►
From YouTube: 2020-11-05 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
C
We
have
we're
going
to
dedicate
this
session
30-minute
session
towards
continuing
our
issue.
Scrubs,
I
think,
cleared
out
like
20.
Some
out
of
140
yesterday
closed,
maybe
two,
maybe
three
issues
so
chip
away.
We
chip
away.
C
There
was
one
one
item
that
we
talked
about
tigran
just
after
you
left,
which
was
do.
We
need
a
backlog,
milestone.
D
C
C
Think
so,
okay
in
the
spec
state,
I've
used
the
release
label
as
either
required
for
ga
allow
for
ga
or
after
ga,
and
it's
got
one
of
those.
But
we
can.
D
C
Okay,
so
I'll
move
to
remove
the
backlog
milestone
after
this
meeting
myself
all
right,
so
we
are
going
to
triage
the
remaining
there's
like
five
issues,
that's
labeled
bugs,
and
then
we
can
start
at
the
top
of
the
list
for
newly
open
issues.
I
concentrate
on
the
bugs
one,
because
if
a
user
is
filing
a
bug
and
they
care
about
something
being
fixed,
I
think
these
ought
to
be
looked
at
first.
So
we
start
here.
D
D
D
D
Let's
say
p2,
maybe
because
I
think
we
have
a
p1
for
the
summary
separately.
D
C
Pete
does
not
peter
deal
breaker,
okay,
spec
label.
That
would
be
appropriate.
G
Okay,
y'all
think
we
should
like
try
and
put
out
a
call
for
a
dedicated
prometheus
owner,
because
it
seems
like
there's
a
lot
of
people
more
interested
in
prometheus
than
we'll
ever
be
right.
We're
I
see
this
unlikely
to
dedicate
the
time
to
work
on
all
these
issues,
so
I
feel
like
we
get
a
dedicated
person.
That's
has
a
more
vested
interest
in
prometheus
than
the
better.
F
We
have
the
aws
people,
hopefully
they
will
fix
this.
But
let's
see.
D
One
this
is
for
grpc
for
http.
We,
we
already
have
the
fixed
right,
so
this
is
probably
what
we
have
to
see.
H
D
D
C
This
is
our
first
p1
we've
been
like
p2s
across
the
board.
Should
we
sign
this.
C
I
agree
like
usually,
if
it's
crash,
how
does
the
user
recover
from
it
right?
It's
like
it's
just
it's
dead
in
the
water.
What
I
meant
was
should
we
make
sure
that
this
has
progress
by
assigning
it
to
somebody,
because
it's
a
p1.
A
C
Thank
you
that
one
was
one
one,
two
one
all
right,
two
more
on
this
list.
D
C
D
D
D
B
D
B
D
C
C
F
D
Yeah,
we
can
do
that
if
you
want
the,
I
can
open
the
list
of
assignees
and
of
list
of
code
owners
and
tell
you,
while
you're
doing
the
priority
assignment.
D
C
All
right,
sorry,
you
guys
sound
muffled
to
me.
I
don't
know
whether
it's
my
headphones
or
what
but
like.
I
have
to
think
hard
on
the
words
you
say.
D
I
can
hear
bogdan
just
fine,
I
don't
know-
and
here
I
can
hear
you
too
just
fine.
I
don't
know.
D
I
Anyway,
doesn't
matter
I
will
I
will.
I
will
update
the
issue.
E
D
I
Is
the
one
make
code
generator
class
circuit
ci?
So
if
you
go
here.
C
D
I
D
D
D
D
This
is
p
2,
I
think
and
assigned
to
them,
is
mentioned
in
the
in
the
comments
somewhere
here.
D
D
Okay,
okay,
this
one
we
tried
to
reproduce.
Couldn't
I
will
make
this
p3
and
keep
an
eye
on
it
and
maybe
close
after
a
while.
It
doesn't
happen
again
p3.
This
is
metrics.
D
C
D
Yes,
I
would
say
same
here:
okay,.
C
J
D
Think
no.
J
D
Yeah
p3
is
fine.
That's
fine.
E
D
You
still
seen
it
all
right:
okay,
it
happened
twice
so
make
it
p2-
and
this
is
this-
is
ryan
right
right.
This.
D
A
F
D
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
D
Yes,
it's
then
said
that
they
had
a.
D
D
Oh
he's
not
a
member
okay,
we
can't
assign
to
him,
assign
this
to
me
and
I
will
reassign.
I
will
take
care
of
it.
This
is
okay.
I've
never
seen
that
happening.
Okay,
make
it
p3,
and
this
is
your
timestamps.
B
C
I
F
F
I
think
it
this
was
the
problem
that
was
not
enabled.
C
J
D
D
Is
yeah
this
should
be
assigned
to
one
of
the
elastic
guys.
It's
either
axw.
D
This
is
crazy
plastic.
Those
traces
right.
D
D
I
D
D
Let's
assign
to
ois
o
w
a
I
yes
I'd,
say
p3.
Maybe
it
seems
like
a
rare
edge
case,
and
this
applies
to
to
everything
racist,
no.
E
J
D
F
B
I
D
F
D
D
Okay,
stackdriver
it's
james
or.
D
A
Three
can
down
a
little
bit.
I
think
the
user
said.
I
It
generates
cost
or
bills
for
them
because
they
are
send
us
custom
metrics.
But
it's
expected
to
be
that,
but
anyway,
I'm
not.
I
don't
want
to
deal
with.
A
I
mean
it
is
not
a
problem,
because
the
second
user
here
said
that
it
is
configurable
and
and
then
it's
just
a
matter
of
changing
the
readme
file
and
then
the
readme
file
was
changed.
Okay,
so
we
can
close
this.
As
I
understand
yeah
I
mean
I
don't
think
it's
a
problem,
perhaps
yeah
close
and
leave
a
message
that
if
it
is,
if
the
problem
is
not
fixed,
then
feel
free
feel
free
to
reopen
I'll.
C
A
D
A
A
A
Yeah,
okay,
I
think
before
before
ga
we
actually,
we
really
need
a
solution
for
this
problem,
though
so
perhaps
bump
the
priority
for
for
the
link
yeah
for
this
one.
This
is
not
really
a
feature
request.
It's
bug,
in
my
view.
A
A
Priority
p1p2:
I
think
it
depends
on
how
we
expect
people
to
consume
those
modules
separately.
From
my
perspective,
it
has
to
be
done
for
ga.
We
have
to
to
make
sure
that
the
modules
are
independently
consumable,
but
I
think
then,
now
it's
up
to
maintainers.
A
Yeah,
so
the
problem
here
is
that
modules
in
the
contrib
are
not.
Some
modules
are
not
able
to
be
consumed
independently,
and
I
think
it
is
now
the
priority
for
this
one
depends
on
whether
we
expect
people
to
consume
those
modules
independently.
A
If
we
do
expect
them
to
be
consumed
independently,
then
say
high
priority,
and
it
should
be
done
for
ga.
I
A
I
D
E
E
C
On
twitter,
see,
you
guys
see.