►
From YouTube: 2022-05-19 meeting
Description
cncf-opentelemetry@cncf.io's Personal Meeting Room
B
B
C
C
So
I
got
a
bunch
of
feedback
on
my
docs
so
far.
D
B
Well,
it's
like
phillip
and
severan
are
out
for
kubecon,
let's
see
if
the
patrice
joins,
but
we
might
just
call
them.
A
B
D
B
Today,
my
flight
is
at
like
5
30.
C
B
D
C
D
E
C
Yeah,
you
met
the
trees,
just
through
slack.
I
think
okay.
C
Yeah
I
can,
I
can
see
the
your
your
screen,
vibrating,
balancing
it's
extremely
amusing
vlogs.
E
B
A
B
Yeah
because
there
was
starting
to
be
enough
people
on
that,
we
kept
dropping
topics,
but
this
one
I
think,
since
there
is
a
large
amount
of
people
in
cuba,
we
can
try
to
keep
it
brief.
But,
okay,
I
want
to
make
sure
you
two
mad
and
via
zoom
at
least.
D
B
B
B
Because
I
think
the
idea
is,
we
want
to
be
able
like
if
we
pull
something
like
the
new
relic
changes,
for
instance
and
it'd,
be
good
to
say
like
to
have
a
pointer.
That's
like
hey.
This
is
where
we
reference
this
from.
But
since
the
goal
of
this
is
to
have
all
that
conceptual
stuff
consolidate
into
this
page,
we
don't
want
to
actually
link
it
through
html,
because
then
we'd
be
creating
dead
links
for
ourselves.
So.
C
Yeah
like
right
now,
in
some
cases
I'm
pulling
some
stuff
verbatim
from
other
blog
posts
from
various
vendors,
but
in
other
cases
like
I'm
rewarding
it,
but
I
still
want
to
you
know
reference
the
work
in
some
manner
because,
obviously,
like
someone's
done
the
leg
work
and
who
hates
to
not
be
attributed
right
so
right
now
I've
just
got
a
references.
Md
page,
it's
just
it
doesn't
show
it
just
lists
the
articles
that
I've
I've
used
for
the
content,
but
it
doesn't
like
say,
hey.
E
What
comes
to
mind
for
me
would
have
been,
I
might
have
preferred,
having
per
page
to
say,
content
for
this
page
was
developed
or
or
inspired
by
or
copied
from
such
and
such
a
link,
but
I
that
that
may
be
too
much
work
and
and
as
austin
is
pointing
out.
Eventually,
we
won't
want
links
to
I'm
assuming
in
some
cases,
pages
may
disappear,
or
maybe
links
back
to
the
hotel
website
is
that
the
goal.
B
B
B
I
mean
we
could
maybe
put
a
page
somewhere
in
the
docs
hierarchy.
That's
like
like
a
special
thanks
or
like
a
you
know,
attributions
page
or
just
like
yep.
Some
of
those
links
eventually.
C
B
E
Things
as
they
are
in
the
sense
that
adriana
you've
collected
references
into
one
reference
page
and-
and
we
can
just
add-
I
don't
remember
if
it's
only
the
references
or
if
there's
text
there
to
say
you
know,
for
example,
what
you
were
suggesting
austin
that
we
we
thank
or
you
know
we
attribute
some
content.
E
Possibly
we
work
to
these
references
and,
as
you
mentioned,
if
links
eventually
wrought,
we
can
just
pull
out
the
links
and
this
the
references
stay
there
and
that
can
just
grow
over
time,
and
I
agree
with
you
it
could.
It
could
live
in
the
repo.
Only
what
I
like
about
having
it
on
the
website.
Well,
maybe
it's.
It's
has
a
bit
more
weight
in
terms
of
attribution,
but
also
we
have
the
tooling
to
you
know,
link
check,
link,
checking
which
is
already
there
that
can
help
help
us
know
when
links
rot.
B
Okay,
so
let's
figure
that
out
then
adriana.
Can
you
make
an
issue
or
or
even
just
like
put
that
in
your
pr
just
a
new
page
somewhere
in
the
docs
hierarchy?
That's
like
special
thanks
or
like
references
or
you
know,
whatever
you
want
to
call
it.
E
Search,
I'm
I'm
still
working
on
that
pretty
much
every
day
track
down
different
leads
so
far
today
have
reached
a
dead
end.
Well,
actually,
as
of
the
end
of
day
yesterday,
so
my
next
step
is
likely.
B
E
So
grpc
uses
google's
search.
Ncdio,
don't
remember,
I
just
want
to
say
that
doxie
just
updated
to
the
latest
version
of
algolia,
and
I
don't
like
the
new
version
and
there's
lunar
there's
support
for
lunar,
which
is
simpler
and
you
might
like,
but
it
is.
Is
it
because
you
feel
there's
a
sense
of
urgency.
Otherwise
I
mean
this.
This
is
one
of
the
main
items
I'm
working
on.
B
B
At
some
point
in
the
future,
like
they're,
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
migrate-
like-
I
don't
know
if
it's
actually
possible,
given
how
much
stuff
is
in
the
lightstep
g
suite,
but
you
know
we
did
get
acquired
by
servicenow
and
they
are
a
microsoft
shop.
So
there's
kind
of
this
hanging
question
of
like
well.
What
do
we
do
about
all
this
stuff?
B
B
E
C
E
Down
that
account-
and
that
will
inform
me
in
terms
of
possibly
moving
forward
with,
as
you
mentioned
as
the
ncf
or
it's
looking
like
it
might
be,
a
linux
foundation,
level
account
and-
and
so
that's
that's
still,
one
of
the
top
items
I'm
working
on
and,
as
I
had
asked
before,
if
you're
not
feeling
that
there's
some
urgency
there,
let's
keep
the
status
quo
and
I'll
keep
on
exploring
creating,
potentially
a
new
account.
Now
that
you're
clarifying,
that's
your
preference.
E
If
that
doesn't
work
within
a
couple
of
weeks,
then
we'll
switch
to
lunar.
Okay,
that's
fine!.
B
It's
I
would
say
other
than
I
mean
from
my
perspective.
My
priorities
right
now
is
try.
C
B
Get
I'm
trying
to.
I
want
to
get
phil
up
and
eventually
adriana
in
as
like
approvers
and
maintainers,
and
try
to
make
sure
there's
nothing
attached
to,
like
my
light
step
identity
just
to
I'm
trying
to
make
sure
that
this
is
sustainable.
A
B
C
I
have
another
pr
pending
that
hasn't
been
merged,
and
then
this
one
okay.
B
Yeah,
I
think
it's
two
pr's
there's
in
the
com
I'll
show
you
the
link
after
this,
but
there's
like
a
minimum
amount
of
like
you
know,
prs
and
issues
or
whatever
that
you
have
to
put
in
first
before
you
get
the
organ
once
you're
in
the
org.
B
C
So
I
just
had
one
question
about
the
the
pr
for
the
comms
like
for
the
hotel
site.
I
I'm
gonna
make
probably
like
a
couple
more
tweaks
today,
but
I'm
thinking
like
I
would
like
to
change
it
from
a
draft
pr
to
like
a
proper
pr
and
merge
in
the
changes
asap.
I'm
just
wondering
if,
like
what
people
feel
about
that.
B
C
E
B
It
over
from
draft
now
just
to
get
a
check,
build
and
everything
so
because
sometimes
things
fall
out
of
you
know
the
link
checker
or
how
it
looks
when
it's
built
and
then
yeah
once
you
know
you
get
the
changes
done.
You
know
it's
like.
E
Severn
had
a
question
in
terms
of
possible,
I'm
just
going
to
say
it.
This
way,
duplication
overlap
in
terms
of
topics
that
are
covered.
E
I
haven't
gone
back
to
how
you
or
if
you
have
addressed
it
yet,
but
is
this
something
that
you've
been
doing
in
terms
of
rereading?
I
think
all
of
your
changes
are
under
con
concepts
right.
C
Yeah,
I
I
have
like
updated
a
couple
of
a
couple
pages
so
like,
for
example,
I
introduced.
So
I
introduced
a
like
an
advanced
concepts
page
that
does
like
the
detailed
definition
of
like
spans
and
traces
as
they
pertain
to
hotel.
C
So
what
I've
done
is
I've
stripped
everything
from
the
data
sources
page
and
just
listed
the
data
sources
and
then
point
people
to
the
advanced
hotel
concepts
page
and
then
there's
like
so
there's
I'd,
say
like
enhanced
content
around
traces
and
spans
plus
I've
expanded
on
baggage,
because
there
was
like
a
really
good
blog
post
from
honeycomb
on
baggage,
for
example,
that
I
thought
did
a
much
better
job
of
explaining
it
and
then
I
want
to
see
if
I
can
tweak
logs
and
metrics
as
well,
so
that
was
okay.
C
I
think
that
was
one
main
area
where
there
was
duplication
and
then
I
just
want
to
clean
up
the
glossary
page
a
bit
as
well.
That
was
going
to
be
my
next
comment.
Yeah
I
started
I
started
doing
that.
I
don't
like
how
it's
organized,
and
I
want
to
make
like
every
term
like
a
linkable
item,
yeah
so
doing.
E
E
No
no
well
right
now.
The
problem
is
that
the
glossary
is
just
a
regular
page.
It's
not
a
template
and
the
entries
are
items
in
a
bulleted
list
and
therefore
not
directly
linkable.
Unless
you
manually
insert
an
anchor
and
even
then
it
linking
jumping
into
the
page
doesn't
bring
you
to
the
to
the
right
spot.
E
So
I
guess
adriana
has
been
bold
in
team
to
to
tackle
that
and
thank
you,
but
again,
if,
if
you
feel
like
that.
E
Be
a
project,
it's
a
good
project
adriana.
I
I
want
you
to
feel
comfortable
in
in
keeping
your
focus,
because
what
you're
doing
is
essential
and
for
example,
it's
not
something
I
could
do
but
putzing
around
with
templates
and
formatting,
and
things
like
that
is
something
which
I'm
very
glad
to
do
so
feel
free
to
not
do
that.
Full
conversion
for
the
glossary
and
just
clean
up
topics
if
you're
having
fun
and
you
want
to
do
both
at
the
same
time.
That's
that's
okay,
too.
So,
just
just
let
me
know.
C
Okay,
yeah
I'll
do
probably
just
an
initial
swipe,
I'm
still
getting
familiar
with
with
all
the
nuances,
so
getting
there
getting
there.
Okay,
I
might
hit
you
up
for
some
help
on
templating
and
whatnot.
Okay,.