►
From YouTube: 2020-07-17 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
D
B
E
Yeah:
okay:
let's
wait
for
Bogdan,
but
I
think
that,
for
me,
the
path
is
clear:
if
we
don't
count
on
soon
about
context
with
the
RPC
folks
and
most
likely
also
with
the
I
forgot
it
the
name
of
this
web
project
and
uses
something
very
similar
reactor.
If
we
don't
come
to
an
agreement
soon,
we'll
have
to
cover
most
likely
an
intermediate
layer,
an
abstraction
layer
but.
B
B
E
We
that
we
don't
allow
it
to
be
swapped
with
something
else:
ok,
yeah
odd.
There
was
also
problem
about
excessive
grabbing
the
bogdan
mentioned
many
times,
and
they
need
that.
Sometimes
it
doesn't
matter.
You
know
just
have
to
do
a
translation
anyway,
so
yeah.
So
my
feeling,
honestly,
is
that
I
think
that
the
first
point
that
you
mentioned
about
your
PC
context
being
part
of
your
PC.
That
has
been
the
problem
honestly
yeah.
C
I
think
it's
an
80%
of
the
issue
is
that
political
problem
and
it's
a
real
problem
like
there
are
like
the
folks
from
Microsoft
or
saying
they
don't
want
to
use
open
telemetry.
If
it's
going
to
have
a
gr,
PC
context,
dependency
in
the
API
and
Microsoft
is
a
big
I
mean
you
know.
Nikita
I
mean
Microsoft
is
a
big
part
of.
C
C
B
But
okay,
so,
but
for
me
it's
because
I
remember
next!
Last
time
it
have
discussed
as
one
of
the
opportunity
of
Act.
One
of
the
alternative
is
to
let's
write
some
other
generic
or
new
general
context.
That's
completely
different
problem
for
for
me
from
let's
hide
your
PC
context
from
the
from
the
API.
E
C
C
E
C
Alright,
well
we're
already
eight
minutes
into
our
very
limited
time,
because
Andrews
gonna
steal
people
away
yeah,
which
I
think
a
some
of
you
I.
Think
that
that
actually
dovetails
very
nicely
into
my
first
agenda.
Item
are
very
under-resourced
on
this
project.
Carlos
and
Bogdan
are
obviously
very
very
busy
with
the
Technical
Committee,
specs
and
other
things,
so
I'm
kind
of
the
only
real.
This
is
no
offense
as
a
tenant
here,
but
I'm
kind
of
the
only
a
active
maintainer
at
the
moment
and
I
need
somebody
to
work
with
yeah.
E
Yeah,
this
is
something
that
can
happen
actually
quite
often
that
one
month
in
here
is
off,
but
not
more
than
one
yeah,
and
the
other
thing
is
that
honestly
I
think
that
all
supported
me,
we
have
probably
overestimated
our
free
time.
You
know
the
way
I
spend
on
Java,
so
I
agree
my
best,
but
I
think
that
so,
which
is
just
not
possible.
You
know
so
yeah
I
think
so.
C
E
Yeah
but
my
point
is
that,
like,
for
example,
we
could
bring
somebody,
you
know
with
cooking
write
code
and
it
helps
reviewing
stuff.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
a
maintainer
like
having
a
man.
Nor
maintainer
can
probably
mean
polemical,
but
bringing
new
up
like
more
approvers
should
be
fine,
you
know,
and
then
we
can
of
course
organize
stuff
as
we
go.
Yeah
yeah.
C
E
C
F
C
C
C
F
Are
there
any
dependent
issues
that
are
related
to
getting
Z
pages
implemented?
I
know
that
was
a
concentration
and
one
of
the
Google
Docs
I
was
throwing
around
by
Morgan.
Some
like
that
see
pages
was
super
interesting
to
Google,
but
were
there
any
related
dependent
issues
or
work
that
could
be
done
that
relate
to
Z
pages
but
also
relate
to
GA.
F
C
G
E
One
question
I
have
is
whether
we
can
have
this.
His
developers
help
us
with
actual
G.
Well,
you
know
GI
stuff,
I,
think
that
this
process
they
work
on
was
funny,
but
still
yeah
yeah,
that's
does
not
our
call,
I
mean
it.
It
really
did.
This
was
something
we
could
just
you
know.
Abby
suggests
you
know,
I
don't
have
somebody
at
Google.
G
Things
things
that
we
should
do
probably
and
things
that
worked
pretty
nicely
in
the
collector,
was
making
sure
that
we
have
not
needed
label
for
a
bunch
of
issues
so
that,
or
or
in
also
good,
first
issue
the
label.
These
two
labels
help
people
when
they
come
to
the
project
of
things
that
they
can
do,
and
they
should
do
as
a
first
couple
of
first
things.
E
One
thing:
that's
one
thing:
the
other
thing
is
that
we
need
to
go
to
our
or
our
natural
issues
and
also
qualify
them.
You
know
there
might
be
the
specs
what
we
need
to
do
anyway,
so
we
need
both
things:
oh
yeah
yeah,
it's
not
all
necessarily
spectrally,
so
I
suggest
that
we
plan
another
routine
because
they
will
have
time
so
we
can
like
Johnny.
You
have
time,
unfortunately,
some
time
as
well
next
week,
probably
early
next
week,
we
can
use
a
triage
at
least
what
we
have.
E
C
Mean
internally,
this
is
pretty
much
my
only
project
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
very
logic,
not
doing
a
little
bit
of
maintenance
work
on
our
other
open-source
projects,
but
there's
other
people
who
can
do
that
to
you.
So
I,
don't
really
have
very
much
internally
that
I
need
to
hand
off.
So
my
time
is
fairly
open,
Monday
and
Tuesday
ish.
C
C
F
B
F
C
A
lot
of
he
knows
your
there's
a
lot
of
people
working
in
there
like
there's.
That's
where
there's
a
lot
of
people
working
in
there
I
would
say
plenty
of
contributions,
happening,
Nikita
and
Trask
and
honor
on
being
kind
of
the
primary
ones,
but
then
some
other
people,
Sir
George,
a
Molly
fief
and
one
other
person.
Okay,.
F
C
E
E
C
E
Sorry,
a
year
ago,
in
Las
Navas
he
was
distracted,
you're
trying
to
persuade
in
Iraq
to
work
on
the
segmentation.
No.
C
B
F
Of
course
has
to
be
an
agreement
with,
like
you,
know
the
Java
and
Instrumentation
folks
traskon.
What
not?
So
that
way,
they
don't
feel
like
a
tease,
but
you
know
what's
going
on,
but
like
that
it
seems
like
a
natural
fit
on
paper.
You
know
I
just
think
that.
Well
that
view,
if
Nikita
you
know
what
you're
saying
is
like
we
need
some
stuff
done
in
the
Java
stick
before
the
job
interpretation
said.
E
E
B
E
C
C
F
C
E
A
small
note,
I
was
trying
to
find
what
things
could
be
configured
based
on.
You
know
the
requirement
that
Bachmann
had
last
week
to
know
what
things
could
be
configured
through
a
CI
or
similar
way
for
context,
implementations
and
I
saw
nothing
is
configured
for
most
multi
ply
meditation.
The
only
thing
is
the
actual
storage
like
whether
they
use
to
read
local
or
not.
That's
the
only
thing
I
saw
that
context.
Implementations
configure.
C
E
E
C
A
E
A
G
G
C
G
So
the
whole
idea
is,
we
will
not
will
have
a
term.
We
will
either
have
a
third
party,
another
repo
where
G,
RPC
and
us
will
reuse
the
same
thing
but
or
we
implement
our
own
based
on
GRDC
and
stuff.
The
whole
idea
was
like
we
struggled
to
understand
some
of
the
requirements
like
what
do
we
need
to
be
able
to
configure
using
the
AI
or
SPI
or
whatever
things?
And
then
yes,
indeed,
the
whole
idea
is
we're
not
gonna
have
the
opposite
context
in
the
next
month,
or
so.
A
C
C
G
That's
so
so
one
proposal
is
to
have
our
own
implementation
may
be
based
on
ERP
C,
because
we'd
like
a
bunch
of
decisions
that
they
may
and
put
it
in
our
report.
That's
the
first
possibility.
Correct
second
possibility
is
to
to
use
one
of
the
reports
that
trans
or
I
created
with
we
have
some
new
domain
and
stuff
I.
Think
Trust
bought
something
like
Java
context
that
I
or
something
like
that.
I,
don't
remember
exactly
the
name.
I
have
another
domain
similar.
G
G
G
G
C
E
A
E
G
A
problem
of
maintaining
it's
a
problem
of
a
lot
of
things,
so
I
think
on
paper.
The
best
option
for
us
is
to
go
with
an
independent
like
trying
to
learn
from
what
the
RPC
did.
What
reactor
didn't
stuff
coming
with
the
with
the
independent,
just
context,
projects
that
we
can
use
and
we
can
convince
our
PC
to
use.
But
that's
on
paper
is
probably
the
best,
but.
C
A
G
Jerk
see
Fox
has
two
problems:
one
the
organization
who
owns
that
repo,
which
we
can
solve
I,
mean
we
have
some
friends
in
CS.
You
have
to
make
sure
we
can
put
this
small
project,
understand
cf,
sandbox
or
something
just
for
for
making
sure
that
the
IP
does
not
belong
to
anyone
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
G
So
that
was
one
thing
and
the
other
problem
for
them
was:
how
do
they
assure
that
nobody
breaks
that
API,
like
from
from
maintenance
perspective,
is
for
them.
It
was
stability
of
that
API
in
general.
They
are
willing
to
work
with
us
to
do
this,
but,
as
I
said,
there
are
a
couple
of
concerns
like
this.
B
A
A
G
Motivated
to
work
on
this
because
I
don't
feel
the
same
problem
as
others
feel
about
just
having
a
name
called
ERP
C
in
that
that's,
that's,
probably
one
of
the
motivation.
One
of
the
reason
why
my
motivation
is
very
low
to
solve
some
of
these
things,
because
indeed,
if
there
is
a
technical
issue,
I'm
more
than
happy
to
solve
it,
and
one
other
thing
that
Carla
said:
okay,
we
need
to
have
a
mechanism
to
configure
the
the
story
using
the
AI,
which
is
not
present
in
that
context
and
I'm
happy
to
work
on
solving
that.
G
A
Does
it
make
sense,
but
the
problem
is:
is
that
you're
in
the
best,
the
best
position
to
solve
that
problem?
You're
you're,
the
one
with
the
relationships
you're,
the
one
with
the
contact?
So
even
if
other
people
had
the
so
so
say,
other
people
had
those
connections.
Then
yeah.
You
wouldn't
necessarily
need
to
be
the
the
point
person,
but
it.
G
E
C
Some
of
this
could
be
mean
addressed
by
the
proposal
from
earlier
with
me
with
combining
these
groups,
because,
obviously
the
number
one
can
Zoomer
of
these
api's.
It
is
the
instrumentation
group,
like
nobody,
is
writing
more
instrumentation
using
these
api's
than
people
Nikita
and
Trask
and
Anurag
and
and
sergej
etc.
C
C
A
C
C
I,
don't
think
we're
gaining
any
more
information
right
now,
but
I
think
I
well,
I'm
gonna
reach
out
to
Trask
also
before
Monday,
hopefully
have
a
chat
with
him
today,
just
about
the
combination
of
the
groups
and
see
whether
what
he
talked
about
that
he
and
I
are,
in
the
same
city,
same
time
zone
easy
to
coordinate
a
discussion
there.
Okay,.
E
E
E
I
am
actually
I
started
cooking
it
yesterday,
but
then
you
know
this
is
meeting
today
is
like
okay,
you
know,
I
will
just
drop
it.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
gonna
be
controversial
or
not
I
hope
I.
It
doesn't,
but
it
seems
like
a
simple
super.
Simple
change.
I
just
need
to
write
more
tests,
but
okay,
so
I
won't
be
before.