
of
the
box,
even
if
it's
very
just
to
have
something.
B
Yeah,
and
so
that
makes
sense
at
some
point,
it
would
be
good
to
start
experimenting
with
the
otlp
support,
because
there
are
multiple
vendors
that
don't
that
don't
rely
on
exporters
they're
not
currently
involved
in
this
project,
but.
D
B
Otlp
is
still
an
exporter,
they
don't
have
their
own
vendor
specific
exporter.
This
is
what
I'm
talking
about.
So
I
want
to
say:
lightstep
relies
on
native
otlp
support
on
their
end.
B
There's
there's
probably
other
vendors
too,
but
otlp
supports
required
for
a
ga
anyways.
But,
as
I
mentioned
before,
the
grpc
support
is
likely
going
to
be
a
a
pain
point
for
us.
C
Like
I
think
that
from
us,
it
may
be
right
now
hard
to
work
on
it,
because
our
backhand
supports
jaeger
and
thrift
protocol.
So
it's
not
critical
for
us.
However,
it's
good
that
we
have
this
as
an
issue
yep.
C
B
That
there
is
data
loss
in
that
process,
so
even
if
even
if
you're,
using
zipkin
and
jaeger
directly
so
let's
say
you're
using
this
instrumentation
and
you're,
going
to
use
a
zipkin
exporter
and
you're
going
to
ingest
that
zipkin
data
directly
as
a
vendor
things
that
you'll
miss
open
telemetry
supports
attributes
on
spam
links.
B
Jaeger-
I
don't
remember
specifically
what
they
do
in
that
case,
but
each
of
those
like
there's
some
sort
of
translation,
that's
happening,
and
it's
not
necessarily
the
full
set
of
data
and
another
example
of
data
that
might
be
dropped
is
there's.
The
dropped.
Attributes
count
that's
available
on
your
otlp
spans,
but
I
don't
know
that
those
are
available
for
zipkin
and
jager.
C
B
C
But
still,
I
think
that
this
is
dropping
you.
This
is
about
sampling
or
something
else.
No,
so
there's
many
reasons.
B
Not
I
see
not
spams
correct,
correct,
so
there's
a
limit
to
the
number
of
attributes
that
I
think
you
can
have
on
a
span
and
then,
furthermore,
you
can
have
custom
processors
that
will
filter
out
certain
attributes
for
whatever
reason
they
decide,
whether
it's
security
or
non-conformance
to
their
policies
or
something.