►
From YouTube: 2022-05-13 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
B
C
Collar
colleagues,
not
in
person
yet
so
I
joined
in
february,
and
I
think
we
have
a
product
off-site
in
september,
so
I'll
probably
travel
out
to
portland
and
september
to
meet
people
in
in
person,
but
our
team's
kind
of
spread
out.
We
got
people
in
texas,
illinois,
portland
or
oregon.
I
should
say
yeah.
A
A
Not
really
I'm
like,
ideally,
I
would
be
fully
committed
to
open
source,
but,
like
all
the
time,
some
issue
happens
on
splunk
side
not
like
with
the
back
end,
but
with
open
with
open
climate
collector,
and
I
had
to
jump
into
those
issues
and
so
on
so
like
I'd,
say
30
percent
of
my
time,
dedicated
to
like
customer
escalations
and
stuff
like
that.
C
I
I
don't
we
get
some
stuff
like
you
know,
sales
people
will
talk
to
us
in
slack
and
we'll,
like
we've,
got
a
developer
relation
engineer
on
the
team
and
like
customers
will
reach
out
to
us
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
like
we
don't
we're,
not
unlike
any
other
product
teams
and
in
new
relic
we're
fully
dedicated
to
the
to
just
contributing
to
the
project.
So
no
one
call
for
me.
That
was
one
of
the
reasons
I
wanted
the
job
nice
nice.
A
E
C
Yeah
did
all
that
go
well,
I
didn't
get
to
watch
any
of
it,
but
I
had
some
teammates
that
were
speaking
too.
E
Yeah,
no,
I
think
it
went
pretty
well,
I
think
you
know
we
had
lots
of
lots
of
good
questions.
The
community
is
really
it
was
really
great
and
the
presentations
were
awesome,
but
yeah
it
was.
It
was
I'm
glad
it's
over,
although
this
seemed
like
this
week
was
like
conf
week
or
something
because
there
was
there
seemed
to
be
like
slo,
conf
and
alifest,
and
there
was
another
one
called
like
wtf,
slo
or
whatever,
like
I
don't
know
it
or
maybe
wtf
to
sre.
E
It
was
all
so
all
the
fest
was
all
virtual.
Oh.
A
A
Interesting
and
all
of
the
presentations
are
recorded.
C
A
C
E
Yeah,
so
the
there
was
a
there
was
a
talk
that
was
pre-recorded
that
was
played
back
on
monday
and
I
was
doing
like
a
live
q
a
after.
There
was
a
book
club
that
I
was
managing
with
michael
hausenblaus
from
aws
on
tuesday,
and
then
there
was
a
hotel,
collector
workshop.
I
was
running
on
thursday,
so
that
one
was
live.
That
was.
D
A
A
It's
if
stuff's
slowing
down
over
there,
it's
not
slowed
down,
but
it's
a
lot
of
stuff
to
do.
P.
Data
is
closed.
Like
one
issue
needs
to
be
done
through
several
releases
and
I'm.
D
A
Working
I'm
looking
into
all
of
the
other
places
with
bogdan
and
yeah.
It's
it's
been
slow
since
the
beginning,
but
like
nothing
changed,
so
we
are
we're
there.
We
are
going
there
so
we'll
release
that
often
we
did
in
three
releases.
I
believe
once
this
is
breaking
change
for
immutable
slices
is
over
and
one
component
by
one
component.
That's
that
that's
the
idea.
E
Like
I'm
trying
to
remember
what
what
other
components
are
left
after
after
that,
I
can't
remember
the
status
of
them.
A
Yeah
next
would
be
like
package
called
component
and
service.
I
believe
those
those
two
we
need
to
go
over.
I
I'm
pretty
sure
there
must
be
less
work
to
do
there,
but
yeah
we'll
take
a
consumer
as
well
consumer
component,
probably
those
two
first
and
then
I
can't
figure
as
well.
Config
is
booked
and
mostly
working
on
yeah.
I
believe.
E
E
A
And
that's
the
milestone
for
p
data,
only
I'll
dig
into
others
and
create
the
other
milestones
or
something
like
this
stuff
like
that
for
different
different
other
companies
as
well.
So
we
can
come
up
with
the
issues
and
sign
them
appropriately.
E
E
Yeah
I'm
just
thinking
like
it
would
be
good
if
we
had
a
if
we
had
a
way
to
identify
which
issues
haven't
or
have
been
triaged.
That
way,
we
at
least
know
where
to
start.
C
E
E
B
D
C
E
I
guess
even
having
like
the
component
label
or
whatever
applied
to
to
it,
is
not
another
good
way
to
do
it.
But
there's
no
component
for
package
stands
yeah.
C
Friday
as
well
that
we
could
desperately
use
a
refresh
on
triagers,
because
the
name
charges
aren't
triaging
yeah.
A
I
believe
so
far
we've
been
using
a
priority
as
a
label
that
something
was
trashed
or
not.
I
think
we
can
go
that
way
anyway.
Let
let's
create
trash
as
well.
I
don't
think
it
will
be.
E
An
issue:
okay,
I'll:
let's
just
go
with
priority-
I
think
you're
right,
let's
use
what
we
have
here.
Otherwise
we
would
have
to
go
back
and
apply
triage
to
625
issues:
okay,
cool,
so,
okay,
I'll
just
mark
so
I'll
mark
this
work
like
p2s,
because
I
don't
think
they're
they're
they're
not
high
priority,
but
they're
just
work.
That
needs
to
get
done
and
it
sounds
like
something
that
dan
will
be
spending
a
bunch
of
time
on.
So.
A
A
We
renamed
comrades
attributes.
First,
okay,
cool
I'll
reply.
E
D
E
C
E
Maybe
maybe
assign
it
to
anthony,
I
guess
he's
the
last.
A
A
B
B
C
No,
please
don't
don't,
assign
it
directly
to
me.
I've
got
I
need
to
finish
up
wiring
up
to
metrics
before
we
can
even
do
this
and
then
there
might
be
other
functions
that
are
more
important
than
this
one.
So
don't
assign
it
to.
C
C
E
C
And
we're
working
on
getting
the
readme
updated
right
now.
My
plan
is
to
get
this
into
the
distribution
once
I've
got
the
metrics
wired
up,
which
will
probably
happen
next
week.
I
I
would
think
we
can
close
this
issue,
but
we
could
leave
it
open
until
the
stability
level
is
updated
as
well.
A
And
from
it's
your
script
onto
portability,.
E
C
They're,
just
complaining
about
the
use
of
the
double
I
thought
didn't
the
logs
transform
processor
recently
get
rid
of
the
double
dollar
sign.
Is
that
still.
A
C
B
C
A
A
C
A
A
Related
alex,
can
you
help
with
merging
this?
I
remember
I
remembered
it
went
through
pretty
good.
D
Oh
yeah
give
me
a
second.
A
C
D
D
D
C
Scrape,
I
think,
oh
no,
the
rebel,
sorry
relabel
config
is
the
next
one.
Isn't
it
the
label
drop
job,
the
one
right
above
yeah
that
one
because
you're
just
closing
them
so
yeah
over
that.
A
A
E
Yeah,
I
think
he
I
think
he
was
on
vacation.
I
think
the
the
dashboard
is
also
in
there,
so
maybe
ping
them
on
the
issue.
No,
and
then.
A
C
We
can
skip
the
sig
sub,
one
anthony
already
assigned
himself
or
sorry
mxpsi
signed
it
yeah
that
one
looks
triage
to
me.
C
C
A
D
D
C
E
C
E
E
B
Medium,
do
we
need
to
do
it
for
ga,
no
there's,
no
ga
for
contrib.
A
C
Is
it
coming
up
a
lot
that
people
are
making
changes
to
the
makefile?
I
guess
what's
the
what's
the
origin
of
this
of
this
issue
did
something
happen.
D
C
C
C
Yeah,
I
think
we
could
probably
close
this
one
because
they
have
bogdan
was
right.
I
thought
maybe
the
documentation
now
says
that
it
should
work,
but
it
doesn't-
and
I
tried
in
my
own
repo,
so
I
think
we've
got
to
do
that
proud
bot
or
else,
so
you
can
just
close
this.
C
E
I
I
added
a
link
here
in
the
chat
to
a
search
for
everything:
that's
not
labeled
with
any
priority
and
there's
551
issues.
We
have
our
work
cut
out
for
us.