►
From YouTube: 2022-03-09 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
How
are
you
I'm
good
right,
nice
call
today.
B
B
C
B
I
don't
know
if
you
all
have
this
or
not
I'm
assuming
that
you
do
do
you
have
something
similar
to
there's
an
an
app
we
have
in
america
called
drizzly
where
you
can
deliver.
You
can
courier
alcohol
to
other
people.
C
C
Compliments
stuff
like
this,
I
don't
know
which
ones
you
have
do.
You
have
delivery
and.
B
Oh
yeah
sure
I'll
I'll
add
that
to
the
channel.
Now
that's
a
good
idea
thanks.
Everyone,
sorry
for
watching
no.
C
C
So
yeah
we
let's
just
wait
two
more
minutes
and
see.
B
C
E
E
Sorry
do
your
drinks
here!
Oh
yes,
I
do
yes,
but
I
don't
want
to
make
up
too
much
because
I'm
actually
gonna
go
back
to
bed.
B
Every
time
I
hear
your
voice
now,
bruh,
I
think
of-
are
you
familiar
with
the
australian
new
zealand
tv
child's
tv
show
bluey.
E
Because
I
see
lots
of
children
walk
around
with
bluey
on
a
t-shirt,
but
I've
never
seen
it.
E
C
E
E
To
make
yes,
yes,
bob
feel
free
to
tell
your
daughter
that
I'll
say
hello
to
bluey
for
her.
D
B
It's
very
it's
it's
kind
of
interesting,
because
each
of
the
shows
are
seven
minutes
long,
which
is
unusual
for
a
television
show
but
perfect
for
our
younger
generation's
short
attention
span.
C
E
E
C
B
That's
like
cocoa
melon
is
in
the
same
realm.
Now
it's
an
animated
short
that's!
You
can
never
have
enough,
but
I
think
we
can
stop
talking
about
children's
tv
shows.
I
want
to
give
as
much
time
to
get
back
to
sleep
as
possible,
so
perhaps
we
can
get
discussing
on
our
agenda.
So,
let's
see.
E
B
Have
me
we
have
teemo,
we
have
brett
and
we
have
more
all
right
so
open.
I
don't
think
I
think
we
only
have
one
open
pr,
perhaps
two
event
and
listener
api
and
endpoint
url
and
headers
to
constructors.
Does
anybody
want
to
discuss
either
of
those
the
one
that
was
open
on
january
28th?
I
think
I'm
surprised,
I
think
it
autoclave
or
that
doesn't
get
auto
closed
by
the
bot,
but
we
could
probably
close
this
one
for
now.
Maybe.
C
Days
so
it's
four
weeks,
I
guess,
is
the
threshold,
doesn't
it.
B
C
B
C
B
Yeah
yeah,
it's
a
good,
a
good,
long-standing
one
and.
C
D
D
I
wanted
to
ask
like
so:
do
you
have
any
comments
on
the
overall
high
level
design
like
the
code,
implementation
and
the
classes,
and
I
I
acknowledge,
like
I
have
made
the
changes,
but
you
saw
that
oh
high
level
design.
So
are
there
any
comments
on
that?
Do
you
want
anything
to
be
changed
or
something
no.
C
I
think
that's
that's
all
fine.
We
can
start
with
working
how
you
implement
so
basically,
all
the
stuff
we
quote
unquote
complaint
about
is
just
nitpicky
or
detailed
stuff.
So
I
don't
think
so.
The
general
way
how
you
handle
this,
I
think
it's
a
good
direction.
D
E
Yeah
yeah,
it's
definitely
heading
the
right
directions.
It's
yeah,
yeah,
okay,.
C
And
then
yeah
that
at
least
that's
yeah,
that's
something
we
go
into
this
direction
and
then,
at
the
end
we
can
say
basically
how
it
plays
out.
You
know
if
you
integrate
it
somewhere
or
I
will
actually
try
to
integrate
it
and
the
symphony
stuff
we
have
so,
and
it's
often
it's
easier
to
say
I
have
to
say
to
see
if
something
is
really
the
best
place,
but
I
don't
see,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
way
to
to
go
ahead.
C
Performer
you're
welcome,
okay,
doc.
I
have
some
more
stuff.
B
Oh
okay,
let's
finish
the
agenda
and
then
you
can
complain
all
you
want
timo.
So
the
other
open
discussion
points
we
had
right
now
were
that
uk
has
is
starting
as
our
mentor
for
the
spring.
We're
excited
to
have
her.
We
were
talking
about
work
for
her
to
do
bro.
I
really
like
your
idea
of
checking
the
compliance
matrix
for
things
and
perhaps
making
tests
for
each
of
those
compliance
matrix
things.
I
agree.
C
Yeah
sure
I
could
help
with
setting
up
well
integration
and
maybe
for
some
things
it's
even
would
be
end-to-end
tests
and
that's
still
some
work
in
progress
from
so
I
could
help
her
on
that
front.
Do
you
have
a
anybody?
Has
any
opinions
on
end-to-end
tests
so
otherwise.
C
That's
correct
and
they
can
be
quite
brutal.
So
that's
not
something
we
shouldn't
shouldn't
just
test
everything,
but
at
least
well
have
you
ever
used
a
code
section.
B
C
No,
I
guess
nobody
concept,
conception,
code
section,
has
a
testing
framework
built
around
php
unit
actually,
but
it
offers
stuff
like
acceptance,
test,
behavior,
driven
tests
and
stuff
like
this,
which
are
a
little
bit
more
high
level
oriented.
So
that
would
could
be
something
we
could
look
into.
It
doesn't
mean
I've
used
it
for
quite
some
project
doesn't
mean
what's
happening.
C
Yeah-
and
it
would
just
you
know,
fit
with
a
php
unit
and
it
has
some
you
know
other
stuff
which
makes
actually
user
oriented
user-faced.
It
has
a
little
bit
easier.
That's
basically,
most
of
the
requirements
are
not
so
low
level
in
there
it's
basically
checking.
If
something
exists,
yeah
in
detail,
we
would
have,
I
think,
to
look
into
different
requirements
and
some
are
not
really
clear.
C
The
last
time
I
looked
into
all
these
requirements
on
the
matrix
and
make
sure
it's
requirement,
I'm
not
sure
about
some
of
them,
what
they
actually
mean.
So
I
don't
know
about
you
guys,
but
that's
I
don't
have
any
any
specific.
C
I
could
take
a
look
another
look
into
it,
but
yeah.
I
think
there
were
some
things
which
basically,
those
are
just
some
statements
and
it's
not
really
explained
in
the
matrix
itself,
what
it's
actually
representing
or
what
the
requirements
are
yeah
and,
on
the
other
hand,
a
lot
of
things
in
this
spec
are
not
really.
C
B
B
All
right,
the
other
okay,
the
other
major
open
discussion
topic,
was
kashan,
asked.
C
We
also
had
the
the
website
stuff
so
to
speak,
so
the.
C
But
my
head
is
a
little
bit
empty
today.
C
Yeah
so
since
it
was
taking
over
on
different
projects,
yeah
I'm
a
little
bit.
Maybe
we
should
talk
about
this
somewhere
else,
but
I'm
not
so
happy
with
people
getting
involved
there
when
I
don't
see
them
being
experts.
B
Yeah,
no,
that's
I
totally
understand
and
if
we
feel
like,
we
have
to
remove
any
documentation
because
we're
not
comfortable
with
it
or
we
need
to
change
it
or
we
need
whatever
I'm
totally
fine
with
I'm
totally
fine
with
scrapping
any
documentation
that
we
have,
because
our
library
has
changed
pretty
significantly.
So
that's
completely!
Okay
with
me.
C
C
That's
my
personal
issue,
but
the
point
is
we
cannot
for,
and
you
know
we
cannot
force
or
merge
anything
there.
So
as
we
I'm
still
working
on
doing
all
the
packages,
I
think
we
should
at
least
you
know
forever
read
me
for
all
the
different
parts
of
the
component,
which
actually
just
states
what
it
is,
what
it
is
for
and
something
that
doesn't
mean
we
that
we
don't,
you
know,
need
documentation
on
the
website,
but
I
think
we
also
need
some
documentation
which
is
closer
to
the
code.
Actually,
because
I.
B
Think
I
really,
I
think,
I
think,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
a
reasonable
separation
between
what
should
go
on
the
open
telemetry.io
website,
and
what
should
go
in
our
repository
is,
I
think
we
could
just
have
like
very
generic
documentation
on
the
open
telemetry.
I
o
website
like
how
to
get
started,
how
you
know
how
to
use
the
library
effectively
those
kinds
of
things
and
then
any
like
in-depth
documentation
could
live
in
our
repo.
C
Yeah,
because
from
what
I've
seen
the
other
languages,
don't
have
much
detail
in
there
as
well,
so
some
just
have
all
the
basic
stuff
like
we
have
so
yeah.
That
would
be
good
if
we
have
some
more
detailed
documentation
in
the
future.
B
Yeah
yep,
I
think
that,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
we
should
try
and
make
the
open
telemetry
io
docs
as
impotent
as
possible
and
then
make
the
like
the
stuff
that
needs
to
change
more
frequently
that
live
in
our
repository,
which
is
sort
of
a
stinky
separation.
But
it
is
what
it
is.
C
Well,
I
mean
would
be
easier
if
it
would
still
be
in
our
repository,
but
yeah
that's
how
it
is
and
then
I
have
to
leave
it
otherwise
yeah.
I
just
leave
it
there.
So
and
generally
I'm
not
very
happy
about
this
change
but
yeah,
okay,
we
have
to
live
with
it
now
and
make
the
best
out
of
it.
C
Yeah
it
does
I'm
so
happy
now.
No
I'm
just
kidding.
You
know
me.
Okay,
then
sorry,
I
interrupted
you
with
something
else.
Well,
I
wanted
to
talk
about
something
else.
B
E
Do
a
full
release,
yep
yep,
so.
C
Oh,
you
had
a
different
topic.
I
just
interrupted
you
with
talking
about
the
documentation
yep,
that's
it!
That's.
B
B
Sean
applied
to
be
a
what
did
he
apply
to
be
a
member
and
but
timo,
and
I
both
support
it.
So
I
think
that
that
should
hopefully
that'll
go
through
today,
normally
they're,
pretty
quick
about
those
community
requests.
B
Yeah
he'll
he'll,
I'm
sure
he'll
approve
it
today
or
whatever.
C
B
C
Okay,
I
wanted
to
look
at.
I
wanted
to
complain
a
little
bit
about
some
people,
so,
first
of
all,
we
have
some
assignments.
C
This
title
guy
took
some
stuff
over
so
what's
happening
with,
that
is
he's
still
working
on
that
or
do
you
know
anything
about
this
plato,
b3,
propagator
and
well,
I'm
still
working
on
this
I've
some
other
stuff
to
do
so.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
this
is
still
there
separate
composer
packages,
because
I
will
very
much
work
on
this.
E
C
This
one
propagator
yeah,
I
start
with
this,
but
actually
I
could
maybe
somebody
and
it's
not
so
super
complicated.
To
be
honest
and
I
did
most
of
the
research
work
I
will
actually
later
maybe
just
uninsign
it
from
and
add
some
information.
C
C
C
Yeah,
I
just
didn't
because
I
actually
started
to
work
on
it,
but
yeah
I've,
some
so
much
other
things
in
my
list
so
and
it's
actually
not
that
super
complicated.
If
you
just
follow
how
the
other
propagators
were
and
the
protocol
is
quite
easy,
it's
simple,
not
easy,
simple
another
one:
oh
yeah
brett
did
you
ever
make
any
progress
with
this
contributor
onboarding
or
do
you
use.
C
Okay
dog
anything
yeah,
then
maybe
we
can
find
some
some
dates
this
week
to
actually
talk
about
the
configuration.
C
C
First
of
all,
we
haven't
been
sure
on
how
to
actually
implement
this
the
best
way-
and
the
other
point
was
that
actually
there
was
a
configuration
planned
for
in
the
specification
in
the
spec,
but
that
didn't
really
took
off
yet,
or
at
least
not
I'm.
Actually,
I'm
subscribed
to
all
the
configurations.
So
I
get
50
emails
every
day
and
I
didn't
see
anything.
C
C
Its
configuration
there
might
not
be
the
one
we
want
to
use
for
the
sdk,
but
that
I
had
to
solve
this
issue
there.
Otherwise,
that's
the
main
point
of
this
bundle
so
yeah.
So
we
wanted
to
pick
it
up
and
maybe
brainstorm
about
what
could?
What
couldn't
we
do
and
some
some
ideas
so
correct?
Am
I
putting
this
correctly?
Yes,
and
we
actually
wanted
to.
C
You
know,
agree
on
some
date
where
we
can
just
call
and
brainstorm
a
little
bit
look
at
some
pros
and
cons,
and
because
it's
not
a
I've,
seen
that
from
implementing
this
stuff
and
symphony
for
something
it's
not
an
easy
task,
and
it's
better.
I
think
if
two
people
look
into
it
so
yeah
to
have
some
better
ideas
and
some
opinions
about
it
and
not
not
being
just
simple,
and
you
know
what
I
am
discussing
that
in
pr
or
something
is
just
too
tedious
got
it.
C
C
C
We'll
take
a
look
at
some
stuff
in
the
sdk
bundle
which
I'm
very
happy
about
so
at
the
documentation,
because
at
the
moment
I'm
the
only
one
working
on
this
stuff
or
actually
be
able
to
work
on
this.
So
you
actually
wanted
to
work.
First,
ask
me
if
you
can
design
the
environment
the
lesson
task
to
make
sure
environment
variables
work
in
the
sdk
bundle,
but
that
looks
very,
I
told
him
it
looks
simple,
but
it's
super
tricky
because
the
configuration
and
the
dependency
injection
and
symphony
it
basically
gets
compiled.
C
C
C
Okay,
let
me
have
a
look.
If
I
have
some.
C
I
don't
know,
there's
still
some
things
on
my
bucket
list,
but
I
don't
want
to
repeat
them
every
week
to
not
bore
you
yeah.
Otherwise,
I'm
still
I'm
overhauling
or
rework
the
symphony,
the
bundle
and
the
demo
a
little
bit,
but
it's
getting
a
little
slow
because
I'm
I'm
busy
with
all
the
interview
stuff
and
some
other
things
and
it's
kind
of
it's
a
little
bit
tedious,
because
I
have
to
have
three
repositories
open.
C
You
know
the
one
for
the
example
and
then
sometimes
I
have
to
make
changes
in
the
sdk
model,
which
has
a
dependency
on
on
or
our
sdk.
So
that's
sometimes
a
lot
of
things.
You
know
I
have
to
make
one
change
there
and
take
a
look,
how
it
works
on
the
bundle
and
then
or
take
a
look
at
the
basically
the
sdk.
So
it's
a
little
bit
slowly
moving,
but
I'm
getting
there
so
and
fixing
some
of
this
and
stuff
in
the
process.
C
E
C
Oh,
I
already
mentioned
fantastic
yeah.
He
fixed
the
problems
with,
I
think,
was.
C
E
D
C
Do
you
mean
to
be
a
member.
E
Okay,
no,
it's
not
a
number,
it's
just
about
what
we
you
know
whether
we
think
that
you're
doing
a
good
job
at
you
know
demonstrating
skill
or
capability
at
reviewing,
and
this
is
to
become
a
sorry,
not
a
not
a
maintainer,
but
an
approver
was
that
right,
kumar.
B
C
Yes,
I
don't
think
there's
a
hard
requirement
and
it
basically
is
not
a.
There
are
no
obligations
connected
with
it.
As
far
as
I
think
right,
bob.
C
So
we
don't
know,
basically
we
are
the
ones
who
can
approve
it
and
it's
up
to
the
technical
team
or
whoever
does
actually
the
invite
if
they
yeah
so,
but
I've
had
a
look
into
some
some
of
the
applications
so
to
speak.
B
I
think
the
the
like
the
overarching
bit
is
like
we
have
a
vested
interest
in
having
more
maintainers
and
contributors
and
as
long
as
you're
actively
contributing,
and
we
feel
your
impact,
we're
probably
going
to
say
yes
to
you,
it's
just
we
you
know.
Yet
we
have
to
follow
the
process
given
to
us
by
the
cncf
to
accept
people.
C
Yes,
but
being
a
member
just
first
doesn't
include
anything.
So
if
you
just
want
to
have
a
fancy
batch
on
your
profile,
then
that's
okay.
For
my
my
site,
I
mean.
B
C
C
Well,
I
could,
but
I
know
I
have
worked.
I've
worked
in
mail
services
as
well,
so
I
don't
complain
about
something
happening
and
people
always
think
mail
service
is
an
easy
thing,
because
it's
around
150
but
actually
15
years
over
15
years.
I
know
it's
not
it's.
A
C
Anything
else
we
have
to
talk
about.
Let
me
think,
because
often
I
just
forget
things
and
then
the
army-
and
you
have
to
should
have
talked
about
that.
No,
no,
no!
No!
No,
then
just
we
guys
make
sure
we
find
sometimes
time
slot
to
have
a
you
know,
a
call
with
yupty.
C
B
A
C
B
We
will
look
at
everybody
on
the
internet.