►
From YouTube: 2022-01-26 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
So
I
think,
thanks
for
your
contribution,
I
think
definitely
I
think
it's
more
beneficial
for
the
project,
so
I
think
definitely
I
think
it
is
going
to
help
the
project
in
the
information.
I
think
it
should
all
it's
already
merged.
I
saw
really
has
already
used
it
and
you
should
be
part
of
the
approval
group
also
now.
B
B
B
Okay,
let's,
let's
add
the
agenda
items
I'll,
I'm
just
taking
looking
into
the
last
meetings
agenda,
so
returning
shade
pointer
for
span.
I
can
quickly
probably.
B
So
this
is,
this
is
kind
of
strange,
the
team
from
the
safe
team
they
have
been
they
have.
They
have
reported
that
there
are
some
issues
in
based
on
whatever
benchmark
test
they
have
done,
but
I
didn't
find
that.
But
I
do
have
some
draft
code
which
I
wrote
to
return
the
unique
pointer
I'll
just
send
it
to
them.
B
And
matrix,
I
think.
B
So
I
did
raise
one
pr
I
mean.
Actually
I
raised
I
plan
to
raise
a
bigger
pr,
but
then
I
felt
that
it
would
be
difficult
to
review
those
that
pr,
so
I
started
raising
smaller
pr's.
A
Is
there
approval
happened
after
we
added
some
to
the
approval
list?
Yes,.
B
Yeah
but
I
I'll
I'll
race,
I
think,
probably
I
want
to
merge
this
and
probably
to
raise
further
fiat,
and
I
just
wanted
that,
probably
if
you,
if
we
can
start
parallely
contributing
to
this,
so
I
I'm
in
process
of
writing
some
one
of
an
architecture
document
for
this.
B
We
probably
can
discuss
either
in
next
meeting
or
probably,
if
it
is
possible,
we
can
set
up
one
separate
meeting
for
discussing
the
architecture
for
for
the
matrix
from
how
how
should
be
implemented.
I
have
some
rough
idea
based
on
what
I
have
been
doing,
the
implementation
that
may
not
be
good
enough,
so
probably
just
want
to
have
discussion
before
we
continue
more
on
that.
B
This
is
this,
is
this
is
basically
I
mean
like
for
matrix
both
both
both
how
how
should
because
we
we
want
to
support
multiple
matrix
types
like
histogram
last
value,
something
so
we
have
to
do
some
aggregation
for
each
of
those
types
and
that
aggregation
has
to
be
stored
in
memory,
so
how
we
should
be
storing
in
the
memory
how
what
component
it
should
have.
What
should
be
the
pipeline
for
of
the
flow
both
for
pushing
the
matrix
and
collecting
the
matrix.
B
So
just
that
architecture
would
be
the
components
which
would
should
be
there.
What
component
should
be
api
front-facing?
What
should
be
internal,
whether
the
whether
the
flow
looks
fine,
we
see
an
issue
in
the
flow
of
matrix
with
all
those
components,
so
I
just
have
rough
ideas
of
law.
You
know
in
that
architecture,
not
a
very
big
document,
just
just
architecture,
high
level
diagram
and
then
probably
the
flow
of
both
the
measurements
and
the
matrix
through
the
architecture.
A
A
It
would
be
from
the
specification
how
our
architecture
documented
document
different
different
with
a
spec
one.
I
mean.
B
So
yeah,
so
if
you
go
to
the
spec,
specs
is
not
giving
you.
It
does
not
specify
how
you
should
be
doing
the
implementation,
how
it
talks
so
spec,
where
we
are
specification
matrix.
B
B
Yeah,
it's
just
so
some
architecture
diagram
which
basically
trying
to
align
it
as
much
as
possible
with
this
specification
and
trying
to
fill
up
the
gaps
which
are
not
there
in
the
specification.
A
B
B
Okay,
so
we
can
do
it.
Probably
if
that's
fine,
we
can
do
it
as
part
of
next
next
week's
or
if
you
want,
we
can
set
up
something
I'll
take
couple
of
weeks,
so
I
think
next
week
will
be
monday
only
right.
We
have
next
meeting
on
monday,
so
I
think
it
should
be
okay.
If
we
can
discuss,
we
can
set
up
half
an
hour
next
week
for
this
discussion
on
monday.
B
Meeting
not
right
now,
actually
I
was
creating
in
somewhere
in
in
in
my
word,
but
I
think
I
anything
that
was
not
something
that
was
not
to
the
extent
that
someone
can
really
read
it.
I'll
do
one
thing
I'll
create
one
draft,
probably
in
a
couple
of
weeks,
I'll
put
it
in
the
team's
channel
and
the
slack
channel
not
clean
sorry,
so
that
we
could.
You
can
start
looking
into
that
and
you
have
some
idea
before
monday's
discussion.
B
A
I
think
today
is
in
general
in
2026.
I
think
maybe
I
if
we
will
agree,
I
can
start
to
prepare
the
pr
I
think
this
week
tomorrow,
probably.
B
Only
one
is
which,
which
is
long
back,
I
think,
probably,
if
you
can,
let's
see
if
we
can
target
to
review
and
complete
it
this
one,
oh
and
that's
some
comments
I
already
fixed
them
yeah
I
saw
it
has
done
some
already
have
done
the
review
for
this
yeah
and,
let's,
let's,
I
think,
I'm
good
good
to
have
his
eyes
on
this,
and
probably
I
think
we
can.
We
can
to
review
it
and
let's
target
to
probably
have
this
in
this
release.
A
B
We
can
have
this
aggregation,
but
this
this
is
this
will
not.
We
have
full
flow,
so
I
mean
if
it
goes,
it's
fine.
Otherwise,
I'm
not
very
not
very
eager
to
put
this
one
this
this
side.
There
were
some
comments.
I
need
to
look
into
that,
but
not
very
important.
Okay,
this
is
elastic
search,
so
I
think
it's
not
very.
B
A
B
C
B
This
one
propagating
resources
to
logger
provider,
okay,
instrumentation
library,
logger,
support
for
instrumentation
library;
so
one
one,
four,
nine
and
one
one:
five
four.
A
B
I
know
because
one
of
our
team
internally
in
microsoft,
they
started
using
the
latest
version
of
open
telemetry
and
they
were
using
the
old
specs
for
open
telemetry
and
I
think
their
build
got
broke.
Because
of
this.
A
D
B
B
C
B
B
B
Closing
for
incomplete.
B
B
This
one
is
still
not.
I
tried
once
more
on
this
release
on
this
ubuntu,
but
still
I
could
not
reproduce
it
so
only
once
I
was
able
to
replace
it
not
afterwards.
B
B
Prs,
I
think
we
this
one,
I
think
once
it
gets
approved
by
a
son
and
then,
let's
see
if
in
case
you
want
to
look
into
that
I'll
I'll
also
ask
daily.
If
you
want
to
see.
B
A
Yes,
sort
of
a
vlogger
in
the
meeting
star
starts
at
10
a.m
every
wednesday.
So
we
have
some
meeting
conflicted
with
the
local
meeting,
but
before
I
can
watch
the
record
there.
B
Every
wednesday,
okay,
so
every
alternate
week,
we'll
have
conflict
with
that.
A
B
A
So
far,
it's
fine
for
me.
So
have
you
looked
more
into
like
at
the
just
our
meeting
time
like
for
the
monday
meeting
or
make
the
schedule
consistent
or
just
for
you?
Yes,.
D
B
C
C
B
B
Are
definitely
interested
I
mean,
I
think
I
this
was
something
which
I
was
planned
to
work
on
after
that.
I
think
I
didn't
have
time
to
do
it,
but
I
mean
if
someone
want
to
take
it
and
have
a
look
into
that
this
was
if
this
was
approved.
I
think
there
were
lots
of
discussion
on
this
before
I
moved
to
this
me
and
tom
move
to
this
project.
I
think
this
was
long
back.
B
It
was
raised,
they
have
been
lots
of
discussions,
and
this
looks
good
based
on
whatever
is
saw
the
pr,
but
if
there's
somebody
want
to
take
it
over
and
just
continue
working
and
probably
to
raise
a
pr,
I
think
it
can
be
used
at
lots
of
places.
I
mean
at
least
in
our
networking
file
handling,
I
think,
lots
of
places.
We
can
use
this
async
here.
B
B
That's
the
reason
why
it's
very
old
pr,
but
I
think
we
still
kept
it
open,
there's
something
relevant
and
if
you
can,
you
can
somehow
use
it.
Yeah.
B
Yeah,
I
think
that's
all
we
don't
have
anything
more
on
the
issues.
We
are
good,
so
I
I'll
for
the
for
this
matrix,
I
think
I'll,
be
when
preparing
a
document.
It
would
be
just
two
pages,
not
not
a
big
something
very
big,
there's
two
pages
which
just
talks
about
the
flow
and
the
diagram,
and
let's
discuss
that
I'll,
try
to
put
it
to
have
something
something
drafted
by
tomorrow
and
if
I
can
put
it
on
the
team
channel
yeah.