►
From YouTube: 2022-07-21 meeting
Description
cncf-opentelemetry@cncf.io's Personal Meeting Room
C
C
C
All
right
shall
we
get
started,
there's
just
a
couple
of
items
on
the
agenda.
The
first
one
I
added
there
is
a
pr
that
has
been
opened
on
open,
telemetry
java,
and
someone
has
added
osgi
support
to
the
project
and
neither
john
or
I
or
onorag
kind
of
have
expertise
in
this
to
review
this,
and
so
we're
just
kind
of
probing
and
seeing
if
anybody
has
experience
in
this
and
can
give
us
a
hand
taking
a
look.
C
All
right,
I
guess,
moving
on
so
ben
you've
added
a
comment
about
restarting
jvm
metric
meetings.
D
Yeah,
basically,
these
are
kind
of
fallen
by
the
wayside
due
to
me
getting
stuck
in
the
uk
with
covid
and
taking
some
pto
and
then
going
to
a
couple
of
conferences,
so
we
haven't
actually
met
for
quite
a
while.
I
feel
like
there's
not
actually
that
much
left
to
do
and
that
we
can
probably
wrap
it
up
in
a
couple
of
meetings.
D
On
the
other
hand,
it
is
about
to
be
august,
and
I
know
that
fabian
and
a
couple
of
others
will
just
be
away
for
august,
because
it's
that's
what
happens
in
europe,
so
I
kind
of
feel
like
maybe
you
know
we
could.
We
could
theoretically
meet
next
week,
but
then
it's
we're
into
august.
So
maybe
actually
the
smart
thing
to
do
is
to
just
say
we'll
reconvene
in
september
and
we'll
we'll
try
and
wrap
it
up
as
quickly
as
we
can
in
a
couple
of
meetings.
B
I'll
be
happy
to
join,
join
that
as
well
hi
stuff
on
by
the
way
you
used
to
work
on
j-rock,
get
an
open,
jdk,
et
cetera,
and
so
I'll
try
and
join
still
still
have
to
read
through
a
little
bit.
What
jv,
metrics
will
already
capture
interesting.
Take
a
look.
D
Well,
you
given
that,
interestingly,
that
you
mentioned
j-rocket,
I
mean
it's
obviously
changed
quite
a
lot
and
it's
now
part
of
open
jdk,
but
part
of
this
actually
is
using
jdk
flight
recorder
as
a
data
source.
So
yeah.
B
D
Yeah,
absolutely
and
on
the
red
hat
side:
that's
some
jonathan
halliday
who's
been
looking
at
that
I've
done
some
initial
work
on
it,
but
jonathan's
got
way
more
time
than
I
have
to
look
at
it,
so
so
yeah.
But
if
you
want
to
hit
me
up
about
the
metric
side
of
things
stuff
and
just
like
hit,
find
me
on
on
on
slack
and
dm
me,
and
we
can,
we
can
look
at
some
stuff
together.
If
you
have
some
time.
C
And
I've
been
I've
been
doing
some
investigation
into
gc
stuff.
So
I
know,
ben
that
you
were
talking
about
investigating
gc
stuff
with
jfr
a
while
back
just
seeing
kind
of
what
the
common
denominator
is.
Amongst
all
the
garbage
collectors,
I've
been
doing
some
work
with
that,
just
trying
to
kind
of
wrap
stuff
up
here
kind
of
have
the
same
mentality
as
you
trying
to
wrap
up
jvm
metrics
in
general.
You
know,
I
know
we're
not
going
to
meet
in
august,
but
maybe
we
can
do
some
asynchronous
work.
C
I'm
going
to
open
an
issue
in
the
instrumentation
repo,
with
kind
of
a
proposal
with
where
I
think
we
can
go
just
draw
a
line
in
the
sand
and
you
know
would
be
good
to
get
some
feedback
on
that.
So
you
know,
maybe
we
can
make
some
progress
before
september.
D
Yeah,
absolutely
I'm
very
happy
to
do
that.
I
mean
for
what
it's
worth,
I'm
not
taking
any
significant
time
off
in
august.
So
so,
if
you,
if
you
do
that
jack
you
and
I
can
just
meet
up-
I
think-
and
we
can
we
can
work
on
it
together.
Totally
sounds
good.
C
All
right,
let's
move
on
stefan,
has
added
an
item
to
talk
about
auth
with
otlp.
A
B
B
If
you
had
any
comments
on
the
that
pr
I
put
in
there
if
it
thing
sort
of
follow
the
pattern
you
expected,
with
sort
of
just
being
part
of
the
the
behind
the
scenes,
ulti,
okay,
http
builder,
that
one
looked
good
to
you.
A
B
C
Okay,
I'll
take
a
look
at
that.
You
know
you
know
I
I
think
it's
going
to
be
in
the
right
direction,
based
on
the
conversation
and
I'll
see.
If
I
have
any
comments.
B
B
So
I
know
we
specifically
sort
of
have
grpc
1.6
or
something
as
the
auto
instrumentation
and
but
if
so,
what
happens
is
so
they
I
don't
they
haven't
built
about
4g
or
pc.
I
think
for
m1,
specifically,
what
they've
done
is
they've
cheated
a
bit
and
they
make
a
copy
of
the
x86
binary
and
call
it
arch,
64
or
something,
and
so
then
gradle
knows
how
to
download
it.
B
So
right
now,
if
you're
an
m1,
it
tries
to
download
the
arc
binary,
it
doesn't
find
it
so
it
doesn't
build
on
an
m1
mac
os
x
today.
But
if
you,
if
I
just
updated
it
to
like
the
latest
version
of
grpc
and
protobuf,
then
it's
compiled
fine,
just
wondering
like
what
limitations
we
have
there.
If
we
need
to
stay
on
one
six
for
some
specific
reason
or
if
we
sort
of
I
can
just
if
I
should
just
do
a
pr
and
just
update
it
to
the
latest
version
across.
E
Sorry,
I
zoned
out
for
a
minute:
was
it
about
the
instrumentation
repo?
It's
about
yeah.
B
E
And
yet
there
was
a
pr
about
that
recently
that
changed
something
in
the
gradle
build.
So
if
you
just
try
the
latest
main
version
I'll.
B
Take
a
look
at
the
latest,
otherwise
I
might
sort
of
do
some
photo
pr,
but
I
I
thought
I'm
the
only
one
hitting
this
as
I
take
it
with
me.
E
B
E
Was
an
issue
about
it?
I
remember
that
somebody
filed
an
issue
about
it
and
I
think
that
we
merged
a
fix
to
it.
Probably.
C
I
ran
into
the
same
issue
on
the
open,
telemetry
java,
docs
repository,
which
is
just
some
kind
of
functional
code
examples.
I
have
an
m1
laptop
myself
and
yeah.
So
for
me
it
was
just,
as
you
said,
simple
enough
to
upgrade
to
the
latest,
so
that
gradle
can
find
the
arch
64
version
of
protac
and
maybe
one
other
dependency,
so.
C
E
C
C
Yeah,
I
I
heard
you
were
out
sick,
so
hope
you
hope
you're
feeling
better
I'll.
Take
a
look
at
those
today
and
but
just
directionally,
I'm
aligned.
So.
A
A
E
A
F
F
Because
we
will
need
to
do
some
work
around
that
and
I
want
to
get
some
details
about
the
options
that
were
taken,
so
I
I'll
reach
him
up
for
for
that.
E
Thanks
yeah
no
problem
also
feel
free
to
create
an
issue
with
any
sort
of
problems
or
missing
features
you
encountered.
We
will
we
can
ping
justin
from
github,
so
it
will
be
all
in
public
and
so
on.
F
Yeah
I'll
do
thanks.