►
From YouTube: 2020-10-14 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello,
later,
hey
nice
to
nice
to
meet
you,
america.
I
think
we've
spoken
a
bit
recently
on
twitter,
yeah,
yeah.
A
Do
yeah,
I
still
have
to
do
the
work
on
it.
I
think
for
now,
we'll
just
maybe
recommend
people
use
a
batch
processor
because
it's
not
a
deal
breaker.
If
the
flashing
occurs
more
frequently,
it
just
makes
things
a
little
wonky
and
then
I'll
try
to
work
on
it.
It
should
so.
I
appreciate
the
help.
B
C
D
E
Hey
tigran
you're,
coming
in
quite
quiet.
I
don't
know
if
something
changed,
your
microphone.
D
All
right
all
right,
yeah,
I
don't
see
jay
in
the
call
he
was
he's
the
originally
he's
the
person
who
submitted
this.
So
if
I
don't
think
we
can
review
this
online
and
james
is
not
in
the
call,
no
he's
not
in
the
call
either
okay.
So
if
anyone
has
an
interest
in
this
issue,
please
go
ahead
and
comment
on
the
github
issue.
Let's
see
what's
the
next.
D
D
C
B
Yeah
this
one,
you
kind
of
reviewed
already
it
was
I
added
to
the
agenda
before
you
actually
left
the
comment
there
yeah
and
then
I
see
that
you
enabled
mergify
last
week.
B
But
that
was
only
for
the
contrib,
so
I
needed
also
for
the
operator.
So
if
you
could.
B
Yeah
and
then
finally,
I'm
preparing
a
blog
post
on
how
to
write
components
for
for
the
contrib
for
for
the
collector
and
if
anyone
fancy
you
know,
reading
a
draft
blog
post
and
the
link
is
here
and
I
appreciate
comments.
B
D
E
Yeah,
so
I
I'd
recommend.
Well,
I
think
it's.
What
you
did
before
is
yes,
like
either
publish
it
on
your
own
account.
If
you
want
and
then
publish
it
as
a
draft
to
the
open,
telemetry,
medium
blog
and
I'll
absolutely
make
sure
it
gets
in
there.
B
Yeah
yeah
so
yeah.
Well,
that's
that's
nice
right
here
I
mean
I
think
it
was
more
like
a
question
more
broad,
not
not
really
on
the
technical
side.
So
I'm
technically,
I
can
just
send
to
publication
and
then
you
guys
review
it
yeah,
but
I'm
always
wondering
if
it
is
suitable
for
for
this
publication.
B
You
know
because
it
is
technical.
I
don't
know
if
no.
E
That's
good:
we
want
more
content
like
this,
like
the
lack
of
technical
content
on
the
project
blog.
Isn't
it
isn't
because
we've
been
saying
like
we
want
less
technical
content,
we've
wanted
more,
it's
just
that
the
project
hasn't
been
that
far
along
historically
for
people
to
write
much
of
it
all
right.
I
think
this
is
fantastic
cool,
very
good,
so
yeah.
E
D
A
This
one's
mine,
hey,
hey,
tigran,
yeah
bogdan,
is,
is
lightning
fast
and
already
reviewed
one
or
two
of
these,
so
apologies
on
the
duplication
but
yeah
just
a
few.
I
work
over
at
datadog
with
some
of
the
other
folks.
A
There
are
a
few
smaller
prs
in
the
hopper
that
any
approver
or
anyone
in
the
community's
reviews
would
be
certainly
very
much
appreciated,
and
then
I
did
actually,
while
I
have
your
attention,
one
small
question
around
them:
we're
getting
pretty
close
on
the
trace
exporting
side
to
having
a
you
know,
feature
complete
exporter,
and
I
was
wondering
whether
I
should
just
include
in
this
last
pr
the
enabling
in,
like
you
know,
adding
the
exporter
or
should
I
just
leave
that
separate
until
everything
else
is
merged.
D
A
A
Okay,
understood
yeah.
Let
me
double
check
with
the
metrics
folks
to
to
figure
out
whether
they
want
to
hold
off
or
anything
but
great
thanks,
thanks
again
for
all
the
reviews
and
feedback
as
well.
It's
very
appreciated
the
last
remaining.
A
I
pinged
kelly
and
he
should
address
that
by
the
end
of
the
day.
So
thanks
everyone.
Okay,
let's
see
this
one
is
done.
That's
the
next
one
I
just
I
opened
that
about
15
minutes
ago.
So
no
certainly
no
rush.
It
needs
a
review.
I
know
ryan,
I
believe.
Apologies
had
reviewed
the
previous
one.
This
just
adds
the
actual
flushing
to
api
intake.
The
translation
work
is
already
complete.
D
F
Yeah
I
made
the
proposal
so
yeah.
I
looked
at
the
metrics
transform
processor
and
it
doesn't
have
the
ability
to
like
add
labels
and
batch
to
metrics,
because
you
have
to
specify
a
metric
by
name
and
then
you
can
make
modifications
to
that.
So
what
I
was
looking
for
was
the
ability
to
add
labels
in
batch.
F
Specifically
for
my
use
case,
I
need
to
add
it
to
all
labels
or
all
metrics
that
pass
through.
So
I
propose
like
a
bunch
of
solutions,
the
recommended
of
which
was
a
new
processor
which
does
exactly
that
like
in
the
configuration
files,
you
just
specify
labels
and
then
the
processor
will
add
those
to
all
metrics
that
pass
through
so
yeah.
I
was
just
looking
for
some
feedback
as
to
whether
people
think
this
is
a
good
idea
to
like
create
this
processor.
D
F
G
Yeah,
I
know
there
was
some
discussion
of
maybe
in
some
otep
or
something
about
unifying
attributes
and
labels
across.
Is
that
likely
to
happen
or
not.
F
G
Yeah,
yes,
I
mean:
if
that
happened,
then
we
could
just
use
the
same
thing
across
traces
and
everything
but
yeah
since
that's
not
gonna
happen,
probably
soon
yeah.
It
does
seem
like
we'll
need
to
have
a
dedicated
processor
to
do
this.
H
Yeah,
because
again
you
know
hi,
jay
and
tigran
we
are,
we
are
looking
at.
You
know
how
we
can
label
for
different
ingests
ingests
that
are
coming
in
and
sources
so
again,
given
that
this
doesn't
exist
as
functionality
having
a
processor
is
probably
the
short-term
fix.
Now
again,
if
there
were
a
general
processor
which
could
handle
this
functionality,
it
would
be
different.
H
E
E
H
G
E
F
E
Have
one
so
that
will
need
to
be
rationalized
and
that's
kind
of
ridiculous?
How
we
so
many
right
now,
however,
we're
still
going
to
need
to
process
whatever
kind
like
whichever
one
we
land
on
is
going
to
need
to
be
processed
in
the
collector.
So
there's
work
to
be
done.
E
All
right
for
now,
I
think
so,
I'm
probably
the
wrong
person
to
give
advice
on
this.
Should
we
think
of
the
josh
and.
E
Yeah
I
mean
it
might
be
just
good
to
go
over
with
josh
tomorrow
at
the
the
metric
sig
sure
I
I
don't
know,
I
think
tigran's,
probably
the
the
the
the
best
person
here
to
speak.
D
To
this
I
I
did
not
have
a
look
at
this
issue.
Can
you
guys
give
me
a
big
time,
so
I
didn't
understand
what
the
options
are
and
then
I'll
post
a
comment
on
the
issue:
does
that
work.