►
From YouTube: 2022-03-14 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
They
have
created,
and
I
think
they
are
going
to
take
it
further.
I
mean
have
given
the
I've,
given
the
added
one
of
those
one
of
those
one
of
one
of
one
of.
A
We
from
our
side
it's
good
if
we
can
just
have
a
high
level
overview
of
what
they
are
doing,
any
licensing
issues,
anything
which
is
not
should
be
there
and
that's
the
thing
with
this.
Overlooking
this
mind,
we're
not
going
to
work,
I
mean
if,
if
you're
interested
well
and
good
to
review
the
beer,
but
I
mean
nothing
that
we
should.
We
are
obliged.
C
A
A
So
I
mean
they
are:
they
are
not
blocked
on
us
that
we
have
to
for
any
permissions,
so
they
should
be
good
to
approve
and
raise
the
peers.
A
A
So
like
in
the
last
in
the
last
year,
I
just
gave
some
very
high
level
review
comments
like
they
are
not
using
the
latest
version
of
the
open,
telemetry's
sdk.
There
were
some
issues
in
the
license.
License
was
missing.
Some
of
the
files
were
not
kind
but
look
to
be
incomplete
the
script.
A
A
A
A
Is
still
not
ready,
there
are
some
issues
which
I
could
at
least
figure
out,
but
I
feel
free
to
review
it
and
see.
A
C
A
But
are
they
feel
free
to
add,
feel
free?
To
put
that
comment,
I
mean
if
you
think
that
that
would
be
helpful
or
if,
if
it
is
possible
to
do
in
a
cleaner
way
to
add
a
feature
flag
and
that
only
adds
the
functionality
for
racing
and
that
is
not
going
to
affect.
I
think
that's
a
good,
that's
good
to
do
it.
B
A
I
was
thinking
that
if
this
can
bring
an
end-to-end
mechanism
mechanism
where
we
can
have
simultaneous
calls,
we
can
call
that
async
exporter
function.
The
processor
can
call
it
several
multi
concurrently,
multiple
times
and
even
the
one
export
is
going.
It
should
be
good
to
call
another
export
invoke.
A
Another
export,
but
somehow
processor
should
be
able
to
track
all
those
exports
which
are
going
on
so,
which
is
which
is
missing
as
of
now
so
the
exporter
right
now,
exporter
just
makes
an
async
call
and-
and
it
does
not
have
any
control
or
to
track
the
status
of
the
that
which
is
not
good,
because
if
any
shutdown
is
called,
the
shutdown
of
processor
should
ensure
that
all
the
ongoing
exports
should
get
completed
before
before
doing
a
shutdown.
A
A
A
A
D
A
A
A
A
Yes,
yeah:
that's
what
I
was
saying
that
it's
the
complete
and
to
even
not,
I
won't
say,
test
but
complete,
n2
and
test
like
any
of
these
examples
which
these
are
like.
If
we
talk
about
the
grp
and
cvrpc,
this
is
going
to
talk
with
the
real
collector.
So
if
we
can
run
that
in
our
ci
pipeline
and
it
just,
we
can
get
the
status
of
the
test
success
of
mass.
I
think
that
should
be.
B
B
D
A
D
A
A
Yeah,
which,
which
is
something
missing
as
of
now,
we
can
definitely
run
any
any
fdk
or
any
test
like
this,
but
without
how
to
track
the
status
of
those
which
would
be
good
to
see.
If
we
can
do
that.
A
A
D
A
A
A
B
A
I
mean
a
few
files
of
change
of
lines
like
new
files.
I
I
think
so
more
modern
major
changes
are
in
synchronous,
matrix
synchronous
right,
which
we
are
doing
it,
but
yeah.
It's.
A
A
A
C
A
A
A
C
You
know
at
the
same
time,
we
still
don't
have
enough
to
end
the
workflow
or
for
metrics
I'm
thinking
and
do
do
you
think
we
can
do
the
complete
at
the
end,
to
end
the
workflow
at
the
end
of
this
month
for
matrix.
B
A
So
so
you
mean,
let's
target
it:
the
next
release
say
by
first
week
of
april
or
something
like
that.
C
C
Yeah,
that's
right,
I
want
to
target
about
and
if
we
do
the
release
for
now,
I
think
we
we
don't
have
end-to-end
metrics
and
I
think
at
the
end
of
this
month,
even
if
we
have
metrics
and
trend
working,
I
think
we
will.
May
we
may
wait
for
another
month
or
two
weeks
to
make
a
new
release
right.
So
maybe
for.
A
C
I
mean
if
we
can
have
a
release
other
than
at
the
end
of
this
month
and
the
interview
the
metrics
and
to
end
that
will
be
great.
Maybe
that's
too
aggressive.
You
mean
this
blind.
C
A
D
Benchmark
I.
D
My
second
comet
failed.
D
D
I
mean
by
failure,
I
mean
the
benchmark
was
not
consistent.
Right
times
are
slower.
A
D
Also
or
one
thing
I've
noticed
like
when
the
pr
is
merged
and
we
try
to
like
merge
main
to
other
pr's
right
and
and
in
that
point
of
time
I
see
we
have
more
failures.
A
D
E
D
It's
we
have
to
wait
for
the
ci
for
the
merged
comet.
To
finish
when
the
benchmark
is
finished,
then
we
start
to.
B
A
So
suppose
I
have
this
pi
so
whenever,
whenever
we
are
going
to
merge
whenever,
whenever
we
are
going
to
merge
this
pr
suppose
that
time,
the
ci
will
run,
which
will
also
run
the
mathematics
right
and
you're
saying.
So
if
there
is
some
other
branch
we
are
going.
If
there
is
another
branch,
this
this
would
be
going.
This
branch
is
going
on.
A
Merge
process,
excuse
me,
but
if
there
is
some
other
branch
which
we
try
to
rebase
and
so
any
other,
we
are
saying
if
any
other
ci
starts
for
any
other
pr,
because
this
pr
for
this
pr,
which
is
on
merge,
we
won't
be
able
to
reverse
right
once
once
the
merge
is
started.
B
A
Yeah,
instead
of
running
it
as
part
of
I'm
not
sure
whether
running
this,
instead
of
running
it
as
part
of
the
ci
pipeline,
if
you
can
have
a
separate
periodic
round
of
benchmarks,
if
that
improves
the
things.
A
Yeah
that
helps
because
anyway,
if
we
remove,
we
won't
get
those
results.
So,
instead
of
the
next
bit
best
thing
before,
instead
of
removing
would
be,
if
you
can
run
it
periodically,.
A
A
For
for
you,
it
is
10
p.m.
Your
time
right,
the
meeting.
C
Yeah
yeah
it
so
did
the
meeting
time
change.
I
think
for
today's
occurrence
and
the
two
weeks
ago,.
A
Yesterday
onwards,
with
the
daylight
changes,
our
meetings
have
got
changed,
I
mean
they
have.
They
have
been
postponed
by
one,
so
instead
of
1
p.m.
Redmond
time
now
it
is
2
p.m.
A
I
think
it
was
my
mistake
when
I
changed
the
meeting
time.
Probably
I
didn't
keep
that
as
ps3,
so
it
got
changed
for
us,
but
which
is
fine,
so
not
any
other
meeting.
So
the
the
maintenance
meeting
is
still
at
9am
for
us
that
didn't
change,
because
that
meeting
was
scheduled
for
phd
time.
But
this
meeting
was,
I
think
I
didn't
schedule
it
for
ps3
time,
so
it
got
registered
for
us.
C
A
A
C
A
So
to
see,
if
he
he
would
be
fine
to
be
a
man
to
be
approver
for
the
one
for
our
we
see
principal
over
television
press,
and
he
is,
I
think
he
was
interested
earlier.
Also.
He
was
interested
on
this
and
I
think
he
said
yeah.
He
definitely
want
to
be
one
of
the
approvers.
E
A
C
A
The
only
problem
is,
he
is
not
going
to
he's
not
going
to
join
the
meetings
because
of
the
timing
issue,
because
I
think
none
of
the
eight
of
these
times
will
help
him.
I
mean,
even
if
we
want
to
change
couple
of
parts
here
or
there,
that
still
will
not
to
join
the
meeting
okay,
but
he
said
that
he
will
be
definitely
active
in
that
as
a
reviewer
and
also
he
would
be.