►
From YouTube: 2022-08-05 meeting
Description
cncf-opentelemetry@cncf.io's Personal Meeting Room
A
B
I
I
just
placed
that
there
I
wasn't
sure
if
josh
was
gonna,
make
it
or
not
you
can.
We
can
cross
them
on
nasty
showers.
B
A
B
All
right,
I
guess
maybe
we
should
go
ahead
and
get
started
here.
The.
B
A
I
feel
we
should
reject
this,
but
most
likely
they
might
be
already
responded.
So
what
do
you
see?
What
is
the
response.
B
A
Yeah
so
number
one
definitely
we're
not
going
to
touch
anything
in
the
api's
bag,
and
if
we
want
to
do
anything
here,
it
will
be
in
the
sdk
stack
and
there's
a
low
interest.
So
it's
not
a
priority
at
all,
so,
based
on
the
original
ask
to
support
something
in
the
api,
the
answer
is
no
we're
not
going
to
do
it
and
if
there's
a
scenario
for
having
summary,
maybe
I
think
if
I
can
be
changed,
but
that
should
be
a
separate
issue.
B
A
B
I
was,
I
was
wondering
about
that
whether
the
individual
actually
was
actively
working
at
and
reviewing
it
based
on
some
other
protocol.
That
you'd
say:
okay,.
A
Yeah,
it
was
initially
when
people
open
the
issue
like.
If
the
issue
is
not
increasing,
then
nobody
is
going
to
look
at
that.
Then
there's
complaints
from
the
community,
then
people
are
thinking,
oh,
maybe
by
assigning
that
automatically
to
some
member
things
will
get
better,
but
actually
it's
worse
because
they
still
don't
do
anything
about
it.
But
it
gives
a
false
expectation
for
the
folks
who
who
created
the
issue.
B
I
see
what
you're
saying
so
is
this:
is
it
part
of
our
our
role
here
in
situations
like
that
that
we
we
poke
the
potential
automatically
assigned
individual
to
review,
and
I'm.
A
Not
sure
because
I,
like
I
personally
feel
automatically
assigning
anything
like
to
someone
is
a
bad
idea.
A
B
A
They
have
similar
things
like
someone
just
configured
some
service,
auto
monitoring,
alert,
yeah,
they're
passionate
they
think.
Oh
automation
is
great.
I
want
to
monitor
all
these
services
and
and
they
just
added
a
group-
and
unfortunately
I
was
united
group,
so
I
woke
up
in
the
morning
getting
2000
emails
in
my
inbox
and
what
am
I
going
to
do,
I'm
going
to
yell
at
them
and
shift
delete
all
the
emails.
I
have.
B
B
That
has
that
been
discussed
further
with
the
tc
in
terms
of
any
additional
approaches
on
how
to
handle
this.
A
A
For
example,
I
I've
been
assigning
the
metrics
api
and
sdk
specific
items
to
myself
and
if
I
see
an
issue
assigned
to
yuri
I'll,
remove
him
and
attend
attended
me
because
he
he's
not
focusing
on
magic,
it
makes
no
sense
for
him
to
respond
there,
yeah
yeah,
but
if
I
see
something
that
I'm
not
interested
in
or
I
I
don't
even
have
expertise,
then
I'll
do
nothing
about
it.
If
I
see
like
myself
automatically
picked
as
a
victim
as
I
need
I'll
just
remove
myself.
B
It
would
be
good
in
my
mind
if
this
group,
this
triage
group,
perhaps
as
it
you
know,
had
more
of
a
form
or
whatever
to
be
able
to
look
at
these
and
make
a
a
knowledgeable
choice
in
terms
of
the
assigning
and
everything
and
then
to
make
sure
that
it
gets
out
to
that
individual
individual
knows
that
they
are
expected
to
respond
within
some.
A
B
A
B
Would
it
be
one
of
those
things
of
if
we
accept
this,
then.
B
Is
there
is
another,
is
there
another
poke
that
goes
to
armand
to
look
at
it?
If
we
accept
this.
A
B
A
A
B
B
B
A
B
Now
we
we
we
just
have,
let
me
show
you.
A
B
A
B
How
do
we,
in
terms
of
the
the
three
categories
we've
talked
about
triage,
rejected,
accepted
or
needs
more
information
how
to
label
this,
so
that
one
we're
indicating
to
the
individual
that
that
it's
been
it's
been
reviewed
and
where
there's
action
been
taken
one
way
or
another.
B
B
B
No,
it's
about
a
point
and
without
more
of
a
quorum
here,
it's
hard
to
to
specifically.
B
Give
a
go
ahead
here
and
you
know
from
a
spec
sig
standpoint.
You
know
we
unless
you
have
a
quorum
in
any
of
these
settings.
B
It's
kind
of
hard
to
to
you
know,
there's
one
thing
about
rejection,
but
in
terms
of
committing
to
the
work
to
go
off
and
do
something
it's
hard
to
do
that
right
unless
we
know
that
there
is
a
specific
sponsor
within
the
organization
that
that
feels
that
they
can
move
forward
with,
you
know
how
to
you
know
how
have
we
and
it
goes
back
to
something
you
were
saying
earlier,
which
is
if
I'm
interested
great
I'll,
take
you
down.
B
If
I'm
not,
then
it
just
sets,
but
that
seems
to
spell
a
situation
for
the
the
open
community
that
says
we're
just
you
know
we're
only
going
to
deal
with
things
that
we
like
and
not
going
to.
A
B
B
Level
that
the
the
open
telemetry
arena
perhaps
regard
could
make
decisions
about
the
path
that
they're
trying
to
go
down
and.
B
But
if
the
vision
is
what
we
want
it
to
be
right,
then
you
would
think
that
we
should
be
able
to
say
that
this
particular
feature.
This
particular
modification
is
or
isn't
part
of
the
the
road
map
that
we
have.
A
B
A
A
B
B
So
would
it
be
appropriate
from
from
this
triage
activity
for
these
types
of
issues
that
we
bring
it
up
to
the
inspect?
To
specifically
address
you
in
this
case?
Maybe
the
semantics
convention
sig
and
say
there
is
this
issue:
you
guys
need
to
reject
it
or
accept
it
or
provide
some
response,
and
and
and
that's
all
we
can
do
bring
it
up
for
the
specific
meeting
with
the
other
six,
the
appropriate
stick,
whatever
the
right
word
is
bring
it
up
before
them.
A
B
Okay,
I
understand
so
so
yeah.
B
A
B
Okay,
all
right
and
that's
that's
what
we'll
do
with
with
this
one
here
and
I
won't
market
it
in
terms
of
triage,
accept
it
or
anything
like
that.
It's
more.
B
A
Yeah
and
I
feel
bad
for
this
issue
because
it
seems
technically
very
reasonable
and
I
I
don't
feel
I
have
the
the
power
to
blast
it
or
not,
because
the
funding
issue,
and
also
if
you
look
at
the
issue,
the
guy
who
opened
it,
actually
violated
the
the
process
we
have
like.
He
just
went
with
the
pr
directly
and
nobody
called
that
out.
So
we
started
some
process.
We
tried
to
enforce
that
for
a
week
and
then
people
just
forgot
about
it
and
and
now
they
they
just
ignored
it.
B
A
B
Context
here
and
there's
still
the
aspect
of
just
trying
to
make
sure
everyone
understands
what
our
practices
are
and
how
to
properly
interact
and
make
suggestions
within
this
community.
So
we'll
go
with
that.
If
that's
okay
with
you,
you
know
we're
gonna,
participate
and
see
if
that
allows
us
to
move
forward
there-
and
we
have
perhaps
time
for
this
next
one
here.
B
Following
on
to
your
comment
on
the
last
one,
we
can't
say
it's
accepted,
potentially
based
upon
our
knowledge
and
and
the
form
that
we
have
right
now
for
this
meeting,
so
as
to
thrust
to
bring
it
up
before
the
the
sig
meeting
to
to
try
to
elicit
comments,
or
at
least
poke
folks,
to
provide
comment.
Sure.
A
A
A
I
don't
have
answer
for
the
next
question:
the
funding
part
unless
it's
something
that
I'm
driving
like.
If
I,
if
I'm
working
on
that,
I
can
commit
myself,
I
can
control
my
own
phony
and
sometimes
I
feel
like
it's
my
it
might
be.
Okay,
if
I
speak
for
gmacd
or
just
storage,
because
I
work
closely
with
them,
so
I
I
can
tell
hey.
This
is
definitely
interesting.
A
B
A
A
B
Yeah
help
help
me
understand
the
the
history
here
as
much
as
you
know,.
B
You
know
there
there
are
these
various
issues
that
continue
to
come
up
within
the
community
of
you
know,
requests
coming
in
from
the
community
or
from
individuals
that
are
involved
with
hotel.
Some
get
done.
Some
do
not
get
done,
some
sit
and
become
stale
for
you
know,
months
years.
So
if.
B
A
B
A
Nobody
from
the
pc
is
sponsoring
that
they
just
they
just
started
their
own
set
and
like
I
I'm
not
the
pc
member,
but
if
I
have
that
power
I'll
stop
them,
because
this
is
very
bad
like
they
started
something
without
funding
and
and
they
start
their
own
group
making
some
progress,
then
they
got
stuck.
B
I
see
so
so
so,
wouldn't
the
shouldn't
the
I
don't
know,
governance
committee
or
whatever
come
to
whoever's,
started
this
and
say
that's
not
how
we
work.
I
mean,
how
do
I,
how
do.
B
B
A
Exactly
and
and
this
time
I
I
did
have
that
such
feedback
and
based
on
the
feedback
he
had
sent
that
pr
which
got
merged
recently,
I
I
told
tyler,
you
cannot
expect
me
to
join
some
random
work
stream
and
rescue
that
I
already
helped
to
work.
Streams
like
matrix
has
been
stuck
for
a
year.
I
hope
that,
and
I
haven't
finished
I
I
need
to
focus.
Maybe
I
can
help
something,
but
I
I
want
us
to
be
very
clear
that
we
should
stop
this.
A
B
B
B
B
Okay,
yeah,
it
makes
it
difficult.
It's
obviously
something
that
still
needs
to
be
discussed
within
leadership
of
the
project,
to
try
to
to
make
sure
that
we
are
not
creating
more
problems
for
ourselves.
B
A
Yeah,
so
my
god
training
is
we
if
we
start
with
like
we
want
to
start
something
with
better
like
making
sure
it's
funded
and
we're
going
to
finish
it.
If
we
don't
have
that
commitment,
we
shouldn't
even
start
that
effort,
or
maybe
we
make
it
very
clear,
like
you
guys,
feel
free
to
start
the
effort,
but
don't
expect
anyone
to
help
you
there,
which
seems
that's
probably
glared
for
that.
B
Yeah,
I
noticed
I
noticed
by
the
way
that
that
the
thing
that
ted
on
the
project
project
board
recommendation
that
you
put
out
there
right
and
it's
been
sitting
around
and
and
there
was
a
thought
of
trying
to
get
the
the
maintenance
sigs
the
maintainer
six
to
respond
and
they
didn't
and
it
was
about
to
go
stale.
And
then
I
noticed
that
you
commented
on
on
it.
I
I
guess
to
stop
it
from
going
stale,
but
I
guess
kind
of
the
question.
In
my
mind
there
was
gee.
B
B
Okay,
because
it
I
it
was,
it
was
an
interesting
aspect
that
I
saw
that
tigran
had
asked
for
commentary,
but
there
didn't
seem
to
be
any
commentary
and
until
you
responded
because
it
was
apparently
had
sat
out
there
and
about
to
go
stale
until
you
commented.
B
Right,
yeah,
I'm
not
sure
from
a
tc
standpoint.
Is
there
you
believe
it's
already
merged
and
it's
it's
official
now
or
what's
the
situation.
B
Yeah,
so
so,
regarding
what
we've
talked
about,
then
I
I
I
appreciate
what
you're
saying
thanks
for
sharing
additional
like
there
for
me,
and
I
guess
the
thought
would
be
going
to
perhaps
suspect
sake
and
trying
to
encourage
perhaps
more
participation
in
this
form
so
that
we
have
more
of
a
quorum
with
folks
from
different
areas
that
could
address
some
of
the
concerns
you
you
mentioned
and
be
able
to
speak
to
some
of
these
issues
and
therefore,
to
perhaps
commit
resources
to
addressing
some
of
the
issues
that
are
being
put
out
there
yeah
all
right,
very
good
thanks.
B
I
know
we're
over
time
at
this
point
appreciate
appreciate
your
time
and
your
insight.
I'm
still
learning
a
lot
here
and
each
time
I
speak
with
you,
you
should
have
more
likes.
I
appreciate
that.