►
From YouTube: 2022-12-06 meeting
Description
cncf-opentelemetry@cncf.io's Personal Meeting Room
A
A
B
B
Okay,
let's
start
with
minute:
there's
only
11
people
I
think
that
probably
a
slow
month,
but
let's
wait
one
more
minute
in
case
more
people
join
I
already
see
some
items
in
the
gender.
So
that's
great,
so
please
go
check
them
out.
If
you
haven't.
B
B
Okay,
let's
start,
let's
wait!
Sorry,
let's
not
wait
anymore!
Okay,
let's
go
over
the
change
items.
The
first
one
been
a
resource,
openshift
platform,
I
just
merged
that
earlier
today,
there
was
no
I
think
there
was
enough
approvals.
There
was
a
small
concern
that
there
would
be
explosion
of
cloud
provider
options,
but
I
think
that
this
PR
only
added
three
more
and
it
just
conforms
to
what
already
exists
so
yeah.
B
If
there
is
an
actual
real
concern,
we
can
discuss
it
later,
but
for
now
it's
immersed
the
second
one
about
kubernetes
cluster
version,
there's
still
some
feedback.
We
are
waiting
from
George,
Suarez,
Riley
and
who
else
I
remember
Angela.
Do
you
want
to
make
it
to
this
call
Riley's
on
holidays
and
Josh?
Surref
may
show
up
here.
Well,
he's
not
so,
sadly,
there's
no
feedback
there.
Let
me
ping
him,
so
he
can
hopefully
review
this
PR
later
today.
B
I
will
also
be
poking.
Joel
Who
provided
an
initial
review,
so
we
can
get
hopefully
actual
approvals.
Foreign.
B
Ty
conventions
can't
review
this
one
as
well.
We
need
more
eyes,
it's
a
small
PR.
It
only
adds
operation
for
kubernetes,
but
it
still
need
size.
A
A
B
No
yeah
I
think
Army.
You
were
in
a
conversation
with
him
in
that
PR
I
think
it's
it's
actually
I,
don't
think
it's
worth
poking
him
if
he's
on
holidays
already.
He
just
mentioned
that
we
should
add
a
note
about
the
detail
there.
So
I
mean
it's
your
call,
I
guess,
but
the
otherwise,
let's
sort
out
your
code,
whether
you
want
to
bring
him
or
not
otherwise,
yeah,
let's
get
other
people
and
especially
Joshua,
who
is
still
around
okay,
perfect.
B
Thank
you,
the
next
one
Santosh
how
he
will
be
joining
actually
later,
I,
don't
know
whether
it
will
still
be
around.
Hopefully,
yes,
okay,
Jack
exception
from
environment,
variable
Etc.
C
Yeah
sure
so,
there's
a
there's
a
PR
out
to
extend
the
attribute
limits
environment
variables
to
the
log
signal
so
similar
to
similarly
to
how
there's
already
General
attribute
limits
and
then
Trace
specific
attribute
limits.
This
introduces
log
specific
attribute
limits
and
I
know
that
there's
a
pause
in
place
on
the
ending,
adding
new
environment
variables,
but
I
was
curious
if
the
TC
has
any
guidance
on
this
specific
set
of
environment
variables,
giving
that
it's
just
adding
symmetry
to
the
log
signal
foreign.
B
B
That's
my
initial
impression.
I
would
like
to
hear
the
opinion
of
other
TC
members,
but
my
impression
is
that
it's
fine.
A
Yeah
I
quit
it
doesn't
introduce
any
new
New
Concept
that
we
wanted
to
avoid
in
it.
It
provides
consistency
with
what
we
already
know.
C
All
right:
well,
that's
all
I
have
to
say
about
that.
If
you
have
an
opportunity
to
take
a
look
at
it,
it
still
needs
some
reviews
and
it
needs
some
reviews
from
people
outside
just
the
logsig
as
well.
Yeah,
probably
so,.
B
Yeah
he
didn't
seem
opposed
to
that.
He
was
mostly
discussing
details,
so
that
sounds
like
he's.
Also
fine
with
it
so
yeah
I
mean,
if
you're
part
of
the
login
group.
Maybe
you
can
also
ask
tigrant
to
to
provide
his
own
review
and
approval.
You
know,
but
yeah
I
would
I
wouldn't
review
myself
and
we
will
ask
other
TC
members
just
to
verify
what
sounds
sounds
right.
B
Perfect
okay,
then
we
have
no
items
other
than
Santosh.
Who
is
will
be
joining
later
today,
however,
for
the
record,
I
think
that
one
of
the
issues
he
wanted
to
discuss
oh
never
mind.
This
is
a
different
one.
I
think
it
was
about
metric
cardinality,
so
maybe
we
can
yeah
I,
don't
think
we
will
be
here
or
actually
it
is
the
metrical
identity
problem.
Okay,
see
what's
Joshua
is
not
here.
Neither
so
does
anybody
who
is
very
familiar
with
these
ones
to
discuss
anything.
B
I,
don't
know
what
to
do
honestly
that
Santosh
is
coming
later
and
he
will
find
nobody,
but
I,
don't
think
we
can
keep
these
artificially
up,
also
ref
or
J
MCD.
Who
could
provide
feedback
they
they
are
not
here.
So,
let's
probably
just
have
add
a
note
for
him,
like
the
ball
parties.
Couldn't
come
this
time.
B
Let's
do
that
and
yeah
if
you're
in
volumetrics
anybody
just
please
review
that
one
I
think
it's
a
long
discussion.
I
need
to
catch
up
on
that
one.
B
Okay,
so
back
to
work.
Thank
you
so
much
everybody
I
will
have
a
notes
in
the
dock
in
the
docs
and
all
that
so
stay
safe,
see
you
next
time.