►
From YouTube: 2021-12-06 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Okay,
perfect,
so,
let's,
let's
start
thank
you,
everybody
for
joining
okay
agenda.
The
first
one
is
the
specification
itself.
As
you
know,
we
have
been.
We
have
been
having
a
month
release,
so
this
should
be
happening
this
week,
but
we
will
probably
wait
for
more
important
items
to
land
in
specification
yeah.
If
you
have
any
opinion
about
that.
Just
comment,
something
in
slack
or
here.
B
Does
that
include
the
the
mixed,
stable,
experimental,
metrics
sdk
stuff,
or
was
that
not
merged?
Yet.
A
That's
the
thing
we
we
want
to
discuss
and
we
want
to
come
to
a
clear
agreement
on
that
and
that's
that's
why
I
think
we
will
be
postponing
doing
the
release
for
for
now.
So
we
may
do
this
later.
This
month,
okay,
yeah
yeah,
of
course,
yeah.
The
thing
is
we
don't
want
to
release
something
that
is
not
super
clear
and
you
know,
expectations
are
satisfied
in
every
front.
A
I
don't
think
there's
anybody
from
the
metrics
group
around.
As
far
as
I
know
as
as
daniel
mentioned,
there's
some
discussion
regarding
whether
we
should
go
stable
in
the
sdk.
The
api
is
very
stable.
The
sdk
still
needs
some
cycles
there
yeah.
So,
let's
see
how
that
goes.
Riley
is
not
around
he's
own
time
off.
So,
let's
see
what
can
be
done,
we
still,
we
still
have
a
number
of
weeks
till
the
christmas
break,
so
yeah.
So
if
you're
interested
in
helping
this,
please
go
review
the
current
pr's.
C
Oh,
I
added
it,
but
that's
all
I
have
to
say
so.
The
example
spec
seems
to
be
vague
or
ambiguous
and
that's
currently
being
clarified.
A
Right:
yeah
yeah,
I
totally
mentioned
I
forgot
to
mention
that.
I
think
that
one
of
the
one
of
the
important
points
is
that
people
who
are
involved
in
this
group.
They
have
a
very
clear
idea.
What
of
what
needs
to
be
implemented.
But
one
of
the
complaints
is
that,
probably
if
a
newcomer
would
come,
he
wouldn't
know
you
know
like
he
wouldn't
understand
what
we
currently
have
there.
So
that's
why
we
need
some
clarifications
here
and
there
there,
okay,
when
moving
on
logs.
D
Yeah
the
focus
of
the
group
currently
still
to
try
to
get
to
the
data
model
to
feature
freeze,
we're
getting
very
close,
three
issues
remaining
and
all
of
them
are,
I
think,
fairly
far
along
where
we,
at
least
within
the
group.
We
have
consensus.
I
think
we're
just
waiting
on
a
few
more
details
and
approvals,
but
hopefully
we
can
propose
that
the
data
model
is
future
freeze
this
month
still
and
yeah.
So
that's
where
we're
at.
A
E
B
E
D
E
Yeah
we,
my
our
maintainers
meeting,
is
great
because
it's
5
30
a.m,
for
one
of
them
and
10
30
p.m,
for
one
of
them.
So
it's
it's!
We're
truly
global
here
at
open,
telemetry.
F
Okay,
moving
on
java
so,
as
stated
here,
we're
getting
ready
for
we're
going
to
do
some
release
candidates
for
1.10,
because
this
is
our
our
goal
for
1.10-
is
to
have
a
stable,
metrics
api
and
we
need
to
go
through
several
cycles,
including
some
deprecations
of
some
things.
We
need
to
remove
so
we'll
probably
end
up
with,
I
guess,
as
two
release
candidates
before
the
final
release,
which
we're
hoping
to
do
in
january.
E
F
B
Really
just
what
it
says
there
we're
still
focusing
on
metrics,
api
and
sdk.
The
api
is
almost
done,
I
would
say,
assuming
nothing
comes
up
while
we're
implementing
the
sdk
and
the
sdk
is
is
moving
along.
Well,
we
took
the
lead
sort
of
from
python
and
decided
to
write
a
like
an
architecture
document,
because
some
people
are
having
trouble
reviewing
the
prs.
So
that
was
what
we
were
working
on
sort
of
at
the
end
of
last
week
and
now
we're
implementing
based
on
based
on
that.
G
A
Nice,
thank
you
so
much
for
that
net,
no
updates,
it
seems,
go
likewise
c,
plus
plus.
Please.
H
Yeah,
so
matrix
is
more
into
the
focus
right
now
matrix
api.
We
did
have
alpha
release
in
the
last
week.
Release
1.1.2
release
and
sdk.
Work
is
happening,
moreover,
slow
and
steady,
so
they're
looking
for
more
contributors,
specifically
for
the
metrics
work,
so
yeah,
that's
something
which
you're
continually
looking
for
that.
You.
A
Thank
you
so
much
for
that.
Okay,
ruby,
swift,
collector
ross
erlang,
oh
sorry,
rust
those
ones,
no
major
updates,
erlang
tristan
or
somebody
from
there
like
to
see
us
that
their
like
c
is
here.
Yeah.
I
So
we're
just
moving
forward
still
with
the
the
review
for
1.0,
things
are
progressing.
Getting
close,
I
think.
A
Sounds
very
good.
Thank
you
for
that.
Okay,
that's
it!
There
are
no
items
in
the
agenda.
Maybe
it's
just
december.
You
know,
and
everybody's
slowing
down
anything
to
comment
or
anything
to
discuss.