►
From YouTube: 2021-09-08 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Can
everyone
hear
me
or
okay
perfect?
So
I
think
the
first
topic
was
added
by
jurassic
long
story.
Short.
We
moved
the
parts
of
the
core
components
to
the
contrib,
so
we
couldn't
build
the
same
image
from
that
repository
because
we
would
have
caused
a
circular
dependency
between
repository
and
we
have
a
new
new
repo
called
open.
The
telemetric
dash
collector
dash
release
where
we
tried
to
build,
even
though
we
spread
we,
we
move
the
components
we
try
to
build
exactly
the
same
image
with
same
capabilities
and
feedback
from
you.
B
I
will
check
with
them
internally,
but
it
looks
like
they
were
just
asking
if
this
can
be
merged,
because
it's
a
dependency
that
they
have
for
something
that
they're
working
on.
But
if,
if
it's
just
a
matter
of
getting
paulo
to
make
some
updates,
then
I'll.
Let
them
know
that
that's
the
status.
A
B
Is
chiendo
just
joined,
so
maybe
we
can,
where
we
were
just
discussing
the
agenda
item
that
we
have
regarding
the
pr
that
you
guys
need
merged
to
unblock
the
work
you're
doing
for
configuration
sources,
and
it
appears
that
the
the
author
of
that
pr
will
need
to
update
it
to
address
some
merge
conflicts.
B
C
Oh
okay
got
it
yeah,
so
sorry
for
the
late
and
yeah
thanks
a
lot
yeah.
I
put
it
here
just
a
reminder
of
this
one
because
we
are
blown
by
this
yeah.
Oh
okay,
thanks.
A
Okay,
david,
you
have
couple
of
topics,
but
let's
start
with
the
first
one.
Probably
after
you
finish,
you
write
the
second
one
since
we
are
in
this.
Yes,.
D
Sir,
so
there
were
some
issues
reported
with
stillness
markers
from
at
least
five
separate
users,
google
being
one
of
them,
and
I
found
quite
actually
a
simple
fix,
which
was
to
revert
the
existing
still
marker
code
and
to
uncomment
two
lines
where
we
were
ignoring
the
staleness
markers
that
the
prometheus
server
code
was
generating.
D
For
us,
it
was
a
regression
since
0.30
and
it's
fixed
at
head,
and
I
wanted
to
know
how
far
back
or
first,
if
I
can
cherry
pick
it
back
and
second,
how
far
back
I
should
cherry
pick
it
I
I
know
you're
you're
busy
with
things
so,
whatever.
A
So
I
think
we
will
do
a
release
the
next
couple
of
days
today
or
tomorrow.
I
would
not
worry
that
much
on
cherry
picking
at
this
moment
since
we
don't
hold
that
stable,
but
if
you
believe
that
it's
a
very
important
fix
that
we
want,
we
have
only
three
releases
since
then,
so.
D
For
those
releases
right,
yes,
so
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
Work,
I'm
happy
to
do
that
work,
but
I'm
just
asking
whether
it
would
be
accepted
or
not.
D
It's
useful
for
my
purposes
for
what
google's
doing,
because
we're
stuck
on
29
right
now
and
we
prefer
to
go
one
version
at
a
time
since
there's
a
reasonable
amount
of
churn
each
each
version.
So
it's
worth
my
time
to
do
it
for
sure.
A
Do
you
really
need
you
need
okay?
So
so
it's
only
in
court
then,
but
also
we
need
to
rebuild
the
countries
because
contribute
reference
that
and
rebuild
the
images
of
the
country
with
the
new
dependencies
to
the
so
so,
if
you
do
so,
let's
assume
you
cherry
picking,
31,
you
said
30
has
the
problem
or
doesn't.
D
D
A
A
I'm
fine,
I
mean
if
this
helps
google
and
helps
you
I'm
I'm
okay.
We
can
even
ignore
contribute
for
the
moment
and
say
that
incontribute
is
fixed
only
in
35,
we'll
be
fixing
35,
but
we
pick
it
for
for
core.
B
I
think
it's
probably
useful
to
also
release
updates
in
contrib,
just
in
case
any
users
are
on
those
older
versions
and
don't
want
to
to
update.
I
would
expect
that
it
should
be
a
fairly
simple
process
to
do
so,
though,
so
we
we
should
and
then
it's
it's
a
good
exercise
of
the
process
to
ensure
that
we're
doing
hot
fix
releases
and
and
keeping
that
muscle,
strong,
yeah.
A
Yeah,
let's,
let's:
let's
do
that,
then
I'm
more
than
happy
to
approve
the
prs
anthony.
Would
you
be
able
to
help
me
by
setting
the
tags?
For
this
sure,
I
think
you
have
right
permissions
in
both
wrappers.
So
yes,
I
should
yeah
perfect,
so
yeah
I'll
I'll
help
with
merging
if
anything
is
needed,
but
so
david,
but
anthony
will
we'll
do
the
official
release
news
forum,
okay,.
D
There's
an
existing
pr
out
to
add
a
the
ability
to
specify
your
prometheus
config
as
a
separate
file
and
the
the
code
itself
is
pretty
simple.
But
obviously
we
want
to
know
if
it's
a
good
idea
or
not-
and
the
main
thing
I
wanted
to
ask
here-
is
whether
it
makes
sense
given
other
proposals
that
I
know
are
out
there
for
managing
configuration.
A
So
I
think
in
in
couple
of
weeks
we
will
stabilize
the
config
source
thing
and
that
will
be
a
trivial
change.
You
will
just
say
if
conf,
if
the
remedius
configuration
has
a
map
structure,
tag
like
it's
indented,
like
chrome
configuration
column,
something
I
don't
know
how
it
looks
like.
But
if
it's
indenting
into
a
map,
you
can
replace
the
entire
map
with
the
with
only
one
statement
automatically.
So
it
will
be
solved
by
that
mechanism
and
you
don't
need
to
do
anything
actually.
A
Oh,
there
is
a
coffee
yeah,
so
right
now
what
you
you
will
be
able
to
do
is
you
will
write
instead
of
config
file
from
that
yammer,
you
will
write
a
config
column
square
bracket
file,
columns,
slash
your
file
and
that's
it.
D
A
Fyi,
the
the
30
release
was
a
bit
of
a
problem
and
we
need
a.
We
made
a
30.1
make
sure
it's
on
top
of
the
30.1
tag.
A
A
A
Actually,
you
can
create
a
pr
that
changes,
the
changes,
the
change
log
and
changes
the
the
reference
to
updates
the
goal
mode.
We
depend
on
the
model
in
the
main
goal
mode.
You
need
to
update
that
as
well
a
bit
of
manual
work
of
what
the
tool
does,
but
you
can
create
that
pr
right
away,
and
hopefully,
by
the
time
I
close
my
my
day
to
day
everything
is
merged
and
including
the
changelog
things.
So
you
can
do
the
release
as
well.
A
I
will
comment
so
if
you
give
me
in
the
next
20
30
minutes
that
pr,
I
will
comment
and
help
you
to
get
that
okay
sounds
good.
So
please
prioritize
a
bit
that
work,
because
it's
already
7
20
pm.
A
Also
one
last
item:
I
need
a
volunteer
from
the
community
who
wants
to
help
me
on
stabilizing
the
configuration
for
for
the
core
components.
So
right
now
we
have
a
configuration
for
otlp
receiver
or
configuration
for
otf
exporter
http
exporter,
which
reference
some
common
configs
for
http
and
stuff.
A
A
E
I'm
sure
I'll
did
you
see
this
month
or
this
week?
If
it's
this
month,
then
I'll
volunteer.
We
should
finish
this
month.
A
Okay,
by
finish,
I
mean
at
least
identify
all
the
changes
that
we
need
and
if
we
need
any
changes
and
start
implementing
them
sounds.
A
A
Good,
thank
you
punyan.
Hopefully
this
will
help
a
bunch
of
people
I
know
for
sure
will
help
also
splunk
and
also
aws.
So
we
are
great
to
to
have
this
moving
forward
yeah
if
there
are
no
more
questions
or
things.