►
From YouTube: 2021-11-10 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Yeah,
so
to
be
completely
honest,
I
was
just.
I
only
grew
in
the
first
place
to
mess
with
my
wife.
B
A
B
A
So
just
a
quick
note,
I
I
was
out
last
week,
I'm
not
a
hundred
percent
recorded,
but
I'm
well
enough
and
perhaps
I'm
I'm
working
a
little
bit
less
than
I
usually
do,
but
yeah
just
that
just
kind
of
give
to
the
guys
why
I
was
not
here
last
week
and
kind
of
is
low
on
the
uptake
of
the
things
too
and
as
you
can
hear,
there
is
some
construction
in
my
house.
A
All
right,
I
don't
know
if
raj
is
gonna
join.
I
think
I
think
we
have
kind
of
to
get
started.
A
So
I
I
think
I
I
want
to
kind
of
just
follow
up
on
the
prs
that
we
have
open.
I
think
we
have
rasmus.
Basically,
it's
ready
the
asp.net,
but
I
think
there
is
nothing
controversial
there.
I'm
planning
to
take
a
look
after
the
meeting,
but
I
I
don't
think
there
is
anything
that
we
need
to
discuss
on
that.
One
specific
is
that
right,
rasmus.
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
I
I
think,
zac
also
already
reviewed,
but
I'm
also
planning
to
take
a
look,
and
I
I
also
agree
with
the
comment
that
zach
made.
That
is
one
filter
that
I
didn't
understand,
but
it's
neat
stuff.
You
know
yeah
all
right,
so
we
take
a
look
after
that
I
I
actually
would
like
to
talk
about
raj's.
A
Pr,
I
think,
is
the
most
interesting
thing
for
us
to
discuss,
but
he
is
not
in
the
meeting.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
talk
at
last
week,
because
the
pis
was
open,
I
think
in
the
last
24
hours.
So
I
don't
know
if
he
mentioned
something
last
week
or
not.
E
So
last
week
he
mentioned
that
they
had
a
pr
ready.
That
was
gonna
result
in
restructuring
the
the
folders
for
additional
dependencies
and
so
on.
But
I
don't
know
if
that
was
in
this
pr.
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it
yet.
A
Okay,
so
I
I
think
perhaps
then
we
we
follow
up
with
trying
to
review
by
ourselves
and
kind
of
get
the
questions
to
raj.
You
know,
because
I
I
think
that
is
the
most
interesting
kind
of
thing
in
the
in
the
short
run
for
us
to
to
look
at.
A
So
then
robert
has
you:
have
two
prs
want
to
clean
up
github
actions
right.
F
A
Yeah
yeah
yeah
and
the
thing
that
I
would
like
to
get
back.
This
is
not
the
prs,
but
did
we
have
any
further
discussion
regarding
the
issues
that
we
have
right
now,
with
that
asp
that
we
are
failing
to
load?
Did
anybody
have
a
chance
to
try
one
of
the
things
that
we
discussed,
that
kind
of
wrapping
in
a
nuget
package,
or
something
like
that.
E
I
didn't
try
some
of
those
other
things.
The
latest
update
that
I
have
was
so
raj
had
said
that
he
wasn't
able
to
reproduce
the
problem
which
I
thought
was
interesting.
So
that's
where
I
tried
to
do
some
experiments
with
the
startup
hook,
and
so
my
initial
attempt
at
reproducing
it
with
the
startup
hook,
ran
into
the
same
issue.
B
A
That's
interesting,
so
do
you
have
because
we
had
an
issue
for
that
did.
Did
you
add
this
information
to.
A
Yeah,
because
I
think
I'm
gonna
try
that
too,
I'm
gonna
follow
those
steps,
then
to
to
see
to
understand
how
perhaps
I
I
hit
something
that
is
the
same
path
that
raj
was
hitting
that
he
didn't
hit
the
issue
that
that's
kind
of
surprising.
E
Yeah
and
so
I'm
not
seeing
the
issue,
if
I'm
defining
the
environment
variables
in
launch
settings,
but
if
I'm
just
defining
environment
variables
externally
and
then
trying
to
run
the
application,
then
I
then
I
experienced
the
problem:
okay,
something
something
curious
going
on
there
yeah
and
for
what
it's
worth.
I
can't
do
a
net
build.
If
I
have
the
startup
hook
defined
globally
too.
A
Wow
yeah,
I
I
I
I
feel
mystified.
I
can
tell
you.
A
Okay,
so
if,
if
I
have
a
chance,
I'm
gonna
try
to
perhaps
I'll
try
a
different
path
before
going
that
I'm
gonna
try
to
do
what
we
talked
about
kind
of
wrapping
everything
in
a
nuget
package
that
we
then
asked
the
target
application
to
reference
that
package
just
to
see.
If
that
is
a,
I
think
that,
as
respect
fix
the
issue
with
the
asp.net
core
example.
A
But
but
that's
the
the
that
the
only
thing
that
I
have
right
now
in
my
mind,
to
fix
that
and
once
that
fixes,
I
I
want
to
add
a
small
test
for
us,
so
we
don't
break
the
same
way
in
the
future.
You
know
something
very
simple
but
add
something
there
that
just
validate
the
the
basic
of
that
scenario.
You
know.
A
E
Yeah,
so
with
the
errors
that
that
I'm
seeing
related
to
the
startup
hook,
I'm
wondering
if
we'll
also
want
to
have
some
sort
of
process
exclusion.
Logic
like
the
profiler
has.
A
I
think
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
You
know,
because,
besides
things
like
typically,
we
don't
want
to
like
powershell
this
kind
of
thing
right.
I
think
there
is
environments
like
azure
app
service.
They
have
stuff
running
there.
That's
kind
of
background
applications
that
we
wanna
kind
of
avoid.
You
know
the
kudu
process,
yeah.
A
Remember
the
name,
but
they
have
like
a
few
process
that
are
managed-
and
I
I
I
remember
from
some
months
ago
seeing
something
that
confused
me
with
a
customer
that
they
have
asp.net
core,
and
I
saw
some
traces
for
a
net
framework
and
I
was
confused.
But
then
the
net
framework
was
a
background
application
from
azure.
You
know
so
that
is
kind
of
so
we
we
should
definitely
have
something
like
that
to
not
attach
to
all
the
processes
on
the
box.
E
E
A
Yeah
yeah
that
that
that's
also
a
good
case.
We
we
should
take
care
of
that.
E
Anyways,
I
can
get
an
issue
submitted
to
track
that.
Yes,
please.
A
A
Upcoming
holidays,
I
I
would
like
to
check
with
people,
so
we
avoid
people
kind
of
showing
up
for
the
meeting
and
having
nobody
around.
So
I
think
we
should
kind
of
see
if
we
wanna
cancel
some
of
those
meetings.
A
I
personally,
I'm
gonna,
take
a
lot
of
days
off
from
here
to
the
end
of
the
year,
so,
for
instance,
next
week
I
will
be
off
and
I'm
not
planning
to
open
exception
for
oh
no
next
next
week
I
mean
it's
you
I
I
start
my
vacation
on
the
thursday
and
then
we
have
the
thanksgiving
weekend
week
and
then
I
think,
unless
somebody
here
wants
to
kind
of
keep
the
meeting
running
on
on
that
week,
I
I
will
be
off
on
the
24th.
E
I'll
be
out
that
week
too,
as
well
as
from
mid-december
through
the
end
of
the
year,
yeah.
A
Basically,
it's
the
same
as
me,
you
know,
so
I'm
I'm
gonna.
Let's
then
handle
via
the
va
slack,
but
so
we've,
if
we
are
not
having
in
the
meetings
I
will
cancel
in
the
calendar,
are
the
specific
ones
that
we're
not
having.
So
we
we
ensure
that
nobody
shows
up,
and
there
is
nobody
around.
You
know
to
look,
perhaps
it's
kind
of
counterintuitive,
but
because
it's
open
source,
sometimes
people
choose
that
time
of
the
year
to
kind
of
try
to
join
the
project.
A
Okay,
these
were
kind
of
the
things
that
I
have
in
my
mind,
but
once
more
I
basically
been
jumping
from
the
last
meeting
to
this
one
at
the
last
minute.
The
meeting
that
I
was
in
to
this
one,
so
please
guys
go
ahead
and
anything
that
you
guys
that
I
forgot
or
didn't
cover
whatever.
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
we
are
kind
of
installed
about
that
thing,
about
what
you
do
with
the
problem
that
we
are
having
with
asp.net
core
and
that
kind
of
blocked
some
stuff
that
I
think
it's
kind
of
the
next
steps
for
us
to
kind
of
think
about
having
some
kind
of
beta
alpha
that
we
can
release.
So
until
we
solve
that,
I
think
we
are
kind
of
skating
on
the
same
place.
You
know
so
yeah.
A
A
A
must
it's
a
must
without
that
we
we
can't
have
it,
but
we
are
optimistic
that
if
we
package
the
nougat
correctly,
it
works,
but
we
need
to
test
it.
So
I
I
will
try
to
do
this
this
week
before
the
next
meeting,
so
we
can
have
an
answer
on
that,
and
the
only
kind
of
other
thing
that
I
I
have
in
my
mind
is
the
work
that
raj
is
doing
with
the
with
the
hook.
So
if
they
start
stopping.
E
Yeah,
so
I
raj
had
previously
previously
asked
the
question
about
timing,
a
release
and
whether
or
not
some
of
the
restructuring
changes
that
they
were
working
on
would
be
part
of
that
release
or
after
that
release,
and
so
I
I
didn't
have
a
good
confident
answer
for
him
at
that
time.
E
My
gut
was
telling
me
that
if
he
had
work
ready
that
we
might
as
well
get
it
reviewed
and
and
ready,
but
if
others
think
that
it's
adding
more
risk
than
we
need
for
an
initial
beta.
Please
speak
up.
A
Yeah,
I
I
I
don't
understand
exactly
what
is
the
changes
that
they
are
planning,
so
I
I
think
I
would
like
to
hear
exactly
what
they
are
planning,
because
in
one
hand,
if
we
didn't
have
this
problem,
that
we
have
right
now,
I
would
say
that
iob
kind
of
hey,
let's
kind,
of
try
to
release
with
asp,
mongodb
and
kind
of
say,
hey
it's
available
here,
give
it
a
try.
So
we
can
so
I
I
was
ready
to
go
for
that,
but
we
need
to
solve
that.
A
So
I
would
like
to
understand
the
the
impact
of
what
they
are
doing.
You
know,
but
then
we
need
to
talk
with
raj.
I
know
that
raj
has
a
conflict
with
one
week
in
one
week
off
for
this
meeting
so
hopefully
he's
he
can
join
us
next
week
and
we
can
also
anticipate
stuff
via
github.
We
don't
need
to
wait.
The
meeting
right.
A
But
but
my
take
is
if,
if
it's
something
that
it's
really
a
big
change,
I
I
would
not
like
to
because
it's
a
very
tentative
release.
Kind
of.
In
that
sense,
it's
a
very
awful
release
right.
So
I
don't
think
there
is
a
problem
for
us
to
kind
of
release
too.
Very
close,
you
know,
so
I
will
not
like
to
hold
it
off
for
that
and
you
kind
of
fully
understand
what
is
something
that
oh,
it's
a
must
that
we
must.
A
I
think
so
right
we
have
asp.net
core,
we
have
client,
we
have
two
bytecode
instrumentations,
so
it's
a
proof
of
the
concept.
It's
a
it's
kind
of
covering
the
scenarios.
I
think
it's
something
that
we
should
be
kind
of
really
releasing
kind
of
in
the
sense.
Okay,
it's
alpha,
but
we
go
to
the
channels.
You
go
to
the
public
channels
and
let
people
know
hey
it's
here.
You
want
to
give
a
try,
give
feedback
and
this
stuff.
A
All
right,
if
nothing
else,
but
if
something
comes
after
we
end
the
meeting
just
go
to
his
lac.