►
From YouTube: 2021-04-20 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Sir
101
no
exactly
well,
I
did
once
again
brought
it
up
in
the
spec
meeting
this
morning
that
there's
a
asia-pac-friendly
meeting
here.
B
So
yeah,
I
think
the
only
the
thing
that
was
most
interesting
to
me
from
today's
meeting
was
well.
I
guess
those
two
things.
Shamik
was
kind
of
asking
about
synthetics
use
cases
and
if
we
have
any
sort
of
recommendations
on
how
to
propagate
or
how
to
signal
that,
an
incoming
request
is
from
a
synthetic
request,
not
a
real
user
request
and
and
also
maybe
for
for
third-party
synthetics
vendors,
how
to
make
sure
that
the
traces
get
properly
propagated,
et
cetera.
B
B
But
you
can
do
you
can
like,
for
example,
the
synthetics
product
that
new
relic
had
let
you
do
like
full
scripting.
You
could
like
script,
entire
workflows
and
things
were
working
and
you
could
alert
on
it
and
stuff
like
that.
B
B
Yeah,
usually
as
a
service,
so
you
can
get
like
synthetics
as
a
service.
It's
very
cool
like
if
you
want
to
do
because
you
can
do
all
sorts
of
great
things
like
actually
measure
response
time,
also
an
alert
on,
and
even
if
there
aren't
users
using
a
particular
piece
of
the
flow
and
stuff
like
that.
So
anyway,.
B
A
B
And
I
pointed
out
that
there's
not
really
any
specification
about
how
resources
like
auto
detectors
should
be
applied.
If
there's
any
kind
of
order
specified
to
that
or
anything
like
that,
so
it's
not
like
he
was
going
to
open
up
at
least
an
issue.
I
guess
he
did
open
up
an
issue
and
I
mean
especially
things
like
if
you,
if
a
user
can
like
what
can
a
user
override
with
their
environment
and
does
it
always
override
something,
that's
coded
et
cetera,
et
cetera,.
B
Yeah,
I
would
just
I
would
annoy
people
as
much
as
you
can.
I
think
if
I
have
anything
open,
that's
interesting.
B
I
merged
that
the
batch
spam
processor,
with
the
where
you
can
give
it
the
executive
service
yeah.
I
really
looked
at
the
code
and
I'm
like
oh
there's,
no
javadoc
on
this
thing
at
all,
so
I'll
probably
go
tomorrow
and
write
some
javadoc
tomorrow
morning.
For
it
I
mean
it's
in
the
incubator,
so
it
doesn't.
It's
not.
A
B
A
I
wish
I
did
I'm
just
stuck
in
lambda
land,
yeah
sort
of
cool,
so
we've
gotten
it
so
that
we
have
a
layers
and
integration
test
and
whatnot
inside
open
thumb
to
lambda.
But
it's
in
a
way
that
we
can
also
customize
it
for
database
distro
for
extra
users
without
being
too
weird,
and
so
that
seems
to
be
working.
Okay,.
B
A
B
B
Yeah,
I
will
pester
what
time
I
could
look
at
the
calendar.
I
know
that
the
people
who
are
working
on
lambdas
are
in
eastern
europe,
so
yeah.
B
B
But
yeah,
I
think
things
are
pretty
quiet
right
now.
So
that's
good
because
I'm
getting
to
think
about
other
stuff,
which
is
even
better
did
you
have
some
any
big
stuff.
You
are
thinking
about
doing
an
open,
fl
and
java
side.
B
A
That's
http
libraries
that
use
instrumentary
api
got
an
http
metric
of
some
sort.
So
that's
what
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
doing.
I
think
still
another
day
or
two
just
full
of
lambda
stuff,
and
I
can
finally
do
something
on
java
again
but
yeah
again,
it's
my
mind
is
most
just
on
the
instrumentation
repo.
I
don't
think
I
have
anything
on
mine
for
the
sdk
repo,
so
pretty
good
sdk.
A
B
B
Yeah,
I
just
it's
a
slippery
slope.
I
don't
want
to
end
up
building
something
like
jacks,
jack's,
rs
and
all
the
annotations,
like
that's
a
whole
like
completely
new
language.
That
is
invented
and
you
wanted
the
worst,
the
worst
possible
one
is
the
swagger
like
the
swagger
annotation
system
is
just
insane.
B
Patience
they
put
annotations
in
their
annotations
and
I
think
you
can
annotate
your
annotations
anyway.
It's
a
real
mess
so
anyway,
I'm
just
trying
to
I
haven't
had
to
put
in
my.
I
think
this
is.
I
don't
think
this
is
a
good
idea,
but
I
know
people
want
it
and
other
people
think
it's
good.
So
I
won't
fight
too
hard
anyway,.
B
B
A
B
The
only
I
think,
the
thing
that
I'm
leaning
towards
right
now
is
that
you
could
that
I
could
write
an
annotation
processor.
Well,
I
think
I've
never
done
one
before,
but
I
imagine
one
could
write
an
annotation
processor
that
would
create
a
wrapper
class
that
exposed
the
same
public
methods
but
then
delegated
and
any
the
method.
The
public
methods
that
were
annotated
would
have
spans
around
them
and
then
that
wrapper
class
would
have
to
be
constructed
with
your
delegate
and
an
open
telemetry
instance
or
or
a
tracer.
A
B
That's
what
I'd
love
to
have,
except
that
somehow
you
have
to
get
it
open
to
launch.
I
guess
I
could
use
the
global
in
that
case,
like
you
could
enforce
that
it
only
ever
used
the
global
if
you
just
injected
that
by
code
at
compile
time.
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
I
never
it's
a
horrible
thing
that
I
know
lots
of
people
hate
it,
but
I
you
know
it
actually
could
be
interesting
to
contribute
it
to
lombok.
Now
that
would
be
an
idea
like
like
actually
add
it
to
the
lombok
experimental
package,
and
that
would
be.
That
would
be
a
very
interesting
idea
because
lombok
has
all
sorts
of
things
with
loggers
and
all
sorts
of
other
things
that
allow
you
to
automatically
do
things
from
other
apis.
A
B
On
it
for
a
week
and
see
what
I
can
do
actually
what
I'm
thinking
we
do
have
a
hack
week
coming
up
sometime
soon-
and
I
was
thinking
about
writing
a
piece
of
code-
we're
writing
a
code
generator
that
would
generate
all
public
api,
the
entire
public
api
service
in
code,
and
then
that
could
be
a
like
a
canary
in
the
coal
mine
for
breaking
api
changes
yeah
rather
than
using
the
the
rather
than
using
the
example
code
for
that
which
doesn't
obviously.
B
B
If
you
fly
back
home,
you
could
get
one
in
california
right
that.