►
From YouTube: 2021-05-27 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
A
That
dear
yeah,
yeah
man,
the
allergies
or
something
must
be
getting
to
me,
and
my
nose
is
just
so
so
stuffed
up
right
now.
Oh.
B
C
C
C
C
Yeah,
okay
yeah.
I
can.
C
Okay,
great,
so,
let's,
let's
start,
if
you
have
any
other
topic,
just
please
help
there
yeah,
okay,
so
last
meeting
actions.
C
We
had
the
expect
compliance
matrix
that
I
I
I
review
it
and
added
a
pr
for
that.
Yeah,
the
mobile
connectivity
semantic
attributes.
It's
also
there,
that's
the
pr.
They
asked
for
some
feedback
from
you,
bryce.
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
I
haven't
been
able
to
take
a
look
at
that
pr
in
a
little
while
we're
working
on
a
our
like
our
beta
release
of
things,
so
I'm
kind
of
swamped.
Okay,.
C
C
Okay,
for
the
rest,
okay,
the
tutorial
thing
we
had
there
yeah.
B
Yeah,
so
I
I
started
with
a
you
know:
simple
app,
you
know
like
make
a
call
and
and
so
on,
a
network
call
and
maybe
a
back
end
of
some
sort,
and
I
was
that's
when
I
started
thinking.
How
do
we
do
this?
You
know
we
need
some
kind
of.
What
are
we
trying
to
do?
Are
we
trying
to
do
it
with
the
open
telemetry
collector,
or
is
it
just.
C
Directly
talking
to
my
my
idea,
but
I
mean
we
can
decide
about
that-
is
more
centered
on
the
easiness
of
instrumenting,
your
app
or
how
you
instrument
your
app
and
so
results
fast
in,
for
example,
ui
that
anyone
can
just
download
and
and
and
check
their
values
there
more
than
go
into
a
best
practices
tutorial.
I
I
think
there
is
more
need
for
first
steps
or
first
information,
so
people
can
start
using
open
telemetry
more
than
having
the
best
possible
performance
thing.
C
That's
my
opinion.
I
don't
know
if
you
you
share
that
opinion
with
me
or
do.
B
You
think
yeah.
No,
I
think
I
I
completely
agree
with
you
know,
making
it
easy
right,
but
at
the
same
time
you
know
you
have
to
give
directions
on
how
to
set
up.
I
mean
you
know
it's
a
docker
command.
You
know
jager
and
prometheus,
but
I
think
you
know
the
direction
seems
like
everyone
is
trying
to
use
the
open
telemetry
collector,
because
that
also
is
a
docker
command.
B
C
C
But
also
for
that
I
in
one
of
the
points
later,
maybe
you
can
also
use
that
instead
of
using
even
jagger
for
showing
some
some
expanse
but
yeah
as
as
as
you
yeah,
I
will
yeah.
My
daughter
just
left
the
guard
if
he
has
now
a
meeting
so
yeah
yeah
as
as
you
as
you
want,
I
mean
something
simple
to.
C
We
we
can
even
make
more
a
blog
post
with
adding
more
more
interesting
stuff
if
we
think
so.
B
C
I
mean
we
can
help
and
we
can
give
ideas.
I
mean
the
yeah,
the
the
simple
exporter
has
the
other
setup,
but
I
think
you
said
that
it
didn't
work
for
you.
B
Yeah,
actually
it
did
not,
it
shows
up
the
service,
but
it
doesn't
show
the
traces
it
doesn't
show.
C
I
I
am
sure
that
worked
on
the
part,
but
maybe
yeah.
There
must
be
something
something.
C
Yeah,
I
am
not
an
expert
on
jager
either,
but
I
remember
when
I
implemented
that
that
I
made
it
work
on
in
fact
use
that
for
demoing
to
some
people
in
my
company.
So
I
I
know
it
worked,
but
maybe
we
changed
something
somewhere
that
might
have
broken
it.
I
don't
know
I
could
take
a
look
if
you,
if
you
yeah.
B
I
I
I
yeah,
I
remember
trying
it
long
back
and
it
worked
so
this
is
yeah
and
I
might
have,
I
might
have
messed
up
something
too
yeah
quite
likely.
C
C
Okay,
the
other
thing
is
the
minimal
documentation.
I
think
that
nobody
has
moved
there.
We
can
leave
the
issue
there
I
mean.
Probably
we
can
continue,
maybe
finding
some
somewhere
some
document,
some
documentation
tool
that
can
provide
something
for
us.
I
don't
know
if
you
know
something
any
of
you.
C
I
mean,
as
classes
are
documented,
somehow
parameters
are
documented.
I
at
least
many
of
them.
I
remember
having
written
at
least
comments
on
the
code
yeah.
If
there
are
some
tools,
if
you
know
some
tool
that
just
takes
that
comments
from
the
code
and
create
some.
C
Okay,
yeah,
that
should
be
yeah
there
should
be,
but
I
don't
know
if
they
are
handling
sweet
or
things
like
that.
You
know.
C
C
C
Okay,
yeah.
I
will
also
try
to
look
for
something
and
the
last
point
of
the
last
meeting
act
was
the
spam
processor
to
create
a
syn
post
press
pan
that
that's
already
in
the
repo
I
created.
I
created
it
for
last
week.
C
It's
a
very
simple
thing,
because
it
only
supports
it's.
It
only
supports
a
span
begging
an
end
yeah.
If
you
go
to
the
pr,
there
is
even
a
an
image
I
did
with
instruments
showing
the
expanse
so
yeah,
it's
very
simple,
just
show
the
span
there
and
yeah.
That's
the
example.
C
You
just
have
to
add
a
sync
post
integration,
spam
processor,
as
you
see
there
and
just
having
that
automatically
creates
the
the
sympos.
A
Like
the
like,
the.
A
Oh
and
instruments
yeah,
that's
that's
the
aim.
Yeah.
C
Okay
yeah,
it
was
very
simple,
but
we
support
multiple
spam
processors.
It
just
was
calling
some
some
function
also.
Somehow
we
could
also
add
signpost
also
allows
to
set
events
in
there.
A
C
We
could,
but
we
could
add
events
directly
there,
but
there
is
a
problem
that
the
spam
processor
doesn't
has
a.
I
mean
there
is
no
no
code
when
that
tells
you
when
an
event
has
been
received
or
something
like
that.
So
there
are
no.
C
The
pros
the
spam
processor
doesn't
have
code
to
receive
the
that
callbacks
and
there
are
no
other
way
of
doing
that.
So
what
I
did
was
exporting
the
os
law
from
the
class,
so
they
can
add
the
thing
post
events
manually,
the
user
of
the
library
but
yeah.
Maybe
it
would
be
great
to
be
to
have
a
way,
but
that
that
will.
C
In
the
open
telemetry,
it's
something
that
just
allows
you
to
know
when
things
happen
and
and
just
be
able
to
add,
also
the
events
here
so
that
that's
why
I
said
that
before
be
not
that
you
could
also
show
the
span
here
if
you
instrument
normally,
and
it
can
help
to
debug.
When
you
have
performance
problems,
it
can
help.
You
know
what
what
are
you
doing
and
instead
of
using
simple
yourself
in
the
profiling
app,
you
can
just
having
your
open,
telemetry,
instrumental
app.
You
have
that
for
free,
so
yeah
cool.
A
C
C
So
that
that's
missing
okay
so,
but
but
I
have
seen
that
they
are
adding.
If
you
check
the
registry,
they
are
adding
instrumentation,
for
example,
individually.
Oh.
A
B
A
All
right
so
next
is
add
a
badge
for
code
coverage.
Nci,
yes
like
in
the
in
the
readme,
like
a
like
a
link
kind
of
thing.
C
So
have
you
do
you
use
code
code?
Have
you
any
of
you
use
that
I
I
haven't
coco
code
codecov
yeah.
A
C
New
okay,
yeah.
A
Yeah
so
let's
see
we
can
go,
take
a
look
at
this
pr
and
we've
got
so
there
should
be
like.
I
guess
I
don't
know
how
these
are
set
up.
C
Yeah
that
that's
in
yeah
and
did
have
in
the
root
you
cannot
access
from
the
it's
in
the
root
of
the.
A
C
C
Is
so
this
was
a
very
simple
action
that
I
wrote
so
yeah.
I
have.
A
C
Did
have
actions
sometime
so
maybe.
A
C
Could
add
that
I
think
for
we
should
create
it
with
code
coverage
and
yeah?
I
I
can.
I
can
take
that
that
that
issue
but
yeah,
but
do
you,
know
what
they
refer
to
the
ci
batch
status.
A
Yeah
so
let's
take
a
look
at
maybe
let's
look
at
like
the
collector,
where
this
one's
good
yeah
so
like
these
things
up
here.
A
A
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
will
look
for
it
then
yeah,
but
I
think
all
of
that
that
looks
like
the
last
one.
So
probably.
A
Yeah,
so,
okay,
so
this
one
is
actually
this
one's
hooked
up
to
github
actions.
B
A
So
here
I'll
I'll
I'll
add
the
java
one
to
the
ticket,
just
as
like
a
reference
perfect,
if
I
can
find
it
again
here
start
from
the
I'll
start,.
C
C
Yeah
probably
should
also
add
a
test
for
also
ios
and
tv
os,
just
in
case.
C
A
C
Okay,
so.
A
So
this
had
had
a
yes
here.
We
go.
A
14
days
ago,
seven
days
ago,
oh
it's
gonna
be
closed.
Soon,
oh,
no,
all
right
I'll
I'll!
Take
care
of
that
this
afternoon.
Okay,.
C
Okay,
the
next
point
is
about
having
some
kind
of
maintenance
releases.
You
know
dates
or
police,
or
I
mean
I
think
we
should
have
maintenance
releases.
I
mean
we
have
1.0.0,
but
we
have
already
fixed
a
paid
off
issues
or
three
with
things
that
were
not
working
as
expected.
C
So
just
to
know,
if
you
would
like
to
have
you
know,
1.0.1
or
having
won
my
internet
release
every
month,
for
example,
or
something
like
that
will
be
nice
or
just
move
on
to
a
feature:
oriented
maintenance.
A
That's
a
that's
a
that's
a
good
question.
Yeah
now
that
we
know
that
we
have
like
a
stable
release.
I
guess
we
can
have
a
github.
We
have
to
get
tagged
and
should
we
just
be
keep
merging
merging
new
things
into
the
main
branch
and
then
eventually
cut
off
a
a
a
pr,
or
do
we
want
or
not
a
pr
but
a
but
actual
version,
or
do
we
want
to
like
have
a
separate
branch
for
for
like
future
feature
work,
I
don't
know
yeah
yeah.
A
C
Okay,
great,
then,
I
will
probably
move
that
to
have
a
release
as
soon
as
possible.
A
Very
cool,
so
I
added
this
last
one
here
for
I'm
trying
to
get
some
metrics
for
monitoring
like
memory
usage
and
cpu
usage
in
the
elastic
agent
and
I'll,
probably
eventually
port
it
up
to
instrumentation
for
for
swift.
A
But
to
do
that,
I
needed
a
gauge,
a
gauge,
a
measurement,
and
this
pr
adds
a
gauge
measurement,
which
is
it's
not
too
complicated.
The
the
meat
of
it
is
really
in
the
the
the
max
val
aggregator,
which
is
what
I
added,
which
just
you
know,
takes
the
maximum
value
over
the
last
well.
Actually,
this
might.
This
might
not
be
good,
but
I
think
should
be
okay,
well
I'll
have
to
test
it
a
little
bit
we'll
see
it's
it.
A
The
pr
is
is
a
draft
right
now,
so
you
don't
need
to
look
at
it
just
yet,
because
I'm
still
kind
of
testing
it,
but
one
other
interesting
thing
I
noticed
is
in
the
metric
sdk,
and
I
think
that
this
was
what
james
was
was
talking
about.
A
The
where
did
it
go,
there's
that
we're
gonna
go
one.
Second,
let
me
see
if
we
can
find
it
the
adapter
here
it
is
okay,
the
in
the
adapter
here
we
weren't
actually
setting
the
time
stamps
on
the
the
protobuf
data
points
in
a
couple
of
them
double
sum,
I
think
it
was
getting.
A
Yes,
yes,
it
was
getting,
but
the
double
sum
wasn't
getting
them.
So
I
think
that
might
have
been
what
james
was
complaining
about
and
so
that
that
might
fix
that
as
well.
Okay,.
C
A
But
that
is
that.
C
Okay,
yeah!
Well,
I
have
one
question
about
that:
have
you
checked
the
new
I
mean?
Is
it
in
the
open,
telemetry,
spec
yeah.
A
A
I
was,
I
was
basing
it
off
of
this
this
spec
here,
so
we
have
the
ch
the
asynchronous
gauge.
A
So
this
is
what
I
based
it
off
of,
I
didn't
add
units
of
measurement
or
description,
yet
I'm
just
trying
for
the
time
being,
just
because
I
don't
think
any
of
the
other
metrics
that
we
have
in
there
had
those.
So
that
might
be
another
thing
to
come
back
around
on.
C
Okay,
yeah
yeah
it
just
doesn't.
I
didn't
check
the
news,
the
new
spec
for
metrics.
Yes,
there
was
to
confirm
me.
A
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
so
yeah
I
base
it.
I
based
it
off
of
this
and
actually
yeah.
It
took
me
a
lot
of
careful
thought
because
I
was
earlier
this
week.
I
was
just
like
pouring
over
these
documents
and
then
trying
to
like
reconcile
like
what
was
being
said
here
with
the
metric
implementation
that
we
had
in
the
in
the
sdk.
So,
okay
yeah,
it
was
a
little
bit.
A
It
was
a
little
bit
confusing,
but
I
think
I
figured
it
out
and
it's
and
I
was
able
to
actually
capture
data
in
the
proper
time
series,
at
least
through
the
pseudo
metric
or
the
pseudo
s
open,
telemetry
collector
that
we
we
have
up
and
running
on
our
back
end.
C
Okay,
great,
could
you
confirm
that
it
also
works
with
the
open,
telemetry
collector.
A
Yeah
yeah
I'll
give
that
a
try.
Yes,.
C
Yes,
that's
as
part
of
the
pr
I
mean
just
just
to
know
that
we
are
not
failing
and
if
not
just
open
an
issue
with
what
you
find.
If
I
mean,
don't,
I
don't
say
just
fix
it.
Yeah.
A
C
That
I
will
con,
I
mean
that
otlp
metric
not
being
exported
to
collector.
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
big
bug
for
the
library,
because
it's
one
of
the
I
mean
it's
not
blocking,
because
metrics
are
still
experimental,
yeah.
A
C
Yeah
just
confirm
that
your
change-
I
I
think
there
is
a
there-
are
some
docker
images
of
the
collector
that
you
can
run
more
or
less
fast.
Okay,.
A
C
Just
to
check
it,
it
ingest
it
correctly
and
doesn't
fail.
I
read
somewhere
that
there
were
some
of
those
doctor
images
with
the
collector.
Yes,
so
you
just
run
it
quite
easily.
Okay,
without
much
configuration
yeah.
C
Okay,
yeah
any.
I
had
another
topic
that
I
didn't
write
here
that
it's
I
wanted
to
to
to
ask
you
bryce.
If
you
would
like
to
be
an
approver
at
the
project.
C
So
I
will
I
I
propose
you
to
to
be
a
an
official
approval,
so
I
can
also
move
that
in
the
code
owners
file
and
thing-
I
don't
know
how
to
handle
that,
but
I
will
create
the
pr
and
we'll
ask
sergey
about
his
opinion.
I
will
on
that
thing
so
yeah,
so
we
can
also
move
faster
with
some
of
the
fear
we
have.
C
Good,
very
cool
yeah.
A
C
A
C
Yeah
we
can
just
move
much
faster
and
not
and
for
some
issues
not
waiting
for
ali
for
city
that
sometimes
he's,
I
think
busy
with
other
things
with
the
committee
and
all
that
stuff
and
yeah.
So
that's
from
from
my
side
and
any
other
topic
you
have.
C
Okay,
great
see
you
next
thursday
see
you
next
thursday.