►
From YouTube: 2021-11-11 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
See
yeah
right
now.
What
I'm
working
on
is
I'm
doing
some
testing
of
our
our
apm
server,
our
collector,
for
they
they
are
adding
tail-based
sampling
and
I'm
running
tests
on
that.
I
did
just
update
our
sdk
to
the
latest
version,
the
1.10
of
the
swift
sdk.
So
that's
good,
but
it's
been,
I
haven't,
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
mobile
or
ios
recently.
B
Okay,
these
are
good.
Did
you
find
some
nasty
bug.
B
Again,
because
yeah,
I
I
put
a
point
to
explain
that
later
in
the
meeting
just
to
give
some
touches,
just
if
your
issues
were
related
to
that
I
know
there
are
some
limitations
that
still
won't
work
as
we
would
like
to
but
yeah.
B
So
and
also
did
you
see
an
issue
yeah,
I
don't
think
you
saw
that
right,
something
about
the
elastic
in
the
image
have
issue.
I
tried
to
mention
you.
That's.
B
Two
days
ago
I
created-
I
don't
know
if
I
put
your
name
in
the
topic
with
the
ad
before
the
name.
A
B
Yeah,
I
don't
I
don't
know
what
what's
the
sorry
was
the
logic
there
in
the
back
in
your
back
end
or
in
your
server
so
yeah
I
mean
I
created
here
the
mention
I
I
thought
you
will
receive
an
email.
A
B
Okay,
yeah
and
sherlock
has
been
adding
a
pair
of
pull
requests
with
the
attribute
things
so
yeah,
some
interesting
stuff
that
we
were
missing
about
the
making
the
attributes
more
consistent
and
that
stuff
so
yeah
that
I
approved
for
them
recently.
B
But,
okay,
let's
go
with
the
with
it
agenda.
If
you
have
any
topic
there,
if
you
want
to
add
anything,
if
not,
we
can
end
as
soon
as
everything
is
stopped
and
you
can
continue
your
work.
My
day
is
ending,
so
I
don't
have
a
rush
or
meetings
or
anything
like
that.
B
So
probably
you
are
now
more
with
more
things
on
in
your
mind,
so
last
meeting
actions
we
had
the
compatibility
plan
approved.
So
we
talked
about
some
interesting
pr's
that
we
changed
and
we
released
the
version
1.1.0
that
you
are
just
now
testing
rice,
any
issue
that
you
are
finding
that
we
can
help
you
with.
D
B
Yeah,
it
sounds
strange
if
I
say
it's
surprising,
but
no
I
I
I
mean
it's
it's
working
quite
well
for
my
project.
For
example,
it's
working
that
really
well
in
the
things
I
am
using,
but
maybe
some
exporter
or
something
that
it's
not
in
my
usual
tooling.
Maybe
that
can
have
problems
but.
A
B
That's
not
very
much
tested
so
yeah,
so,
okay,
so
that's
all
for
we.
We
didn't
have
more
actions.
Last
week
today,
just
to
talk,
I
would
say,
starting
yesterday
and
today
I
have
been
working
on
the
automatic
context.
Handling
for
the
new
async
await
libraries,
because
apple
is
releasing
bug.
14
is
back
14.
B
This
changes
to
ios
13,
an
app
with
a
new
xcode
13,
xcode
13.2
beta,
so
that's
probably
coming
soon,
and
some
of
our
users
will
probably
aren't,
will
probably
be
interested
in
adding,
I
think,
away
to
all
the
frameworks
out
there.
B
We
might
think
about
supporting
that
in
our
library
and
having
a
sync
await
methods
that
we
have
talked
previously.
That
probably
exporting
is
something
that
will
work
perfect
with
async
await,
because
we
can
check
asynchronous
the
the
status
and
that
stuff,
but
yeah
so
yeah.
I
have
been
thinking
a
bit
about
increasing
our
library
to
support
us
in
kawaii,
but
that
can
be
a
hard
task
so
still
not
but
yeah.
B
Just
if
you
are
interested
or
something
like
that,
maybe
we
can
try
to
add
something
there,
but
I
have
been
working
mainly
on
the
yeah
and
the
automatic
context
handling
inside
async
await.
You
know
that
it
doesn't
work.
The
previous
approach
we
had
with
activity
yeah.
A
B
I
implemented
a
way
to
use
the
task:
local
infrastructure,
that
comes
with
a
new
concurrency
but,
as
I
said
what
I
implemented,
it
was
working
on
the
simple
stuff,
but
now
thinking
more
about
that,
I
have
seen
that
it
could
fail
in
some
situations.
For
example,
if
you
have
a
some
how
to
say
some
assings
inside
another
things
it
could,
it
was
failing
to
recover
the
parent
expander,
the
parent
context,
because
it
was
removing
that.
B
So
I
have
been
adding
tests
and
modifying
the
code
of
that
so
working
on
that
to
have
better
support
for
more
cases,
and
the
anna
also
have
been
testing
that
we
cannot
remove
the
activity
thing,
even
if
the
task
local
works,
because,
for
example,
you
have
the
async
cues
code
that
work
as
synchronous.
B
It's
not
integrated
with
the
task
local
either.
So
the
test
lock
is
not
copied
when
you
run,
for
example,
let
me
show.
B
C
B
It
uses
some
infrastructure,
I
mean
it
uses
it,
probably
a
grand
central
dispatch
queues
in
its
own
way,
but
it's
not
integrated
with
your
grand
central
dispatch
queues,
for
example.
So
that
can
be
a
quite
problematic.
So
let
me
share,
for
example,
xcode
yeah,
I'm
working
with
a
beta
now,
so
one
of
the
tests
I
was
doing,
I
don't
know:
if
yeah
is
this
one,
it
creates
a
span,
sets
the
current
context,
value
on
the
span
and
it
checks
that
it's
being
set
correctly
and
creates
another
asynchronous
span
in
this
async
method.
B
So
it
works
asynchronously
until
you
call
a
wait
here.
It's
calling
away
directly
so
just
because
I
want
to
check
that
it's
working
as
expected.
So
the
the
point
here
is
that
this
one
is
correct,
but
when
you
start
at
another
span-
and
you
end
that
span
here-
it
also-
I
mean
it's
just
creating
the
span
and
ending
it,
and
when
you
end
it
here,
this
one
was
falling.
It
was
not
reporting
the
parent
span
here,
but
it
was
removing
also
that
so
you
have
two
spans
in
an
asynchronous.
B
It
was
been
removed.
So
was
working
on
supporting
this.
That
now
is
working,
and
now
I
want
to
work
in
another
in.
I
need
how
to
say
in
a
a
weight
of
a
weight
of
a
weight
methods,
so
just
to
check
that
we
are
not
losing
there,
because
this
one
just
what
this
one
level
with
two
expands
inside
the
async
method,
was
failing.
B
So
just
working
on
that
to
have
support.
I
don't
know
if
I
will
find
a
solution
for
everything,
because,
as
you
know,
it's
not
a
standard
support.
We
are
using
some
internal
methods
here,
for
example,
now
using
a
queue,
so
we
can
put
some
pop
from
the
queue
for
its
start,
local.
That
should
be
that
this
is
the
value
that
will
be
copied
with
all
the
a
I
think,
a
weight
that
happens
in
inside.
It's
task
created
there,
but
yeah.
Let's
see
if
that
that
works.
B
This
one
is
nice,
but
I
am
waiting
for
this
remove
in
the
parent
and
it's
a
bit
convoluted,
but
the
thing
is
I
I
set
a
current
baggage,
I
create
another
queue
and
in
that
queue
I
check
that
I
always
have
the
same
parent
baggage,
so
the
baggage
is
transmitted
the
same
as
will
happen
with
a
span
context.
So
this
is
the
the
same
logic.
But
the
point
is
that
if
I
remove
the
activity
stuff
this
that
runs
after
this
remove
context
fails.
D
B
B
If
I
have
explained
correctly
or
things
like
that,
but
try
to
so
what
what
was
failing
with
the
previous
task-
local
contest
manager,
that
was
the
one
using
the
task-
local
stuff
and
the
concurrency,
and
why
we
cannot
only
use
this
for
some
other
stuff,
because
we
failed,
as
as
shown
in
this
example,
I
tried
removing
it,
and
I
was
seeing
that
it
was
been
a
common
task,
local
for
everything.
So
that
was
not
what
I
what
I
was
expecting
so
yeah.
B
So
we
need
both
and
we
need
both
to
work
well
together
that
it
looks
a
bit
more
convoluted
and
difficult,
but
yeah.
I
think
we
at
least
will
try
to
solve
the
most
common
ways.
B
And
they
will
find
some
corner
cases.
I
have
still
not
found
it,
but.
A
A
I'd
be
interested
in
poking
around
at
it
a
little
bit,
which
is.
B
Good,
I
mean
it's
more,
I
mean
the
task
local
contest
manager,
the
current
version
yeah,
but
it
only
works
with.
If
you
are
using,
I
I
mean
the
new
xcode
132
yeah
includes
swift,
552,
okay
and
that's
the
version
that
supports
ios,
ios,
13
and
mac
os
1015,
the
other
one
I
have.
B
B
So
this
is
the
only
way
I
want
to
be
able
to
support
in
both
the
current
code
works
like
this,
so
you
are
using
monterrey
in
your
mac,
for
example,
you
could
use
this
code
and
you
will
find
the
same
issues
that
I
am
finding
with
with
yeah
this
test.
I
can
create
a
branch
and
upload
there,
so
we
can
the
only
problem
with
branches
is,
I
can
create
a
branch,
but
I
cannot
update
the
branch
once
is
uploaded
to
the
project,
because
the
policy
for
branches
in
the
official
project
is.
B
That
you
cannot
modify
them
once
update
updated,
so
I
can
also
I
can
create
a
branch
in
my
in
my
fork,
my
personal
form
that
the
one
I
use
for
development
and
you
can
take
the
from
there
if
you
want.
B
C
C
A
D
B
B
Yeah
these
are
the
api
tests.
Yeah,
yes,
using
the
test,
local
context
manager,
not
creating
automatic,
is
not
a
spam
builder
or
anything
like
that,
because
in
the
api,
the
spam
builder
is
very
limited
and
the
tracer
is
also
very
limited
and
you
cannot,
it
doesn't
handle
context
those
you
cannot
set
active
and
doesn't
pass
the
context
because
it's
a
very
limited.
B
It's
an
operation
implementation,
so
you
you
should
move
to
sdk
to
have
proper
behavior,
so
yeah
you
can
test
here
this
and
after
that,
there's
your
implementation
and
run
all
the
all
the
tests
of
the
project.
So
you
can
see
what
where
things
are
fading
and
that
stuff.
B
B
Okay,
so
yeah,
if
you
find
some
issue
with
your
work
bryce,
please
let
me
let
me
know
or
push
the
slack
channel
and
we
can
and
we
can
talk
about
it.