►
From YouTube: 2021-04-14 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
C
D
E
Okay,
giving
that
excel
one
minute
or
two
for
people
to.
A
A
F
E
So
in
principle,
let's
see,
I
think
I
think
less,
that
I
checked
there
was
just
the
pr
from
the
abs
they
pull
from
upstream,
and
that
seems
to
be,
I
think,
okay,
let
me
just
quick
check
on
the
pianist.
E
There
is
one
more
okay
and
then
is
the
b3
propagator
any
blocking
issues
on
the
bb3
propagator
that
we
need
to
discuss
or.
C
That's
just
the
integration
test.
There
are
a
few
issues
there.
C
B
I
think
the
issue
right
now
is
that
our
integration
tests
we
in
a
pre,
I
think
it's
because
we
previously
were
uploading
one
log
file,
but
now
we
actually
have
since
added
rotating
logs
and
so
the
original
path
isn't
there.
I
think
that's
what
the
issue
is.
B
I
think
so
so
I
can
see
that
in
the
in
the
devops
runs
yeah,
there's
the
publish
one
that's
supposed
to
publish
the
the
one
log
file
yeah
that
that
part
is
not
up
to
date.
I
mean
we
only
recently
made
the
change
in
datadog
as
well
to
to
accommodate
that.
That's
one
thing
I
can
take
a
look
at
the
actual
integration
test
failures
to
see
if
there's
any
other
patterns.
Besides
just
that
publish
it
seems
like
there's
other
test
cases
that
have
failed.
F
Okay,
okay,
so
so,
basically
we
have
to
look
at
the
the
test
case.
The
the
failures
for
for
this
one.
B
If
I
may
jump
in
really
quick
besides
the
publishing
issue,
there's
two
other
issues:
there's
one
that's
a
flaky
test
which
we're
looking
at
and
then
then
now
the
another,
the
other
one
is
actually
a
result
of
the
b3.
Maybe
change
not
making
its
way
to
one
of
our
our
samples.web
request
integration
test.
B
B
We
have
just
one
real
test
failure
and
that's
would
need
to
be
addressed
in
the
pr.
C
C
C
No,
I
maybe
I
just
built
it
myself.
That's.
C
E
C
C
I
didn't
change
much
here,
just
added
one
more
set
of
headers
and
checking
the
whole
set
that
once
that's
it
basically.
E
I
see
so
so
it
seems
at
first
that
we
have
something
that
builds.
You
are
building
something
that
we
normally
are
not
building.
That
seems
to
be
the
case.
E
E
So
zack
this
is
something
that
is
not
built
on
the
ci
path.
I
guess
normally.
B
Yeah
right
now,
it's
not.
We
haven't
wired
up
all
of
our
iis
tests
into
the
integration
test
run
and
that's
one
of
those
I
think
most
of
the.
So
we
are
about
to
wire
up
some
of
them,
but
I
think
currently,
all
the
tests
in
the
asp.net
folder
test
applications
asp.net.
I
don't
think
there's
a
game
built
right
now
during
the
integration
test
run.
B
E
Okay,
so
so
I
think
we
we
understand
that,
then
we
I
I
think
the
the
fingers
should
do
the
cast
and
the
fixes
that
we
have
to
do
to
build
anyway.
E
E
And
the
other
one
is
the
upstream.
I
think
I
I
I
I
think
the
questions
there,
I
think
all
settled
right.
It's
just
a
matter
of
merging
right
or
do
we
still
have
something
missing.
D
I
think
I
zach
already
told
that
it's
okay.
G
E
Okay,
so
we
are
good
there
and
I
think
erasmus
wants
to
bring
up
the
the
thing
about
extensibility
on
top
of
the
the
the
the
project,
so
we
could
have
kind
of
or
either
different
settings
or
different
defaults,
let's
say
to
to
the
product
and
perhaps
need
a
some
way
to
do.
This
kind
of
extension.
C
C
I
think
it
shouldn't
add
some
a
lot
of
performance
penalties
or.
E
So
so,
but
but
the
idea
is
to
have
something
to
inject
kind
of
what
you
bring
the
the
default.
The
settings
kind
of,
I
think
you
mentioned
a
model
similar
to
what
the
sdk
has
right.
E
C
E
C
E
Okay,
do
you
think
you
you
can
build
the
on
top
of
that
issue
open
a
pr
with
a
kind
of
a
very
simple
the
implementation
of
the
plugin
itself?
Basically,
just
do
one
thing
very,
simply
and
kind
of
just
to
give
a
feeling
and
a
minimal
try
if
that.
C
G
Specific
use
case
that
we're
trying
to
solve
with
this
plugin
or
is
this
just
some
future
anticipated
need.
D
G
D
C
E
And
I
I
think
is,
is
a
general
for
us
to
start
to
have
sensibility
that
in
that
sense,
is
anticipating
something
else
you
know,
but
I
think
if
we
take
the
history
of
this
kind
of
thing,
eventually
we
need
ways
to
do
that.
E
Yes,
yes,
that
that's
always
they
they
used
to
say
a
few
years
ago,
when
the
plugins
were
very
common.
That
is
the
first
step
for
the
product
to
really
get
stuck
is
when
you.
E
No,
but
I
I
think
I
think
the
target
is
very
limited
and
the
idea
is
about
to
have
that
for
configuration
and
then
after
that
load
is
done
and
you
have
the
settings.
The
plugin
basically
is
not
it's
not
doing
anything.
You
know
and
all
the
cost
is
also
at
startups,
which
is,
of
course,
is
also
cost,
but
is
not
doing
the
running
of
the
product.
E
So
I
think
make
a
concrete
with
api,
even
with
a
small
setting,
it
could
be
even
the
the
contacts
propagation
or
whatever
is
needed
to
do
that
on
top
and
then
I
think
we
think
the
concrete
code
we
we
can
give
much
better
appraisal
of
the
proposal.
C
E
Yeah,
so
we
robert
and
you
were.
E
A
bunch
of
issues
which
is
great,
but
I
I
have
to
be
sincere-
I've
been
very
busy
with
other
stuff.
I
couldn't
give
much
attention
to
that.
I
hope
by
middle
of
may
I'm
really
back
fully
here,
but
so
far
I
I
have
to
say
that
I
I
couldn't
catch
up
with
all
of
that.
E
E
A
D
E
D
Yeah
I
mean
that
way
or
I
don't
reorganize
ourselves
somehow
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
in
your.
I
don't
know
organizations
other
folks
who
have,
I
don't
know,
also
knowledge
or
something
like.
I
still
feel
that
for,
for
example,
perspective,
maybe
something
someone
from
europe
could,
I
don't
know,
be
more
involved.
D
Because
right
now,
I
feel
that
at
least
at
least
david
and
rasmus
right
now
are
like
100
committed
to
do
the
stuff,
and
we
kind
of
we
could
work
faster.
If
we
have
just
more,
you
know,
maybe
not
even
help,
but
just
feedback
from
your
site.
B
I
can
I
can
ask
and
see
if
anybody
wants
to
take
on
some
of
this,
I
think
on
us.
We,
the
data
oxide,
we
just
don't-
have
as
much
resources
for
for
planning
this
work,
so
it
would
probably
just
be
like
a
best
effort
thing
right
now.
E
Yeah
and
robert,
I,
I
really
think
also
the
the
point
that
you
mentioned
about
the
time
zone.
It's
kind
of
it
impacts
the
project,
but
I
think
open
source.
We
have
to
figure
out
ways
to
improve
on
that,
but
it's
it's
a
hard
thing.
You
know
kind
of
it's
very
late
for
you
guys,
and
this
is
also
the
start
of
our
day.
So
basically,
the
overlap
is
very
small.
G
I
know
on
my
side:
we
don't
have
any
more
resources
that
that
can
assist
with
this
project
and
even
I'm
part-time.
E
We
could
make
a
call
out
for
help
on
the
on
the
community
meeting.
You
know
to
see
if
somebody
else
also
have
resources
to
kind
of
join
the
project
resources,
and
I
mean
people-
and
I
I
kind
of
been
postponing
a
bit
on
that,
because
I
I
would
like
to
have
at
least
something
that
and
we
are
getting
there.
We,
we
did
a
bunch
of
stuff
that
allows
minimum
work
with
open,
telemetry
stuff.
E
We
can
send
you
the
collector,
you
can
send
you
the
the
main
back
ends
of
open
source
for
tracing,
but
I
think
I
I
think
you
are
getting
to
the
time
that
perhaps
we
can
go
and
go
to
the
community
meeting
and
ask
for
people
if
other
people
have
the
time
to
join
the
project.
You
know
now
that
we
have
something
more
completely
working.
E
F
E
I
think
that
that
perhaps
somebody
else
joins.
I
remember
that
I
saw
one
item
about
putting
an
update,
design
and
road
map.
I
don't
have
time
to
to
touch
that
right
now,
but
I
think
that
is
a
very
good
step
in
that
direction.
D
All
right,
yes,
so
paulo,
my
my
like
pro
the
problem,
I
see
that
whoever
will
jump
from
outside.
I
don't
think
you're
looking
for
maintainers
correct
you're,
rather
looking
for
country
like
contributors
or
approvers,
right
or
you're
thinking
about
finding
some
additional
maintainer,
because.
E
Well,
I
I
think
I'm
looking
for
people
to
participate
in
the
project
as
they
start
to
participate.
Then
we
we
we
see
if
they
become
approvers
if
they
become
maintainers.
E
By
the
way
this
reminds
of
something
I
I
wanted
to
propose
to
add
robert
as
a
approver
for
the
project.
I
had
forgot
about
that,
but
I
I
think
robert
was
the
first
from
splunk
to
kind
of
really
jump
on
the
project
and
has
been
very
active,
so
I'd
like
to
to
propose
to
have
robert
as
approver
for
our
project.
E
All
right,
thank
you,
so
I
I
just
going
back
to
our
question.
Robert
is,
as
I
said,
we
let's
try
to
get
people
participating
and,
depending
on
how
they
participate,
they
they
can
become
maintainers.
They
can
become
approvers
in
the
same
kind
of
process
that
everyone
goes.
E
I
I
think
so
microsoft.
I
know
that
the
the
the
people
that
are
working
on
the
sdk
they
mentioned
that
they
didn't
have
resource
for
that,
but
I
I
I
mentioned
this
to
seizure
and
and
riley,
and
if
that
changes
you
know
they
they
may
they
may
participate.
E
I
know
that
alan
from
new
relic
has
been
participating
a
lot
on
the
sdk
and
he
joined
us
for
a
few
meetings,
but
I
think
he
is
busy
with
other
stuff
and
he
couldn't
help
us
here.