►
From YouTube: 2023-03-07 meeting
Description
cncf-opentelemetry@cncf.io's Personal Meeting Room
A
A
A
Yeah,
it's
been
weird
here,
I'm
in
Michigan,
and
you
know:
we've
had
like
40s
and
sunny.
A
A
To
see
if
anybody
else
joins
in
the
meantime,
there's
no
agenda
this
week
can't
make
it
again.
C
A
C
Open
against
contrib,
previously
it
was
kind
of
held
up
on
waiting
for
a
few
things,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
of
where
we're
at
with
that
now
I
guess:
I'm
being
lazy
by
asking.
If
any
of
you
are
aware.
B
So
yeah
there's
two
issues
or
the
I
think
they're
Linked
In,
the
pr
one
of
them
is
kind
of
waiting
on
input
from
the
core
maintainer,
so
that
is
getting
the
the
service
attributes,
making
those
available
to
extensions
I
kind
of
looked
through
it
and
I
think
that
there's
what
I
think
is
a
fairly
clear
path
forward
for
how
to
which
ones
to
get
and
how
to
provide
them.
B
But
there
was
there
were
kind
of
a
few
questions
open
questions
when
I
brought
it
up
at
Sig
meeting
a
couple
weeks
ago.
So
I
put
a
comment
out
on
the
issue.
Hopefully
they'll
get
back
soon.
B
Otherwise,
I
might
open
a
draft
PR
and
see
if
I
can
maybe
present
a
bit
of
a
path
forward.
The
other
one
for
getting
the
collectors
effective
config
is
just
waiting
on
review.
That's
been
kind
of
going
back
and
forth
for
a
while
now
so
both
kind
of
there,
the
the
short
of
it,
is
they're
waiting
on
the
collector
maintainers.
B
We
just
need
their
input
there,
but
still
going
forward
outside
of
that
I'm
working
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
saw
my
ping
I'm
working
on
a
supervisor
implementation
kind
of
in
parallel.
While
we
wait
on
those
two
I
am
currently
just
kind
of
going
through
and
doing
some
touch
up
for
a
couple
of
just
smaller
items.
I
think
I
can
knock
out
as
part
of
the
initial
PR
and
then
hopefully,
I'll
have
some
issues
out
within
a
couple
days
here
to
I
have
the
path
forward
for
more.
B
C
I
think
that's
a
fair
assessment,
excellent!
Okay,
in
your
opinion,
like
does
it
make
sense
to
I,
guess
nag
certain
individuals
if
we
want
to
try
and
push
this
forward
a
little
bit
right
now,
like
should
I,
be
kind
of
shaking
some
trees
or
sliding
to
people's
DMs
like
what's
your
opinion
like
is,
is
now
the
right
time
or
should
we
get
our
ducks
in
a
row
a
little
bit
more.
B
It's
hard
to
say
I
feel
like
we
have
been
nagging
I
think
that
there
are
just
other
priorities
or
other
things
going
on,
but
I
don't
know.
Maybe
the
nagging
I've
been
doing
isn't.
C
B
Might
that
might
be
better
I,
don't
know
it's.
If,
if
you
want
to
get
try
anything
it's
worth
a
shot,
I,
don't
know
that
there's
I,
don't
know
that
there
are
any
hard
blockers.
I,
think
that
we're
more
or
less
in
good
shape
to
to
keep
moving
and
I.
Don't
think
that
there's
anything
from
our
end,
that
is
holding
things
up
all.
C
Right
awesome
well:
well,
thank
you
for
bringing
me
up
to
speed
and
and
yeah
I'm
gonna
see
what
I
can
do
just
to
get
regain
interest,
or
at
least
nag
enough
to
see
if
you
can
get
things
moving
forward
again
and
I'm
excited
to
work
on
this
again
all
right.
So
that
was
my
selfish
agenda
item
for
the
non-existent
agenda.
Does
anyone
else
have
their
own
selfish
items.
A
Haven't
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at
your
PR
but
I'm
just
curious
where,
where
you're
at
with
supervisor.
B
Yep
so
I
I
put
up
the
I
mean
the
thing
I
put
up
was
basically
just
the
example
with
a
couple
of
things
to
make
it
so
that
it
wasn't
totally
like
an
example
right
now,
I'm
going
through
and
I'm
just
knocking
out
a
couple
of
of
small
items
like
there's
a
couple
of
small
to-do's
in
there
that
I
figured
just
they
don't
even
really
need
issues.
We
can
just
kind
of
take
those
out.
B
I'm,
hoping
I
saw
that
cheek
and
left
a
review,
so
I'm
gonna,
hopefully
get
back
to
him
and
knock
all
those
items
out
quite
a
day,
but
maybe
tomorrow,
and
then
we
can
go
from
there
yeah.
So
the
my
goal
for
opening
up
that
PR
to
be
like
ready
for
review,
is
really
just
gonna
have
all
or
to
have
all
of
the
the
major
ticket
items
that
we
have
consensus
on
for
the
supervisor,
with
issues
in
contrib
and
then
link
those
to
the
the
pieces
in
the
supervisor.
B
And
then
there
are
still
a
couple
of
open
items:
I've
still
been
thinking
about
those
I'm
gonna,
hopefully
get
back
to
those
soon,
but
we
can
nail
those
out
then
I
think
that
would
be
I'm,
not
sure
where
the
best
place
for
discussion
is
there
I
think
the
Google
Doc
is.
It
seems
like
the
central
place,
but
trying
to
type
things
out
in
that
tiny
little
sidebar
isn't
isn't
a
great
format.
B
So
that's
a
little
unfortunate
I,
don't
know
if
if
it
becomes
an
issue,
we
can
always
move
it
to
the
contribution
tracker,
but
I
think
if
we
can
Hammer
a
few
of
those
out,
we
can
create
issues
for
those
as
well
and
get
those
work
done.
B
A
Sure
do.
A
B
That
could
be
a
good
place,
would
probably
be
either
there
in
the
collector
core
repo
I
know,
there's
a
couple
of
those
there,
and
this
would
just
be.
This
would
be
the
I
guess.
The
specification
and
the
contribute
implementation
would
be
one
implementation,
but
I'm
fine
with
it
living
alongside
the
the
the
op
amp
supervisor
that
we
have.
B
I
wouldn't
be
opposed
to
that
I
think
that
would
I
would
make
the
discussion
process
easier
and
I.
Think
that
would
I
think
also
make
it
just
a
little
bit
more
transparent
just
be
easy
to
follow.
A
B
Maybe
at
the
the
next
meeting
or
over
slack
I'll
post,
how
about
this
I'll
post
a
question
or
you
can?
If
you
want
in
the
the
working
group
slack
Channel
and
maybe
we
can,
we
can
have.
A
C
Just
uncomfortable
silence
all
right,
any
other
agenda
items.